When the Court Below Flogs What Heaven Will Not Clear

Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 293:2

Rav Idi bar Avin said in the name of Rabbi Amram, who said in the name of Rabbi Yitzhak, who said in the name of Rabbi Yohanan: Rabbi Yehudah says in the name of Rabbi Yose the Galilean, every prohibition in the Torah that is a negative commandment involving an action, one is flogged for it; a negative commandment that does not involve an action, one is not flogged for it, except for one who swears falsely, one who exchanges a consecrated animal, and one who curses his fellow using the divine Name. From where do we learn the case of one who swears? Rabbi Yohanan said in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai: Scripture says, "You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not clear one who takes His name in vain" (Exodus 20:7). The court above does not clear him, but the court below flogs him and thereby clears him. Rav Pappa said to Abaye: Perhaps the Merciful One means it this way, that He will not clear him at all? He replied: If it were written "He will not clear," it would be as you say; but now that it is written "for the LORD will not clear," it is the LORD who does not clear him, yet the court below flogs him and clears him. We have found a source for the vain oath; from where do we learn the false oath? Rabbi Yohanan himself said: "in vain," "in vain" is written two times. If the second is not needed for the matter of the vain oath, apply it to the matter of the false oath, such as one who swears "I ate" when he did not eat. And why are they different? Rava said: Explicitly the Torah broadened the false oath to resemble the vain oath; just as the vain oath concerns the past, so too the false oath concerns the past.

Themes