5 min read

God Redeemed Israel Before Israel Deserved It

At the Red Sea, Israel and Egypt looked alike to strict justice. God split the water not because Israel was worthy but because an oath outranked merit.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Lily Was Hard to Reach
  2. What Rebecca's Father Saw First
  3. What the Oath Overruled
  4. The Lily Among Thorns Again

Israel stood at the edge of the sea with Pharaoh's army behind them, and the court of heaven had an ugly file open on both parties.

The clean story is slaves escaping and oppressors drowning. Vayikra Rabbah 23, the fifth-century CE Leviticus midrash, starts the story earlier, inside Egypt's habits, and the picture it gives is not clean. By the time Israel reached the shore, they had lived among Egypt's practices long enough that the two peoples had started to resemble each other in ways that strict justice would not overlook.

The Lily Was Hard to Reach

Rabbi Elazar takes the image from Song of Songs 2:2, a lily among thorns, and places it at the edge of the sea. In Vayikra Rabbah 23:2, he says redemption was difficult for God the way it is difficult to pluck a delicate flower from a thornbush. Not because the sea was wide. Not because Pharaoh was militarily formidable. The difficulty came from what strict justice saw when it looked at the people God was about to save.

Egyptians and Israelites had both become uncircumcised in practice. Both had grown long locks in the Egyptian style. Both wore sha'atnez, the forbidden mixture of wool and linen. The midrash does not say Israel had been fully absorbed into Egyptian culture. It says the prosecution had details, not slogans. When the guardian angels of the other nations argued before the throne that both peoples deserved the same fate, they had specific evidence. Israel going through the sea and Egypt going through the sea would have looked, from strict justice's perspective, like two comparable groups receiving two comparable outcomes.

What Rebecca's Father Saw First

Vayikra Rabbah 23:1 builds toward the sea through a verse in Leviticus: you shall not follow the practices of Egypt where you lived, and you shall not follow the practices of Canaan where I am bringing you (Leviticus 18:3). Rabbi Yitzhak connects this commandment to Rebecca's story. Her father and brother were men of bad character. What saved her from absorbing their values was what Rabbi Yitzhak calls her own inner uprightness. She was the lily in the thornbush before she was the matriarch of Israel. The commandment not to follow Egypt's practices is addressed to people who have already been living inside those practices. It assumes contamination. It demands separation.

Israel coming out of Egypt was not a population that had been hermetically sealed from Egyptian influence for four hundred years. They were a people who had built the cities, eaten the food, worn the clothes, kept the hair, and breathed the air of a particular civilization for generations. The commandment they received at the beginning of the legal code about sexual morality was not theoretical. It was a response to a documented entanglement.

What the Oath Overruled

If the sea had split based on merit, both peoples might have drowned. Something else operated at the shore.

Vayikra Rabbah's reading does not make Israel's rescue a reward for righteousness. It makes it the fulfillment of a prior commitment. God had sworn to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He had sworn to the patriarchs who walked uprightly before strict justice even had Israel as a case to evaluate. That oath was not contingent on what their descendants did in Egypt. It preceded the Egyptian period entirely. The prosecution could lay out the long locks, the linen woven into the wool, the foreskins left whole, and every item would be true, and none of it would reach the oath, because the oath had been spoken to men who were dust by the time the file was opened.

So the lily came loose from the thorns. The water stood up on either side and held, and Israel walked through on the seabed not because the prosecution had run out of evidence but because the evidence was answering the wrong question. Strict justice asked what these people had earned. The oath asked what had already been promised, and a promise made to the dead still binds the living.

The Lily Among Thorns Again

Rabbi Berekhya, also in Vayikra Rabbah 23, imagines God speaking to Moses: when you were in Egypt you were like a lily among thorns. Now that you are entering Canaan, remain like a lily among thorns. The warning is not that Israel became contaminated in Egypt. The warning is that the contamination was not finished with them. Canaan would present the same temptations. The thornbush was simply a different thornbush.

