<b>When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel (Exod. 30:12).</b> Scripture states elsewhere in allusion to this verse: <i>Thy navel is like a round goblet, thy belly is like a heap of wheat set about with lilies, wherein no mingled wine is wanting</i> (Song 7:3). <i>Thy navel</i> refers to the Sanhedrin. But why did they call the Sanhedrin a navel? Just as the navel is located in the center of a man’s body, so the Sanhedrin met in a chamber of hewn stone in the center of the Temple. Furthermore, just as the child, whose mouth is closed while within its mother’s womb, is sustained through the navel, so the Israelites were sustained only by virtue of the Sanhedrin. Hence they likened it to a navel. The word <i>round</i> indicates that just as the navel is round, so the Sanhedrin sat in a semicircular room.
The meeting place of the Sanhedrin was called a <i>sahar</i> (“goblet”) because it resembled a <i>sohar</i> (“store”). For just as you are able to find whatever you need in a store, so the Sanhedrin decided what was pure and impure, fit and unfit, permitted and forbidden.
<i>Wherein no mingled wine is wanting</i>. If one of the members of the Sanhedrin found it necessary to leave the meeting to satisfy his physical needs, he would first look about to see if twenty-three members were in attendance.<sup class="footnote-marker">4</sup><i class="footnote">The judicial court, also called the small court, consisted of twenty-three members; all had to be present at a trial.</i> If there were, he would leave, but if not, he would not depart. <i>Thy belly is like a heap of wheat</i>. Just as there is in a heap of wheat life for the world, so the world was sustained through the merit of the Sanhedrin. Another explanation. R. Johanan said: <i>Thy belly is like a heap of wheat</i> alludes to the Book of Leviticus, which contains the means for attaining atonement for guilt and sinful acts. It holds (a heap of) sin (<i>het</i>) offerings and (a heap of) guilt offerings. He placed it in the middle of the Torah, with all its offerings.<sup class="footnote-marker">5</sup><i class="footnote">Two books of the Torah precede Leviticus, and two follow it.</i> In that way it resembles a heap of wheat (<i>hittim</i>).
R. Simeon the son of Lakish said: Why is it (Israel) compared to wheat? Just as wheat piles up when poured into a measure, so the elders, the students, the wise, and the pious increase in number when a census is taken.
<i>Thy belly is like a heap of wheat</i>. R. Idi said: Is not a heap of cedar cones more beautiful than a heap of wheat? Why does this verse say <i>a heap of wheat</i>? They replied: The world cannot exist on cedar cones if it lacks wheat. Hence it says: <i>Thy belly is like a heap of wheat</i>.
<i>Set about with lilies</i>. Does a man ever fence in his fields with lilies? Does he not normally fence in his fields with thorns and thistles, with pits and thornbushes? What then is the meaning of <i>Set about with lilies</i>? This refers to numerous commandments that are as sensitive as lilies. For example, a man is extremely anxious to enter his bridal chamber, for no day is dearer to him than that day. It is the day on which he rejoices with his bride. What does he do? He spends a considerable amount of money to set up the bridal chamber and he comes to have intercourse with her. But if she says to him: “I have seen something like a red lily (i.e., the blood of menstruation), he draws away from her. He turns his face to one side and she to the other. What compelled him to turn from her? Was it a snake biting him, a scorpion stinging him, or a thorn between them? No, only the words of the Torah, since it is said: <i>And thou shalt not approach a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is impure by her uncleanness</i> (Lev. 18:19). Hence it is written: <i>Set about like lilies</i>.
<i>This they shall give</i> (Exod. 30:12). Observe that Israel was so beloved that even their sins brought them considerable benefit. If their sins could do that, how much more so would their meritorious deeds. You find that when Jacob sent Joseph to his brethren, they watched him approach and said to one another: <i>Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, therefore, and let us slay him</i> (Gen. 37:19–20). They hurled him into the pit and said: Let us eat and drink, and then we will kill him. After eating and drinking, they were about to say grace when Judah said to them: We are planning to take a life, yet now we would bless God. If we should do this, we would be blaspheming against God and not blessing Him. Because of this Scripture says: <i>And the covetous vaunteth himself, though he condemn the Lord</i> (Ps. 10:3). <i>Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites and let not our hand be upon him</i> (Gen. 37:27). (And they all agreed.)
<i>And they sat down to eat bread</i> (ibid., v. 25). R. Judah the son of Shalum said: This is a notable instance of many sitting down together in unity, with a single thought in mind; to sell Joseph. Yet he fed the world for seven years, through two famines. If despite their sin he could feed the world and cause it to endure, how much more beneficial would have been the result if they had acted meritoriously. Similarly, observe what happened to the tribes in the chapter Shekalim, when they were permitted to atone for the incident of the golden calf. If the heinous sin they committed could lead to the performance of a worthy act, how much more so if they had acted meritoriously.