Bamidbar Rabbah Reader

That is what is written: “Woe! The tranquil in Zion…” (Amos 6:1), this is the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, who would recline in the palaces of pleasure. “And the secure on Mount Samaria” (Amos 6:1), these are the Ten Tribes who resided securely in Sebastia.36This is another name for Samaria. “Those who name themselves the foremost of the nations” (Amos 6:1), who descend from two eponyms, Shem and Ever, as from there, Israel are called Hebrews [ivrim].

“And come to them the house of Israel” (Amos 6:1). Idolaters, when they eat and drink, they engage in trivial matters: ‘Who is as wise as Bilam; who is as mighty as Goliath; who is as wealthy as Haman?’ Then Israel comes and they say to them: ‘Was Aḥitofel not wise, was Solomon not wise; was Samson not mighty, was David not mighty; was Koraḥ not wealthy, was Solomon not wealthy, as it is stated in his regard: “The king caused silver to be in Jerusalem like stones…”’ (I Kings 10:27).

Everyone agrees with the statement of Israel. “Come to Kalne and see” (Amos 6:2), this is Ketisifon.37A great city in Babylon. “And go from there to greater Ḥamat” (Amos 6:2), this is Ḥamat of Antioch. “And descend to Gat of the Philistines” (Amos 6:2), these are the steep fortresses of the Philistines.

“Are they38The cities mentioned. better than these kingdoms?” (Amos 6:2). This is Zion and Samaria. “Is their border greater than your border?” (Amos 6:2). The Holy One blessed be He said to them: ‘It is a great and excellent portion that I have given you, that none of all the nations has one greater and more excellent than your portion.

Why, then, do you not perform My will and you do not fear Me, that I will bring upon you a punishment because you do not place My words upon your heart?’ That is what is written: “Who spurn the day of evil” (Amos 6:3) – this is the day of exile that they distance from their heart, and are not concerned about it. Rather, they say: “No harm will befall us” (Micah 3:11). “While you convene a session of villainy” (Amos 6:3) – you presented yourselves to reside alongside villainy, this is Esau, just as it says: “For the villainy to your brother Jacob…” (Obadiah 1:10).

“Who lie on beds of ivory” (Amos 6:4); on beds from an elephant.39The Aramaic phrase means beds of ivory. “And sprawl [usruḥim] on their couches” (Amos 6:4); that they sully [masrihin] their beds with transgressions, as they would swap their wives with one another and sully their beds with semen that is not theirs. “Eating the fattened sheep from the flock, and the calves from inside the stall” (Amos 6:4).

Come and see, each tribe had a day of debauchery of its own. When he would seek to go to his debauchery, he would pass his entire flock before him, would take the fattest of them, stand over it, and slaughter it. “Who strum on the face of the lyre; they considered themselves like David with musical instruments” (Amos 6:5). Just as David would sing to the Holy One blessed be He by means of lyres, so, they prepared lyres for themselves, to sing over wine.

That is what is written: “Who drink with wine bowls [mizrekei yayin]” (Amos 6:6). Rav, Rabbi Yoḥanan, and the Rabbis, Rav said: Congealed wine.40It is possible to toss [lizrok] cups of congealed wine from one to another, to whet their appetites for drink. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Small cups.41One tosses the small amount of wine from the cup directly into one’s throat. The Rabbis say: Cups that have pipes attached to them.42When placed on their sides, a flow of liquid emerged from the pipe directly into the mouth of the drinker.

From where would they drink? Rabbi Abbahu said in the name of Rabbi Ḥanina: From Patgita, whose wine would seduce the body. The Rabbis said in the name of Rabbi Ḥanina: From Pelugeta. “And anoint themselves with virgin oils” (Amos 6:6); Rabbi Yehuda bar Yeḥezkel said: Oil from olives that were one-third ripened, that removes hair and smooths the skin.

Rabbi Yanai said: Oil from Antioch. Even after all this goodness, “but they are not distressed over the destruction of Joseph” (Amos 6:6).43They did not take to heart the destruction that their sinful ways would bring to them. Joseph represents the kingdom of Israel, as opposed to the kingdom of Judah. What will their end be?

Because of wine they were seduced and strayed. That is what is written: “Therefore, they will now be exiled at the head of the exiles…” (Amos 6:7). We have learned that wherever there is wine, there is licentiousness. That is why the Holy One blessed be He wrote the portion of the nazirite after the portion of the sota, because wine causes licentiousness.

Therefore, a person should abstain from wine because it will lead him astray. That is why it is stated: “When a man or a woman will articulate [to take the vow of a nazirite, to abstain for the Lord].”

That is what is written: “The words of Lemuel the king” (Proverbs 31:1). Why is Solomon called Lemuel? Rabbi Yishmael said: On the very night that Solomon completed the labor of the Temple, he married Bitya daughter of Pharaoh. There was rejoicing there, in the celebration of the Temple and the rejoicing over Pharaoh’s daughter.

The rejoicing over Pharaoh’s daughter overshadowed the rejoicing over the Temple. That is what the parable says: Everyone flatters the king. That is why he is called Lemuel, because he cast the yoke of God’s kingdom from upon him, as though saying: ‘Why does he need God [lama lo el]?’ At that moment, the Holy One blessed be He considered destroying Jerusalem.

That is what is written: “For [this city has been] a cause of My wrath and of My anger [from the day that they built it until this day; remove it from My presence]” (Jeremiah 32:31). The Rabbis said: Pharaoh’s daughter introduced to him one thousand types of song, and he commanded them to be sung before him that night. She would say to him: ‘This is the way they sing before such-and-such idol, and that is the way they sing before such-and-such idol.’

What did Pharaoh’s daughter do? She spread a hanging over him and affixed on it all sorts of gems and jewels that shone like stars and constellations, and any time Solomon would seek to rise, he would see the stars and constellations and he slept until the fourth hour of the day. Rabbi Levi said: On that day, the daily offering was sacrificed at the fourth hour. Regarding that hour, we learned: There was an incident and the daily morning offering was sacrificed at the fourth hour.

Israel were saddened, as it was the day of the dedication of the Temple, but they were unable to do anything because Solomon was sleeping and they were afraid to wake him due to fear of the monarchy. They went and informed Bathsheba his mother and she went and woke him and rebuked him. That is what is written: “The oration with which his mother admonished him” (Proverbs 31:1). Rabbi Yoḥanan said: It teaches that his mother bent him over a post and said to him: “What, my son?” (Proverbs 31:2) – everyone knows that your father was God-fearing.

Now, this is what they will say: Bathsheba his mother caused him to do thus. “What, son of my womb?” (Proverbs 31:2) – all the women of your father’s household, once they became pregnant, they would never see the face of the king, but I forced my way and entered so that my son would be fair and agile.44The Rabbis say that relations during the last trimester are beneficial to the fetus. “And what, son of my vows?” (Proverbs 31:2) – all the women of your father’s household, when they would become pregnant they would vow and say: ‘Let me have a son who is worthy of kingship,’ but I vowed and said: ‘Let me have a son who will be quick and scholarly in Torah and worthy of prophecy.’

“Do not give your strength to women” (Proverbs 31:3) – you would be pursuing lewdness, as they agitate a man’s mind: “A companion of harlots will lose a fortune” (Proverbs 29:3). “Or let your ways destroy kings” (Proverbs 31:3); the Torah cautioned and said: “He shall not amass for himself many wives” (Deuteronomy 17:17). Be careful regarding these matters, as they destroy kings. “It is not for kings, Lemuel” (Proverbs 31:4); what [business] do you have with kings who say: ‘Why do we need God [lama lanu el],’ and [you] emulate their actions?

“It is not for kings to drink wine” (Proverbs 31:4) – why do you liken yourself to kings who drink wine, become inebriated, and perform all kinds of acts of lewdness? Do not emulate their actions. “Or for princes: Where is strong drink?” (Proverbs 31:4). Shall one for whom all the secrets of the world are revealed drink wine and become inebriated?

“Lest he drink, and forget what was legislated [meḥukak]” (Proverbs 31:5) – Rabbi Shimon said: These are the words of the Torah that are inscribed [haḥakukim], and it is written among them: “You shall not commit adultery” (Exodus 20:13). “And subvert justice for all the children of the poor” (Proverbs 31:5), she [his mother] said to him: Justice was entrusted to the kingdom of the House of David, just as it is written: “House of David, so said the Lord: Adjudicate justice in the morning” (Jeremiah 21:12).

If you drink wine and subvert justice for all the children of the poor, you will exonerate the guilty and convict the innocent. From here they said: A judge who drank a quarter log of wine shall not judge, likewise, a Sage who drank a quarter log of wine shall not issue a ruling. “Give strong drink to the hopeless, and wine to embittered souls” (Proverbs 31:6). Rabbi Ḥanan said: Wine was created in this world only to pay a reward to the wicked in this world, as they are hopeless in the World to Come, and to comfort mourners.

That is what is written: “And wine to embittered souls.” From here they said: All those executed by the court would be given undiluted wine to drink to addle their minds. That is what is written: “Give strong drink to the hopeless.” “Let him drink and forget his poverty, [and remember his misery no longer]” (Proverbs 31:7).

Regarding the hopeless, it says that he will forget death, which is his poverty.45He has no reward after death. “And…his misery,” is said regarding the embittered soul; one whose sons and daughters die before him and his soul is embittered. The wine will cause his heart to rejoice and he will no longer remember his sorrow. “And remember his misery no longer,” these are his children, who are his misery, like that which we learned: “And our misery” (Deuteronomy 26:7), these are the children, just as it is stated: “Every son that is born [you shall cast into the Nile]” (Exodus 1:22).

“Open your mouth for the mute” (Proverbs 31:8), from here [we learn] that if there are none proffering a claim for an heir or for a purchaser, the court proffers a claim on their behalf. Alternatively, “open your mouth for the mute,” this relates to the orphans who do not know how to proffer a claim; moreover, they do not know their father’s business, that the court proffers a claim on their behalf.

That is, “for the judgment for all whose lives are transitory [benei ḥalof]” (Proverbs 31:8), these are the children of [someone] dead who passed [sheḥalaf] and went to his eternal home. Another matter, they46The orphans themselves. are their father’s replacement [ḥilufei], just as it says: “For whom there is no replacement [ḥalifot]” (Psalms 55:20) – Rabbi Ḥanina said: This is one who does not leave a son after him.

“Open your mouth, rule justly” (Proverbs 31:9), that you will not act in a matter that will teach [false] claims. “And the case of the poor and indigent” (Proverbs 31:9), just as it says: “You shall not distort the judgment of your indigent in his dispute” (Exodus 23:6). Another matter, these are the charities and the gifts to the poor, which is theirs by law, as you must take from the robber and give to them, to realize what is stated: “Do not rob the impoverished, as he is impoverished…” (Proverbs 22:22).

Another matter, “the words of Lemuel the king, the oration [masa] [with which his mother admonished him]” (Proverbs 31:1); this is the Torah that admonished Solomon, as it is called the mother [em] of those who study it, just as it says: “For if [im] you call for understanding” (Proverbs 2:3) – em is written.47The word im and the word em have the same Hebrew letters. Why are the words called masa?48Literally, a burden.

It is because harsh matters will befall anyone who emulates the actions of Solomon. “What, my son [beri]?” (Proverbs 31:2). It does not say “what, beni,” but rather, “what beri.” These are the commands and the prohibitions in the Torah, which is called bar, just as it says: “Kiss bar, lest he become angry…” (Psalms 2:12), as all its matters are clear [barim].

It is regarding a prohibition in the Torah: “You shall not marry them; your daughter you shall not give to his son, [and his daughter you shall not take for your son]” (Deuteronomy 7:3), that it says this matter. It is because Solomon took from the daughters of the nations and married them, as it is stated: “King Solomon loved many…women… from the nations, regarding whom the Lord had said to the children of Israel: Do not consort with them, and they shall not consort with you, as they will sway [your heart after their gods; Solomon clung to them for love]” (I Kings 11:1–2). Ḥananya ben Rabbi Yehoshua said: It is for that reason that it said: “You shall not marry them.”

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai says: Actually “for love” [means] for harlotry.49Namely, he did not marry them. Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥalafta says: He did not require them to convert and to draw them near beneath the wings of Heaven. “What, son of my womb [bitni]?” The Torah cautioned regarding a married woman.

This is why beten is written here, as regarding an adulterer and an adulteress it is written: “Her belly [bitna] will distend…” (Numbers 5:27); “to cause a belly [beten] to distend…” (Numbers 5:22). “What, son of my vows?” The Torah cautioned him not to drink wine so that he would not come to engage in harlotry. This why “my vows” is written here, corresponding to the portion of the nazirite that is written after the portion of the sota.

In it, it is written: “When a man or a woman will articulate to take [a vow of a nazirite].” “Do not give your strength to women” (Proverbs 31:3) – after the Divine Spirit alluded to these three prohibitions,50Not to intermarry, not to commit adultery, and not to drink wine. it then detailed them specifically. That is what is written: “Do not give your strength to women,” corresponding to the foreign women whom he took and they diverted his heart from the Holy One blessed be He.

“Your strength,” that is the strength of the Torah that said: “He shall not amass for himself many wives” (Deuteronomy 17:17), and he violated it. “Or let your ways eradicate counsel [melakhin]” (Proverbs 31:3), the verse is speaking regarding harlotry with a married woman. That is what is written: “Or let your ways [udrakhekha] eradicate,” just as it says: “As all flesh has corrupted [its way [darko]]” (Genesis 6:12).

“Eradicate” – matters of Torah that counsel you to good, just as it says: “Counsel and resourcefulness are mine” (Proverbs 8:14). Melakhin is nothing other than counsel, just as it says: “Therefore, king, let my counsel [milki] be acceptable to you” (Daniel 4:24). That is, “eradicate [lamḥot] counsel,” just as it says: “The [priest] shall write these curses [in the scroll, and he shall dissolve [umaḥa] them]” (Numbers 5:23).

“It is not for kings, Lemuel…” He was called by three names: Yedidya, Kohelet, and Solomon. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: Seven – [those three, and] Agur, ben Yakeh, Lemuel, Itiel. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: His primary essence was three: Yedidya, Kohelet, and Solomon. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman concedes regarding these four; that he was called by them as a nickname and [therefore] they require expounding.

Agur, because he accumulated [agar] matters of Torah. Yakeh, because he expelled [heki] matters of Torah, like this bowl that is filled for a while and emptied after a while. Lemuel, as he whispered [nam] to God [lael]: ‘I can amass many wives and not sin.’ Itiel, as he said: ‘God [el] is with me [iti] and I will prevail.’

And it says: “It is not for kings, Lemuel.” The Torah said three matters regarding which kings were commanded: Not to amass many wives, not to amass many horses, and not to amass much gold and silver. They must not say [lomar] to God [lael] that they will amass and will not sin. “It is not for kings to drink wine” (Proverbs 31:4).

This is stated regarding the vow of the nazirite that is written after the portion of the sota, that kings must guard themselves from wine, and likewise princes, so they will not come to lewdness and render the world guilty. Why did it caution kings and princes alone? After all, everybody must be cautious regarding wine so they will not drink and be corrupted. It is, rather, because kings have the wherewithal to drink and do anything in transgression that they wish, and there is no one to reprimand them.

“Lest he drink, and forget what was legislated [mekhukak]” (Proverbs 31:5); due to the wine that he drank, he will forget what the Torah commanded to the legislator [mekhokek]51This is a reference to Moses. See Deuteronomy 33:21. – the statutes of the Torah; that is the portion of the sota. “And subvert justice for all the children of the poor” (Proverbs 31:5). This adulterer who goes to the married woman and she becomes pregnant from him, that mamzer52Any child born from a forbidden union that is punishable by karet. has no portion in the belongings of her husband, but he will receive a portion of his belongings with his [other, actual] sons because they think he is his son.

Another matter, at times, the husband will not leave a son, and by Torah law, the inheritance then goes to his brothers. But this mamzer will inherit his belongings, as they think he is his son, and [this] will subvert justice for all the children of the poor. That is why after the sota, the Torah cautioned regarding the law of the nazirite, as wine causes the adulterer and the adulteress to sin. That is what is written: “When a man or a woman will articulate [to take the vow of a nazirite, to abstain for the Lord].”

From where is it derived that Solomon later conceded?53That he should not have drunk. It is as it is stated: “I am a greater fool than a man [ish]” (Proverbs 30:2) – this is Noah, as it is written: “Noah, the man [ish] [of the soil], began [and he planted a vineyard]” (Genesis 9:20) – by means of wine he was cursed,54Since his descendants were cursed as a result of his drunkenness, it is as though he was cursed (Etz Yosef). but I [Solomon] did not learn from him.

“And the understanding of man [adam] is not mine” (Proverbs 30:2) – this is Adam the first man, who, by means of the wine that he drank, the entire world was cursed because of him, as Rabbi Avin said: Eve poured wine for Adam and he drank, as it is stated: “The woman saw [vatereh] that the tree was good for eating…” (Genesis 3:6), and it is written: “Do not look at [tereh] wine in its redness” (Proverbs 23:31).

“I have not learned wisdom” (Proverbs 30:3) – from the wisdom of the Torah, as everywhere that wine is written, it makes an impression. “Nor do I know sacred knowledge” (Proverbs 30:3). One who seeks to sanctify himself so he will not sin with harlotry, shall abstain from wine. I was corrupted with harlotry, but now “I know sacred knowledge.” That is why the portion of the nazirite is stated after sota.

“Speak to the children of Israel” (Numbers 6:2), those who take the vow of the nazirite. “And say to them,” to caution the court regarding this, that they should not allow the nazirite to violate his naziriteship. If they see that he seeks to violate his naziriteship, they shall compel him to fulfill his statement. This is to teach you that the great are cautioned regarding the lesser, and they will be punished due to them if they do not rebuke them.

Likewise it says: “They will stumble over one another” (Leviticus 26:37); one due to the iniquity of another. This is to teach you that the entire Jewish people are guarantors for one another. “When a man or a woman will articulate [to take the vow of a nazirite]” – that is what is written: “There was [vayhi] a certain man from Tzora…” (Judges 13:2).55This is the beginning of the chapter dealing with the birth and naziriteship of Samson.

Rabbi Levi said: Every place that vayhi is stated, it is nothing other than an expression of suffering: “Vayhi in the days of Aḥashverosh” (Esther 1:1) – there was Haman. “Vayhi in the days when the judges [judged]” (Ruth 1:1) – there was a famine. “Vayhi when man began [to increase]” (Genesis 6:1) – “the sons of the great [saw the daughters of man]” (Genesis 6:2).56This eventually led to the Flood.

See Genesis 6:1–3. “Vayhi in the days of Amrafel” (Genesis 14:1) – “they waged a war” (Genesis 14:2). “Vayhi when Joshua was in Jericho…” (Joshua 5:13) – “[a man was standing before him] and his drawn sword was in his hand” (Joshua 5:13).57Joshua was confronted by the commander of the host of the Lord. “Vayhi the Lord was with Joshua” (Joshua 6:27) – “the children of Israel committed trespass regarding the proscribed thing” (Joshua 7:1).

“Vayhi when Samuel aged” (I Samuel 8:1) – “his sons did not follow his path” (I Samuel 8:3). “Vayhi David was successful in all his endeavors” (I Samuel 18:14) – “Saul was hostile to David” (I Samuel 18:9). “Vayhi a certain man from Tzora…” (Judges 13:2) – “Manoaḥ said to his wife, we will die” (Judges 13:22). Vayhi, Rabbi Yudan said: Every place that this expression is stated regarding the righteous, he is the equivalent of thirty-one righteous men, the numerical value of vayhi.58Vav – 6, yod – 10, heh – 5, yod – 10 = 31.

“A certain [eḥad] man,” a great man. Wherever ehad is used it indicates greatness. With regards to the Holy One Blessed be He, one is said as it it written "God is One" (Deuteronomy 6:4); there is no one in the world who is His equal. Likewise, regarding Abraham: “Abraham was one [eḥad]” (Ezekiel 33:24); there was no one in those days who was his equal.

Regarding Israel, it is written: “Who is like Your people, Israel, one [eḥad] nation on the earth” (I Chronicles 17:21); there is none among the nations that are its equal. Likewise, regarding Avimelekh it says: “One of [aḥad] the people almost lay with your wife” (Genesis 26:10); because he was king. Likewise regarding Elkana it says: “Eḥad” (I Samuel 1:1), as there was no one in his generation who was his equal. “[There was a certain man] from Tzora [from the family of the Danite]” (Judges 13:2), anyone whose name and the name of his city are stated, it is known that he is from that city.

His name, but not the name of his city, it is known that he is from Jerusalem. “From the family of the Danite,” because Tzora belonged to Judah, as it is written: “Eshtaol, Tzora, and Ashna” (Joshua 15:33), and Tzora belonged to Dan, “the border of their inheritance was Tzora, Eshtaol…” (Joshua 19:41), it was necessary to state that he was “from the family of the Danite.” It does not say “from the tribe,” but rather, “from the family of the Danite.”

It teaches that his [Manoaḥ’s] father was from Dan and Manoaḥ’s mother was from Judah. In this regard, Jacob said: “Dan will judge his people, [as one of [ke’aḥad] the tribes of Israel]” (Genesis 49:16), like the most elite of the tribes; this is Judah. That is why Jacob juxtaposed him to Judah, as he was from the land of Judah and his mother was from Judah. Likewise Manoaḥ was from Dan and his wife was from Judah; consequently Samson emerged from the tribe of Dan and the tribe of Judah, as they said: The name of Samson’s mother was Hatzlelponi, and her lineage is ascribed to the tribe of Judah, as it is stated: “And the name of their sister was Hatzlelponi” (I Chronicles 4:3).

“And his name was Manoaḥ” (Judges 13:2). The wicked precede their name: “Naval was his name” (I Samuel 25:25); “Goliath was his name” (I Samuel 17:4); “Sheva ben Bikhri was his name” (II Samuel 20:21). But the righteous, their name precedes them: “And his name was Elkana” (I Samuel 1:1); “And his name was Yishai” (I Samuel 17:12); “And his name was Boaz” (Ruth 2:1); “And his name was Mordekhai” (Esther 2:5); “And his name was Manoaḥ.”

They are similar to their Creator: “But My name, the Lord…” (Exodus 6:3). They raised an objection to it: But is it not written: “Rebecca had a brother and his name was Lavan”? (Genesis 24:29). Rabbi Yitzḥak said: He was conspicuous.59Lavan was not his name, but rather, his whiteness was a conspicuous attribute of his. Rabbi Berekhya said: He was obvious [meluban] in his wickedness.

They raised an objection: “And his name was Mikhaihu” (Judges 17:1) – because he received guests, his name was written like the names of the righteous. They raised an objection from the [verse regarding the] sons of Samuel: “The name of his firstborn son was Joel and the name of his second was Aviya” (I Samuel 8:2). The Rabbis said: Just as this one was wicked, so, too, that one was wicked. Rabbi Yudan said in the name of Rabbi Simon: Ultimately, they repented.

That is why he [Samuel’s firstborn, Joel] is called: “Vashni” (I Chronicles 6:13), as they changed [shenishtanu] to good deeds.60The full verse reads: “The sons of Samuel: his first-born, Vashni, and Aviya.” That is why they merited the Divine Spirit. That is what is written: “The word of the Lord that was to Joel son of Petuel” (Joel 1:1). This is Samuel.

Why is he called Petuel? It is because he enticed [pita] the Holy One blessed be He with his prayer.61See Psalms 99:6. Manoaḥ, why is he called Manoaḥ? It is because he was privileged to speak with an angel, and prophecy is called rest [menuḥa], as it is stated: “Seraya was the minister of Menuḥa” (Jeremiah 51:59).

It teaches that Barukh ben Neriya62He was Seraya’s brother and a disciple of the prophet Jeremiah. According to another opinion, Seraya was another name of Barukh. merited the Divine Spirit, just as it says: “The spirit of the Lord will rest [venaḥa] upon him (Isaiah 11:2). “His wife was barren, she had not given birth” (Judges 13:2). This teaches that there was a dispute between Manoaḥ and his wife.

He said to her: ‘You are barren; that is why you have not given birth.’ She said to him: ‘You are sterile and that is why I have not given birth.’ Manoaḥ was not sterile. “An angel of the Lord appeared to the woman” (Judges 13:3).

From here you learn that Manoaḥ’s wife was a righteous woman who merited having an angel speak with her, to introduce harmony between her and her husband and to inform her that she was barren and it was she who was preventing the pregnancy, not her husband; that is why he spoke with her. Because she saw the angel, she is called Hatzlelponi, because she addressed [pona] the angel. Tzelal is nothing other than an angel, just as it says: “As it is for this that they entered beneath the shelter [betzel] of my roof” (Genesis 19:8).63Lot is referring to the angels who came to rescue him from the destruction of Sodom.

There, because Lot was more righteous than his wife, the angels came to the shelter of his house and not the shelter of her house. However, here, where the angel came to her because she was righteous, that is why she is called Hatzlel. Why is it stated: Hatzlel, and it did not say Hatzel? It is because he appeared to the woman twice, once in the city and once in the field.

“Behold now, you are barren and have not given birth” (Judges 13:3); he informed her that she was barren and that is why she had not given birth in order to introduce harmony between her and her husband, as she had been angry at her husband Manoaḥ because she was not giving birth. “But you will conceive, and you will bear a son,” (Judges 13:3), from here on you will conceive and you will bear a son.

