Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Reader

Because of (the following) four things R. Mattia b. Charash went to R. Elazar b. Hakappar in Ludia. He said to him: My master, did you hear of the four divisions of atonement expounded by R. Yishmael? He answered: One verse states (Jeremiah 3:14) "Repent, you wayward sons" — which indicates that penitence atones. Another verse states (Leviticus 16:30) "On this day, atonement will be made for you" — which indicates that Yom Kippur atones.

One verse states (Psalms 89:33) "I will punish their offense with the rod, and their transgression with plagues" — which indicates that afflictions atone. And another verse states (Isaiah 22:14) "This transgression will not be forgiven you until you die" — which indicates that death atones. How are these four verses to be reconciled? If one transgresses a positive commandment and repents, he "does not move from there" until he is forgiven.

And of this it is written "Repent, you wayward sons." If one transgresses a negative commandment and repents, there is no power in penitence to atone; but penitence suspends (punishment) and Yom Kippur atones. And of this it is written "On this day atonement will be made for you." If one willfully transgresses (sins punishable by) krithuth (cutting-off) and judicial death penalty and repents, there is no power in penitence to suspend, but penitence and Yom Kippur atone for one half, and afflictions purge and atone for the other half.

And of this it is written "I will punish their offense with the rod, and their transgression with plagues." If one desecrates the name of heaven and repents, there is no power in penitence to suspend or on Yom Kippur to atone, or in afflictions alone to purge. But penitence, Yom Kippur, and afflictions suspend, and the day of death purges. And of this it is written ("This transgression will not be forgiven you) until you die."

And (I Samuel 3:14) "The transgression of the house of Eli will not be atoned for by sacrifice or offering." It is not atoned for by sacrifice or offering, but it is atoned for by death.

Abba Channan says in the name of R. Elazar: This ("in haste") is the haste of the Shechinah. And even though there is no proof for this, it is intimated in (Song of Songs 2:8) "the voice of my Beloved, behold, it comes," (heralding the redemption, etc.), (Ibid. 9) "Behold, (seeking to redeem us), He stands behind our wall, etc." I might think that this will be so in the future, too. It is, therefore, written (Isaiah 52:12) "But not in haste will you leave, and you will not go out in flight. For the L–rd walks before you, and your rear guard is the G–d of Israel." "It is a Pesach (offering) to the L–rd": All of their acts (in respect to it) are to be for the sake of Heaven.

(Exodus 14:27) "And Moses stretched forth his hand upon the sea, and the sea returned towards morning to eithano. "eithano" signifies "His strength" as in (Numbers 24:21) "Eithan is your dwelling." R. Nathan says: "Eithan" signifies "hardness," as in (Jeremiah 5:15) "Behold, I am bringing against you a nation from afar, house of Israel, says the L–rd, a nation that is eithan, an enduring nation." "And Egypt fled towards it": to apprise you that wherever Egypt fled, the sea pursued it.

In the past, you (the Jews) would rob them (the Egyptians) and I would prosecute you by royal edict, but now, my hand will permit it. In the past, you would kill them and I would prosecute you by royal edict, but now, "I shall sheathe my sword."

(Exodus 12:12) "And I shall pass ("ve'avarti") through the land of Egypt": R. Yehudah says: As a king, who makes the rounds of his kingdom. Variantly: I shall place My wrath ("evrathi") and My fear in Egypt. "evrah" is wrath, as in (Psalms 78:49) "He sent His burning anger upon them — evrah and scorn, and affliction," and (Isaiah 13:9) "Behold, the day of the L–rd is coming — fury and evrah and burning wrath, etc."

An analogy: A dove, fleeing a hawk, enters a king's palace, whereupon the king opens the eastern window for her, whence she escapes. The hawk, following, the king closes all the windows and begins shooting arrows at it. Similarly, when the last of the Israelites ascended from the sea, the first of the Egyptians entered it, whereupon the ministering angels began shooting arrows at them, and hailstones, fire, and sulphur, as it is written (Ezekiel 38:22) "And I will punish him (Gog) with pestilence and with blood, and with torrential rain, and hailstones, fire, and sulphur will I rain upon him and upon his wings, and upon the many peoples that are with him."