The law being given was not retrospective judgment. It was prospective instruction for a people the lily image acknowledged as fragile, beautiful, and genuinely at risk. The same plant that had survived Egypt by some thread of inner uprightness was being told that survival was not a finished act. It would have to keep choosing to be a lily in soil seeded with thorns, the way Rebecca had stayed upright in her father's house and the way Israel had stayed barely distinct enough at the sea for the oath to find a lily to pull free.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Vayikra Rabbah 23:1Vayikra Rabbah

The Torah tackles this very question, and the answer is surprisingly nuanced.

We find a fascinating passage in Vayikra Rabbah 23, which explores (Leviticus 18:3): “You shall not act in accordance with the practices of the land of Egypt in which you lived, and you shall not act in accordance with the practices of the land of Canaan where I am bringing you, and you shall not follow their statutes.” Seems straightforward. Don't imitate the surrounding cultures. But the Rabbis dig deeper.

This teaching connects "the practices of the land of Egypt" to the verse "Like a lily among the thorns" from the Song of Songs (2:2). Intriguing, isn't it? What does a lily have to do with avoiding Egyptian customs?

Rabbi Yitzchak offers a powerful interpretation using the story of Rebecca. Remember her? (Genesis 25:20) tells us that Isaac was forty when he married Rebecca, the daughter of Betuel the Aramean from Padan Aram, sister of Laban the Aramean. Now, the Rabbis ask, if we already know she's from Padan Aram, why the need to emphasize that her father and brother were Arameans? As Bereishit Rabba 63:4 points out, isn't it redundant?

The answer is profound. Rebecca’s family, her entire locale, was steeped in deceit. Her father was a ramai, a deceiver! And yet, from this environment of trickery and falsehood, emerged a righteous woman. This, Rabbi Yitzchak says, is the lily among the thorns. Rebecca was surrounded by corruption, yet she remained pure, untainted by the negative influences around her.

Rabbi Pinchas, quoting Rabbi Simon, adds another layer using (Genesis 28:5), which speaks of Jacob going to Padan Aram to find Laban, son of Betuel the Aramean. Rabbi Pinchas says that the verse "included them all in deceit." The very name "Padan Aram" implies a place of deception. (See also the commentary in Bereishit Rabbah, which develops this idea further.)

So what’s the takeaway? Vayikra Rabbah isn't just telling us to avoid adopting foreign customs. It's highlighting the incredible strength it takes to maintain one's integrity, one's values, in a corrupt environment. It’s about the power of the individual to rise above their surroundings.

Rebecca's story becomes a powerful metaphor. Just as a lily can bloom amidst thorns, so too can we remain righteous, ethical, and true to our values, even when surrounded by negativity. It’s a reminder that while our environment can influence us, it doesn't have to define us. We have the power to choose our own path, to be a light in the darkness, a lily among the thorns. And isn't that a comforting and challenging thought?

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 23:2Vayikra Rabbah

Rabbi Elazar paints a vivid picture. Imagine a lily growing amidst a thicket of thorns. Beautiful. But how difficult would it be to pluck it, to reach in and claim that delicate flower? That, he says, is how challenging it was for God to redeem Israel. Deuteronomy (4:34) reminds us of the tribulations, signs, wonders, war, mighty hand, outstretched arm, and fearsome deeds involved. It wasn't exactly a walk in the park!

Here's the kicker. Rabbi Elazar points out something even more unsettling. The Egyptians and the Israelites weren't all that different! Both were, shall we say, “uncircumcised” in spirit (and perhaps literally!), both sported long locks, both wore sha’atnez – diverse kinds of forbidden mixtures of wool and linen. Basically, the Israelites acted just like the nations of the world. So, from a purely legalistic point of view – from the perspective of the attribute of justice – there was no real reason to redeem them. Yikes!

So, what tipped the scales? Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani offers a powerful explanation: God had bound Himself with an oath. Had He not, Israel would have remained in Egypt forever. He points to (Exodus 6:6), "Lakhen, say to the children of Israel, I am the Lord, and I will take you out…I will rescue you…I will redeem you." That word lakhen? It doesn't just mean "therefore." Rabbi Shmuel says it's an expression of an oath, just like in I (Samuel 3:14), "Therefore, I have taken an oath to the house of Eli."