“Now, please beware” (Judges 13:4); he cautioned her not to drink vinegar of wine and vinegar of intoxicating drink and the water in which grapes were soaked64See Numbers 6:3.. These are nothing other than precautions for wine, so that the nazirite will not come to drink wine, that is why the verse prohibited them for him. “And do not drink wine or intoxicating drink" (Judges 13:4), just as it says: “From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain” (Numbers 6:3), “…and do not eat any impurity” (Judges 13:4).

Impure is nothing other than prohibited, as the Torah cautioned the nazirite not to eat anything “that may be derives from the grapevine,” (Numbers 6:4), just as it says: “…and grapes, fresh or dried, he shall not eat. [Throughout his days as a nazirite] he may not eat from anything that may be derived from the grapevine” (Numbers 6:3–4). “For behold, you will conceive and bear a son” (Judges 13:5).

From here, the semen from the night was kept in her womb and she had not expelled it. When the angel said to her: “For behold, you will conceive and bear a son,” the womb absorbed that drop. “A razor [umorah] shall not come upon his head” (Judges 13:5), just as it says: “A razor shall not pass on his head” (Numbers 6:5). Why is a razor called morah?

It is because the hair fears [mityareh] nothing other than the razor as it shaves a shave of destruction, just as it says: “Do not destroy the corner of your beard” (Leviticus 19:27). “For the lad will be a nazirite to God from the womb” (Judges 13:5). It was revealed before the Holy One blessed be He that Samson was one who would follow his eyes. That is why He cautioned him as a nazirite that he should not drink wine, because wine leads to licentiousness.

If, when he was a nazirite, he followed his eyes, had he drunk wine there would have been no rehabilitation for him as he would have constantly been pursuing licentiousness. What is it that is said: “From the womb”? It is to realize what is stated: “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you” (Jeremiah 1:5). However, regarding the wicked what does it say?

“The wicked are corrupt from the womb; liars go astray from birth” (Psalms 58:4). Likewise it says: “I was formed in iniquity; [in sin my mother conceived me]” (Psalms 51:7). “He will begin to deliver Israel from the hand of the Philistines” (Judges 13:5). In him will be fulfilled the prophecy of Jacob, who said: “Dan will judge his people…Dan will be [a serpent]…[I await your deliverance, Lord]” (Genesis 49:16–18).

“The woman came and she told her husband, saying: A man of God came to me, and his appearance was like the appearance of an angel of God, very awesome…” (Judges 13:6). From here [we derive that] the Divine Presence would rest only upon those with a striking appearance. “He said to me: Behold, you will conceive [and give birth to a son]” (Judges 13:7), but what he said to her: “Behold now, you are barren” (Judges 13:3), she did not reveal to him, as she did not wish to reveal her inadequacy.

“As the lad will be a nazirite to God from the womb until the day of his death” (Judges 13:7). She added [the phrase]: “Until the day of his death,” as she did not know what was in the future. But the angel, who knew that he was going to lose his naziriteship by means of Delilah, that was why he did not say: “Until the day of his death.” “Manoaḥ entreated [vayetar] the Lord, and said: Please, my Lord, the man [of God whom You sent, let him come again to us]” (Judges 13:8).

Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Why is the prayer of the righteous analogized to a pitchfork [eter]? It is to say to you: Just as the pitchfork overturns the grain in the field from place to place, so the prayer of the righteous overturns the attribute of cruelty to the attribute of mercy. “God heeded the voice of Manoaḥ, [and the angel of God came again to the woman]” (Judges 13:9). Why did the angel of God return to the woman and did not come to Manoaḥ?

It was in order to avoid invalidating his initial statements that he said to the woman. Alternatively, it was to endear her in his eyes. “The woman hurried, ran, [and told her husband]” (Judges 13:10). It teaches that all actions of the righteous are with alacrity. “[Behold, the man] who on that day [bayom] came to me, [appeared to me]” (Judges 13:10).

It does not say “today [hayom],” but rather, bayom. It teaches that the angel did not appear to her until the following day, because Manoaḥ did not pray until the morning prayer of the following day, just as it says: “Lord, in the morning hear my voice…” (Psalms 5:4). It teaches that the righteous seek clarity regarding their actions. “[Are you the man who spoke to the woman?] He said: I am” (Judges 13:11); I am initially and I am ultimately, as I am not changing my words.

“Manoaḥ said: Now, let your words come” (Judges 13:12). Manoaḥ said to him: ‘Until now, I have heard from the woman, and women are not qualified to instruct, and one may not rely on their statements. But, “now, let your words come,” I would like to hear from your mouth, as I do not believe her statements; perhaps she made changes in her statement, or subtracted or added.’ “What will be the guidelines for the lad?” (Judges 13:12); what naziriteship must he observe after he is born? “…and his actions?” (Judges 13:12); what shall his mother do all the days that she is pregnant with him?

“The angel of the Lord said to Manoaḥ: “From everything that I said to the woman [let her beware]” (Judges 13:13), in order to accord honor to the woman and endear her to him. “Let her beware” (Judges 13:13), he said to him regarding vinegar of wine, vinegar of intoxicating drink, and the water in which grapes were soaked: “She shall not partake of anything that may be derived from the grapevine and she shall not drink wine or intoxicating drink” (Judges 13:14), in its plain sense.

“And she shall not eat any impurity” (Judges 13:14), just as it says: “And grapes, fresh or dried, he shall not eat” (Numbers 6:3). “Everything that I commanded her, she shall observe” (Judges 13:14); what he said to her: “A razor shall not come upon his head” (Judges 13:5). “Manoaḥ said to the angel of the Lord: Please let us detain [naatzera] you” (Judges 13:15). Manoaḥ said to him: ‘We had been obstructed, just as it says: “For the Lord had obstructed all wombs of the house of Avimelekh” (Genesis 20:18), and you brought us tidings of relief.

Let us make a festival with you, just as it says: “On the eighth day it shall be an assembly [atzeret] for you” (Numbers 29:35). “And we will prepare a young goat before you” (Judges 13:15); you caused us to rejoice and we will rejoice with you with a goat, as rejoicing is only with meat.’ “The angel of the Lord said to Manoaḥ: If you detain me, I will not eat of your food” (Judges 13:16). The angel said to him: ‘It is not the way of the prophets of the Lord to receive payment for their prophecy.’

Regarding false prophets, what does it say? “You profaned Me among My people for handfuls of barley and for crumbs of bread, to kill…” (Ezekiel 13:19). But regarding true prophets, what does it say? “He65Elisha. said: As the Lord before whom I have stood lives, I will not accept” (II Kings 5:16).

“If you would prepare a burnt offering, offer it up to the Lord” (Judges 13:16). The angel intimated to him that he needed to offer up a burnt offering to the Lord in response to the good tidings, just as Abraham did when the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “To your offspring, I will give this land” (Genesis 12:7). Immediately, Abraham built an altar in response to the good tidings, as it is written: “He built an altar to the Lord, who appeared to him” (Genesis 12:7), and an altar is for nothing other than an offering.

“For Manoaḥ did not know that he was an angel of the Lord” (Judges 13:16). Why is it stated? It is because his wife said to him: “His appearance was like the appearance of an angel of God, very awesome” (Judges 13:6); she was under the impression that Manoaḥ identified that he was an angel, but, nevertheless, he invited him to eat, as he was mistaken, believing that there is eating on High. That is why it is stated: “For Manoaḥ did not know that he was an angel of the Lord.”

That is why he invited him to eat. But had he known that he was an angel, he would not have said to him to eat, as he was well-versed in the fact that there is no eating on High. Why did he not identify him? From here you learn that when prophets would go on a mission of the Holy One blessed be He, the Divine Spirit that would rest upon them would confer awesomeness upon them in the eyes of their beholders, as everyone feared them, as they resembled angels.

Why, then, did the angels who came to inform Sarah regarding pregnancy eat, but this one did not want to eat? It is because those angels, when they first appeared to Abraham, they appeared to him in the image of wayfarers, and he brought them into his house as he was accustomed to, and invited them to eat. They did not want to deprive him of the exercise of hospitality and they ate with him. After they ate, they stated their mission.

It did not appear as though they received payment for their mission. But this angel, initially he stated his mission. Had he eaten with him, it would have appeared as though he received payment for his mission. That is why he refrained from eating.

“Mano’aḥ said to the angel of the Lord: What is your name?” (Judges 13:17). It is because he did not identify him as an angel, that is why he asked him regarding his name. “So that when your words come to pass we will honor you [vekhibadnukha]” (Judges 13:17); Manoaḥ said to him: ‘Tell me your name so that I will ask where I might find you when your prophecy comes to pass, and we will give you a gift.’

Vekhibadnukha is nothing other than a gift, just as it says: “For I will honor you [ki khabed akhabedkha]” (Numbers 22:17).66Balak sought to convince Bilam to curse Israel on his behalf, and said he would honor him, meaning he would shower him with gifts of silver and gold. “The angel of the Lord said to him: Why do you ask my name?” (Judges 13:18). The angel said to him: ‘You need not ask my name, as ultimately, you will never see me again.’

That is what is written: “It is inscrutable [vehu feli]” (Judges 13:18). Regarding himself, he said to him that he will be obscured from him, that he will never see him again, just as it says: “This knowledge is inscrutable to me. [It is sublime; I cannot reach it]” (Psalms 139:6). Alternatively, “It is inscrutable [vehu feli]” – the angel said to him: ‘I do not know to tell you my name as, in accordance with the mission upon which the Holy One blessed be He sends us, He calls us a name.’

That is: Vehu feli; in accordance with each and every wonder [pelia uflia] that He performs through us, He calls us a name. Alternatively, vehu feli, it is a name. The name of the angel is feli, based on his mission to render Samson a nazirite, just as it says: “For the lad will be a nazirite to God” (Judges 13:5). This is why He called him feli, like the matter that the verse said: “When a man or a woman will articulate [yafli] [to take the vow of a nazirite]…” (Numbers 6:2).

You find that Moses alluded to the naziriteship of Samson in this portion, to teach you that there is no matter that is written in the Prophets and the Writings to which Moses did not allude in the Torah. “A man” (Numbers 6:2), this is the angel, who came to render Samson a nazirite, who was called a man, just as it says: “Are you the man who spoke to the woman?” (Judges 13:11). “He said: I am” (Judges 13:11).

The angel said to him: ‘You think of me that I am a man, but I am not a man; rather, I am an angel.’ Similarly, “He said: Are you my son Esau? He said: I am” (Genesis 27:24). I am not Esau, but rather, Jacob.67Meaning the word "I" can sometimes mean I am not who you think I am.

“Or a woman” (Numbers 6:2), it is because he first appeared only to the woman. “When…will articulate [yafli]” (Numbers 6:2), as his name is peli. “To take the vow of a nazirite to abstain for the Lord” (Numbers 6:2), “for the lad will be a nazirite of God” (Judges 13:5).

“Speak to the children of Israel…” (Numbers 6:2), it is taught: “Speak to the children of Israel” – Israel take a vow of naziriteship but the idolaters do not take a vow of naziriteship. “And say to them” (Numbers 6:2), to include the slaves. “A man,” but not a minor, “or a woman,” to render the women like the men.68The laws of naziriteship apply to women just as they apply to men. That is what we learned: The Samaritans69There are versions where this reads, the gentiles.

Some say that it comes to teach that the legal status of the Samaritans is equal to that of gentiles. do not have naziriteship, women and slaves have naziriteship. There is a stringency regarding women more than slaves, as one compels his slave70He can compel him not to observe his naziriteship as long as he is in servitude. and does not compel his wife.71If he did not nullify his wife's vow on the day that he heard of the vow, he cannot compel her not to observe her naziriteship.

There is a stringency regarding slaves more than women, as he nullifies the vows of his wife but he does not nullify the vow of his slave. If he nullified for his wife, he has nullified for perpetuity. If he nullified72If he did not allow his slave to observe his naziriteship. for his slave, when he is liberated, he completes his naziriteship. If he passed from his presence,73If the slave fled.

Rabbi Meir says: He may not drink74This is to encourage him to return to his master so he can resume drinking wine. and Rabbi Yosei says: He may drink.75This is so he will not suffer from deprivation which could affect his fitness to serve his master when he returns. “When…will articulate [ki yafli],” one who is able to distinguish [lehaflot]. From here they said: One who is able to distinguish [mufla] and will soon reach majority, his vows take effect.

Alternatively, “when…will articulate” – when one articulates his vow, [this means] to the exclusion of one who ruminates [on becoming a nazir] in their heart. “To take the vow of a nazirite” – why was this portion stated?76A person can take any vow. Why is there a special portion relating to the vow of the nazirite. It is because it says: “If a man takes a vow to the Lord, or takes [an oath]…” (Numbers 30:3); if one took a vow for one day, it is prohibited for one day,77If one takes a vow to abstain from something for one day, the vow obligates him for one day. for two, it is prohibited for two; from the species regarding which he took a vow, from that species he is prohibited.

Do I hear that the same is true regarding naziriteship as well? This is why this portion is stated; whether he took a vow for one day or for one hour, it is prohibited for thirty days to drink wine, to become impure by means of a dead person, and it is prohibited to shave. “To take the vow of a nazirite,” why is “vow” written here?78It could have just said: “To abstain for the Lord.” It is to render naziriteship like vows.

Just as regarding vows one violates: “One shall not profane” (Numbers 30:3) and “you shall not delay” (Deuteronomy 23:22), the same is true regarding naziriteship. And just as regarding vows, the father nullifies the vows of his daughter and the husband violates the vows of his wife, the same is true regarding naziriteship. “A nazirite, to abstain [nazir lehazir],” it is to render substitutes for naziriteship like naziriteship.79Even if someone does not say explicitly that they will be a nazir, but says instead a substitute phrase, it obligates them.

One who says: Behold I am a nazik, naziaḥ, paziaḥ, he is a nazirite. Lehazir, it is, perhaps that he can render others nazirites [sheyazir]? The verse states: “Nazirite” – he can render himself a nazirite but he cannot render others a nazirite. However, there is a halakha transmitted to Moses at Sinai that a man renders his son a nazirite, but a woman does not render her son a nazirite.

Rabbi Yishmael says: Nazir lehazir; [we learn] from here that a person can establish naziriteship during his naziriteship.80See Jerusalem Talmud, Nedarim 1:1. “To abstain for the Lord.” Shimon HaTzadik said: In all my days, I had never eaten the guilt offering of a nazirite. One time, one from the south came and I saw him, that he was ruddy, with beautiful eyes, and a fine appearance, and his locks were curls, arranged in piles.

I said to him: ‘What did you see that led you to destroy this fine hair?’81A nazirite shaves all of his hair when he completes his naziriteship. See Numbers 6:18. He whispered to me: ‘Rabbi, I was a shepherd in my city and I went to fill the vessel with water from the spring. I saw my reflection in the water and my evil inclination quickly overcame me and sought to eliminate me from the world.

I said to it: Wicked one, why are you proud of something that is not yours? It is of dust, worms, and maggots. I will consecrate you to Heaven and shave you for the sake of Heaven.’ I lowered my head and kissed him and I said to him: ‘May there be many like you in Israel, who perform the will of the Omnipresent.’

In your regard, the verse said: “To abstain for the Lord.” Rabbi Mona asked: Why would Shimon HaTzadik not eat the guilt offering of a nazirite? If you say it is because the nazirite is a sinner because he afflicted himself by abstaining from wine, did Shimon HaTzadik not partake of a sin offering of fats, or a sin offering of blood?82A sin offering brought by somebody who ate forbidden fats, or blood.

Shimon Hatzadik believed that people take a vow of naziriteship in anger. Since they vow in anger, they will ultimately come to regret.83When they become impure by means of a corpse and are required to begin the naziriteship anew, they regret having taken the vow at all. Since he regrets, his offerings become tantamount to slaughtering non-consecrated animals in the Temple courtyard. However, since this one took a vow after consideration, his mouth and his heart were in concert.

“From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain: vinegar of wine and vinegar of intoxicating drink he shall not drink; he shall not drink anything in which grapes were soaked, and grapes, fresh or dried, he shall not eat” (Numbers 6:3). “From wine and intoxicating drink…” – that is what is written: “Woe, the valiant to drink wine…who vindicate the wicked following a bribe…” (Isaiah 5:22–23). There it is written: “Happy are you, land, that your king is a free man” (Ecclesiastes 10:17).

When is the land characterized as happy? It is when its king engages in Torah, as it is stated: “The tablets were the work of God [and the writing was the writing of God, engraved [ḥarut] on the tablets]” (Exodus 32:16) – do not read it as ḥarut, but rather, as ḥerut, freedom, as one is a free man [ben ḥorin] only when one engages in Torah study. “And your princes dine at the proper time” (Ecclesiastes 10:17), as they set fixed times for Torah and they eat thereafter, to realize what is stated: “Go, eat your bread with joy, and drink your wine with a good heart, as God has already accepted your actions” (Ecclesiastes 9:7).

That is what is written thereafter: “In valor and not in drunkenness” (Ecclesiastes 10:17), with the valor of Torah, not with the drunkenness of wine. That is why Isaiah said: The valor of Torah is characterized with “happy” (Ecclesiastes 10:17), but the valor of wine is with “woe,” – “woe, the valiant to drink wine” (Isaiah 5:22). Likewise it says: “To whom, woe? To whom, alas….

To those who linger over wine” (Proverbs 23:29–30). “And capable men [anshei ḥayil] to mix intoxicating drink” (Isaiah 5:22). There it is written: “You shall identify from among the people [capable men [anshei ḥayil]]…They shall judge the people…” (Exodus 18:21–22). But these are capable men only to mix intoxicating drink, just as it says: “To those who come to assess the mixture” (Proverbs 23:30).

What is “to mix intoxicating drink”? They would mix strong wine with weak wine in order to become inebriated with it. There was an incident involving a group of dissolute men, who would eat and drink until midnight but would not become inebriated. Wine was brought to them; they said mix wine with wine.

They did so until the wine entered them. They arose and struck one another in a drunken state. Their cry circulated throughout the city. The constable came, apprehended them, transferred them to the custody of the kingdom, and they were all eliminated.

What caused this to befall them? It was the wine that they were drinking. In their regard it is stated: “To those who come to assess the mixture” – the mixture is nothing other than wine mixed with wine. That is, “and capable men to mix intoxicating drink.”

On account of this they forget the Torah and corrupt the law, as it is written thereafter: “Who vindicate the wicked following a bribe” (Isaiah 5:23), and it says: “Lest he drink, and forget what was legislated” (Proverbs 31:5) – he will forget the Torah that was given by means of the lawgiver, this is Moses, as it is stated: “As there the lawgiver’s plot is hidden” (Deuteronomy 33:21). What is written?

“And subvert justice for all the children of the poor” (Proverbs 31:5). Wine and knowledge are likened to the Pleiades and Scorpio. Whenever the Pleiades are visible in the sky, Scorpio is not visible in the sky, and when Scorpio is visible, the Pleiades are not visible. So, wine is likened to Scorpio, and knowledge is likened to the Pleiades.

Just as the scorpion strikes with its tail, so, wine, strikes in its aftermath, as it is stated: “At its end, it bites like a serpent” (Proverbs 23:32). Just as the Pleiades ripens fruits and provides them with flavor, so, knowledge provides flavor and fragrance to a person’s words. Wine enters, knowledge exits. Any place there is wine, there is no knowledge.

Wine enters, a secret emerges; the numerical value of wine [yayin] is seventy84Yod – 10, yod – 10, nun – 50 = 70. and the numerical value of secret [sod] is seventy.85Samekh – 60, vav – 6, dalet – 4 = 70. Knowledge is divided into four portions; two in the two kidneys, one portion in the mouth, and one portion in the heart. From where is it derived that two portions of wisdom are in the two kidneys?

It is as it is stated: “Who set wisdom in obscurity [batuḥot]?” (Job 38:36). These are the kidneys, that are obscured [tuḥot] in the body. And one portion in the heart, as it is stated: “Inform me of wisdom in the closed place” (Psalms 51:8). And one portion in the mouth, as it is stated: “My mouth will speak wisdom” (Psalms 49:4).

Wisdom was placed in these four receptacles and, corresponding to them, the Sages established the measure of inebriation in four receptacles, each containing a quarter log of undiluted wine, which constitute four cups.86Of wine diluted in the customary manner. If a person drank one cup, which is a quarter log, one-quarter of his knowledge has departed. If he drank two cups, two portions of his knowledge have departed.

If he drank three cups, three portions of his knowledge have departed, and his heart is confused. Immediately, he begins speaking inappropriately. If he drank the fourth cup, all of his knowledge has departed. Both his kidneys have gone mad, his heart is confused, and the tongue ceases.

He seeks to speak but cannot. Instead, his tongue is despondent. This is why they said that a priest who drank a quarter log of wine was disqualified from Temple service, and an Israelite who drank a quarter log of wine was disqualified from serving as a judge. This is to teach you that no good emerges from wine.

That is what is written: “From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain: vinegar…” – due to inebriation. Why did the Torah prohibit “anything in which grapes were soaked,” that he would not become inebriated from them? Eating anything that emerges from the grapevine is also prohibited; things from which he would not become inebriated. Why?

From here one learns that a person is obligated to distance himself from impropriety, and from anything resembling impropriety, and from anything that resembles anything that resembles it. From here one learns that the Torah established a fence surrounding its matters. There we learned: Be measured in judgment, establish many students, and establish a fence around the Torah (Mishna Avot 1:1). How does a person establish a fence around his matters, like the Torah did around its matters?

It says: “To a woman in her menstrual impurity you shall not approach” (Leviticus 18:19). May one, perhaps, hug her, kiss her, or speak idle matters with her? The verse states: “You shall not approach.” May she, perhaps, sleep with him on the bed clothed?

The verse states: “You shall not approach.” May she, perhaps, wash her face and line her eyes, and may he take a cup from her? The verse states: “And one who is afflicted with her menstruation [benidata]…” (Leviticus 15:33), as long as she is afflicted, she shall be ostracized [benidui].87From her husband. From here they said: Any woman who makes herself repulsive during the days of her menstruation, the Sages are pleased with her.

But any woman who adorns herself during the days of her menstruation, the Sages are not pleased with her. It says: “Any man shall not approach his kin [to uncover nakedness]” (Leviticus 18:6). From here they said: A man may not enter into seclusion with any women at an inn, even with his sister, even with his daughter, and even with his mother-in-law, due to the [potential] allegations of the people [there].

One may not converse with a woman in the marketplace, even with one’s wife, and it goes without saying with another woman, due to the allegations of the people. Here, it is stated regarding his kin: “You shall not approach [tikrevu], and elsewhere it says: “You shall not approach [tikrav]” (Leviticus 18:19) – to a matter that brings one to a matter of transgression, you shall not approach; distance yourself from impropriety and from anything that resembles impropriety.

For, so said the Sages: Distance yourself from a minor sin, lest it bring you to a major one; run to fulfill a minor mitzva, as it will bring you to a major one. “At its end, it bites like a serpent” – just as the serpent, because it incited Eve to drink wine, the earth was cursed because of it, as it is stated: “Cursed is the earth because of you” (Genesis 3:17), likewise, due to wine, one-third of the world was cursed, as it is stated: “Noah awoke from his wine….

He said: Cursed is Canaan” (Genesis 9:24–25). This is Ḥam, who was his third son, and he is called “the father of Canaan” (Genesis 9:18). Just as this adder sets aside between life and death, so wine sets man aside from the paths of life to the paths of death, as wine causes one to engage in idol worship. That is what is written: “Your eyes will see strange things [zarot]” (Proverbs 23:33), just as it says: “There shall be no strange [zar] god among you” (Psalms 81:10).

Likewise, it says: “He shall not drink anything in which grapes were soaked…from anything that may be derived from the grapevine…” (Number 6:3–4). The Torah established a fence surrounding its matters, that one may not eat and may not drink from anything that is made from the grapevine, so that he will not come to drink. The parable says: ‘Go, go,’ one says to the nazirite, ‘around, around; do not approach the vineyard.’

“From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain,” even if he said only: ‘Behold, I am a nazirite from wine,’ he is a full-fledged nazirite, as we found three matters are prohibited for a nazirite: Drinking wine, shaving hair, and becoming impure due to a dead person. Is one, perhaps, not a nazirite until he abstains from all of them? The verse states: “From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain” – even from one of the three, he is a nazirite.

They said: One who says: ‘Behold I am a nazirite from the [grape] seeds, from the [grape] skins, from shaving, from impurity’ is a nazirite, and all the minutiae of the nazirite are incumbent upon him. Rabbi Yosei HaGelili says: “From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain” – why did the verse repeat “wine and intoxicating drink”? Is wine not intoxicating drink, and is intoxicating drink not wine?

Why did it do so? It is because it says: “You shall eat before the Lord your God, in the place that He will choose…the tithe of your grain, [your wine…]” (Deuteronomy 14:23), is it perhaps that even the nazirite is included? How then do I realize: “From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain”? It is with all other types of wine, with the exception of the wine of mitzva.