"And the L–rd shook out Egypt": as one shakes out a pot, its bottom ascending, and its top, descending. Variantly: "Vayenaer the L–rd, Egypt, etc.": The L–rd "invigorated" Egypt in order to (be able to) receive the punishment. Variantly: "Vayenaer the L–rd, Egypt, etc.": He delivered them into the hands of "young," cruel angels, viz. (Mishlei 17:11) "And a cruel messenger will be sent against him," and (Iyyov 36:14) "Their souls will expire by youth" ("noar").

Others say: It is not written "I will draw my sword," but "I will empty my sword." He desired to cohabit with their males ("sword" here being a euphemism for the male organ,) as in (Ezekiel 28:7) "and they will draw their sword against the beauty of your wisdom," the idea being that they will empty their "sword." And because his heart swelled in pride, the Holy One Blessed be He demeaned him and all of the peoples degraded him.

Rebbi says: For everything from "You shall not take the name" and down, penitence does atone. From "You shall not take the name" and up, including "You shall not take the name," penitence suspends and Yom Kippur atones. And which is from "You shall not take the name" and down? A positive commandment and a negative commandment, aside from "You shall not take the name." (Which is) from "You shall not take the name" and up? Transgressions punishable by judicial death penalty, death at the hands of Heaven, kareth, forty lashes, sin-offerings and guilt-offerings, and "You shall not take the name" among them.

"and I shall smite": I might think, through an angel or through a messenger; it is, therefore, written (Ibid. 29) "and the L–rd (Himself) smote every first-born" — not through an angel or a messenger.

(Exodus 14:28) "And the waters returned and covered the chariot, etc.": even that of Pharaoh. These are the words of R. Yehudah, it being written (Ibid. 15:4) "the chariots of Pharaoh and his host, etc." R. Nechemiah says: except for that of Pharaoh, it being written (Ibid. 9:16) "But, because of this I have preserved you." Others say: Pharaoh descended last and he drowned, viz. (Ibid. 15:19) "For the horse of Pharaoh came with its chariot and its riders into the sea, and the L–rd turned back upon them the waters of the sea."

The Egyptians comprised three factions at the sea: One said: Let us take their money and not kill them; a second: Let us kill them and not take their money; the third: Let us kill them and take their money. Re those who said: Let us take their money and not kill them — "I shall divide spoil." Re those who said: Let us kill them and not take their money — "I shall fill my soul with them."

(Ibid. 20:8) "Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it": "Remember" and "Keep" (the Sabbath day to sanctify it [Devarim 5:12]) were both stated in one pronouncement. (Exodus 31:14) "Its profaners shall be put to death" and (Numbers 28:9) "And on the Sabbath day, (sacrifice) two yearling lambs" were both stated in one pronouncement (Leviticus 18:16) "the nakedness of your brother's wife" and (Devarim 25:5) "Her yavam (levir, i.e., her brother-in-law) shall come upon her" were both stated in the same pronouncement. (Ibid. 22:11) "You shall not wear sha'atnez, wool and linen together" and (Ibid. 12) "Fringes (involving sha'atnez) shall you make for yourself" were both stated in the same pronouncement — something beyond the powers of a human being to say.

As it is written (Psalms 62:12) "One thing has G–d spoken, these two have I heard." (Jeremiah 23:29) "Is My word not like fire, says the L–rd (and like a hammer shattering rock!")

R. Eliezer says: Scripture speaks of a Canaanite (as opposed to a Hebrew) man-servant. You say this, but perhaps it speaks of a Hebrew? (This is not so, for) it is written here "his man-servant or his maid-servant," and elsewhere, (Leviticus 25:44) "From them (the Canaanites) shall you buy a man-servant or a maid-servant." Just as there, the Torah speaks of the Canaanites, so, here. Variantly: man-servant is being likened to maid-servant, and maid-servant to man-servant.