Rabbi Berekhya adds another layer. "With Your arm, You redeemed Your people" (Psalms 77:16) – with force! He suggests that God, in a sense, overpowered the attribute of justice to fulfill His promise. He bent the rules, so to speak, out of love and commitment.

And then, we get into some numerological territory. Rabbi Yudan points out that from "to come and take for himself a nation from the midst of a nation" until "with fearsome deeds" in (Deuteronomy 4:34), there are seventy-two letters. (Just be sure to remove the second usage of the word "nation" to get the count right!). Rabbi Avin takes it a step further, saying that God redeems them with His very name, because the name of the Holy One blessed be He, is also seventy-two letters.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it's a reminder that redemption isn't always about deserving. Sometimes, it's about promise, about love, about a force that transcends strict justice. It reminds us that even when we’re not at our best, when we’re stuck in our own "Egypt," there's a divine commitment to our liberation. The Exodus story, as interpreted by the Rabbis, is less a tale of perfect righteousness and more a evidence of unwavering divine love. And that, my friends, is a story worth remembering.

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 23:7Vayikra Rabbah

That feeling is surprisingly ancient.

The Rabbis of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) knew it well, wrestling with how to maintain Jewish identity in a world of competing cultures. In Vayikra Rabbah 23, we find a fascinating interpretation of the verse prohibiting Israelites from following the practices of Egypt and Canaan (Leviticus 18:3). It's more than just a simple commandment; it’s a story about identity, influence, and staying true to yourself.

Rabbi Berekhya paints a beautiful picture. He imagines God saying to Moses: "When you were in Egypt, you were comparable to a ‘lily between the thorns.’ Now that you are entering the land of Canaan, be like a lily among the thorns; make certain that you do not act in accordance with the practices of these, or in accordance with the practices of those." image for a moment. A lily, delicate and beautiful, surrounded by sharp, prickly thorns. It’s a powerful metaphor for the Israelites’ position. They were vulnerable, yet they possessed a unique beauty and holiness that needed to be protected. The challenge? To thrive without being consumed by the surrounding environment.

Rabbi Yitzḥak offers another compelling interpretation. He compares Egypt and Canaan to twin daughters, born of the same mother, from the same father, even from the same fetal sac! He draws a parallel from (Genesis 10:6), which lists the sons of Ham, including Kush, Egypt, Fut, and Canaan, together. The implication is that these nations, like identical twins, shared similar characteristics, particularly when it came to moral corruption. This makes the warning against emulating them all the more urgent.

Rabbi Ḥanina then shares a parable: A king has an only daughter and settles her in an alleyway known for its licentiousness and sorcery. Naturally, he warns her: “Make certain that you do not act in accordance with the practices of these, and in accordance with the practices of those.”

This parable really hits home, doesn't it? The daughter represents Israel, and the dangerous alleyway represents the corrupting influences of Egypt and Canaan.

But what were those "practices" exactly? The Midrash doesn't shy away from specifics. When the Israelites were in Egypt, the Egyptians were "practitioners of licentiousness," described in (Ezekiel 23:20) as having "flesh like donkeys," meaning they were unrestrained and animalistic in their desires. And when the Israelites entered Canaan, they encountered a culture steeped in both licentiousness and sorcery, as described in (Nahum 3:4): “Due to the great licentiousness of the harlot, blessed with grace, practitioner of witchcraft.”

So, God's warning, "Make certain that you do not act in accordance with the practices of these, nor in accordance with the practices of those," wasn't just a general admonition. It was a specific call to resist the very real and pervasive temptations surrounding them. The stakes were high: the preservation of their unique covenant with God.

What does this all mean for us today? We might not be facing the exact same challenges as the ancient Israelites, but we are constantly bombarded with influences – from social media, from popular culture, from societal pressures. How do we remain "lilies among the thorns"? How do we stay true to our values, to our traditions, in a world that often seems to be pulling us in the opposite direction?

Perhaps the key lies in recognizing the "thorns" for what they are: fleeting, ultimately unsatisfying distractions that can wound our souls. And in consciously choosing to cultivate the "lily" within us: the beauty, the holiness, the unique spark of divinity that makes us who we are. It's a lifelong journey, a constant balancing act, but one well worth undertaking.

Full source