Or, is it even with the wine of mitzva? How, then, do I realize the verse: “You shall eat before the Lord your God, in the place that He will choose…the tithe [of your grain, your wine…]”? It is regarding all other people, with the exception of the nazirite. The verse states: “From wine and intoxicating drink he shall abstain,” to render the wine of mitzva as wine that is optional.

Rabbi Elazar HaKapar says: “Wine,” this is diluted, “and intoxicating drink,” this is undiluted. Or, perhaps, it is that “wine,” this is undiluted; “and intoxicating drink,” this is diluted? The verse states: “Its libation is wine, one fourth of a hin…” (Leviticus 23:13), “Pour a libation of intoxicating drink […to the Lord]” (Numbers 28:7). You pour libations of undiluted wine, but you do not pour libations with diluted wine.

Consequently, you must not say like the second formulation, but rather like the first formulation: “Wine,” this is diluted; “and intoxicating drink,” this is undiluted. “He shall abstain [yazir]” – nezirut everywhere is nothing other than separation. Likewise, it says: “They shall abstain [veyinazeru] from the sacred items of the children of Israel” (Leviticus 22:2). And it says: “[You shall not…gather] the grapes that you left untended [nezirekha]” (Leviticus 25:5).

And it says: “They separated themselves [vayinazeru] from me and turned to the shameful” (Hosea 9:10). And it says: “Shall I weep during the fifth month, abstaining [hinazer]?” (Zechariah 7:3). Consequently, nezirut everywhere is nothing other than separation. “He shall abstain” – do I hear, from his commerce and from his healing?

The verse states: “He shall not drink” – drinking is forbidden to him, but his medical needs and his commerce are permitted.88He is allowed to sell wine, and place wine on a wound if necessary. “Vinegar of wine and vinegar of intoxicating drink he shall not drink,” this tells that it rendered vinegar like wine in this regard, and the vinegar of a mitzva like the wine of a mitzva.89If he took a vow to drink vinegar and then vowed to become a nazirite, he cannot drink the vinegar.

“Anything in which…were soaked” – it tells that if one soaked grapes in water, its status is determined by the flavor.90If the water tastes like wine, it is prohibited for him. From here you expound to all Torah prohibitions: If what is derived from the vine, the prohibition of which is not an eternal prohibition,91The prohibitions of the nazirite are limited in time. At the time of the vow the person determines the amount of time that he will be a nazirite (with a thirty day minimum). and the prohibition of which is not a prohibition against benefit,92A nazirite may not drink wine, but he may benefit from wine.

For example, he can sell wine. and there is dissolution of the prohibition,93A nazirite can have his vow abrogated if he has a sufficient reason. it rendered flavor the same as substance; the rest of the Torah prohibitions, prohibitions that are eternal, prohibitions that are prohibitive of benefit, and there is no dissolution of the prohibitions, is it not logical that we would render flavor the same as substance?

“And grapes,” in their plain sense; “fresh” to include the unripe; “or dried, he shall not eat,” to incur liability for this by itself, and for that by itself. From here you expound to all nazirite prohibitions. If, here, where it is one species with two names, one incurs liability for this by itself and for that by itself, so, too, in all cases where there is one species with two names, one incurs liability for this by itself and for that by itself.94If he was warned not to eat grapes and nevertheless ate fresh grapes and dried grapes, he gets punished twice, once for eating fresh grapes and once for eating dried grapes. This comes to include new wine and grapes, that he incurs liability for two.

“All the days of his naziriteship, from anything that may be derived from the grapevine, from seeds to skin, he shall not eat” (Numbers 6:4). “All the days of his naziriteship, from anything…” – the verse comes to teach you that if someone ate an olive-bulk from all of them, he is flogged forty lashes. From here you expound to all Torah prohibitions: If what is derived from the vine, whose prohibition is not an eternal prohibition, and the prohibition is not a prohibition of benefit, and there is dissolution of the prohibition, they join each other to constitute an olive-bulk, the rest of the Torah prohibitions, which are eternal prohibitions, and the prohibitions are prohibitions of benefit, and there is no dissolution of the prohibitions, it is logical that they would join each other to constitute an olive-bulk.

“From anything that may be derived from the grapevine” – I hear even the leaves and the tendrils are included? The verse states: “From seeds to skin” – just as the detail is explicit, the fruit and the waste of the fruit, so I include only the fruit and the waste of the fruit, to the exclusion of leaves and tendrils, that are not fruit or waste of the fruit. “Meḥartzanim” – the minimum of “ḥartzanim” is two; “ad zag,” one, this is the statement of Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya.

Which are ḥartzanim and which are zagim? The ḥartzanim are the external and the zagim are the internal, just as it says: “Golden bell and pomegranate” (Exodus 28:34), and we translate it: The clapper [zaga]95The zag is on the inside of the bell. of gold and a pomegranate; this is the statement of Rabbi Yehuda. Rabbi Yosei says: So you shall not be mistaken, it is like the bell [zug] of an animal; the external is zug while the internal is inbal.

“He shall not eat” – eating is no less than an olive-bulk. From here one learns that the prohibitions of a nazirite are an olive-bulk.96A nazirite is liable for punishment if he eats an olive-bulk or more.

“All the days of his abstinence to the Lord, he shall not approach a dead person” (Numbers 6:6). “All the days of his abstinence to the Lord….” Come and see that anyone who sanctifies himself below, they sanctify him above. This one, because he abstains from wine and conducts himself with suffering in that he does not shave the hair of his head in order to protect himself from transgression, the Holy One blessed be He says: ‘He is considered before Me like a High Priest.’

Just as it is prohibited for a priest to become impure for all corpses, so it is prohibited for a nazirite to become impure for all corpses. Just as regarding the High Priest, it is written: “For the crown of the anointing oil of his God is on him” (Leviticus 21:12), so, by the nazirite it says: “For the crown of his God is on his head” (Numbers 6:7). Just as regarding the priest, it is written: “Aaron was set apart, to sanctify him as most holy” (I Chronicles 23:13), so, the nazirite is called holy, as it is stated: “All the days of his naziriteship he is holy to the Lord” (Numbers 6:8).

Come and see how much the mitzvot adorn Israel. Does growing hair long not render a person repulsive, as he is unable to shampoo his hair? But because he grows it for the sake of Heaven, the verse characterizes it as a crown for his head. That is what is written: “For the crown of his God is on his head.”

“All the days of his abstinence...” – a nazirite whose days are completed110But who did not yet bring the sacrifice which terminates the naziriteship. is forbidden to drink, to shave, and to become impure due to dead people. If he shaved, drank wine, or became impure due to dead people, he incurs forty lashes. Regarding wine, from where is it derived that he is flogged? It is written: “All the days of his naziriteship [from anything that may be derived from the grapevine…he shall not eat]” (Numbers 6:4), rendering the days after completion like the days before completion.

Regarding shaving, from where is it derived? It is as it is written: “All the days of the vow of his naziriteship, [a razor shall not pass on his head]” (Numbers 6:5), to include the days after completion like the days before completion. Regarding impurity, from where is it derived? It is as it is written: “All the days of his abstinence to the Lord, [he shall not approach a dead person],” rendering the days after completion like the days before completion.

Three categories are prohibited for the nazirite; impurity, shaving, and what is derived from the grapevine. Impurity, from where is it derived? It is as it is written: “All the days of his abstinence to the Lord, [he shall not approach] a dead person.” Shaving, from where is it derived?

It is as it is written: “All the days of the vow of his naziriteship, a razor shall not pass on his head.” (Numbers 6:5) What is derived from the grapevine, from where is it derived? It is as it is written: “All the days of his naziriteship, from anything that may be derived from the grapevine [he shall not eat]” (Numbers 6:4). There is a stringency in impurity and shaving, more than in what may be derived from the grapevine, as impurity and shaving voids the naziriteship and what emerges from the grapevine does not void.

There is a stringency in what may be derived from the grapevine, more than in impurity and shaving, as what may be derived from the grapevine has no allowance at all, but shaving for a mitzva, e.g., a leper, as it is derived from the extraneous “his head”111Leviticus 14:9. that is stated regarding the leper to include a nazirite leper, that he shaves. And there is an allowance to become impure for a met mitzva.112This is a corpse with no one to bury it.

There is a stringency in impurity more than in shaving, as impurity voids everything and one is obligated to bring an offering for it, but shaving voids only thirty days and one is not obligated to bring an offering for it. “He shall not approach [lo yavo] a dead person [nefesh met].” I hear that even dead animals [nafshot behema] are included, like the matter that is stated: “One who kills an animal [nefesh behema]” (Leviticus 24:18).

The verse states: “For his father and for his mother […he shall not become impure]” (Numbers 6:7); regarding what matter is the verse speaking? It is regarding dead people. Rabbi Yishmael says: This is not necessary. It says lo yavo; it is regarding the dead who impurify through bia,113Entry under the same roof as the corpse. and these are dead people.

“For his father,” why is it stated? It is because it [the law] is broad regarding a common priest: “He shall not become impure from a dead person among his people” (Leviticus 21:1) and then it permits him regarding relatives: “Except for his relative [who is close to him: For his mother, for his father, for his son, for his daughter, for his brother]” (Leviticus 21:2); perhaps the same is true regarding the nazirite?

The verse states: “For his father,” saying that he may not become impure for relatives. “And for his mother,” why is it stated? It is because it says regarding the nazirite: “He shall not become impure for them upon their death” (Numbers 6:7). Rabbi says: Upon their deaths he may not become impure, but for their leprosy or for their ziva,114See Leviticus 15:1–15, 25–30. he may become impure.

Regarding the High Priest, from where is it derived? The verse states: “And for his mother” (Leviticus 21:11), regarding the High Priest, which was unnnecesary for me, as it is already an a fortiori inference: If in an instance where a common priest may become impure for his paternal brother, the High Priest may not become impure for his father, in an instance where a common priest may not become impure for his maternal brother, it follows that the High Priest may not become impure from his mother.

If you obtained this logically, why does the verse state: “And for his mother,” regarding the High Priest? It is here in order to derive and learn a verbal analogy from it. “His mother” is stated regarding the High Priest and “his mother” is stated regarding the nazirite. Just as “his mother” that is written regarding the nazirite [is regarding her death], but he may become impure for her leprosy or for her ziva, so, too, regarding “his mother” that is written regarding the High Priest, he may become impure for her leprosy of for her ziva.

“For his brother” (Numbers 6:7), why is it stated? For his brother he may not become impure, but he may become impure for a met mitzva. “And for his sister” (Numbers 6:7), why is it stated? One who was going to slaughter his Paschal lamb and to circumcise his son and he heard that a relative of his died, shall he, perhaps, become impure?

You said: “He shall not become impure for them upon their death.” Shall he, perhaps, not become impure for a met mitzva? The verse states: “For his sister,” for his sister he does not become impure, but he becomes impure for a met mitzva. “For his brother” is stated to permit him to become impure for a met mitzva, which is only a prohibition: “He shall not become impure for them.”

“And for his sister” is to permit him to become impure even in the place of the Paschal lamb and circumcision, for which one incurs liability for karet. But for his son and for his daughter are not stated, as minors cannot become nazirites. Rabbi Akiva says: Nefesh, these are those who are unrelated. Met, these are those who are relatives.

“For his father” he may not become impure, but he may become impure for a met mitzva. If “for his father” is stated, why is “and for his mother” stated? Had his father been stated and his mother had not been stated, I would have said: This is why he may not become impure for him, because he [his status as his father] is based on presumed status, but his mother, who certainly bore him, let him become impure for her.

And had the All Merciful written "his mother," I would have said: It is for his mother that he may not, as her offspring are not attributed to her, but his father, because the verse said: “By their families, by their patrilineal houses” (Numbers 1:2); let us say that he may become impure for him. That is why “for his father” is stated. “For his brother” – that were he a High Priest and a nazirite, he may not become impure for his brother, but he may become impure for a met mitzva.

“And for his sister” – that were he going to slaughter his Paschal lamb or to circumcise his son, he may not become impure for his sister, but he may become impure for a met mitzva. “He shall not become impure for them upon their death,” but he stands there at the eulogy and at the line.115This is the line of those comforting the mourners. This is in contradistinction to the High Priest, who is not present at those occasions.

Rabbi says: Upon their death” he does not become impure, but he becomes impure for their leprosy and for their ziva. “For the crown of his God is on his head,” to relate what is the cause.

“All the days of his naziriteship he is holy to the Lord” (Numbers 6:8). “All the days of his naziriteship he is holy to the Lord.” Why is it stated? Because it says: “until completion of the days” (Numbers 6:5) – I only have those for whom there is an end to their naziriteship, from where do I derive [the concept that there may be] an eternal nazirite? The verse states: “All the days of his naziriteship,” to include an eternal nazirite. “He is holy to the Lord,” this is the sanctity of the body.116That he may not make it impure through coming in contact with a corpse.

If a corpse shall die near him with unexpected suddenness, and make impure his consecrated head, he shall shave his head on the day of his purification, on the seventh day he shall shave it” (Numbers 6:9). “If a corpse shall die near him” – this is in a case where the impurity is clear; to the exclusion of a case of uncertainty, this is the impurity of the depths.117When the nazir became impure from a concealed or buried corpse which nobody was aware of at the time the nazir came in contact with it.

Which is the impurity of the depths? It is any case where there is no one, even at the ends of the earth, who can identify it [the corpse]. If there were one at the ends of the earth who could identify it, this is not the impurity of the depths. If it was concealed in hay or pebbles, this is the impurity of the depths.

If it was in water, darkness, or boulder crevices, this is not the impurity of the depths. They said impurity of the depths only regarding a corpse alone. “With unexpected suddenness [befeta pitom],” Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Befeta, this is unwitting, as it says: “With suddenness [befeta], without enmity, he pushed him” (Numbers 35:22).118This is one of the examples of an unwitting murderer. Pitom, this is by force of circumstance, as it says: “The Lord said pitom to Moses, [Aaron and Miriam]” (Numbers 12:4).

The Rabbis say: Pitom is intentional, as it says: “But simpletons [uftayim] continued and were punished” (Proverbs 22:3). Alternatively, pitom, this is unwitting, as it is written: “A peti will believe anything” (Proverbs 14:15). If pitom can mean intentional, by force of circumstance and unwitting, why did the verse need to write befeta to include the unwitting?119The word pitom can mean intentional, by force of circumstance, or unwitting, so why did the verse also use the word befeta?

Had befeta not been written, I would have said that one brings an offering for his impurity where he was impure unwittingly, just as it is throughout the entire Torah, but if it was by force of circumstance or intentional, I would say that he is not. The All Merciful wrote peta, which is unwitting, to reveal regarding pitom, that it is by force of circumstance or intentional, and nevertheless, he is obligated to bring an offering for his impurity.

“And make impure his consecrated head, [he shall shave his head]” – regarding one who was ritually pure and became impure, he is obligated in the removal of hair and the bringing of an offering, and to exempt a nazirite located at a grave.120Who at the time of the vow was impure because he was in a graveyard. “He shall shave his head” – he shaves his head but he does not shave all his hair. “On the day of his purification,” it is on the day of his sprinkling, on the seventh.

Do you say: On the day of his sprinkling, on the seventh, or on the eighth? The verse states: “On the seventh day he shall shave it.” If on the seventh, even though he did not sprinkle? The verse states: “On the day of his purification” – on the day of his sprinkling.

“On the seventh day” – I have only the seventh, from where do I derive the eighth, ninth, and tenth?121That if he did not shave on the seventh day, he can shave at a later date. The verse states: “He shall shave it.” I have only during the day, from where do I derive at night? The verse states: “He shall shave it.”

I have only shaving in impurity, from where do I derive shaving in purity?122That he can shave at night also when he shaves in purity. The verse states: "He shall shave it." How so? He would sprinkle on the third and the seventh, shave on the seventh, and bring his offerings on the eighth. If he shaved on the eighth, he brings his offering on that same day; this is the statement of Rabbi Akiva.

“And on the eighth day he shall bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons, to the priest, to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 6:10). “And on the eighth day” – to exclude the seventh, or is it to exclude the ninth? “Eighth” is stated here and “eighth” is stated elsewhere: “And from the eighth day on” (Leviticus 22:27). Just as “eighth” stated elsewhere, it allowed in that regard the eighth and from the eighth on, so, too, “eighth” stated here allows in its regard the eighth and from the eighth on.

Had it said “turtledoves,” would it be, perhaps, many? The verse states: "He shall bring two turtledoves” – I said only two. May one, perhaps, bring turtledoves and young pigeons? The verse states: “Or two young pigeons.”

May one, perhaps, bring one young bird from this and one young bird from that? The verse states: “He shall bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons.” From here they said: One does not bring a turtledove opposite a young pigeon, nor a young pigeon opposite a turtle dove.123One may not bring one as a burnt offering and one as a sin offering. “To the priest, to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting,” it teaches that one must tend to those he is bringing until he brings them to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting.

“The priest shall offer one as a sin offering, and one as a burnt offering, and atone for him, for what he sinned regarding the corpse, and he shall sanctify his head on that day” (Numbers 6:11). “The priest shall offer one as a sin offering, and one as a burnt offering," that the priest will designate them, one as a sin offering and one as a burnt offering in the course of their preparation. I have only designation by the priest, from where do I derive by the owner?

It is stated regarding a birth mother: “She shall take two turtledoves or two young pigeons, one as a burnt offering and one as a sin offering" (Leviticus 12:8); the owners designate [them] at the time they buy them. Consequently, we have learned here: Designation by the priest and designation by the owner. And consequently, we have learned here: An undesignated pair, when is the priest required to designate them?

When the owners set them aside for an offering but left them undesignated. And consequently, we have learned here: A designated pair is when the owners designated which is for a burnt offering, and which is for a sin offering. “And atone for him, for what he sinned regarding the corpse,” due to impurity from corpses, this is the statement of Rabbi Yishmael. Rabbi Elazar says: Since he sinned against his soul, as he afflicted himself by abstaining from wine.

Are these matters not inferred a fortiori? If one who afflicted himself by abstaining from wine requires atonement, all the more so one who afflicted himself by abstaining from all matters.124This is the basis for the opinion of the Sage that anyone who fasts is called a sinner (Ta’anit 11a). “He shall dedicate to the Lord the days of his naziriteship, and he shall bring a lamb in its first year as a guilt offering and the first days shall be void, as his naziriteship was impure” (Numbers 6:12).

“And shall sanctify his head on that day…He shall dedicate to the Lord the days of his naziriteship” (Numbers 6:11–12); consequently, we have learned that someone begins counting from the day that he shaved, this is the statement of Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Yehuda. Rabbi says: “And atone for him, for what he sinned regarding the corpse, and shall sanctify his head on that day” (Numbers 6:11) – on the day of the bringing of his offerings.

“He shall dedicate to the Lord the days of his naziriteship.” All the guilt offerings in the Torah prevent atonement [if they are not brought] except for this one. Could it be, perhaps, that this one prevents it? The verse states: He shall dedicate…and shall bring” – even though he has not brought [the guilt offering], he has dedicated.

In the name of Rabbi Yishmael they said: This one, too, prevents it, as it is stated: “He shall dedicate to the Lord.” When? “And he shall bring a lamb in its first year as a guilt offering.” “He shall dedicate to the Lord the days of his naziriteship.”

From where is it derived that he is prohibited from becoming impure due to a corpse on the days following his naziriteship like [during] the days of his naziriteship, until the bringing of the offering? The verse states: “Then the nazirite may drink wine” (Numbers 6:20). Does the nazirite drink wine? Rather, it is here in order to derive and learn a verbal analogy from it.

Here, nazirite is stated, and there nazirite is stated. Just as regarding the nazirite stated elsewhere,125With regard to drinking wine. it rendered the days after naziriteship like the days during naziriteship until the bringing of the offering, so, too, regarding the nazirite stated here, it renders the days after naziriteship like the days during naziriteship until the bringing of the offering, “He shall bring a sheep,” and not a ram.

“In its first year,” of its own, and not one year according to the years of the world.126The age of the animal is determined by its birthday, and is not considered a year older as soon as Rosh HaShana arrives. “As a guilt offering,” this is a penalty. Rabbi Shimon said: We have not found a guilt offering that comes to void, other than this one alone, as it is written after it: “And the first days shall be void.”

“And the first days shall be void” – one who has earlier and later days voids it. From where is it derived that if one said: ‘I am a nazirite for one hundred days’ and became impure after one hundred minus one day, from where is it derived that it voids it all? The verse states: “And the first days shall be void” – one who has later days, voids, and this one has latter days. If he became impure on day one hundred, does it, perhaps, void everything?

The verse states: “And the [first] days…” – by inference, there are later days, and this has no latter days. Or even if he became impure at the beginning of the one hundred, does it void everything? The verse states: “And the first days shall be void” – one who has earlier days, voids, and this one has no earlier days. “As his naziriteship was impure,” – impurity voids everything, but shaving does not void everything, but only thirty days, as we require “shall grow long” (Numbers 6:5). Impurity voids, but wine does not void.

“This is the law of the nazirite, on the day of the completion of the days of his naziriteship he shall bring it to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 6:13). “This is the law of the nazirite” the law for both a nazirite for [a specific period of] days, and an eternal nazirite. Do you, perhaps, include the naziriteship of Samson?127There is a form of naziriteship called the naziriteship of Samson which is distinct from an eternal naziriteship, as described in the midrash here.

The verse states: “This,” as they said: What is the difference between an eternal nazirite and a Samson nazirite? If the hair of an eternal nazirite becomes heavy, he may ease it with a razor, and he brings three animals.128He brings the three offerings, a sin offering, a burnt offering, and a peace offering, brought by a standard nazirite when he shaves at the end of his naziriteship. If he becomes impure, he brings an impurity offering.

If the hair of a Samson nazirite becomes heavy, he may not ease it with a razor and if he becomes impure, he does not bring an impurity offering. Rabbi says: Avshalom was an eternal nazirite, as it is stated: “It was at the end of forty years, and Avshalom said to the king: Please let me go and pay my vow that I vowed to the Lord in Hebron. For your servant took a vow while I lived in Geshur in Aram, saying: If the Lord restores me to Jerusalem, I will worship the Lord” (II Samuel 15:7–8).

What is “at the end of forty years”? Rabbi Nehorai says in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua: At the end of forty years since they requested a king for them. That year that they requested a king for them was the tenth year of Samuel of Rama. Avshalom would shave once every twelve months, this is the statement of Rabbi, as it is stated: “…It was at the end yamim leyamim that he would cut his hair, for it weighed upon him and he would cut his hair; he would weigh the hair of his head; it was two hundred shekels, by the king's weight” (II Samuel 14:26).

Yamim is stated here, and elsewhere it is stated: “Its redemption shall be yamim” (Leviticus 25:29). Just as there it is twelve months, so, too, here, it is twelve months. Rabbi Nehorai says: He would cut his hair once every thirty days, just as the priests cut their hair, as it is stated: “They shall not grow long hair, they shall trim the hair of their heads” (Ezekiel 44:20). Rabbi Yosei says: From Shabbat eve to Sabbat eve, as we find that princes cut their hair from Shabbat eve to Shabbat eve.

“This is the law” – for a purity offering or even for an impurity offering? The verse states: “On the day of the completion of the days of his naziriteship” – I said it only regarding one for whom there is an end to his naziriteship. “On the day of the completion,” he shall bring during the day, but not at night. “He shall bring it [oto]” – he shall bring himself, and other do not compel him to come.

This is one of three instances of et in the Torah that Rabbi Yishmael expounds. “They will cause them [otam] to bear the iniquity of guilt” (Leviticus 22:16). Did others cause them, rather they caused it to themselves? Similarly, you say: “He buried him [oto] in the valley” (Deuteronomy 34:6).

Did others bury him, or rather he buried himself? Here, too, you say: He shall bring it [oto]. He shall bring himself, and other do not compel him to come.

“He shall sacrifice his offering to the Lord: One unblemished lamb in its first year as a burnt offering, one unblemished ewe in its first year as a sin offering, and one unblemished ram as a peace offering” (Numbers 6:14). “He shall sacrifice his offering to the Lord,” it tells that the animal is consecrated to the Lord. “In its first year,” of its own [life], and not one year according to the years.

“Unblemished,” to exclude a blemished animal. “One,” and not two. “One,” that his consecration should be exclusively for God’s name. “As a burnt offering,” its consecration shall be for the sake of a burnt offering: “A ewe,” is it, perhaps, two?129Clearly, the verse means one.

The verse states: “One.” It says “one,” as one does not shave for two naziriteships together.130Rather, one must bring separate offerings for each naziriteship. “In its first year,” one year of its own, and not one year according to the years. “Unblemished,” to exclude a blemished animal.

“As a sin offering,” its consecration shall be for the sake of a sin offering: “A ram,” is it, perhaps, two? The verse states: “One.” It says “one”; as one shaves over one offering.131Even if the nazirite only brought the peace offering he may shave his head. “Unblemished,” to exclude a blemished animal.

“As a peace offering,” its consecration shall be for the sake of a peace offering. It teaches regarding the nazirite that he must bring three animals.

“And a basket of unleavened bread, loaves of high quality flour mixed with oil, and wafers of unleavened bread smeared with oil, and their meal offering, and their libations” (Numbers 6:15). “And a basket of unleavened bread,” there is a mitzva to bring it in a basket. I have only a basket, from where is it derived to include other vessels? The verse states: “A basket [sal],” “and a basket [vesal].”132The extra vav is expounded to include other vessels.