Just as "maid-servant" — (she may be sold as a maid-servant,) whether adult or minor, so "man-servant," adult or minor — to exclude a Hebrew man-servant, who although (he may be sold as) a man-servant when he is an adult, may not (be sold as) a man-servant when he is a minor. And to exclude a Hebrew maid-servant, who, although she may be a maid-servant when she is a minor, may not be a maid-servant when she is an adult, (leaving her master, as she does, with the advent of pubertal signs.)

R. Yitzchak said: I might understand that (also included is) a servant of two partners or one who is half-free, half-slave; it is, therefore, written "his man-servant or his maid-servant." Just as the first implies a servant that is entirely his, so, the second — to exclude the servant of two partners or one that is half-free (half-slave). R. Yishmael says: Scripture speaks of a Canaanite man-servant, it being written (Exodus 21:21) "for he (the servant) is his money."

Just as his money is his for all time and he exercises complete control over it, (so, the servant being spoken of) — to exclude a Hebrew man-servant, who, though under his complete control, is not his for all time, (leaving, as he does in Yovel), and to exclude a servant of two partners or one who is half-free (half-slave), who, though he is his for all time, is not under his complete control.

"and I smote every first born": even from different places. Whence do I derive (the same) even for the first-born of Egypt who were in other places? (From Psalms 136:10) "He smote Egypt through their first-born" (connoting, even if they were not in Egypt).

And the ministering angels were astounded (at Israel's survival), saying: "Idolators walking on the dry land in the midst of the sea!" And whence is it derived that the sea, too, was filled with fury against them? From (Ibid. 14:22) "And the water was to them a wall (chomah), on their right and on their left." Read it not "chomah" but "cheimah" (wrath).

What is it that rescued Israel? "on their right and on their left." "on their right" — in the merit of the Torah that they were destined to receive, viz. (Devarim 33:2) "From His right hand, the fire of the Law for them." And "on their left" — (in the merit of) prayer. Variantly: "on their right and on their left": "on their right" — (the mitzvah of) mezuzah that Israel is destined to observe. "and on their left" — tefillin (worn on the left hand).

Re those who said: Let us kill them and take their money — "My hand shall impoverish them." With five things (i.e., utterances) did Pharaoh stand and blaspheme in the midst of the land of Egypt, viz. "The foe (Pharaoh) said: I shall pursue (and) I shall overtake; I shall divide spoil; My soul shall be filled with them; I shall empty my sword; My hand shall impoverish them." And, corresponding to these, the Holy Spirit responded, viz.: "You blew with Your breath … they plummeted like lead in the mighty waters; Your right hand, O L–rd breaks the foe; and in the greatness of Your grandeur, You destroy those who rise up against You; You send forth Your wrath — it consumes them as stubble;

(Exodus 21:20) "with a rod": I might think, whether or not it is of killing potential; it is, therefore, written (Numbers 35:38) "Or if with a wooden implement, whereby he can die he strike him," whereby we are apprised that he is not liable until he strikes him with something that has the potential to kill.

Whence do I derive (the same for) the first-born of Cham and Cush? (viz. Genesis 10:6) From (Psalms 78:51) "And He struck every first-born in Egypt, the first fruit of their strength in the tents of Cham."

Pappus expounded (Song of Songs 1:9) "to a mare in the chariots of Pharaoh, etc.": Pharaoh rode on a stallion — the Holy One Blessed be He revealed Himself, as it were, on a stallion, viz. (Habakkuk 3:15) "You made Your stallion tread the sea." Pharaoh (also) rode on a mare, which can endure a long stretch better than a stallion — the Holy One Blessed be He revealed Himself on a mare, viz. "To a mare in the chariots of Pharaoh, etc." R. Akiva: "Enough, Pappus!"

Pappus: How, then, do you understand "to a mare" ("lesusati")? R. Akiva: Understand it as "lesasti" ("to My joy"), the Holy One Blessed be He saying: "Just as I rejoiced in destroying Egypt, so I would have rejoiced in destroying Israel (for their idolatry). What prevented Me from doing so? "on their right and on their left" (see above).

You inclined Your right hand — the earth swallowed them up." An analogy: A renegade stands and blasphemes behind the king's palace: If I find the king's son, I will seize him and slay him. I will impale him and kill him with a terrible death. Thus Pharaoh stood and blasphemed in the land of Egypt: I will pursue, I will overtake, I will divide spoil. And the Holy Spirit mocks him and says: "You blew with your breath" — "the sea covered them"; "you inclined your right hand" — "the earth swallowed them."