“And a basket of unleavened bread”; a generalization, “loaves…and wafers of unleavened bread”; a detail; the generalization includes only what is in the detail. It teaches that it does not require four different types, like the thanks offering. “Unleavened bread, loaves of high quality flour mixed with oil, and wafers of unleavened bread smeared with oil” – why was it necessary to mention unleavened bread in relation to the wafers?

It is because otherwise, I could have applied smearing to the loaves or mixing to the wafers. The verse states: “Unleavened bread,” regarding unleavened bread they are equal, but are not equal regarding mixing and spreading. “And wafers of unleavened bread smeared with oil,” is it, perhaps, performed in the manner of the smearers?133They typically smear the entire wafer. The verse states: “With oil,” enough to fulfill the mitzva of oil.

How does he do so? He dips his finger and places one annointment on this one and one anointment on that one.134One anointment per wafer, but he does not smear the entire wafer. “And their meal offering, and their libations” – for the burnt offering and for the peace offering, or, is it even for the sin offering and the guilt offering? Just as it is stated regarding the leper, who brings a meal offering with his sin offering, his guilt offering, and his burnt offering, as it is stated: “On the eighth day he shall take two unblemished lambs, and one unblemished ewe…[and three-tenths of an ephah of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering, and one log of oil]” (Leviticus 14:10).

He would bring three-tenths of an ephah, one-tenth for each and every kind. Is is, perhaps, the same regarding a nazirite? The verse states: “And the ram he shall prepare as a peace offering…[and the priest shall perform its meal offering, and its libation]” (Numbers 6:17). Was the ram not included in the generalization “and their meal offering and their libations”?

But it emerged from the generalization and taught regarding the generalization: Just as the ram, which is a peace offering, is unique in that it comes as a vow and as a gift offering and requires libations, so, too, everything that comes as a vow or as a gift offering requires libations.135This excludes sin offerings and guilt offerings that were brought only if one sinned.

“The priest shall bring them before the Lord, and shall perform his sin offering, and his burnt offering (Numbers 6:16). This teaches that the sin offering is sacrificed before the burnt offering in every instance. “And the ram, he shall prepare as a peace offering to the Lord, with the basket of unleavened bread, and the priest shall perform its meal offering, and its libation” (Numbers 6:17). “And the ram, he shall prepare as a peace offering.” This tells us that the burnt offering precedes the peace offering. “With the basket of unleavened bread” – he shall have the bread precede the slaughter of the ram, as the bread is sanctified only with the blood of the slaughter. “And the priest shall perform his meal offering…” – this is for the purpose that we stated.136At the end of section 19.

“The nazirite shall shave his consecrated head at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, and shall take the hair of his consecrated head, and he shall place it on the fire that is beneath the peace offering” (Numbers 6:18). “The nazirite shall shave his consecrated head at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting.” Rabbi Yoshiya says: It is with regard to the peace offering that the verse is speaking.137The nazirite should shave his hair after the peace offering is sacrificed.

Or, it is only “at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting,” in its plain sense. You said: If the Torah said this: “You shall not ascend on stairs to My altar, [so that your nakedness will not be exposed upon it]” (Exodus 20:23), all the more so regarding a disgraceful act – that he should not shave. Why, then, does the verse state: “At the entrance of the Tent of Meeting”? The verse is speaking of the peace offering, in whose regard it is written: “He shall slaughter it at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting” (Leviticus 3:2).

Rabbi Yitzḥak says: It is unnecessary. It says: “And he shall take the hair of his consecrated head, and he shall place it on the fire that is beneath [the peace offering]”; this is regarding something that is lacking taking and placing, and not something that is lacking taking, bringing, and placing. That is, in the place that he would cook, there he would shave. I have only that he shaves in the Temple.

From where is it derived even in the rest of the country? It says: “Shall shave [gilaḥ],” “and…shall shave [vegilaḥ],”138The midrash is using the letter vav at the beginning of the word as a source for the halakha stated. even in the rest of the country. What is the difference between one who shaves at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting and one who shaves in the rest of the country? One who shaves at the entrance to the Tent of Meering casts the hair beneath the pot,139This is the pot in which the peace offering is cooked. but one who shaves in the rest of the country does not cast his hair beneath the pot.

“The nazirite shall shave…at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting.” Abba Ḥanan said in the name of Rabbi Elazar: If the entrance was not open, he would not shave. He would take the gravy and place it on the hair of his consecrated head and cast it beneath the pot of the peace offering, as it is stated: “And he shall place it on the fire that is beneath the peace offering [zevaḥ hashelamim]” – from his offering [mizivḥo], he shall place beneath it.

“The peace offering” – I have only beneath the peace offering, beneath the sin-offering, from where is it derived? The verse states: Zevaḥ, in any case.140Any type of offering. I have only if he burns it when he shaves in the Temple, in the rest of the country from where is it derived? The verse states: “And he shall place it on the fire,” in any case.

“The priest shall take the cooked foreleg of the ram, and one loaf of unleavened bread from the basket, and one wafer of unleavened bread, and he shall place them on the palms of the nazirite, after he has shaved his consecrated head” (Numbers 6:19). “The priest shall take the cooked foreleg” – “cooked” is nothing other than complete.141From the fact that it does not say flesh, but rather the foreleg, it means that the foreleg must be complete.

Another matter, “the priest shall take the cooked foreleg,” is it, perhaps, raw? The verse states: “Cooked.” If cooked, is it perhaps, [cooked separately,] in and of itself? The verse states: “Of the ram.”

It teaches that it was cooked with the ram. How would he perform it? He would cut it until he would leave a hairbreadth; neither would the sacred absorb from the non-sacred, nor would the non-sacred absorb from the sacred. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said in the name of bar Kappara: All prohibited items that impart flavor are nullified in a mixture of one to one hundred.

Rabbi Ḥiyya and Rabbi Yehoshua said in the name of bar Kappara: All prohibited items that impart flavor are nullified in a mixture of one to sixty. Both of them derive it from the nazirite’s lamb. The one who says one to one hundred, you estimate the foreleg is one one-hundreth of the ram. The one who says one to sixty, you estimate the foreleg is one-sixtieth.

The one who says one one-hundredth, you remove the bones from the foreleg. The one who says one-sixtieth, you do not remove the bones from the foreleg. Perhaps, just as you remove the bones from the foreleg, so, remove the bones from the ram. You cannot, as it is taught: The waste of the teruma does not join the teruma to neutralize the non-sacred produce, but the waste of the non-sacred produce joins the non-sacred produce to neutralize the teruma.

“And one loaf of unleavened bread from the basket” – if it broke, or if part of it is missing, it is disqualified. “He shall place them on the palms of the nazirite, after he shaved his naziriteship.” These are after he has shaved his consecrated head, but the bringing of his offering is not after he has shaved his consecrated head.

“The priest shall wave them as a wave offering before the Lord, it is sacred for the priest, with the breast of waving and with the haunch of lifting, and then the nazirite may drink wine” (Numbers 6:20). “The priest shall wave them.” The priest places his hands beneath the hands of the nazirite and waves. How does he wave?

He waves to and fro. From where is it derived that he would raise and lower? It is as it is stated: “That was waved and that was raised” (Exodus 29:27). It juxtaposes raising to waving.

Just as waving, one waves to and fro, so, too, raising, one waves to and fro. And just as raising, one raises and lowers, so, with waving, one raises and lowers. From here they said: The mitzva of waving, one waves to and fro and raises and lowers. Waving, one performs one wave, not two.

“Before the Lord,” in the east, as everywhere that it is stated: “Before the Lord,” it is in the east unless it is otherwise specified in the verse. “It is sacred for the priest, with the breast of waving and with the haunch of lifting.” Is the nazirite’s ram not included in: “For [I have taken] the breast of waving and the haunch of lifting [from the children of Israel, from their peace offerings, and have given them to Aaron the priest and to his sons as an eternal allotment from the children of Israel]”? (Leviticus 7:34).

Why is it stated here? It is because the law regarding the nazirite’s ram addressed a new matter; that it requires the separation of the foreleg.142In a regular peace offering the foreleg is not separated and given to the priest. Is it, perhaps, limited to its novel element? That is why the verse needed to restore it to its general principle; that it requires separation of the breast and the haunch.

“Then the nazirite may drink wine.” Is this after a single act, or is it only after all the actions? It is written here: “Then the nazirite may drink wine.” It is written there: “After he has shaved his consecrated head” (Numbers 6:19). Just as there, it is after a single action, so, too, here it is after a single action.

“This is the law of the nazirite who vows, his offering to the Lord for his naziriteship, besides what he can afford; in accordance with his vow that he vows, so he shall perform with the law of his naziriteship” (Numbers 6:21). “This is the law of the nazirite…” I have only for the present, from where is it derived for the generations that this matter will be practiced in Shilo and in the eternal Temple?

The verse states: “The law.” Will the nazirite offering be, perhaps, in practice, even on improvised altars? The verse states: “This.”143“This” is a restrictive term, excluding improvised altars. “His offering to the Lord for his naziriteship,” but not his naziriteship for his offering.144The order is naziriteship, followed by offering.

“His offering to the Lord for his naziriteship,” just as one is liable for misappropriation of an offering, so, too, one is liable for misappropriation of the hair. “Besides what he can afford,” is [being] a nazirite contingent on what he can afford? How so? “His offering to the Lord for his naziriteship” – where he separated from his own.

“Besides what he can afford” – where others separated for him so he could gain atonement with their gift. “In accordance with his vow that he vows.” From where do you say that if one said: ‘I am a nazirite in order to shave over one hundred burnt offerings and over one hundred peace offerings’ that he is obligated to bring them all? The verse states: “In accordance with his vow.”

Or, even if he said: ‘I am a nazirite in order to shave over one hundred sin offerings and over one hundred guilt offerings’ that he would be obligated to bring them? The verse states: “That he vows.” I said only regarding consecrated items that come as vows or gift offerings, excluding sin offerings and guilt offerings that do not come as vows or gift offerings. “So he shall perform with the law of his naziriteship.”

Or, even if he said: ‘I am a nazirite on condition that I can drink wine and become impure to corpses,’ do I read in his regard: “In accordance with his vow”? The verse states: “So he shall perform with the law of his naziriteship.” Or, even if he said: ‘Five naziriteships are incumbent upon me that I will shave one shave that will be effective for all of them,’ do I read in his regard: “In accordance with his vow”?

The verse states: “So he shall perform with the law of his naziriteship.”145In both cases, once he takes a vow of naziriteship, all the details of the laws of naziriteship take effect upon him.

Rabbi Shemaya would say: What did the Torah see that led it to be lenient regarding an impure nazirite, in that he brings turtledoves or young pigeons?146One as a sin offering and one as a burnt offering. It is because when he became a nazirite, his intent was for the sake of Heaven, and when he became impure, he lost everything that he had done and went back to the beginning. That is why the Torah had mercy on him, to absolve him with the offering of a poor person.

Why is the guilt offering a lamb? It is because he did not protect himself from impurity. The Torah penalized him so that he would accept naziriteship in purity. Why does a pure nazirite bring three types of offerings?

It is in order to permit three matters that are prohibited for him: Anything derived from the grapevine, shaving, and impurity. He would bring the sin offering to permit impurity, the burnt offering to permit shaving, and the peace offering to permit what is derived from the grapevine. Because two prohibitions are written regarding eating what is derived from the grapevine, that is why he would bring two types of bread with the peace offering.

Libations for the burnt offering and for the peace offering correspond to the two prohibitions of drinking, to permit them. Why would he separate the foreleg from the nazirite’s peace offering? It is to strengthen his arm.147So that he would be able to withstand the evil inclination when he resumed drinking wine. Why does the portion of the nazirite follow the portion of the sota, and after the portion of the nazirite, the Priestly Benediction?

It is because they would say to the sota: ‘My daughter, wine accomplishes much. It is the way of a woman only to separate herself from wine like a nazirite.’ They stipulate in her regard everything that is stated in the portion. If she was pure, “she will be absolved and conceive offspring” (Numbers 5:28). Priests, who bless Israel, will emerge from her.

“Speak to Aaron and to his sons, saying: So you shall bless the children of Israel; say to them:” (Numbers 6:23). “So you shall bless the children of Israel…” – that is what is written: “Do not envy a man of villainy, and do not choose any of his ways” (Proverbs 3:31). “A man of villainy” – this is the wicked Esau; “man” – just as it says: “Esau was a man who knew hunting” (Genesis 25:27); “villainy” – just as it says: “For the villainy to your brother Jacob” (Obadiah 1:10).

What is it that it said: “Do not envy”? It is because it was revealed before the Holy One blessed be He that Israel is destined to be subjugated to Edom1Edom is considered the nation of Esau. and would be hard pressed and overburdened in their midst, and Israel is destined to protest this, just as Malachi said: “You said: It is vain to worship God and what is the profit in our having kept His commission.… Now we praise the wicked; the evildoers, too, prosper; they also test God and escape” (Malachi 3:14–15).

That is why the Divine Presence said by means of Solomon: “Do not envy a man of villainy” – do not envy the tranquility of the wicked Esau; “and do not choose any of his ways” – you shall not perform any of his actions. Why? Look to the end of the matter, as, behold, the day will come when God will despise everyone who would impugn [maliz] the mitzvot. That is what is written: “For the devious person [naloz] is an abomination to the Lord” (Proverbs 3:32).

Likewise it says: “The Lord abhors a man of bloodshed and deceit” (Psalms 5:7). However, one whose path is upright before Him will be among His confidants; that is what is written: “And His secret is with the upright” (Proverbs 3:32). Likewise, it says: “Now, it will be said to Jacob [and to Israel what God has wrought]” (Numbers 23:23). And it says: “The secret of the Lord is to those who fear Him…” (Psalms 25:14).

And it says: “You will return and see the difference between the righteous and the wicked, between one who serves God and one who does not serve Him” (Malachi 3:18). “The curse of the Lord is on the house of the wicked” (Proverbs 3:33) – this is Esau the wicked, just as it says: “[If Edom will say:] We are ruined, but we will return and build the ruins, so said the Lord of hosts: They will build, and I will destroy; [they will be called the boundary of wickedness]” (Malachi 1:4).

“And He blesses the abode of the righteous” (Proverbs 3:33) – this is Israel, in whose regard it is written: “Your people, they are all righteous, they will inherit the land forever” (Isaiah 60:21). “Your eyes will see, and you will say: May the Lord be exalted [beyond the boundary of Israel]” (Malachi 1:5). “If it is to scoffers, He will scoff” (Proverbs 3:34) – these are the Edomites, who are called scoffers, as it is stated: “A wicked and arrogant man, scoffer is his name” (Proverbs 21:24).

And they are called wicked, just as it says: “Now we praise the wicked” (Malachi 3:15). From where is it derived that the verse is speaking of the Edomites? As it is written: “The evildoers [osei risha], too, prosper” (Malachi 3:15) – these are the Edomites, just as it says: “They will be called the boundary of wickedness [risha]” (Malachi 1:4). And they scoff at Israel every day, about the troubles that befall them, just as it says: “You were haughty against Me with your mouths, and you increased your words against Me; I heard” (Ezekiel 35:13).

“He will scoff” – the Holy One blessed be He is destined to mete out to them according to their measure, just as it says: “As you have done, so will be done to you; your retribution will return upon your head” (Obadiah 1:15). “But to the humble He gives favor” (Proverbs 3:34) – this is Israel, who are poor among them2This is a reference to the Edomites mentioned above, and refers in general to all of the oppressors of Israel. and walk humbly in their midst and bear their yoke upon them in order to sanctify the name of the Holy One blessed be He.

That the Holy One blessed be He is destined to be gracious to these and punish those, just as it says: “Therefore, the Lord will wait to be gracious to you […for the Lord is a God of justice]” (Isaiah 30:18). And it says: “The humble will increase their joy in the Lord” (Isaiah 29:19). And it says: “For a people will live in Zion, in Jerusalem; you will not weep” (Isaiah 30:19). “The wise will inherit honor” (Proverbs 3:35) – this is Israel, who are called wise when they perform the Torah and the mitzvot, as it is stated: “You shall observe and you shall perform, as this is your wisdom and your understanding…” (Deuteronomy 4:6).

Because Israel observes the Torah in their midst, the Holy One blessed be He is destined to bequeath to them a throne of glory, just as it says: “He will bequeath to them a throne of glory” (I Samuel 2:8), as the Holy One blessed be He is destined to restore the monarchy to Israel, just as it says: “The kingdom, the dominion, and the greatness of the kingdoms under the entire heavens [will be given to the holy people of the Most High]” (Daniel 7:27).

“And fools carry away disgrace” (Proverbs 3:35) – these are the Edomites, just as it says: “I will eliminate the wise from Edom, and wisdom from the mountain of Esau” (Obadiah 1:8). And it says: “[Concerning Edom, so said the Lord of hosts:] Is there no longer wisdom in Teman? Is counsel lost from the children? Has their wisdom spoiled” (Jeremiah 49:7)?

What is “carry away disgrace [kalon]”? It means that they will carry away disgrace in their portion, as their end will be that they will go into fire. Kalon is nothing other than fire, just as it says: “Whom the king of Babylon roasted [kalam] in the fire” (Jeremiah 29:22). And it says: “Just ripened, roasted [kalui] in fire” (Leviticus 2:14).

Likewise it says: “[The house of Jacob will be fire,] and the house of Joseph a flame, [and the house of Esau for straw, and they will ignite them and consume them]” (Obadiah 1:18). And it says: “I was seeing until the beast was slain and its body destroyed and it was relegated to the burning of fire” (Daniel 7:11). That is, “and fools carry away disgrace.” Another matter: “Do not envy a man [of villainy]” (Proverbs 3:31) – it is speaking of an adulterer, who, when he consorts with the wife of another and she is impregnated by him, he robs money from the children of the woman’s husband and gives it to the mamzer, as the husband thinks that he is his son, but he is not his son, and he bequeaths him the inheritance with his sons.

It is regarding this matter that the adulterer is called “a man of villainy.”3Villainy is a translation of ḥamas, which also refers to theft. What is “do not envy”? It is that anyone who sees the adulterer, who realizes the lust in his heart with the wife of another and she feeds him and gives him to drink, should not envy his tranquility and should not choose any of his ways. Why?

It is because the adulterer is called an abomination: “They are six that the Lord hates, and seven that are an abomination to His soul” (Proverbs 6:16). “One who incites discord among brethren” (Proverbs 6:19) is one of the abominations. This is the adulterer, who incites discord between a man and his wife, just as it says: “And a spirit of jealousy overcame him, [and he warned his wife]” (Numbers 5:14).

That is why it is stated: “For the devious [naloz] person is an abomination to the Lord” – this is the adulterer, in whose regard it is written: “And are devious [unlozim] in their tracks” (Proverbs 2:15–16). “And His secret is with the upright” (Proverbs 3:32) – this is one who sees his actions and abstains from wine in order to render his paths upright, just as it says: “Who render their paths upright” (Proverbs 9:15).

What is His secret? It is that the Holy One blessed be He teaches him how to save himself from her, just as it says: “I have guided you on the path of wisdom” (Proverbs 4:11). The numerical value of wine [yayin] is seventy4Yod – 10; yod – 10; nun – 50; the sum is 70. and of secret [sod] is seventy.5Samekh – 60; vav – 6; dalet – 4; the sum is 70. He abstains from wine that totals seventy, and he merits the secret of wisdom that totals seventy.

Wine enters, a secret emerges, wine remains out, a secret enters. That is, “and His secret is with the upright.” “The curse of the Lord is on the house of the wicked” (Proverbs 3:33) – this is the adulterer. What is the curse [hame’era]?

It is that the water that causes curse [hame’arerim] will examine him just as they examine her. That is, “the curse of the Lord,” just as it says: “May the Lord render you as a curse…” (Numbers 5:21). “And He blesses the abode of the righteous” (Proverbs 3:33) – this is the male nazirite and the female nazirite, who, if they abstained from wine to protect themselves from sin, merit a blessing. That is why it juxtaposed the portion of the Priestly Benediction after the portion of the nazirite, because he merits receiving the blessings of the Priestly Benediction.

That is, “and He blesses the abode of the righteous,” just as it says: “May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24). “If it is to scoffers,” (Proverbs 3:34) – this is the adulterer, who errs due to wine, who is called a scoffer, just as it says: “Wine is a scoffer, intoxicating drink is tumultuous…” (Proverbs 20:1). “He will scoff” (Proverbs 3:34) – as everyone scoffs at the adulterer, as he is a curse and an oath for My chosen ones.

“But to the humble, He is gracious” (Proverbs 3:34) – these are the nazirites, who adopt humility for themselves, who abstain from wine and grow their hair in order to torment themselves and protect themselves from transgression. The Holy One blessed be He is gracious with them, just as it is written: “And be gracious to you” (Numbers 6:25). “The wise will inherit honor” (Proverbs 3:35) – because the nazirites feared sin they were called wise men, just as it says: “Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” (Psalms 111:10).

And it says: “Behold, fear of the Lord is wisdom” (Job 28:28). They inherit honor, as the Holy One blessed be He lifts His countenance to them and grants them peace, as when a person sits peacefully in his home, that is his honor. Likewise, it says: “Preserve your honor and stay at home” (II Kings 14:10), as after the portion of the nazirite, the Priestly Benediction is written, in which it is written: “And grant you peace” (Numbers 6:26).

“And fools carry away disgrace” (Proverbs 3:35) – these are the adulterer and the adulteress, and they are called fools. The adulterer, from where is it derived? “Whoever is a simpleton let him turn here” (Proverbs (9:16). The adulteress, as it is written: “The woman of folly is loud” (Proverbs 9:13).

“Carry away disgrace” – “he shall expose the head of the woman” (Numbers 5:18), and it says: “Her belly will distend…” (Numbers 5:27); do you have any disgrace greater than that? That is, “carry away disgrace.” This is why the portion of the Priestly Benediction is stated after the portion of the nazirite, as anyone who abstains from wine for the sake of Heaven merits all the blessings stated in the Priestly Benediction. From where is it derived? It is just as it says: “So you shall bless [the children of Israel]” (Numbers 6:23).

“My beloved is like a gazelle or a fawn [ofer ha’ayalim]…” (Song of Songs 2:9) – Rabbi Yitzḥak said: Israel said before the Holy One blessed be He: Master of the universe, in truth you came to us first. “My beloved is like a gazelle” – just as the gazelle leaps, so the Holy One blessed be He leapt and bounded from Egypt to the sea and from the sea to Sinai. In Egypt, “I will pass in the land of Egypt…” (Exodus 12:12).

At the sea, “this is my God and I will exalt Him” (Exodus 15:2). At Sinai, “He said: The Lord came from Sinai” (Deuteronomy 33:2). “Or a fawn” – Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina said: To the fawn of deer.6Rabbi Yosei teaches that "ofer ha'ayalim" means a fawn, and not a certain type of deer. “Behold, he is standing behind our wall” (Song of Songs 2:9) – this is the wilderness of Sinai.

“Watching from the windows” (Song of Songs 2:9) – “the Lord descended upon Mount Sinai…” (Exodus 19:20). “Peering through the cracks” (Song of Songs 2:9) – “God spoke all these matters…” (Exodus 20:1). “My beloved spoke up and said to me” (Song of Songs 2:10) – “I am the Lord your God” (Exodus 20:2). Another matter: “My beloved is like a gazelle” (Song of Songs 2:9) – Rabbi Yitzḥak said: Israel said before the Holy One blessed be He: Master of the universe, You told us that You will come to us first.

“My beloved is like a gazelle” – just as the gazelle appears and is then concealed, so, the initial redeemer appeared and was then concealed. Rabbi Berekhya said in the name of Rabbi Levi: Like the initial redeemer, so will be the ultimate redeemer. The initial redeemer, this is Moses; he appeared to them and was then concealed from them. How long was he concealed from them?

Rabbi Tanḥuma said: Three months; that is what is written: “They encountered Moses and Aaron…” (Exodus 5:20).7“Encountered” indicates that there had been an interruption in the contact between them. The ultimate redeemer, too, will appear to them and will then be concealed from them. How long will he be concealed from them? Rabbi Tanḥuma said in the name of Rabbi Ḥama ben Rabbi Hoshaya: Forty-five days.

That is what is written: “From the time of the abolishing of the daily offering and the setting up of the abomination of desolation there will be one thousand two hundred and ninety days” (Daniel 12:11), and it is written: “Happy is one who waits, and reaches one thousand three hundred and thirty-five days” (Daniel 12:12). How many are these extra days? They are the forty-five days that he will be concealed from them and will then reappear to them.

Where will he take them?8Where will they be during those forty-five days? Some say to the Judean desert, and some say to the wilderness of Siḥon and Og. Anyone who believes him and follows him will eat roots of the broom tree and saltwort leaves; that is what is written: “Who pick saltwort from bushes, and the root of the broom tree is their food” (Job 30:4). Anyone who does not follow him will go and make peace with the nations of the world, and they will ultimately kill him.

Rabbi Yitzḥak bar Maryon said: At the conclusion of forty-five days, the Holy One blessed be He will cause manna to fall for them. That is what is written: “I will yet settle you in tents as in the appointed [moed] days” (Hosea 12:10), and it says: “The appointed time [moed] of your exodus from Egypt” (Deuteronomy 16:6). “Or a fawn” (Song of Songs 2:9) – Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina said: To the fawn of deer.

“Behold, he is standing behind our wall” (Song of Songs 2:9) – this is the western wall of the Temple, which is never destroyed. Why? It is because the Divine Presence is in the west. “Watching from the windows” (Song of Songs 2:9) – due to the merit of the patriarchs; “peering through the cracks” (Song of Songs 2:9) – due to the merit of the matriarchs.

Just as there is a distinction between a window and a crack, so there is a distinction between the merit of the patriarchs and the merit of the matriarchs. “My beloved spoke up and said to me” (Song of Songs 2:10) – what did He say? “As I live, the utterance of the Lord, that you will don all of them like jewelry, and you will tie them like a bride” (Isaiah 49:18). Another matter: “My beloved is like a gazelle” (Song of Songs 2:9) – just as this gazelle leaps from place to place, from fence to fence, from tree to tree, and from booth to booth, so, the Holy One blessed be He leaps and bounds from this synagogue to that synagogue.

Why to that extent? It is order to bless Israel, as it is stated: “In every place I mention My name, [I will come to you and I will bless you]” (Exodus 20:21). By what merit? It is by the merit of Abraham our patriarch, as it is written: “So [ko] you shall bless,” just as it says: “So [ko] shall be your offspring” (Genesis 15:5).

“Or a fawn” (Song of Songs 2:9) – Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina said: To the fawn of deer. “Behold, he is standing behind our wall” (Song of Songs 2:9) – when the Holy One blessed be He came to visit Abraham our patriarch on the third day since his circumcision, just as it says: “The Lord appeared to him in the plains of Mamre, and he was sitting [yoshev]…” (Genesis 18:1). Yashav is written.9Yoshev is written without a vav, so it looks like yashav.

He sought to stand; the Holy One blessed be He said to him: Sit, Abraham, you are a paradigm for your descendants, as when your descendants enter synagogues and study halls and recite Shema, they sit and My glory stands. What is the source? “God stands [nitzav] in the assembly of the Almighty” (Psalms 82:1) – Rabbi Ḥagai said in the name of Rabbi Yitzḥak: It is not written here, “God omed,”10The word “stands” would usually be rendered as omed. but rather, “God nitzav,” at the ready.

This is just as it says: “It will be before they call, I will answer” (Isaiah 65:24). That is why it is stated: “Behold, he is standing behind our wall”; these are the synagogues and study halls. “Watching from the windows” (Song of Songs 2:9) – when the Holy One blessed be He said to Aaron and his sons: “So you shall bless…,” Israel said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘Master of the universe, to the priests You said that they should bless us.

We need only Your blessings and to be blessed from Your mouth.’ That is what is written: “Look from Your holy abode, from Heaven, and bless Your people Israel” (Deuteronomy 26:15). The Holy One blessed be He said to them: ‘Although I said to the priests that they should bless you, with them I stand and bless you.’ That is why the priests spread their hands, saying: The Holy One blessed be He is standing behind us.

That is why it says: “Watching from the windows” – from between the priests’ shoulders; “peering through the cracks” (Song of Songs 2:9) – from between the priests’ fingers. “My beloved spoke up and said to me” – “and I will bless them” (Numbers 6:27). “So you shall bless” – that is what is written: “I will render you a great nation…” (Genesis 12:2). Rabbi Pinḥas ben Yair said: The Holy One blessed be He blessed Abraham with seven blessings, and these are they: “I will render you a great nation” (Genesis 12:2); “I will bless you” (Genesis 12:2); “I will make your name great” (Genesis 12:2); “you will be a blessing” (Genesis 12:2).

I will bless those who bless you” (Genesis 12:3); “one who curses you, I will curse” (Genesis 12:3), “[all the families of the earth] will be blessed in you” (Genesis 12:3). These correspond to the seven verses in the act of Creation in which “that it was good” is written.11Seven including Genesis 1:31: “And it was very good.” Rabbi Levi bar Ḥayata and Rabbi Abba son of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said: There are three expressions of greatness and four blessings written here.

He apprised him that there would be three patriarchs and four matriarchs. But is it not that there are only two expressions of greatness? “I will render you [ve’e’eskha]” is an expression of greatness12Thus, there are, in fact, three expressions of greatness., as it is written: “It is the Lord who appointed [asa] Moses [and Aaron]” (I Samuel 12:6). Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: “I will render you a great nation” (Genesis 12:2) – this is that we recite: God of Abraham.

“I will bless you” (Genesis 12:2) – this is that we recite: God of Isaac. “I will make your name great” (Genesis 12:2) – this is that we recite: God of Jacob. Do we, perhaps, conclude with all of them? The verse states: “You will be a blessing” (Genesis 12:2) – it is with you they conclude: The Shield of Abraham, and we do not conclude with all of them.13This midrash is referring to the first blessing of the Amida prayer.

Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Ze’eira said: “You will be a blessing” – your blessing precedes Mine, as after they recite Shield of Abraham, only then do they recite: Who revives the dead. Another matter: “You will be a blessing [berakha]” (Genesis 12:2) – you will be a pool [berekha]. Just as this pool purifies the impure, you, too, draw the distant under the wings of the Divine Presence. “I will render you [ve’e’eskha] a great nation” (Genesis 12:2) – Rabbi Berekhya said: It is not written here, Etenkha,14See Genesis 17:20: “I will make him [untativ] a great nation.” asimekha,15See Genesis 46:3: “I will make you [asimekha] a great nation there.” but rather ve’e’eskha.16This connotes creation of a new entity.

After I create you as a new creation, just as it says: “God made [vayaas] the firmament” (Genesis 1:7), then you will be fruitful and multiply. “A great nation” (Genesis 12:2) – Abraham said before Him: ‘Master of the universe, from Noah, did You not produce seventy nations?’ He said to him: ‘That nation in whose regard it is written: “For who is a great nation” (Deuteronomy 4:7), I am producing from you.’

Rabbi Pinḥas HaKohen bar Ḥama said: When did the Holy One blessed be He render Abraham a great nation? It was when they departed from Egypt, came to Sinai, received the Torah, and arrived in the Land of Israel. Moses looked at them and said: They have been rendered just as the Holy One blessed be He promised to the elder, as it is stated: “And who is a great nation” (Deuteronomy 4:8). Alternatively, “a great nation” – as I will give your descendants the Torah, and from it they will be called a great nation, as it is stated: “It is a particularly wise and understanding people, this great nation” (Deuteronomy 4:6).

“I will bless you” (Genesis 12:2) – Rabbi Berekhya said: Because travel causes a person three phenomena: It lessens procreation, it lessens his expenditure,17It reduces his disposable income. and it lessens his reputation; that is why it was stated to him: “I will render you a great nation” (Genesis 12:2) – travel will not lessen your procreation; “I will bless you” – travel will not lessen your expenditure; “I will make your name great” (Genesis 12:2) – it will not lessen your reputation.

People say in a parable: From house to house, a cloak; from place to place, a soul. However, you will lose neither a soul nor property. “You will be a blessing” (Genesis 12:2) – it is already written: “I will bless you” (Genesis 12:2); why does the verse state: “You will be a blessing”? Rabbi Eliezer said: The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘From when I created My world until now, I needed to bless My creations,’ as it is stated: “God blessed them…” (Genesis 1:28), and it says: “God blessed Noah and his sons” (Genesis 9:1). ‘But from here on, the blessings are granted to you; to one whom you see fit to bless, bless.’

Nevertheless, Abraham did not bless his sons. Why is it so? It is analogous to a king who had an orchard and he entrusted it to a sharecropper. In that orchard there was one tree that was an elixir of life and one tree a deadly poison.

The sharecropper said: I will cultivate and complete [my work], and the king will do with his orchard what he chooses. So, the king, this is the Holy One blessed be He. The orchard, this is the world. He granted it to Abraham, as He said to him: “You will be a blessing.”

What did Abraham do? He had two sons, one righteous and one wicked: Isaac and Ishmael. Abraham said: If I bless Isaac, Ishmael will request to be blessed, and he is wicked. Rather, I am a servant; I am flesh and blood.

Tomorrow, I will pass from the world, and what the Holy One blessed be He wishes to do in His world, He will do. When Abraham passed away, the Holy One blessed be He appeared to Isaac and blessed him, as it is stated: “It was after the death of Abraham, [God blessed Isaac his son]” (Genesis 25:11). Isaac blessed Jacob, and Jacob blessed the twelve tribes, as it is stated: “All these are the tribes of Israel, twelve, and this is that which their father spoke to them, and he blessed them” (Genesis 49:28).

From here on, the Holy One blessed be He said: ‘The blessings are granted to you. The priests will bless My children, just as I said to Abraham their patriarch: “You will be a blessing.”’ That is why it is stated: “So you shall bless…”

“So you shall bless” – that is what is written: “Behold the bed of Solomon…” (Song of Songs 3:7). Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai interpreted it regarding Solomon: “Behold the bed of Solomon” – this is King Solomon. “There are sixty valiant men surrounding it” (Song of Songs 3:7) – sixty valiant men surrounded his bed at night, and they were “from the valiant of Israel” (Song of Songs 3:7). “Each armed with a sword, trained in war” (Song of Songs 3:8) – why would he do so?

It is “from fear in the nights” (Song of Songs 3:8) – as he was afraid of the demons [and acted] so that they would not harm him. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: Before a person sins, he is an object of awe and fear. Once he sins, he is subject to awe and fear. Before he sinned, Adam the first man would hear the Divine Voice, stand on his feet, and was able to withstand it.

Once he sinned, he would hear the Divine Voice and hide, as it is stated: “[They heard the voice of the Lord God]…the man and his wife hid [from the presence of the Lord God]” (Genesis 3:8). Rabbi Avin said: Before Adam the first man sinned, he would hear a gentle voice. After he sinned, he heard a thunderous voice. Until Israel sinned, “the appearance of the glory of the Lord was like devouring fire atop the mountain” (Exodus 24:17).

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: There were seven partitions of fire consuming one another, and Israel would see and were not afraid and were not fearful. Once they sinned, they were unable to look even at the intermediary: “Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, and behold, [the skin of his face] was radiant, [and they feared approaching him]” (Exodus 34:30). Rabbi Pinḥas ben Rabbi Avin said that Rabbi Ḥanin said: Even the intermediary felt it together with them from one time to another.18From before the sin to after the sin.

Before, “the kings of hosts flee [and flee]” (Psalms 68:13). Rabbi Yudan in the name of Rabbi Aivu: “The kings of hosts” – the kings of the angels; even Mikhael and Gavriel would fear Moses. Once they sinned, Moses was unable to look even at their lowest-ranking soldiers. That is what is written: “For I was daunted due to the wrath and the fury” (Deuteronomy 9:19).

Until Saul sinned: It is not written here, “Saul took the kingdom,” but rather, “Saul captured the kingdom over Israel…” (I Samuel 14:47). What is, “wherever he turned, he would inspire terror” (I Samuel 14:47)? He would emerge victorious. By what merit?

It was by the merit of the mitzvot and good deeds that he had to his credit, as he was poor, ate non-sacred produce in purity, and would spend his own money but was sparing with the money of Israel. He considered the honor due his servant equal to his own honor. Rabbi Yehuda bar Naḥman said in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish: And he was learned in Torah, as it is written: “Through me19The Torah. kings reign…” (Proverbs 8:15).

Once he sinned: “Saul saw the Philistine camp, and he was afraid…” (I Samuel 28:5). Until David sinned with that act:20With Batsheva (II Samuel chap. 11). “The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear…” (Psalms 27:1)? Once he sinned with that act, “I will come upon him and he will be weary and discouraged” (II Samuel 17:2).

Until Solomon sinned, he would dominate with songs and poems [shirim veshirot] and he would rule over the demons, as it is stated: “I appointed for myself sharim vesharot” (Ecclesiastes 2:8) – male singers and female singers. “And the pleasures of people” (Ecclesiastes 2:8) – these are bathhouses. “Shida veshidot” (Ecclesiastes 2:8) – these are male demons and female demons, who stoked the fires in them.

He ruled them to the extent that when he built the Temple, he controlled the actions of Ashmedai.21The king of the demons. When he sinned, Ashmedai banished him from his kingdom, and after he returned to his kingdom, his fear was upon him, and he brought sixty valiant men who would guard his bed. That is what is written: “From fear in the nights” (Song of Songs 3:8) – as he feared the demons. “Behold the bed of Solomon…” (Song of Songs 3:7) – the Rabbis interpreted the verse regarding those who departed from Egypt.

“Behold the bed [mitato]” – His tribes [matotav], just as it says: “The oaths to the tribes [matot]” (Habakkuk 3:9). “Of Solomon [shelishelomo]” – of the Holy One blessed be He, that peace [shehashalom] is His. “There are sixty valiant men surrounding it” (Song of Songs 3:7) – six hundred thousand who departed from Egypt, from the age of twenty and above. “From the valiant of Israel” (Song of Songs 3:7) – this comes to include women and children.

“Each armed with a sword” (Song of Songs 3:8) – “the children of Israel ascended armed [from the land of Egypt]” (Exodus 13:18). “Trained in war” (Song of Songs 3:8) – from whom did they learn? It was from the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “The Lord is a Man of war” (Exodus 15:3). “Each man with his sword on his thigh” (Song of Songs 3:8) – when Moses told them that the Holy One blessed be He had told him the statute: “Every uncircumcised person may not eat of it” (Exodus 12:48) – each and every one of them took a sword, placed it on his thigh, and circumcised himself.

Who circumcised them? Rabbi Berekhya taught it in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: Moses would circumcise, Aaron would uncover the corona, and Joshua would give them to drink. Some say: Joshua would circumcise, Aaron would uncover the corona, and Moses would give them to drink. That is what is written: “And again circumcise the children of Israel, a second time” (Joshua 5:2).

Infer from here that he circumcised them the first time. “And circumcised the children of Israel [at the Hill of the Foreskins]” (Joshua 5:3) – what is “at the Hill of the Foreskins”? Rabbi Levi said: It is a place where they made that hill of foreskins. That is, “each man with his sword on his thigh” (Song of Songs 3:8).

What is, “from fear in the nights” (Song of Songs 3:8)? It is because they were unable to offer the paschal offering, as it is written: “All uncircumcised people may not eat of it” (Exodus 12:48). Had the children of Israel not offered the paschal offering, they would have died on the eve of Passover when the Egyptian firstborn died, as it is stated: “I will see the blood and I will pass over you, and there will not be a plague among you to destroy, when I smite the land of Egypt” (Exodus 12:13).

That is, “from fear in the nights.” “Behold the bed…” (Song of Songs 3:7) – Rabbi Yonatan interpreted the verse regarding the Sanhedrin. “Behold the bed [mitato]” – His tribes [shevatav], just as it says: “The oaths to the tribes [matot].” “Of Solomon [shelishelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:7) – of the Holy One blessed be He, that peace [shehashalom] is His.

“There are sixty valiant men surrounding it” (Song of Songs 3:7) – these are the sixty people of the land, as it is stated: “And sixty men of the people of the land, who were found inside the city” (II Kings 25:19). “From the valiant of Israel” (Song of Songs 3:7) – to include eleven men; that is a Sanhedrin of seventy-one. Who were the eleven men? It is as it is written: “The captain of the guards took Seraya the chief priest, Tzefanyahu the deputy priest, and the three gatekeepers” (II Kings 25:18); that is five.

“From the city he took one official” (II Kings 25:19) – this is the most distinguished member of the court; that is six. “And five men of those who see the king’s face” – that is eleven. One verse says: “And five men of those who see the king's face,” and one verse says: “And seven men of those who see the king's face” (Jeremiah 52:25). Who were the two extra?

It is to add to them two scribes of the judges; “and the scribe of the commander of the army, who directs [the people of the land]” (Jeremiah 52:25) – this is the emissary of the court. “Each armed with a sword” (Song of Songs 3:8) – Rabbi Meir and Rabbi Yosei: Rabbi Meir says: They would all sharpen their knowledge of halakha like a sword, so if an incident happened to come into their jurisdiction, the halakha would not be calling for a response.

Rabbi Yosei says: At the time of judgment they would all deliberate regarding the halakha to ensure that the true judgment would be issued, and they would consider it as though a sword were positioned between their thighs and Gehenna was open before them. That is, “from fear in the nights” (Song of Songs 3:8) – they were frightened about how to issue a ruling regarding the incident in order to be rescued from the sentence of Gehenna.

Rabbi Menaḥem, son-in-law of Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Avina: If a woman comes to the study hall to ask you regarding a law or a question, you should consider her as though she emerged from your loins. Do not eye her with lust, and be fearful of the sentence of Gehenna, which is like night. “Behold the bed… ” (Song of Songs 3:7) – Rabbi Samlai interpreted the verse regarding priestly watches. “Behold the bed [mitato]” – His tribes [matotav], just as it says: “The oaths to the tribes [matot].”

“Of Solomon [shelishelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:7) – of the Holy One blessed be He, that peace [shehashalom] is His. “There are sixty valiant men surrounding it” (Song of Songs 3:7) – these are the twenty-four priestly watches, the twenty-four Levite watches, and the twelve divisions.22During David’s reign, each tribe was accorded responsibility to support the kingdom for one month a year (see I Chronicles, chap. 27).

“From the valiant of Israel” (Song of Songs 3:7) – this is to include the rest of the people who were located in Jerusalem, [the] Sanhedrin, the courts, and the students. “Each armed with a sword” (Song of Songs 3:8) – just as it says: “[Exaltation of the Almighty is in their throats,] and a double-edged sword is in their hand” (Psalms 149:6). “Trained in war” (Song of Songs 3:8) – this is the battle of Torah, just as it says: “In the book of the Wars of the Lord” (Numbers 21:14).

Rabbi Ze’eira and Rabbi Yehuda in the name of Rabbi Shmuel: Torah scholars who would teach the priests the halakhot of slaughter, receiving, sprinkling, and taking a handful would collect their wages from the collection of the chamber. Rabbi Yitzḥak ben Rabbi Redifa in the name of Rabbi Ami: The examiners of blemishes in Jerusalem would collect their wages from the collection of the chamber. Rav Aḥa and Rabbi Tanḥum ben Rabbi, the son-in-law of Rabbi Samlai: Proofreaders of the Torah scroll in the Courtyard would take their wages from the collection of the chamber.

Gidel bar Binyamin in the name of Rabbi Ami: There were two judges in Jerusalem for robberies, and they would take their wages from the collection of the chamber. Rav Huna said: The Curtain would come from the funds of Temple maintenance. Shmuel said: The women who weave the curtain would take their wages from the collection of the chamber. That is, “trained [melumedei] in war” (Song of Songs 3:8), as they would teach [melamdin] the priests how to perform the service.

“Each man with his sword on his thigh from fear in the nights” (Song of Songs 3:8) – they would caution them that when they would slaughter they should not render the offerings pigul,23If while performing the sacrificial rites the priest has a thought to eat the flesh or sprinkle the blood after the appointed time, the offering is disqualified as pigul. and they should not disqualify any of the offerings by keeping them past the appointed time.

“Behold the bed…” (Song of Songs 3:7) – Rabbi Samlai interpreted the verse regarding the Priestly Benediction. “Behold the bed” – this is the Temple. Just as the bed is for nothing other than procreation, so, everything that was in the Temple would procreate, as it is stated: “The staves extended” (I Kings 8:8), and it says: “Parvayim gold” (II Chronicles 3:6). What is parvayim?

It is that it produced fruits [perot]. And it says: “The House of the Forest of Lebanon” (I Kings 7:2). Why is it called “The House of the Forest of Lebanon”? It is to say to you: Just as a forest produces fruits, so did the Temple.

The forms that were on its walls were of gold, as they would craft there all sorts of trees that would produce fruits. “Of Solomon [shelishelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:7) – of the Holy One blessed be He, that peace [shehashalom] is His. “There are sixty valiant men surrounding it” (Song of Songs 3:7) – these are the sixty letters of the Priestly Benediction. “From the valiant [migiborei] of Israel” (Song of Songs 3:7) – as they bolster [megaberim] Israel.

Rabbi Azarya said: Matters that are mentioned with might, as the name of the Holy One blessed be He is mentioned in each and every one: “May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24); “may the Lord shine” (Numbers 6:25); “may the Lord lift” (Numbers 6: 26). “Each armed with a sword” (Song of Songs 3:8) – as they battle against all the punishments in the Torah. “Each man with his sword on his thigh” (Song of Songs 3:8) – even if a person sees in his dream as though a sword is cutting his thigh, let him rise early to the synagogue, stand before the priests, and hear the Priestly Benediction, and no evil matter will harm him: That is why the Torah cautions the priests and says to them: “So you shall bless…”

“Speak to Aaron…” – because the entire action of this portion involves Aaron, it included Aaron and his sons in the Divine Speech, as this is the principle: Whenever the action is by the priests, the Divine Speech is to the priests. When the action is for Israelites, the Divine Speech is to Israel. “So you shall bless” – Rabbi Yehuda says: From where is it derived that it was stated from the mouth of the Holy One blessed be He to Moses in what order they shall bless Israel?

The verse states: “So you shall bless the children of Israel.” “So you shall bless the children of Israel” – in the sacred tongue. Do you say in the sacred tongue, or perhaps it is actually in any language? Here it is stated: “So you shall bless,” and there it is stated: “These shall stand to bless the people” (Deuteronomy 27:12).

Just as there it is in the sacred tongue,24See Sota 33a. so too here it is in the sacred tongue. Rabbi Yehuda said: It is not necessary. It says: “So”; it is not valid unless it is stated in this language, as any place that it is stated: Speaking up [aniya], stating [amira], and so [ko], it is in the sacred tongue. “So you shall bless” – while standing.

Do you say while standing, or perhaps it is not while standing. The verse states: “These shall stand to bless the people” (Deuteronomy 27:12). Blessing is stated here and blessing is stated there. Just as the blessing that is stated there is while standing, so too the blessing stated here is while standing.

Rabbi Natan said: It is not necessary, as it already said: “To serve Him and to bless in His name” (Deuteronomy 10:8). Blessing and service are juxtaposed. Just as service is while standing, as it is stated: “To stand to serve” (Deuteronomy 18:5), so too, blessing is while standing. “So you shall bless” – with the lifting of hands.

Do you say with the lifting of hands, or is it with the lifting of hands and without the lifting of hands? The verse states: “Aaron lifted his hands to the people and blessed them” (Leviticus 9:22) – just as he was with the lifting of hands, so his descendants, with the lifting of hands. Rabbi Yonatan says: If so, just as there it was the New Moon, with a communal offering, and a High Priest, so too, here with the New Moon, with a communal offering, and a High Priest.

The verse states: “For the Lord ]your God[ has chosen him…him and his sons” (Deuteronomy 18:5). It juxtaposes his sons to him, just as he is with the lifting of the hands, so his sons are with the lifting of the hands. And it is written: “All the days” (Deuteronomy 18:5), and blessing is juxtaposed to service. “So you shall bless” – with the ineffable Name.

Do you say with the ineffable Name or is it only with an appellation? The verse states: “They shall place My name upon the children of Israel, and I will bless them” (Numbers 6:27) – with the ineffable Name. Is it, perhaps, even in the outlying areas? “They shall place My name” is stated here, and it is stated elsewhere: “To place His name” (Deuteronomy 12:5); just as there it is in the Temple, so too, here it is in the Temple.

From here they said: In the Temple with the ineffable Name, and in the country with an appellation; this is the statement of Rabbi Yoshiya. Rabbi Yonatan says: It says: “In every place I mention My name, [I will come to you and I will bless you]” (Exodus 20:21). This is an inverted verse: Everywhere that I come to you and bless you, there I will mention My name. Where do I appear to you?

It is in the Temple. You too shall mention My name only in the Temple. From here they said: Invoking the ineffable Name is prohibited in the outlying areas. “So you shall bless the children of Israel” – I have derived only a blessing for Israel; a blessing for proselytes, women, liberated slaves, from where is it derived?

The verse states: “Say to them” – to all of them. “So you shall bless the children of Israel” – face-to-face. Or nape to face? The verse stated: “Say to them” – face-to-face, like one person talks to another.

“Say to them” – from here it is derived that the synagogue attendant must say to them that they should recite it. If two priests are going up to the platform, the attendant must say to them: ‘Priests, recite the blessing.’ But if there is only one priest, he need not say it, as it is stated: “Say to them” – to two. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: Any priest who fails to go up to the platform violates three positive mitzvot: “So you shall bless,” “say to them,” and “they shall place My name” (Numbers 6:27).

Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: Any priest who does not move his feet to go up to the ark in the blessing of Temple service25This is a reference to the blessing of “Look with favor [retzeh]” in the Amida. may then no longer go up. As it is stated: “Aaron lifted his hands toward the people, and blessed them and he descended from performing the sin offering” (Leviticus 9:22). Just as there it is with Temple service, so too, here it is with Temple service.

Rabbi Samlai said: A synagogue in which there are many priests, all of them go up to the platform, provided that there are ten Israelites who answer amen. A synagogue that consists exclusively of priests, some of them go up to the platform and some of them answer amen. The people who are behind the priests are not included in the blessing. That is why the priests go up to the ark, so that all the people are before them.

Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi said: Any priest who did not wash his hands may not lift his hands, as it is stated: “Lift your hands toward the Sanctuary26The word kodesh can mean “Sanctuary” or “holy.” The midrash is interpreting the verse to mean, "Lift your hands in holiness [kodesh] and bless.” and bless the Lord” (Psalms 134:2). His students asked Rabbi Elazar ben Shamua: By what virtue have you lived long?

He said to them: In all my days, I did not utilize a synagogue as a shortcut. I did not step over the heads of the sacred people.27I would reach my place before the people assembled, so I would not need to step over them when they were seated on the floor. And I did not lift my hands without a blessing. What blessing does one recite?

Who has sanctified us with the sanctity of Aaron and commanded us to bless His people Israel with love. When the priest moves his feet to go up to the platform, what does he recite: May it be Your will, Lord our God, that this blessing that You commanded us to bless Your people, Israel, will not contain any obstacle or iniquity. When he turns his face away from the congregation, what does he recite?

Master of the universe, we performed what You decreed upon us. Perform with us what you promised us. Rav Ḥisda said: The priests are not permitted to bend their fingers at the knuckles until they turn their faces away from the congregation. The attendant is not permitted to call for the Priestly Benediction until the congregation has concluded saying amen.

The priests are not permitted to begin reciting another blessing until the congregation has concluded saying amen. The priests are not permitted to turn their faces away from the congregation until the prayer leader begins reciting: “Grant peace,” and they are not permitted to move their feet and depart until the prayer leader completes reciting: “Grant peace.” During the additional prayer of Shabbat, what does the congregation recite?

Rav Asi said: “A song of ascents. Behold, bless the Lord…” (Psalms 134:1), “Lift your hands …” (Psalms 134:2), and, “Blessed be the Lord from Zion…” (Psalms 135:21). Why does one not recite “May the Lord bless you from Zion” (Psalms 134:3), which is written in this context? Rabbi Yehuda son of Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi said: Because he began with the blessings of the Holy One blessed be He, he concludes with the blessings of the Holy One blessed be He.

During the afternoon prayers of a fast, what do they recite? Rav Aḥa bar Yaakov said: “If our iniquities have testified against us, Lord, act for Your name’s sake; for our rebellions are many, we sinned to You. The Hope of Israel, its Savior in times of trouble, why should You be as a stranger in the land and as a wayfaring man who turns to tarry to stay the night? Why should you be like an astonished man, as a mighty man who cannot save?

But You, Lord, are in our midst, and Your name is called upon us; [do not abandon us]” (Jeremiah 14:7–9). During the closing prayer of Yom Kippur, what do they recite? “Indeed, so shall a man who fears the Lord be blessed. May the Lord bless you from Zion; may you see the prosperity of Jerusalem all the days of your life.

May you see the children of your children. Peace upon Israel” (Psalms 128:4–6). Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said: Anyone who recites them in the outlying areas is nothing other than mistaken. Rabbi Ḥanina bar Pappa said: Know that in the Temple too, one should not recite them.

Is there a servant that one blesses him and he does not listen? Rav Aḥa bar Ḥanina said: Know that even in the outlying areas one is required to recite them. Is there a servant that one blesses him and he does not express his appreciation? Rabbi Abbahu said: Initially I would recite these verses.

When I saw that Rabbi Abba of Akko did not recite them, I too did not recite them. From here it is derived that one does not recite them in the outlying areas. In the rest of the country, the Priestly Benediction is three blessings, but in the Temple, it is one blessing. Why to that extent?

It is because one does not answer amen in the Temple. It was taught: From where is it derived that one does not answer amen in the Temple? As it is stated: “Arise and bless the Lord your God forever and ever, and may they bless the name of Your glory, exalted above all blessing and praise” (Nehemiah 9:5). From where is it derived that there is praise for each blessing?

It is as it is stated: “Exalted above all blessing and praise” – for each and every blessing give Him praise. In the rest of the country, they lift their hands to the level of their shoulders, but in the Temple, above their heads, with the exception of the High Priest, who does not lift his hands higher than the plate.28The golden plate which was on his head. “Say [amor] to them” – it is written with a vav.

The Holy One blessed be He said to the priests: Do not, because I commanded you to bless Israel, bless them as though compelled to do so, and hastily, but rather, bless them with intent of the heart so the blessing will take effect upon them completely. That is why it is stated: Amor to them.

“May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24). “May the Lord bless you and protect you” – with the protection with the blessing. A king of flesh and blood has a slave in Syria, but he resides in Rome. The king sent for him.

He ascended and came to him [the king]. He gave him [the slave] one hundred litra of gold. He [the slave] loaded them and set out on the way. Robbers attacked him and took everything that he [the king] had given him and everything that he had with him.

Could he [the king], perhaps, have protected him from the robbers? Therefore, “may the Lord bless you” with wealth, “and protect you” from the robbers. Another matter: “May the Lord bless you” – with money, “and protect you” – so that you will not become the scapegoat29The one to whom the government turns for payment of penalties incurred by all residents of the city. in your province, and that a penalty will not be imposed upon the province in which they say: Give us gold.

Rather, may He bless you and protect you. “May He bless you” – with sons; “and protect you” – with daughters, who require protection. “May He bless you” – with wealth, “and protect you” – that you will fulfill mitzvot with it. “May the Lord bless you” with the blessing that is explicit in the Torah: “You shall be the most blessed of all the peoples…” (Deuteronomy 7:14); “blessed are you in the city…blessed is your basket…blessed are you upon your arrival” (Deuteronomy 28:3, 5–6); “all these blessings will come upon you…” (Deuteronomy 28:2).

Rabbi Natan says: May he bless you regarding your belongings and protect you regarding your body. Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Is it not that if they are blessed they are protected and if they are protected they are blessed? Why does the verse state: “And protect you”? It is from the evil inclination, so that we will not cause you to depart from the world.

Likewise it says: “For the Lord will be your hope and will protect your foot from being trapped” (Proverbs 3:26). Another matter: “And protect you” – that others will not rule over you. Likewise it says: “By day the sun will not strike you” (Psalms 121:6); “Behold, [the Guardian of Israel] neither slumbers [nor sleeps]… The Lord is your guardian” (Psalms 121:4–5). “ The Lord will guard you from all evil… The Lord will guard your going…” (Psalms 121:7–8).

Another matter: “And protect you” – from the demons that surround you, as it is stated: “One thousand may fall at your side.… for He will charge His angels [to guard you in all your ways]” (Psalms 91:7, 11). Another matter: “And protect you [veyishmerekha]” – He will observe [yishmor] for you the covenant of your patriarchs. Likewise it says: “The Lord your God will observe [veshamar] for you the covenant and the kindness regarding which He took an oath to your patriarchs” (Deuteronomy 7:12).

Another matter: “And protect you [veyishmerekha]” – He will keep [yishmor] the end of days for you. Likewise it says: “A prophecy of Duma: To me one calls from Seir…” (Isaiah 21:11).30This is a prophecy about the end of days, and the continuation of the verse contains the word shomer. Another matter: “And protect you” – He will protect your soul upon death. Likewise it says: “May the soul of my lord be bound in the bond [of life with the Lord your God]” (I Samuel 25:29).

I hear regarding the righteous one and the wicked one? The verse states: “And the souls of your enemies may He cast away [as from a slingshot]” (I Samuel 25:29). Another matter: “And protect you” – He will protect your feet from Gehenna. Likewise it says: “He protects the feet of His pious ones, and the wicked shall be silent in darkness” (I Samuel 2:9).

They are blessed and protected. From where is it derived that the Divine Presence is in their midst? The verse states: “May the Lord shine His countenance…” (Numbers 6:25). “May the Lord shine…” – may He give you of the light of the Divine Presence, as it is stated: “Arise, shine, [for your light has come]” (Isaiah 60:1), and it says: “Through Your light we see light” (Psalms 36:10), “The Lord is God; He has given us light” (Psalms 118:27).

“May the Lord shine His countenance to you, and be gracious to you” (Numbers 6:25). “May the Lord shine [yaer] His countenance to you” – may He grant you brightness [meor] of the eyes. Alternatively, “may the Lord shine…” – may He look upon you with a bright countenance and not with an angered countenance. Another matter: “May…shine [yaer]” – this is the light of Torah; He will enlighten your eyes and your heart in the Torah, and grant you sons who are devoted to Torah, just as it says: “For mitzva is a lamp, and Torah is light [or].” (Proverbs 6:23).

“May the Lord shine [yaer] His countenance” – may He produce from you priests who kindle the altar, just as it says: “So you will not kindle [ta’iru] My altar in vain” (Malachi 1:10). And it says: “The fire on the altar shall be kept burning on it; it shall not be extinguished” (Leviticus 6:5). “And be gracious to you” – they are blessed and protected, and the Divine Presence is in their midst, from where is it derived that they are graced with knowledge and understanding?

The verse states: “And be gracious to you” – just as we pray: You grace man with knowledge and teach a person understanding. Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – He will instill knowledge in you so that you will be gracious to one another and have mercy upon one another, like the matter that is stated: “And He will give you mercy…” (Deuteronomy 13:18). Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – He will grace you with children, just as it says: “The children with whom God has graced your servant” (Genesis 33:5), and it says: “God be gracious to you, my son” (Genesis 43:29).31The second verse from Genesis refers to Benjamin, whereas the first verse from Genesis refers to all the other tribes, as at that point Benjamin had not yet been born.

Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – just as it says: “May God be gracious to us and bless us; may He shine His countenance upon us, Selah” (Psalms 67:2). Another matter: “And be gracious to you [viḥuneka]” – he will grant you [yoḥnekha] your wishes. Likewise it says: “He will show grace to you [yoḥnekha] at the sound of your outcry; upon His hearing, He will answer you” (Isaiah 30:19). Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – Rabbi Ḥiyya the Great taught: The Lord will encamp [yaḥaneh] in your midst.

Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – He will produce prophets from you, just as it says: “I will pour a spirit of grace and supplication upon the house of David [and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem]” (Zechariah 12:10). Another matter: “And be gracious to you [viḥuneka]” – He will place His grace upon you everywhere that you go, just as it says: “He placed his favor [ḥino] in the eyes of [the prison warden]” (Genesis 39:21), “Esther found favor [ḥen] [in the eyes of everyone who saw her]” (Esther 2:15), “God granted Daniel kindness32The term in the verse is ḥesed, which the midrash considers synonymous with ḥen. and compassion [before the chief of the chamberlains]” (Daniel 1:9), “and you will find grace and approbation [in the eyes of God and man]” (Proverbs 3:4).

Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – regarding Torah study. Likewise it says: “It will give your head an adornment of grace…” (Proverbs 4:9), “for they will be a graceful adornment for your head…” (Proverbs 1:9). Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – with gratuitous gifts; likewise it says: “Be gracious to us, Lord; be gracious to us…” (Psalms 123:3), “so our eyes are to the Lord our God until He will be gracious to us” (Psalms 123:2).

Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – to take you from subjugation to the kingdoms, just as it says: “Be gracious to us, Lord; be gracious to us, for we are sated with scorn” (Psalms 123:3). Another matter: “And be gracious to you” – to redeem you, just as it says: “Lord, be gracious to us; [we have longed] for You. [Be…our salvation in a time of suffering]” (Isaiah 33:2).

“May the Lord show favor to you, and grant you peace” (Numbers 6:26). “May the Lord show favor [yisa…panav] to you” – He will remove his anger from you. Yisa is nothing other than an expression of removal, just as it says: “Pharaoh will remove [yisa] your head [from upon you]” (Genesis 40:19). “Panav” – this is the countenance [panim] of rage, just as it says: “I will direct My countenance against that person…” (Leviticus 20:6).

In other words, He will remove from you that countenance of rage that was fitting to come upon you. “May the Lord show [yisa] [favor [panav] to you]” – when you are standing and praying, as it is stated: “He said to him: See, I have granted [nasati] your request [fanekha]…” (Genesis 19:21). The matters may be inferred a fortiori: If I granted Lot’s request due to Abraham, My beloved, will I not show you favor due to you and due to your forefathers?

That is what is written: “May the Lord show favor to you.” One verse says: “May the Lord show favor to you,” and one verse says: “Who will not show favor” (Deuteronomy 10:17). How can both of these verses be realized? When Israel performs the will of the Omnipresent, “May the Lord show favor to you.”

When they do not perform the will of the Omnipresent, “Who will not show favor.” Another matter: “May the Lord show favor” – does the Holy One blessed be He show favor? Is it not already stated: “Who will not show favor” (Deuteronomy 10:17)? The Holy One blessed be He said: Just as they show Me favor, I show them favor.

How so? I wrote in My Torah: “You will eat and be satisfied, and you shall bless” (Deuteronomy 8:10), but a person of Israel sits, he, his children, and the members of his household, and they do not have sufficient food to satisfy them, but they show Me favor and recite a blessing, and are exacting with themselves for the measure of an olive-bulk or an egg-bulk.33There is a disagreement among the Sages regarding whether one must say Grace after Meals after eating an olive-bulk of bread or an egg-bulk of bread (Berakhot 45a).

Therefore, “may the Lord show favor [to you].” Another matter: “May the Lord show…” – one verse says: “May…show,” and one verse says: “Who will not show” (Deuteronomy 10:17). Until the sentence is sealed, “may the Lord show…”; after the sentence is sealed, “who will not show favor.” Similarly, one verse says: “You hear prayer” (Psalms 65:3), and one verse says: “You have covered Yourself with a cloud [so that no prayer can pass]” (Lamentations 3:44).

Until the sentence is sealed, “You hear prayer”; after the sentence is sealed, “You have covered Yourself with a cloud.” One verse says: “The Lord is near to all who call Him” (Psalms 145:18), and one verse says: “Why do You stand afar, Lord?” (Psalms 10:1). Until the sentence is sealed, “the Lord is near to all who call Him”; after the sentence is sealed, “why do You stand afar, Lord?” One verse says: “From the mouth of the Most High, evil and good do not emerge” (Lamentations 3:38), and one verse says: “The Lord was intent on harm” (Daniel 9:14).

Until the sentence is sealed, “from the mouth of the Most High…”; after the sentence is sealed, “the Lord was intent…” One verse says: “Launder your heart of evil, Jerusalem” (Jeremiah 4:14), and one verse says: “For even if you launder with natron [and use much soap, your iniquity is stained before Me]” (Jeremiah 2:22). Until the sentence is sealed, “launder [your heart] of evil…”; after the sentence is sealed, “even if you launder…” One verse says: “Return, wayward sons” (Jeremiah 3:22), and one verse says: “If they repent, He does not repent” (Jeremiah 8:4).34Even if they repent, God will not retract the punishment.

This is before the sentence is sealed; that is after the sentence is sealed. One verse says: “Seek the Lord when He can be found” (Isaiah 55:6), and one verse says: “As I live, the utterance of the Lord God, I will not respond to you” (Ezekiel 20:31). This is before the sentence is sealed; that is after the sentence is sealed. One verse says: “I do not desire the death of the wicked” (Ezekiel 33:11), and one verse says: “The Lord wished to put them to death.” (I Samuel 2:25).

This is before the sentence is sealed; that is after the sentence is sealed. Another matter: “May the Lord show favor to you” – in this world; “who will not show favor” (Deuteronomy 10:17) – in the World to Come.35Repentance is possible in this world, not in the World to Come (Etz Yosef). Another matter: “May the Lord show favor to you,” and one verse says: “Who will not show favor” (Deuteronomy 10:17).

Rabbi Yosei ben Dostai says: How can these two verses be realized? It is, rather, “may the Lord show favor” – regarding a matter between you and Him; “who will not show favor” – regarding matters between you and your counterpart. Rabbi Akiva says: One verse says: “He will cleanse” (Exodus 34:7), and one verse says: “He will not cleanse” (Exodus 34:7). How is it possible to realize these two verses?

It is, rather, regarding a matter between you and Him, “He will cleanse”; regarding matters between you and your counterpart, “He will not cleanse.” Ben Azai says: He cleanses for those who repent, but does not cleanse for those who do not repent. Another matter: “May the Lord show favor [panav]…” – He will turn His face [panav] toward you. One who greets his counterpart face-to-face is not comparable to one who greets him from the side.

Rather, “May the Lord show favor [panav]” – He will turn His face to you, just as it says: “I will turn [ufaniti] to you and make [you] fruitful” (Leviticus 26:9). “And grant you peace” – peace upon your arrival, peace upon your departure, peace with every person. Rabbi Natan says: “And grant you peace” – peace is the peace of the kingdom of the house of David: “with abundant authority and everlasting peace [upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom]” (Isaiah 9:6).

Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says: This is the peace of Torah, as it is stated: “The Lord gives strength to His people; the Lord will bless His people with peace” (Psalms 29:11). Great is peace, as the Holy One blessed be He altered a matter due to peace, as it is stated: “Shall I indeed bear a child? But I have grown old” (Genesis 18:13).36This is what God told Abraham, despite the fact that Sarah had actually said: “And my lord is old” (Genesis 18:12), referring to Abraham.

Great is peace, as the angel that spoke with Manoaḥ altered due to peace. He had said to the woman: “Behold, you are barren and have not given birth” (Judges 13:3), but he did not relate that matter to Manoaḥ.37He refrained from saying this when Manoaḥ could hear, so that Manoaḥ would not blame his wife for their childlessness. Great is peace, as the Name that is written in sanctity, the Holy One blessed be He said: Let it be erased on the water in order to instill peace between a man and his wife.38This is referring to the procedure of the sota.

Rabbi Elazar says: Great is peace, as the prophets implanted into the mouths of all the people only peace.39See Nahum 2:1, Hagai 2:9, Isaiah 57:19. Rabbi Shimon ben Ḥalafta said: Great is peace, as there is no vessel that contains blessing other than peace, as it is stated: “The Lord will bless His people with peace” (Psalms 29:11). In the Priestly Benediction as well, after all the blessings, He concluded them with peace: “And grant you peace,” saying that the blessings are of no avail unless accompanied by peace.

Rabbi Elazar HaKappar says: Great is peace, as every prayer concludes only with peace, and the Priestly Benediction concludes only with peace. Great is peace, as it is given to the humble, as it is stated: “The humble inherit the earth and delight in abundant peace” (Psalms 37:11). Great is peace, as it is equivalent to everything. We recite: Who makes peace and creates everything.

Rabbi Elazar son of Rabbi Elazar HaKappar says: Even if Israel engages in idol worship but there is peace between them, the Holy One blessed be He, as it were, said: The accuser cannot touch them, as it is stated: “Ephraim is attached to idols, leave him” (Hosea 4:17). But when they were divided, what is stated in their regard? “Their heart is divided; now they will be punished” (Hosea 10:2). That is, great is peace and dispute is despised.

Great is peace, as even in time of war, peace is necessary, as it is stated: “When you approach a city [to wage war against it, you shall call to it for peace]” (Deuteronomy 20:10). And it says: “I sent messengers from the wilderness of Kedemot [to Siḥon, king of Ḥeshbon, with words of peace]” (Deuteronomy 2:26). And it says: “Restore them peacefully” (Judges 11:13). Great is peace, as even the dead require peace, as it is stated: “You will come to your fathers in peace” (Genesis 15:15).

And it says: “You will die in peace” (Jeremiah 34:5). Great is peace, as it is provided for penitents, as it is stated: “Creator of the expression of the lips: Peace, peace [for the far and for the near]” (Isaiah 57:19). Rabbi Meir says: Great is peace, as the Holy One blessed be He did not create an attribute more beautiful than peace, which was given to the righteous, as when he passes from the world, three groups of ministering angels greet him with peace.

The first says: “He will come in peace” (Isaiah 57:2). The second says: “They will rest on their resting places” (Isaiah 57:2). The third says: “One who walks with integrity” (Isaiah 57:2). It is not sufficient for the righteous that their death is in the hands of Glory, as it is stated: “The glory of the Lord will gather you” (Isaiah 58:8), but they laud them before them with peace: “He will come in peace.”

Great is peace, as the Holy One blessed be He did not create an attribute more beautiful than peace, and He withheld it from the wicked, as when they pass from the world, three groups of angels of destruction greet them. The first says: “There is no peace” (Isaiah 48:22). The second says: “The Lord says to the wicked” (Isaiah 48:22). The third says: “You will lie in suffering” (Isaiah 50:11).

It is not sufficient for the wicked that their death is at the hand of destroyers, as it is stated: “His soul approaches perdition and his life to the killers” (Job 33:22); and it says: “He will be driven from light to darkness” (Job 18:18); and it says: “Let their way be dark and slippery, with an angel of the Lord pursuing them” (Psalms 35:6); but they vex them and say to them: “There is no peace,” “you will lie in suffering.”

Great is peace, as it is given as reward for Torah and mitzvot, as it is stated: “I will grant peace in the land” (Leviticus 26:6). Great is peace, as it is given to lovers of Torah, as it is stated: “Great peace for lovers of Your Torah” (Psalms 119:165). Great is peace, as it is given to those who study Torah, as it is stated: “All your children will be students of the Lord, and the peace of your children will be abundant” (Isaiah 54:13).

Great is peace, as it is given to those who perform acts of charity [tzedaka], as it is stated: “The act of righteousness [hatzedaka] will be peace” (Isaiah 32:17). Great is peace, as the name of the Omnipresent is called peace, as it is stated: “He called it: The Lord is peace” (Judges 6:24). Great is peace, as those who reside On High require peace, as it is stated: “He makes peace in His heights” (Job 25:2).

The matters can be inferred a fortiori; if in a place where there is no enmity and hatred they require peace, all the more so for a place where all these attributes exist. Rabbi Shimon would say: Come and see that the attribute of flesh and blood is not like the attribute of the Holy One blessed be He. A king of flesh and blood, when he goes out to war he goes with multitudes and legions, but when he goes to make peace, he goes alone.

But the attribute of the Holy One blessed be He is not so. When He goes to make peace, He emerges with multitudes and legions, as it is stated: “He makes peace in His heights” (Job 25:2), and then it is written: “Is there a number to His troops?” (Job 25:3). And it says: “The chariots of God are myriads, thousands upon thousands of companies. My Lord is among them, at Sinai, in holiness” (Psalms 68:18).

And it says: “Thousands upon thousands serve Him, and myriads upon myriads…” (Daniel 7:10). But when He goes out to war, He goes alone, as it is stated: “The Lord is a Man of war…” (Exodus 15:3) – He wages war with His name and does not require assistance. And it says: “I have trodden a winepress alone…” (Isaiah 63:3). You find that when the Holy One blessed be He exacted retribution from the generation of the Flood, He exacted retribution only alone, as it is stated: “Behold, I am bringing the Flood, water….” (Genesis 6:17).

Likewise, from the people of Sodom, He exacted retribution only alone: “The Lord rained [brimstone and fire] upon Sodom and [upon Gomorrah from the Lord from the heavens]” (Genesis 19:24). Likewise when He exacted retribution from the Egyptians, as it is stated: “The Lord smote every firstborn…” (Exodus 12:29). Likewise, He exacted retribution alone from the Emorites, as it is stated: “And the Lord cast large stones upon them” (Joshua 10:11).

Likewise, from Sennacherib, He exacted retribution alone, as it is stated: “The angel of the Lord emerged and smote in the camp…” (II Kings 19:35). One verse says: “Is there a number to His troops?” (Job 25:3), and one verse says: “Thousands upon thousands serve Him” (Daniel 7:10). When Israel were exiled, “Thousands upon thousands serve Him”; as it were, the entourage On High was diminished. Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says in the name of Abba Yosei ben Dostai: “Thousands upon thousands serve Him” – one troop; how many troops are they?

“Is there a number to his troops?” One verse says: “He counts a number for the stars, and calls them all by names” (Psalms 147:4), and one verse says: “Who brings out their host by number, calling all of them by name” (Isaiah 40:26).40One verse implies that each one is called by a separate name, and one verse implies that they are all called by one name. When the Holy One blessed be He calls them, He calls all their names simultaneously and they respond, something that is impossible for flesh and blood, to call two names simultaneously.

Likewise it says: “God spoke all these matters, saying” (Exodus 20:1). It teaches that He said all of the Ten Commandments in one utterance. And it says: “God spoke one; these are two that I heard. Might belongs to God” (Psalms 62:12).

And it says: “Is My word not like fire, the utterance of the Lord, and like a hammer that shatters the rock?” (Jeremiah 23:29).41See Shabbat 88b. Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says in the name of Abba Yosei ben Dostai: What is “and calls them all by names”? There is no name repeated; the name that he is called now is not the name that he is called later. Likewise it says: “Why do you ask my name? It is hidden” (Judges 13:18).

I do not know to what name I will be switched. One verse says: “David gave to Ornan for the place shekels of gold, six hundred by weight” (I Chronicles 21:25), and one verse says: “For silver, fifty shekels” (II Samuel 24:24). How can both of these verses be realized? It was the place of the threshing floor for six hundred [shekels of gold], the place of the altar for fifty [shekels of silver].

Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says in the name of Abba Yosei ben Dostai: There were twelve tribes, and David took fifty shekels from each and every tribe, the result being six hundred shekels from all the tribes.42See Zevaḥim 116b, where the Gemara explains that according to this opinion David collected from each tribe an amount of silver worth fifty shekels of gold, and paid to Ornan an amount of silver worth six hundred shekels of gold.