(Exodus 17:4) "and Moses cried out to the L–rd": We are hereby apprised of the eminence of Moses. He did not say: Since they are quarreling with me I will not implore mercy for them, but "And Moses cried out to the L–rd." "saying: What can I do to this people?" Moses said before the Holy One Blessed be He: L–rd of the universe, between You and them I will be killed! And You tell me not to be harsh with them, viz. (Numbers 11:12) "For You say to me: "Bear them in your bosom as a nurse bears a nursling, etc." — when they want to kill me!

And whence is it derived that it must be in a locus which is critical to life? From (Devarim 19:11) "and he lie in wait for him and he rise up against him and he smite him mortally," whereby we are apprised that it (the weapon) must be of killing potential in a locus which is critical to life.

Pappus expounded (Iyyov 23:13) "And He is one, and who can turn Him back? Whatever He desires, He does": He is the sole judge of all who enter the world, and no one can contest His words. R. Akiva: "Enough Pappus!" Pappus: "And how do you understand it?" R. Akiva: The words of Him who brought the world into being are not to be contested, for all of them are in accordance with truth and justice.

And thus is it written (Psalms 2:1) "Why do the nations rage … (4) The Dweller in the heavens shall laugh", (Ibid. 59:8) "They spout with their mouths … (9) You, O L–rd, will laugh at them."

Here the L–rd "lowers" (Himself) and Moses "raises" himself (in protest). And elsewhere the L–rd "raises" (Himself) and Moses "lowers" himself, viz. (Exodus 32:10) "And now leave Me and I will annihilate them, etc.", followed by (Ibid. 11) "And Moses prayed before the L–rd, etc."

Now if (in the killing of) an Israelite, the graver (instance), not being subject to (the provision of [Exodus 21:21]) "But if one or two days," he is not liable unless it be with an implement of killing potential and in a locus which is critical to life, then (in the killing of) a Canaanite, the instance of lesser gravity, being subject to the above provision, how much more so should he not be liable unless it be with an implement of killing potential and in a locus which is critical to life! (Why, then, need it be written?) For if you say this, you have ruled for punishment through a fortiori reasoning, wherefore it is written "with a rod, etc.", to teach that punishment is not to be ruled for through such reasoning.

R. Pappus expounded (Genesis 3:22) ("and the L–rd G–d said:) Behold, the man has become like one of us" — as one of the ministering angels. R. Akiva: "Enough Pappus!" Pappus: "And how do you understand it?" R. Akiva: The Holy One Blessed be He gave him two options: one of life and one of death, and he chose the one of death.

And it is written (Ezekiel 38:18) "And it will be on this day, on the day that Gog comes against the land of Israel.. (20) the fishes of the sea will quake before Me." All of those thousands and ten thousands plummeted like lead.

(Exodus 17:5) "And the L–rd said to Moses: Pass over, etc.": Pass over (i.e., overlook) their words. R. Yehudah says: Pass by them, for you will find water for them. R. Nechemiah says: Forgive their sin. Variantly: "Pass before the people" and whoever is bothered, let him speak!

"to sanctify it": with a blessing — whence they ruled: It is sanctified by wine (i.e., "kiddush") upon its entry. This tells me only of kiddush at night. Whence do I derive (the same for)kiddush in the daytime? From "Remember the day of Sabbath." This tells me only of (kiddush for) the Sabbath. Whence do I derive (the same for) the festivals? From (Leviticus 23:4) "These are the festivals of the L–rd, which (including the Sabbath) you shall "call" (in the kiddush) in their times."

Rebbi says: What is the intent of "with a rod"? It is "extra" towards the formulation of an identity (gezeirah shavah), viz.: it is written here "rod," and, elsewhere, (vis-à-vis tithing, Leviticus 27:32) "rod." Just as here, excluding (a servant) acquired by two partners, so, there, excluding (from the tithe a beast) acquired by two partners.