Rabbi Elazar ben Shamua says: The threshing floor for six hundred, but “the cattle for the burnt offering, the threshing tools, and the implements of the cattle for the wood” (II Samuel 24:22), were for “fifty shekels of silver.” One verse says: “Solomon had four thousand stables for horses” (II Chronicles 9:25), and one verse says: “Solomon had forty thousand horses’ stables” (I Kings 5:6). How can both of these verses be realized?

There were four thousand large stables, with forty thousand horses. One verse says: “It would hold three thousand bat that it contained” (II Chronicles 4:5), and one verse says: “It would hold two thousand bat” (I Kings 7:26). How can both of these verses be realized? It was two thousand for liquid and three thousand for dry goods.

From here they said: Two kor of liquid that are three kor of dry goods.43The term bat, which measured volume, represented different volumes depending on whether the item being measured was liquid or solid. The same was true for the kor. Two kor of liquid took up the same amount of space as three kor of dry goods. Beloved is peace, as for all the deeds and meritorious acts performed by Abraham our patriarch, He gave only peace as his reward, as it is stated: “You will come to your fathers in peace” (Genesis 15:15).

Likewise, you find regarding Jacob our patriarch, who requested peace from the Omnipresent, as it is stated: “And I will return [to my father’s house] in peace” (Genesis 28:21). Likewise you find regarding Aaron, who was praised before the Omnipresent only with peace, as it is stated: “My covenant was with him, life and peace” (Malachi 2:5). Likewise you find regarding Pinḥas that He gave peace as his reward, as it is stated: “Behold, I am granting him My covenant of peace” (Numbers 25:12).

Likewise, you find that the Torah was analogized only to peace, as it is stated: “And all its paths are peace” (Proverbs 3:17). Likewise, you find that the Holy One blessed be He consoles Jerusalem only with peace, as it is stated: “My people will reside in an abode of peace” (Isaiah 32:18). Likewise, He exacted retribution from Amon and Moav only by withholding peace from them, as it is stated: “You shall not seek their peace or their welfare…” (Deuteronomy 23:7). Likewise, Israel is blessed each day with peace, as it is stated: “And grant you peace.”

“And they shall place My name upon the children of Israel, and I will bless them” (Numbers 6:27). “And they shall place My name” – this tells that they are blessed with the ineffable Name. Is it, perhaps, that even in the outlying areas they will be blessed with the ineffable Name? The verse states: “And they shall place My name,” and elsewhere it is stated: “To cause My name to dwell” (Nehemiah 1:9).

Just as elsewhere it is the Temple, here too it is the Temple. However, when the corrupt men increased, they then began entrusting the Name only to the circumspect in the priesthood. Rabbi Tarfon said: There was an incident where I and my brethren the priests were in a line, and I inclined my ear toward the High Priest, and I heard that he recited it in the midst of the intoning of the priests.44That High Priest was circumspect, as he was careful to ensure that God’s name would not be casually overheard.

Or, perhaps, in the Temple they recite the blessing but they do not recite the blessing in the outlying areas? It said: “In every place I mention My name, [I will come to you and I will bless you]” (Exodus 20:21) – even in the outlying areas. However, in the outlying areas one recites three blessings, and in the Temple one blessing. In the Temple, one recites the Name as it is written; in the outlying areas with its appellation.

In the outlying areas they lift their hands to the level of their shoulders, but in the Temple, over their heads. “And I will bless them” – why is it stated? Because it is stated: “So you shall bless the children of Israel” (Numbers 6:23), I have derived only a blessing for Israel; for proselytes, for women, and for slaves, from where is it derived? The verse states: “And I will bless them.”

Is it, perhaps, that if the priests wish to bless Israel they get blessed, but if not, they do not get blessed? The verse states: “And I will bless them,” so the priests will not say: We will bless Israel. The verse states: “And I will bless them” – I will bless My people. Likewise it says: “For the Lord your God has blessed you…” (Deuteronomy 15:6).

The priests bless Israel; who blesses the priests? The verse states: "And I will bless them” – the priests bless Israel, and I bless both these and those. That is, “and I will bless them.”

“It was on the day that Moses concluded erecting the Tabernacle, he anointed it and sanctified it and all its vessels, and the altar and all its vessels; he anointed them and sanctified them” (Numbers 7:1). “It was on the day that Moses concluded…” – that is what is written: “I will hear what the Almighty Lord has to say, for He will speak peace to His people and to His pious ones; let them not return to folly” (Psalms 85:9).

You find that when Israel performed that act1The Golden Calf., and the Holy One blessed be He grew angry at them, as it is stated: “The Lord said to Moses: I have seen this people…” (Exodus 32:9),2The following verse says: “Now, let Me be, and My wrath will be enflamed against them, and I will destroy them” (Exodus 32:10). "Leave me [and I will destroy them…]" (Deuteronomy 9:14). Immediately, Moses stood and asked for mercy from before Him so that He would reconcile with them, just as it is stated: “Moses implored…” (Exodus 32:11).

The Holy One blessed be He reconciled with them, as it is stated: “The Lord reconsidered the evil…” (Exodus 32:14). Nevertheless, umbrage remained in His heart in their regard, as it is stated: “On the day of My reckoning, I will reckon their sin upon them” (Exodus 32:34). When the Tabernacle was crafted, Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: Moses went and bent his ear in the Tabernacle. He said: Do you say that umbrage remains in the heart of the Holy One blessed be He in Israel’s regard?

That is what is written: “I will hear what the Almighty Lord has to say” (Psalms 85:9). What is “the Almighty [ha’el] Lord? Moses said: Until now has He remained in His anger against them and is He barely with them? Ha’el is nothing other than an expression of strength, just as it says: “And he took the mighty of [eilei] the land” (Ezekiel 17:13).

Or is He reconciled with them and He is acting with them with the attribute of mercy; that is what is written: “Lord.” Lord is nothing other than the attribute of mercy, as it is stated: “Lord, Lord, merciful and gracious” (Exodus 34:6). Immediately, the Holy One blessed be He placated him that He has no umbrage in His heart, just as it is written: “The Lord passed [vayaavor] before him” (Exodus 34:6), that He removed [shehe’evir] His fury from them and overlooked [ve’avar] their transgressions.

Rabbi Simon said: Why does it say “Lord, Lord” twice? It is, rather, that the Holy One blessed be He placated him and said to Moses: Just as in the past I would act with them with the attribute of mercy before they performed that act, so, too, now, I will act with them with the attribute of mercy. Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: At that moment, Moses heard a pleasant voice, an excellent voice. In the past, Moses would stand, and the divine speech would enter his ear like a current of water.

No one of Israel could hear it, but when his face would redden they knew that divine speech had come to him. Once the Tabernacle was crafted, he heard a pleasant voice. What did he hear? “For He will speak peace to His people and to His pious ones” (Psalms 85:9).

Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon: The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘In the past there was enmity between Me and My children, hatred between Me and My children, contention between Me and My children, but now that the Tabernacle was crafted there is love between Me and My children, peace between Me and My children.’ That is, “for He will speak peace to His people” (Psalms 85:9) – this is Israel, for crafting the Tabernacle.

“And to His pious ones” (Psalms 85:9) – this is the tribe of Levi, in whose regard it is written: “And of Levi he said: Your Tumim and Your Urim for Your pious one” (Deuteronomy 33:8). From where do you know that the verse is speaking regarding the Tabernacle? It is because it is written thereafter: “Indeed, His salvation is near for those who fear Him, so that glory may dwell in our land” (Psalms 85:10).

When was there peace for Israel? When the glory of the Holy One blessed be He dwelled in the Tabernacle. It is just as it says: “And the glory of the Lord filled the Tabernacle” (Exodus 40:34). Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Why would I teach this matter from the book of Psalms?

It is a matter of Torah. Even from its location there is nothing lacking. See what is written: “And grant you peace” (Numbers 6:26). When? It was “on the day that Moses concluded [erecting the Tabernacle].”

“It was on the day that [Moses] concluded…” – that is what is written: “Will a man be more just than God…?” (Job 4:17). Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen said: When Jacob went to Pharaoh, he did not leave his presence until he blessed him, as it is stated: “Jacob blessed Pharaoh” (Genesis 47:10). What did he bless him? He said to him: May the Nile rise to your feet.3It signified the end of the famine.

I, too, when I come to you, I come laden with blessings. Where did He allude to it to them? It was at Sinai. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: By means of an allusion, the Holy One blessed be He said to Israel that they should craft the Tabernacle and He would give them blessings when He came, as it is stated: “You shall craft for Me an altar of earth…in every place that I mention my name, I will come to you and I will bless you” (Exodus 20:21).

So, He did; when He came to the Tabernacle, He blessed them, as it is stated: “May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24). When? It was “on the day that [Moses] concluded [erecting the Tabernacle].” We learned that man is not more just than God.

That is, “will a man be more just than God…?” No. It is, rather, that the Holy One blessed be He, too, blessed Israel when He came to them. That is why it is written: “May the Lord bless you and protect you,” and it juxtaposed to it: "It was on the day that [Moses] concluded…”

“It was on the day that [Moses] concluded…” – that is what is written: “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High” (Psalms 91:1). Rav Huna said in the name of Rav Idi: Who said this psalm? We were under the impression that Solomon came and said it, but it was none other than Moses who said it. That is what is written: “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High” – this is Moses, who stayed in the shelter of the Most High, as he entered the cloud, which is the shelter of the Most High, just as it says: “Clouds are shelter for Him” (Job 22:14).

Likewise, it is written: “Moses entered into the midst of the cloud” (Exodus 34:18), “Who rests in the shadow of the Almighty” (Psalms 91:1), as he rested there several nights, as it is stated: “He was there with the Lord forty days and forty nights” Exodus 34:28), and he said: “I will say of the Lord: He is my shelter…” (Psalms 91:2). Another matter: “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High…” (Psalms 91:1) – Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan: Three matters Moses heard from the Holy One blessed be He and he recoiled backward.

When He said to him: “Each man shall give a ransom for himself” (Exodus 30:12), Moses said: ‘Who can give a ransom for himself?’ “Skin for skin, everything that a man has he will give for his life” (Job 2:4), and it is still not sufficient, as it is stated: “A man can neither redeem his brother nor give God a ransom for him. The redemption of their lives is too costly [and can never be attained] (Psalms 49:8–9).

The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘I am not asking according to My ability, but rather, according to their ability’ – “this, they shall give” (Exodus 30:13). Rabbi Meir said: The Holy One blessed be He took a type of coin of fire from beneath the Throne of Glory and showed it to Moses. “This, they shall give” – like this they shall give. Likewise, when the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “Command the children of Israel…My offering, My food, for My fires, [My pleasing aroma, you shall take care to sacrifice to Me at its appointed time]” (Numbers 28:2), Moses said: Who can provide Him with offerings?

Were we to sacrifice before Him all the beasts of the field and arrange all the trees of Lebanon, it would not be sufficient for Him, as it is stated: “Lebanon is not sufficient for kindling and its beasts are not sufficient for burnt offerings” (Isaiah 40:16). The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘I am not asking according to My ability, but rather, according to their ability’; “You shall say to them: This is the fire offering [that you shall bring to the Lord: Unblemished lambs in the first year, two each day, a continual burnt offering]” (Numbers 28:3).

Not both of them at the same time, but rather: “The one lamb you shall offer in the morning, [and the second lamb you shall offer in the afternoon]” (Numbers 28:4). Likewise, when the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “They shall craft a Sanctuary for Me, and I will dwell in their midst” (Exodus 25:8), Moses said: Who can craft a Tabernacle for Him in which He will dwell? “Behold, the heavens and the heaven of heavens cannot contain You, [certainly not this House that I have built]” (I Kings 8:27); and it says: “Do I not fill the heavens and the earth, [the utterance of the Lord]” (Jeremiah 23:24); and it says: “[So said the Lord:] The heavens are My throne, and the earth is My footstool; [what house could you build for Me, and what place could be My resting place]” (Isaiah 66:1).

The Holy One blessed be He said: I am not asking according to My ability, but rather, according to their ability. When I wish, the entire world cannot contain My glory, or even one of My suns. Rather, I am asking of you twenty4The reference is to the boards that support the Tabernacle. in the north, twenty in the south, and eight in the west. That is why Moses said: “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High” (Psalms 91:1); the Holy One blessed be He, who sits in the concealed place of the world, sees all but is not seen, and He seeks to rest in our shelter.

Rabbi Prozedak bar Naḥsha said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon: The Almighty rests in the shelter that was crafted by Betzalel; that is the Tabernacle. That is, “in the shelter, the Almighty will rest” (Psalms 91:1).5This is a reinterpretation of the second half of Psalms 91:1, instead of, “in the shadow of the Almighty he rests.” “I will say of the Lord: He is my shelter” (Psalms 91:2) – this song of ravages, Moses recited it as he ascended the mountain, as he feared demons.

What is: “I will say of the Lord: He is my shelter”? He is my protector. “And my fortress” (Psalms 91:2) – He is my bastion. “My God, in whom I trust” (Psalms 91:2) – as with His name, I fend off demons and angels of destruction.

“For He will rescue you” (Psalms 91:3) – the Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘You trusted Me; I will stand for you.’ “For He will rescue you…” “from an ensnared trap” (Psalms 91:3) – from a trap placed by a hunter; “from devastating pestilence” (Psalms 91:3) – from pestilence that brings devastation to the world. “He will cover You with His pinion” (Psalms 91:4) – what is: “He will cover You with His pinion [be’evrato]”?

It is by the merit of the Torah that was given with the right6The right is taken to refer to the right hand, and “be’evrato” is being interpreted as “with His limb.” of the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “From His right, a fiery law to them” (Deuteronomy 33:2). “You will find refuge under His wings; [a shield and armor are His truth]” (Psalms 91:4) – one who comes to seek refuge under the wings of the Holy One blessed be He, He is an actual shield and armor for him.

What is, “a shield and armor are His truth”? Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: I will craft a weapon for anyone who trades in the truth of Torah. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: The truth of Torah is a weapon for those who master it. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: The Holy One blessed be He gave a weapon to Israel with the ineffable Name written upon it.

“You will not fear the terror of night” (Psalms 91:5) – from Agrat bat Maḥalat and her chariot nor from all the demons that rule the night. “Nor the arrow that flies by day” (Psalms 91:5) – Rabbi Berekhya said: There is a demon that flies in the air like a bird and darts like an arrow. What will save you from it? It is sending the mother bird from the nest, as it is written previously: “For He will rescue you from an ensnared trap [paḥ]” (Psalms 91:3), and paḥ is nothing other than a bird, like the matter that is stated: “Will a bird fall into a trap [paḥ] on the ground…” (Amos 3:5).7Although paḥ is not itself a bird, it appears in the context of a bird, and can therefore be used as alluding to a bird.

And it is written: “If a bird’s nest happens before you.… You shall send [shale’aḥ teshalaḥ] [the mother] away…” (Deuteronomy 22:6–7).8This is expounded: If you encounter a demon, send away the mother bird, and you will be protected. If you send away [shale’aḥ] the bird, you will send away [teshalaḥ] the demons. “Nor the pestilence that stalks in darkness” (Psalms 91:6) – anyone whose actions are in the darkness, pestilence dominates him.

Likewise, it says: “Pestilence goes before Him, and plague emerges at His heels” (Habakkuk 3:5). It says the same here. “Nor the scourge [ketev] that ravages at noon” (Psalms 91:6) – the Rabbis say: It is a demon. Why is it called ketev?

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: Because it plunders the strength of the day from the beginning of the fourth hour until the end of the ninth hour.9Ketev is a portmanteau of kotef uvozez, meaning plucks and plunders. Rabbi Levi said: Because it plunders the strength of the day from the end of the fourth hour until the beginning of the ninth hour, but rules in neither the sun nor the shade, but only between the shade and the sun.

Its head resembles that of a calf, and a horn emerges from its forehead, and it rolls like a jug. Rav Huna said in the name of Rabbi Yosef: Ketev Meriri (Deuteronomy 32:24) is made of many scales, many hairs, and many eyes. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: One eye is affixed to its heart, and anyone who sees it has no life in this world, whether man or animal. And anyone who sees it falls and dies.

Meriri dominates from the seventeenth of Tamuz until the ninth of Av. Ḥizkiya saw it, fell on his face, and died. Rabbi Pinḥas HaKohen said: There was an incident involving one who saw it and fell on his face. It was said: Yehuda ben Rabbi Shmuel saw but did not fall. They said, nevertheless, he died.

Rabbi Abbahu was sitting and studying in a certain study hall in his place, Caesarea. He saw one pursuing another and in his hand was a certain rod10A wooden rod. with which he sought to strike him. He saw a demon pursuing him, and in his hand was an iron rod. Rabbi Abbahu went out and pursued him.

He said to him: ‘Do not strike him because he may die.’ He said to him: ‘Rabbi, from this he will die?’ He said to him: ‘There is a demon pursuing you and in his hand is an iron rod. You will strike him with this one, and it will strike him with that one and he will die.

Rabbi Yoḥanan would instruct the Bible teachers and the Mishna teachers that they should not raise a strap against the children on those days.11The days between the seventeenth of Tamuz and the ninth of Av. Rabbi Shmuel bar Rabbi Yitzḥak would instruct the Bible teachers and the Mishna teachers to dismiss the children after four hours of the day on those days. “[One thousand] will fall at your side, [and ten thousand to your right, but it will not reach you]” (Psalms 91:7) – Rav Yitzḥak said: Regarding the hand that controls one mitzva, the mitzva of phylacteries, it is written: “One thousand will fall at your side,” as one thousand angels were assigned to it to protect it.

However, the right hand, which controls many mitzvot, tens of thousands of angels are assigned to it. Rabbi Ḥanina ben Rabbi Abbahu said: It does not say: They will be assigned to you, but rather, they “will fall” (Psalms 91:7). If one thousand demons come, they will fall on the side that controls one mitzva, and if they are ten thousand demons, they will fall before the side that controls many mitzvot.

The way of the world is that if a person is assigned one thousand people, it is incumbent upon him to feed them. The Holy One blessed be He, though, assigns this person one thousand angels to his left and ten thousand to his right for his wellbeing and to protect him, “but it will not reach you” (Psalms 91:7) to feed them. “You will only look with your eyes” (Psalms 91:8) – your tranquility; “and see the punishment [shilumat] of the wicked” (Psalms 91:8) – You will see what the Holy One blessed be He will pay [sheyeshalem] to the wicked in accordance with their actions.

“For You, Lord, are my shelter; [You have made the most high Your dwelling place]” (Psalms 91:9) – Rabbi Ḥanina said: Israel said: ‘Holy One blessed be He, You gave us the Torah below with us, but Your Divine Presence rests on high?’ That is what is written: “For You, Lord, are my shelter,” as You gave me Your Torah, but “You have made the most high Your dwelling place,” You placed Your dwelling place on high?

“No evil will befall you” (Psalms 91:10) – just as it is stated: “No iniquity will befall the righteous” (Proverbs 12:21).12God responds that no evil will befall you even though He dwells on high. “And no plague will come near your tent” (Psalms 91:10) – Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Until the Tabernacle was erected, the demons would provoke people in the world. When the Tabernacle was erected, when the Divine Presence rested below, the demons were eliminated from the world.

That is what is written: “And no plague will come near your tent” – this is the Tent of Meeting. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Why must you go to the book of Psalms? In its place it is not lacking: “May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24). When?

“It was on the day that Moses concluded.” What is “the day that [Moses] concluded [kalot]’? It means that all the demons were eliminated [shekalu] from the world.

“It was on the day that [Moses] concluded” – that is what is written: “[King Solomon] made himself a palanquin [from the timber of Lebanon]” (Song of Songs 3:9) – this is the world, which is made like a type of palanquin. “King Solomon [Shelomo]” – this is the Holy One blessed be He, who instituted peace [shalom] between fire and water, combined one with the other, and crafted the firmament, as it is stated: “God called the firmament heaven [shamayim]” (Genesis 1:8), as it is fire [esh] and water [mayim].

“From the timber of Lebanon” – as it was constructed from the place of the Temple. Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥalafta said: Why is it called the foundation stone?13This is the stone that is located in the inner sanctum in the Temple. It is because the world was founded upon it. That is what is written: “From Zion, the epitome of beauty, God appeared” (Psalms 50:2).

“He crafted its pillars of silver, [its cushioning of gold, its seat of purple wool; its interior is inlaid with love, from the daughters of Jerusalem]” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the firmament, just as it says: “The pillars of the heavens will sag” (Job 26:11). Why does it call them silver [kesef]? It is because it puts the act of Creation to shame [mekhasef]. Likewise it says: “The heavens relate [the glory of God]” (Psalms 19:2).

“Its cushioning of gold” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the earth, which produces the fruit of the land and the fruit of the trees, which are similar to gold. Just as gold, there are different types and different shades, so too the fruits of the land; some of them are green and some of them are red. “Its seat [merkavo] of purple wool [argaman]” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the sun, which is placed above, rides on a chariot [bemerkava], and illuminates the world, just as it says: “It14The reference is to the sun that is mentioned in the previous verse. is like a bridegroom leaving his bridal chamber…” (Psalms 19:6).

By the power of the sun rain falls, and by the power of the sun the land produces fruit. That is why it calls it argaman, as the Holy One blessed be He created it in order to weave man for the creatures. Man is nothing other than fruit and food, just as it says: “The king allotted [vayman] for them [a daily portion from the king’s food]” (Daniel 1:5). “Its interior is inlaid with love” (Song of Songs 3:10) – as after all the act of Creation, He created Adam and Eve to rule over them all.15The phrase is being interpreted as meaning that the world was inlaid with what God loved, namely, Adam and Eve.

Likewise it says: “She has sent out her young women; she will call” (Proverbs 9:3).16This is expounded as referring to Adam and Eve (see Vayikra Rabba 11:1). That is, “from the daughters of Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 3:10) – that all the creations would fear them and be assigned to them, just as it says: “Fear of you and dread of you will be [upon every beast of the earth, and upon every bird of the heavens, and upon all that crawls on the ground, and upon all fish of the sea; into your hand they are given]” (Genesis 9:2).

Another matter: “Palanquin (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the world. Why is it called “palanquin [apiryon]”? It is because it was created only for procreation [lifriya]. Likewise it says: “He did not create it for emptiness; He formed it to be inhabited” (Isaiah 45:18).

“King Solomon [Shelomo] made for himself” (Song of Songs 3:10) – the Holy One blessed be He created it only so there would be peace [shalom] between the creations, as it is stated: “Who forms the light and creates darkness, makes peace…” (Isaiah 45:7). “From the timber [me’atzei] of Lebanon [halevanon]” (Song of Songs 3:10) – as by the counsel [shebaatzat] of the Torah, whose matters are clear [melubenet], God created the world.

Likewise it says: “Counsel [etza] and resourcefulness are mine” (Proverbs 8:14).17The word “mine” refers to wisdom. From where is it derived that the matters of Torah are clear? It is as indeed it is written: “Then He saw and quantified it, prepared it, and also investigated it. He said to man: [Behold, the fear of the Lord, it is wisdom, and turning away from evil is understanding]” (Job 28:27–28).

“He crafted its pillars of silver” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is a genealogy. Likewise it says: “The righteous one is the foundation of the world” (Proverbs 10:25). “Silver” is nothing other than refining the genealogy, just as it says: “He will sit like one refining and purifying silver, and he will purify the sons of Levi and refine them [like gold and like silver]” (Malachi 3:3). “Its cushioning of gold” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the Torah, in whose regard it is written: “They are more desirable than gold, than much fine gold” (Psalms 19:11), and the Holy One blessed be He gave it to study it only to one who preserves his genealogy.

Likewise, it says: “To the wicked one God said: What have you to do with My book of statutes, and you invoke My covenant” (Psalms 50:16)? Why is it so? “When you see a thief, you run with him; you join in with adulterers” (Psalms 50:18). And it says: “Render to the Lord, you families of the peoples; render to the Lord honor and might” (Psalms 96:7).18The fact that it says “families of peoples” and not just “peoples,” underscores the importance of genealogy.

“Its seat [merkavo] of purple wool” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the Holy One blessed be He, in whose regard it is written: “Who rides [rokhev] the heavens to assist you” (Deuteronomy 33:26). And He weaves the world so that all of them will emerge according to their species and they will not intermingle one species with another, just as it says: “Let the earth sprout vegetation” (Genesis 1:11).19In the following verse it says: “Vegetation yielding seed in its kind” (Genesis 1:12).

He rests His Divine Presence only upon those of pure lineage in Israel. Likewise it says: “To be a God for you and for your offspring after you” (Genesis 17:7). When your offspring are identifiable as being after you, the Holy One blessed be He is God to them, but when his offspring are not identifiable as being after him, as they are intermingled with the offspring of their counterparts, He is not God to them.

“Its interior is inlaid with love, from the daughters of Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 3:10) – Rabbi Yudan says: This is the merit of the Torah, as it is stated in its regard: “A loving doe” (Proverbs 5:19), and the merit of the righteous, as it is stated: “And I loved Jacob” (Malachi 1:2). Rabbi Azarya said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda bar Simon: This is the Divine Presence, just as it says: “You shall love the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 6:5).

Another matter: “Palanquin [apiryon]” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the eternal Temple. Why is it called apiryon? It is because all the golden forms would produce after its kind.20It expounds the word apiryon as producing fruit [peri]. “From the timber of Lebanon” (Song of Songs 3:10) – just as it says: “And we will cut timber from Lebanon…[and you will take it up to Jerusalem]” (II Chronicles 2:15).

“He crafted its pillars of silver” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “He erected the pillars before the Sanctuary, one to the right [and one to the left]” (II Chronicles 3:17). Was it of silver? Was it not of bronze?21As stated in I Kings 7:15–21. It was, rather, of refined bronze whose value equaled that of silver.

“Its cushioning of gold” (Song of Songs 3:10) – it is taught: The entire Temple was overlaid with gold, except for behind the doors (Midot 4:1). Rabbi Aivu said: The mishna is referring to the second Temple; however, in the first Temple it was even behind the doors. There are seven types of gold: Fine gold, pure gold, beaten gold, chased gold, glittering gold, refined gold, parvayim gold. Fine gold, in its plain sense, just as you say: “The gold of that land was fine” (Genesis 2:12).

Rabbi Yitzḥak said: It is fine when he is in the house, and it is fine when it is accompanying him. Pure gold, they place it in the crucible and it lacks nothing. Rabbi Yehuda said in the name of Rabbi Ami: Solomon placed one thousand gold talents into the furnace one thousand times until there remained only one talent. Was it not taught: Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Yehuda said: It happened that the candelabrum in the Temple was one Gordian dinar greater than the candelabrum of the wilderness, and he placed it in the furnace eighty times until it diminished?

Rather, initially the dross diminished by a large amount; from this point forward it diminished by only a minimal amount. Beaten gold is spun like a thread and drawn like wax. Hadrian had the weight of an egg [of beaten gold]. Diocletian had the weight of a Gordian dinar.22The egg-bulk is significantly larger.

This kingdom23Their Roman successors. has none of that. Chased gold [sagur] – that would cause all the owners of gold to close [soger].24The gold was of such high quality that all other gold dealers would close their shops until the chased gold was sold, since everyone would buy the high quality gold. But is it not written: “And seven thousand talents of refined silver, to overlay the walls of the houses” (I Chronicles 29:4)?

Was it silver? Was it not gold, as it is written: “The great Temple he overlaid with juniper wood, which he overlaid with fine gold” (II Chronicles 3:5)? Why do they call it silver [kesef]? It is because it would put to shame [makhsif] all the owners of gold.

And all the vessels were crafted from it, the basins, the pots, the shovels, the forks, the spoons, and the firepans, [were of] chased gold. There it is written: “And the potot for the doors of the Temple” (I Kings 7:50). What are potot? Rabbi Yitzḥak of Migdal said: It is the cup under the hinge.25The hinge extended into a hole in the ground.

A "cup" was placed in the hole, and the hinge extended into the cup. Rabbi Simai said: These are the teeth of the keys, to teach you that the Temple was not lacking even insignificant matters. Glittering [mufaz] gold – Rabbi Patriki, brother of Rabbi Derosai, says in the name of Rabbi Aivu Abba: It is like this sulfur enflamed in fire. Rabbi Avin said: It is after the name of its country, Me’ufaz.

Refined gold – the school of Reish Lakish says: They would cut it like olives, feed it to ostriches, and it emerges refined. Parvayim gold – Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: It is red and similar to the blood of a bull [par]; and some say that it produces fruits [perot]. Rabbi Ḥanina bar Yitzḥak said: When Menashe placed an idol in the Sanctuary, all those fruits dried. That is what is written: “The flower of Lebanon withers” (Nahum 1:4).

However, in the future, everything will be restored, as it is written: “It will blossom and will rejoice…” (Isaiah 35:2). “Its seat of purple wool” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “he crafted the curtain of sky-blue, purple, and crimson wool, and fine linen” (II Chronicles 3:14). Because the purple wool is the most important of them all, as it is a royal garment, just as it says: “He will don purple wool” (Daniel 5:7), that is why he mentioned it.

Similarly, “eaters of the flesh of swine, detestable creatures, and mice” (Isaiah 66:17) – what prohibition is there that is greater regarding swine than the rest of the non-kosher animals, and mice from the other creeping animals? Rather, it mentioned swine, and the same is true regarding all non-kosher animals and beasts, and it mentioned mice, and the same is true of all creeping animals in the world.

Another matter: “Palanquin” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the Ark. Rabbi Yehuda bar Rav Ilai said: This is analogous to a king who had a fine, praiseworthy, and appealing daughter. The king said to his servants: Craft a chair for her with a cover. It is preferable that they see the beauty of my daughter from behind the cover.

So, the Torah is fine, praiseworthy, and appealing. The Holy One blessed be He said: Craft an Ark for it, so its beauty will be seen from within the Ark. “King Solomon [Shelomo] made himself” (Song of Songs 3:10) – the king that peace [shalom] is His. He rendered the entire Torah that way, as it is stated: “All its ways are peace” (Proverbs 3:17).

“From the timber of Lebanon” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “you shall craft an Ark of acacia wood” (Exodus 25:10). “He crafted its pillars of silver” (Song of Songs 3:10) – these are the two pillars that stood before it like a type of portico. “Its cushioning of gold” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “you shall plate it with pure gold” (Exodus 25:11). “Its seat of purple wool” (Song of Songs 3:10) – Rabbi Tanḥuma said: This is the Ark cover, which is similar to purple, and it is written in its regard: “You shall place the Ark cover upon the Ark from above” (Exodus 25:21).

“Its interior is inlaid with love, from the daughters of Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 3:10) – Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: This is the merit of the Torah, this is the merit of the righteous who engage in its study. Rabbi Azarya said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon: This is the Divine Presence. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: It is written: “I will meet with you there…” (Exodus 25:22), etc.26This is a reference to the interpretation given later in this section.

Another matter: “Palanquin” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the Tabernacle. Rabbi Azarya said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon: To what is this matter comparable? It is to a king of flesh and blood who had a daughter and he loved her excessively. As long as his daughter was a minor, he would speak to her in public.

When he would see her in the courtyard, he would speak with her. When she grew older and displayed signs of puberty, the king said: It is not in keeping with my daughter’s honor that I will speak to her in public. Instead, craft a partition for her so that when I wish to speak with my daughter, I will speak with her behind the partition. So, when the Holy One blessed be He saw Israel in Egypt, they were lads, as it is stated: “When Israel was a lad, I loved him, and from Egypt I called My son” (Hosea 11:1).

He saw them at the sea, and He would speak to them, as it is stated: “The Lord said to Moses: Why are you crying out to Me? [Speak to the children of Israel]” (Exodus 14:15). He saw them at Sinai and would speak with them, as it is stated: “Face-to-face the Lord spoke with you” (Deuteronomy 5:4). Once they received the Torah and became a complete nation for Him, they said: “Everything that the Lord has spoken we will perform and we will heed” (Exodus 24:7).

The Holy One blessed be He said: It is not in keeping with my children’s honor that I will speak to them in public. Rather, craft for Me a Tabernacle, and when I need to speak with them, I will speak with them from the Tabernacle. That is what is written: “When Moses would come into the Tent of Meeting to speak with Him, [he heard the Voice speaking to him from above the Ark cover that was upon the Ark of the Testimony, from between the two cherubs, and He spoke to him]” (Numbers 7:89).

“King Solomon [Shelomo] made himself” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the Holy One blessed be He, that peace [shalom] is His, as He makes peace with Israel after the contention that He had with them due to the act of the calf. “From the timber of Lebanon” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “you shall make the boards for the Tabernacle [of acacia wood]” (Exodus 26:15). “He crafted its pillars of silver” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “the hooks of the pillars and their bands shall be of silver” (Exodus 27:11).

“Its cushioning of gold” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “you shall overlay the boards with gold” (Exodus 26:29). “Its seat is of purple wool” (Song of Songs 3:10) – “you shall craft a curtain of sky-blue, purple, [and crimson wool]” (Exodus 26:31), and it is written: “You shall screen the Ark with the curtain…” (Exodus 40:3). “Its interior is inlaid with love, from the daughters of Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 3:10) – Rabbi Azarya said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon: This is the Divine Presence.

Rabbi Yudan said: This is the merit of the Torah, and this is the merit of the righteous. Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin said in the name of Rabbi Levi: “Moses was unable to enter [the Tent of Meeting, because the cloud rested upon it and the glory of the Lord filled the Tabernacle]” (Exodus 40:35). To what is this matter comparable? It is to a cave that is located on the seashore.

The sea raged and the cave became filled with water, but the sea lacked nothing. So, the Tent of Meeting was filled with the radiance of the Divine Presence, but the world lacked nothing. That is, “its interior is inlaid with love, from the daughters of Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 3:10) – this is the Divine Presence. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: It is written: “I will meet with you there…” (Exodus 25:22) – it is to teach you that even what is behind the Ark cover is not unoccupied by the Divine Presence.

A certain idolater asked Rabban Gamliel: Why did the Holy One blessed be He appear to Moses from the midst of the bush? He said to him: Had he appeared on a certain carob tree or on a certain fig tree would you have asked me this? To dismiss you with nothing is not possible. It is to teach you that there is no place on earth that is unoccupied by the Divine Presence, as even from the bush He would speak would speak to Moses.

Another matter: “Palanquin…” (Song of Songs 3:10) – what is written just before it? “Behold the bed of Solomon: [There are sixty valiant men around it, from the valiant of Israel, all armed with a sword, trained in war; each man, a sword on his thigh, from fear in the nights]” (Song of Songs 3:7–8). This is the Priestly Benediction, as we stated previously.27See Bemidbar Rabba 11:3. It is to teach you that Solomon came only to explain the Torah and based his statements on the order of the Torah.

Just as just before the portion of the Tabernacle, the portion of the Priestly Benediction is written, so too, Solomon did the same: First he mentioned the Priestly Benediction, and then he spoke of the Tabernacle: “[King Solomon] made himself a palanquin” (Song of Songs 3:10). Why did he do so? Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin said: To what is the matter comparable? It is to a king who betrothed his daughter.

He made an elaborate betrothal celebration, and the evil eye affected them. When the king came to marry off his daughter, what did he do? He gave her an amulet. He said to her: Let this amulet be upon you so the evil eye will not affect you.

The Holy One blessed be He did so as well. When He came to give the Torah to Israel, He made an elaborate public celebration, as it is written: “All the people were seeing the thunder” (Exodus 20:15). That was only betrothal [kidushim], as it is written: “Go to the people and sanctify them [vekidashtam] today and tomorrow” (Exodus 19:10), but the evil eye affected them and the tablets were shattered, just as it says: “He shattered them at the foot of the mountain” (Exodus 32:19).

When they came to craft the Tabernacle, He did not do so. The Holy One blessed be He gave them the blessing first, so that the evil eye would not affect them. That is why it is first written: “May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24) from the evil eye, and then: “It was on the day that [Moses] concluded…”

Rabbi Avin said: The attributes of the Holy One blessed be He are not like the attributes of a king of flesh and blood. When a king of flesh and blood enters a province, after the residents of that province laud him and honor him, then he performs all their needs for them. He builds them communal buildings and performs deeds to facilitate their comfort in the province. But the Holy One blessed be He is not like that; rather, before Israel crafted the Tabernacle, the Holy One blessed be He gave them the blessing first, just as it is stated: “May the Lord bless you and protect you” (Numbers 6:24), and then: “It was on the day that [Moses] concluded…”

“It was [vayhi] on the day that [Moses concluded…]” – what is vayhi?28It indicates that it is as though they had discussed this matter previously. Rabbi Yehoshua said: The Holy One blessed be He stipulated conditions with Israel while they were still in Egypt that he would take them out of Egypt only in order that they will craft a Tabernacle for Him and cause His Divine Presence to rest in their midst, just as it is stated: “They will know that I am the Lord their God who took them out of the land of Egypt to cause Me to rest in their midst” (Exodus 29:46) – in order that I “rest in their midst.”

When the Tabernacle was erected, the Divine Presence descended and rested in their midst. “Vayhi” – Rav said: A matter that had not occurred from when the world was created until now took place on that day, as from when the world was created until that moment, the Divine Presence had not rested in the world below. It was only from when the Tabernacle was erected and onward; that is why “vayhi” is stated.29Vayhi is stated repeatedly in the Creation account, e.g., “it was [vayhi] evening, it was [vayhi] morning.”

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: It is a matter that was, and stopped, and then it was restored to the way it had been, as you find that from the beginning of the creation of the world that the Divine Presence rested in the world below, just as it is written: “They heard the sound of the Lord God proceeding in the garden…” (Genesis 3:8). When the Divine Presence departed at the time that Adam sinned, it did not descend again until the Tabernacle was erected. That is why “vayhi” is written; a matter that was, and stopped, and was restored to the way it had been.

“Vayhi” – there was woe [vai haya]. Who said woe? Rabbi Avin said: As it were, the Holy One blessed be He said woe. To what is the matter comparable?

It is to a king who had a cantankerous noblewoman wife. The king said to her: Fashion for me a royal purple garment. All her days that she was engaged in that garment, she did not complain. Days later, she completed the garment and gave it to the launderer.

He prepared it and she brought it to the king. When the king saw her, he began shouting woe. Let her not return to her cantankerous nature. So, you find that Israel were complaining all the time, just as it is written: “The people complained against Moses” (Exodus 15:24), and likewise: “the entire congregation of the children of Israel complained [against Moses and against Aaron]” (Exodus 16:2), and likewise: “You have killed the people of the Lord” (Numbers 17:6).

The Holy One blessed be He demanded that they craft a Sanctuary for Him, as it is written: “They shall craft a sanctuary for Me…” (Exodus 25:8). You find that all the days that they were engaged in the labor of the Tabernacle, they were not complaining. When they completed the labor of the Tabernacle, the Holy One blessed be He was shouting woe, let them not return to complaining like they used to complain.

“Vayhi” – the firstborn said woe because the priesthood had been taken from them, as until the Tabernacle was erected, the independent altars were permitted and the service was performed by the firstborn, as it is stated: “He sent the young men of the children of Israel, and they offered up burnt offerings…” (Exodus 24:5), and likewise it is written: “You shall ascend, and Aaron with you, but the priests and the people [shall not advance to ascend]” (Exodus 19:24).

Rabbi Yehoshua ben Korḥa and Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi]: One of them says: “The priests” – these are the firstborn; and the other said: These are Nadav and Avihu. Likewise, it is written: “The Lord broke the staff of the wicked, the rod [of rulers]” (Isaiah 14:5). Rabbi Abba bar Mamal said: These are the firstborn; because they sacrificed to the calf, they lost the priesthood. Likewise, you find that all the priests who performed service for idol worship in the first Temple, the Holy One blessed be He disqualified them in the second Temple, as it is stated: “But the priests, the Levites, sons of Tzadok, [who kept the commission of My Sanctuary when the children of Israel strayed from Me, they shall approach Me to serve Me]” (Ezekiel 44:15).

That is why the firstborn shouted woe when the Tabernacle was erected. “Vayhi” – who said woe? The ministering angels said woe. They said: Now the Holy One blessed be He will forsake us and descend and reside on earth.

Nevertheless, the Holy One blessed be He appeased them and said to them: As you live, the essence is on high, as it is written: “His glory covered the heavens” (Habakkuk 3:3), and then “His praise filled the earth” (Habakkuk 3:3). Rabbi Simon said in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi: The Holy One blessed be He misled them when He said to them that the essence is on high. From where is that derived?

It is as it is written: “His glory is on earth and the heavens” (Psalms 148:13) – first earth and then the heavens. That is why they said woe. “Vayhi” – who said woe? The nations of the world said woe.

Why woe? It is, rather, that this is what they said: Before the Holy One blessed be He was resting in their midst, He would stand over them and fight their wars; now that they crafted a Tabernacle for Him and He resides in their midst, all the more so. That is why they said woe.

“On the day” – that is what is written: “Go out and gaze, daughters of Zion, [at King Solomon, at the crown with which his mother crowned him on the day of his wedding, and on the day of the rejoicing of his heart]” (Song of Songs 3:11). It is speaking at the time that the Divine Presence rested upon the Tabernacle. “Go out and gaze” – just as it says: “The entire people saw, shouted, and fell on their faces” (Leviticus 9:24).30This was their reaction to seeing the Divine Presence in the Tabernacle.

“The daughters of Zion [Tziyon]” – [alludes to] those who are marked [metzuyanim] for Him with circumcision, as had they not been circumcised they would not have been able to look at the Divine Presence. Rather, they would have fallen, just as Abraham our patriarch fell, as it is stated: “Abram fell on his face, and God spoke with him” (Genesis 17:3). Likewise, regarding Bilam, it says: “He falls with uncovered eyes” (Numbers 24:4, 16).

Likewise it says: “Moses said: This is the matter that the Lord commanded that you shall do, and the glory of the Lord will appear to you” (Leviticus 9:6). What is, “this is the matter [ze hadavar]”? It was regarding circumcision that he said to them, just as it says: “This is the reason [veze hadavar] that Joshua circumcised” (Joshua 5:4). “That the Lord commanded” – to do to Abraham; this is analogous to a storekeeper who had a friend who was a priest.

There was impurity in the house of his friend [the storekeeper], who sought to bring him to his house. The priest said to him: If you wish that I will come into your house, listen to me and remove the impurity from inside your house. When the storekeeper knew that there was no impurity there, he went and brought the priest into his house. So, the Holy One blessed be He, when he sought to appear to Abraham, his beloved, a foreskin was still attached to him.

Once he circumcised himself, He immediately appeared, as it is stated: “On that very day, Abraham was circumcised” (Genesis 17:26), and then: “The Lord appeared to him” (Genesis 18:1). That is why Moses said to them: ‘God commanded to have circumcision performed on Abraham your patriarch when He sought to appear to him. You too, anyone of you who has someone uncircumcised, let him come out and have himself circumcised, “and the glory of the Lord will appear to you.”’

That is why Solomon said: “Go out and gaze, daughters of Zion, at King Solomon [Shelomo],” at the king who desires faultless [shelemim] people, just as it says: “Walk before Me and be faultless” (Genesis 17:1), as the foreskin is a blemish on the body. Another matter: “At King Solomon [Shelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:11) – at the King who created His creations complete [shelemim]. He created the sun and the moon in their fullness, and all the acts of Creation were created in their full stature, as it is stated: “[The heaven and] the earth and all their hosts [tzevaam]” (Genesis 2:1).31Tzevaam is expounded as tzivyonam, in their full form.

Bar Kappara said: Adam and Eve were created as twenty-year-olds. Another matter: “At King Solomon [Shelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:11) – at the King who made peace between his creations and those who love Him. He made peace between fire and Abraham32This refers to a midrash that states that Nimrod placed Abraham in a furnace and that God saved Abraham (Bereshit Rabba 39:3)., the sword and Isaac, and angels and Jacob.

Another matter: “At King Solomon [Shelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:11) – at the King who makes peace between his creations. The heavenly beasts are of fire, and the firmament is of snow. The heavenly beasts are of fire, as it is stated: “The beasts were darting to and fro like the appearance of a flash” (Ezekiel 1:14). The firmament is of snow, as it is stated: “Over the heads of the beast there was the likeness of a firmament, resembling the [awesome] ice…” (Ezekiel 1:22).

Neither does this one extinguish that one, nor does that one consume this one. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: “Dominion and fear are with Him; [He makes peace in His heights]” (Job 25:2). “Dominion” – this is Mikhael, and he is of snow; “and fear” – this is Gavriel, and he is of fire. What is “with Him”?

They are devoted [mushlamim] to Him; this one does not harm that one, and that one does not harm this one. Not only does He go so far as to make peace between angel and angel, but even within one angel he makes peace, as he has five faces. That is what is written: “His body was like beryl, his face like the appearance of lightning, [his eyes like torches of fire, his arms and his legs like burnished bronze, and the sound of his speech like the noise of a multitude]” (Daniel 10:6) – neither does this one extinguish that one, nor does that one extinguish this one.33The lightning and the fire are against the beryl, which is translated as resembling the sea, and the great multitude is likewise an allusion to water.

It is written: “A river of fire flowed and emerged [from before Him]” (Daniel 7:10), and the firmament is of water, as it is stated: “He roofs His upper chambers with water” (Psalms 104:3). Neither does this one extinguish that one, nor does that one extinguish this one. Rabbi Yaakov of Kefar Ḥanan said: “He makes peace in His heights” (Job 25:2) – the sun has never seen the concave side of the moon.34See Rosh HaShana 23b where the Gemara states that this is to prevent the moon from feeling bad.

Rabbi Yoḥanan said: There is no constellation that sees what preceded it, and there is no constellation that sees what is above it, only what is below it, like this person that descends a ladder, turned backwards. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai taught: The firmament is of water and the stars of fire, and they reside one with the other and they do not harm one another. Even between the plagues He makes peace [shalom].

That is what is written: “There was hail and fire igniting [mitlakaḥat] within the hail” (Exodus 9:24). Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Neḥemya: Rabbi Yehuda said: Bowls of hail filled with fire. Rabbi Neḥemya said: Fire and water intermingled one with the other. Rabbi Ḥanan said: The explanation of Rabbi Yehuda is that it is like the seed of a split pomegranate that can be seen from the outside.

The explanation of Rabbi Neḥemya is that it is like this lantern of a lamp, in which water and oil are mixed as one, and it is kindled above them. Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: What is mitlakaḥat? It means dies [maita] and regroups [umitkahala] to perform its mission in order to perform the will of its Creator. Rav Ada said: This is analogous to a king who had two powerful legions that would contend with one another.

When a war involving the king came about, they made peace with one another and came and waged the king’s war. So, hail and fire contended with one another. When they saw the war of the Holy One blessed be He with Egypt, it is stated: “There was hail and fire igniting within the hail” – a miracle within a miracle. That is why it is stated: “At King Solomon [Shelomo]” (Song of Songs 3:11).

“At the crown with which his mother crowned him” (Song of Songs 3:11) – Rabbi Yitzḥak said: We have reviewed the entire Bible, and we have not found that Batsheva fashioned a crown for her son Solomon. Rather, “crown” – this is the Tent of Meeting, which is like this crown that is set with jewels and gems and is adorned with sky-blue, purple, and crimson wool, and fine linen. Rav Ḥoneya said: Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai asked Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Yosei, he said to him: ‘Did you, perchance, hear from your father, what is: “At the crown with which his mother crowned him”?’

He said to him: ‘Yes. It is analogous to a king who had an only daughter and he loved her excessively. He did not relent from loving her, to the extent he called her his sister. He did not relent from loving her to the extent he called her his mother.

So, the Holy One blessed be He loved Israel. He called them: “My sister, my love, my faultless dove” (Song of Songs 5:2). He did not relent from loving them, to the extent he called them His mother. That is what is written: “Pay attention to Me, My people, and listen to Me, My nation [ule’umi]” (Isaiah 51:4); ule’imi is written.’35Without a vav, meaning My mother.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai stood and kissed him on his head. He said to him: ‘Had I emerged into the world only to hear this explanation from your mouth, it would have been sufficient.’ Alternatively, “his mother [imo]” means his nation [umato]. Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin said in the name of Rabbi Levi: When the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘They shall craft a Tabernacle for Me,’ he should have placed four poles upright and stretched the Tabernacle atop them.

Rather, it teaches that the Holy One blessed be He showed Moses on high red fire, green fire, black fire, and white fire; He said to him: ‘In the form “that you are shown on the mountain”’ (Exodus 25:40). Rabbi Berekhya in the name of Rabbi Batzla: This is analogous to a king who had a magnificent garment fashioned with jewels. He said to a member of his household: ‘Fashion me one like this.’ He said to him: ‘My lord the king, am I able to craft one like it?’

He told him: ‘I in my glory, and you with your dyes.’36Do your best to approximate the garment that you see. So, Moses said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘My God, am I able to craft like these?’ He said to him: ‘Like the form “that I [am showing you]”’ (Exodus 25:9), “with the sky-blue, the purple, and the crimson wool, and with the fine linen” (Exodus 38:23). The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: If you craft what is above, below, I will abandon My supernal council and descend and constrict My Divine Presence into your midst below.

Above, “seraphim standing” (Isaiah 6:2); below, “acacia wood standing” (Exodus 26:15). It is not written here: “Place acacia wood upright,” but rather, “standing,” as though placed among the hosts on high. That is what is written: “Seraphim standing above Him” (Isaiah 6:2). Just as above there are stars, so below37In the Tabernacle. there are stars.

Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said: It teaches that the gold hooks in the Tabernacle looked like the stars fixed in the firmament. “On the day of his wedding” (Song of Songs 3:11) – this is Sinai. There was matrimony, as it is stated: “Sanctify them [vekidashtam]38This is expounded to mean betrothal [kidushin]. today and tomorrow” (Exodus 19:10). “And on the day of the rejoicing of his heart” (Song of Songs 3:11) – this is the giving of the Torah, as it is stated: “He gave to Moses, when He concluded [kekhaloto] [speaking with him on Mount Sinai, the two tablets of the Testimony]” (Exodus 31:18).

Kekhalato is written.39Meaning: Like His bride. Another matter: “On the day of his wedding” (Song of Songs 3:11) – this is the Tent of Meeting. “And on the day of the rejoicing of his heart” (Song of Songs 3:11) – this is the eternal Temple. From where is it derived that there was matrimony at the Tent of Meeting?

It is as it is written: “On the day that Moses concluded [kalot] erecting the Tabernacle.” Kalat is written; on the day that the bride [kala] entered the wedding canopy.