R. Pappus expounded (Psalms 106:20) "And they exchanged their glory for the image of an ox that feeds on grass": I might think, for the "ox" on high (i.e., Taurus); it is, therefore, written "that feeds on grass." R. Akiva: "Enough Pappus!" Pappus: "And how do you understand it?" R. Akiva: As referring to the terrestrial ox. I might think, that it refers to the mundane ox; it is, therefore, written "that feeds on grass." There is nothing more revolting and detestable than an ox (in the act of) eating grass.

(Exodus 15:10) "in the mighty waters": Four are called "mighty": The Holy One Blessed be He — (Psalms 93:4) "Mighty on high is the L–rd"; Israel — (Ibid. 16:3) "the mighty, the object of all My desire"; Egypt — (Ezekiel 32:18) "and the daughters of the mighty nations (Egypt)"; and the waters — "They plummeted like lead in the mighty waters."

"and he die under his hand": His striking and his (the servant's) dying must be in his domain. If he struck him (in his domain) and then sold him to another, he is not subject (to the provisions of "But if one day or two days, etc.")

(Exodus 14:30) "and the L–rd saved Israel on that day": As a bird held in a man's hand, so that if he pressed its hand but a little he would choke it, as it is written (Psalms 124:6-8) "Our soul (at the splitting of the sea) escaped as from the hunter's snare. The snare broke and we escaped. Our help is in the name of the L–rd, Maker of heaven and earth." Or: As a man releasing a fetus from a cow's womb, as it is written (Devarim 4:34) "Or has a G–d ever done miracles to come and take for Himself a nation from the midst of a nation, etc."? Why "a nation from the midst of a nation"? — As a man releasing a fetus from a cow's womb, viz. (Ibid. 20) "and you did the L–rd take, and He brought you forth from the iron furnace, etc."

"And your staff with which you smote the Nile take in your hand, etc.": because of their (seditious) "murmurings." This is one of the three instances where Israel "murmured" against them (the L–rd and Moses) and said: They (the following) are instruments of punishment, (but not of good): the incense, the ark, and the staff.

"vengeance shall be taken": "Vengeance" connotes death. You say "death," but perhaps money (i.e., monetary restitution) is referred to. (This is not so.) It is written here "vengeance," and, elsewhere (Leviticus 26:25) "vengeance." Just as there, death (is indicated), so, here, death (is intended.) Just as there, (death by) the sword (is indicated), so, here, ([death by the sword] is intended.)

(Exodus 14:30) "And Israel saw Egypt dead on the shore of the sea": For four reasons: That they not say: Just as we came up on this side, so they came up on another side (and will pursue us); so that the Egyptians not say: Just as we were lost in the sea, so Israel was lost in the sea; so that Israel take the spoils, the Egyptians being laden with silver, gold, and precious stones and pearls; so that Israel regard them and see them dying, and rebuke them, viz. (Psalms 50:22) "I will rebuke you and lay it before your eyes," (Michah 7:10) "Then my foe will see, and shame will cover her."

They said: This incense is an instrument of punishment. It killed Nadav and Avihu, viz. (Leviticus 10:1) "And the sons of Aaron, Nadav and Avihu, took each of them his coal-pan, etc." Therefore, let all of Israel know that it can (also) effect atonement, viz. (Numbers 17:12) "and he put on the incense and he atoned for the people."

(Exodus, Ibid. 10) "And the seventh day is Sabbath to the L–rd your G–d. You shall not perform any labor." What is the intent of this? (Exodus 31:15) "Everyone who does labor on the seventh day, die, he shall die" tells us of the punishment. Whence do we derive the exhortation?

From "And the seventh day … you shall not perform any labor." This tells me only of the punishment and the exhortation for the labor of the day. Whence do I derive (the same for) the labor of the night? From (Ibid. 14) "those who desecrate it (subsuming both day and night), die, he shall die."

This tells me only of punishment (for labor at night). We have not yet heard the exhortation. It is, therefore, written "And the seventh day is Sabbath to the L–rd your G–d. Let "Sabbath" not be mentioned (i.e., "seventh day" is sufficient). It is mentioned to include the night in the exhortation.