5 min read

They Mocked Phinehas for His Lineage and God Answered Them Publicly

After Phinehas stopped the plague, his enemies attacked his mother's lineage. God answered by publicly establishing his priestly identity through Moses.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Plague Had Stopped and the Mockery Began
  2. Contamination by Lineage
  3. What God Said to Moses
  4. What the Covenant of Peace Actually Gave Him

The Plague Had Stopped and the Mockery Began

Twenty-four thousand dead. Then silence. The plague that had been moving through the camp of Israel stopped the moment Phinehas's lance went through Zimri and Cozbi. The stopping was immediate and absolute, the kind of correlation the tradition never treats as coincidence. Phinehas stood at the center of the camp with the bodies on his lance, and the first thing his enemies found to say about him was: look at the grandson of a man who fattened calves for idol worship.

The grandfather they meant was Jethro. Before his conversion, before he became the priest who recognized the God of Israel and brought Moses wisdom about how to delegate judicial authority, before he was Moses's father-in-law and the man whose seven daughters had been kind to a stranger at a well in Midian, Jethro had been a priest of idols in Midian. The specific charge the mockers raised - that he fattened calves for pagan sacrifice - was a real and specific accusation about Jethro's pre-conversion career, carrying the full weight of everything Israel had just been punished for at Shittim. Cozbi, whose death had ended the plague, was Midianite. Jethro had served Midianite gods. The implication was not subtle.

Contamination by Lineage

The Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginzberg's compilation published between 1909 and 1938, drawing from Numbers Rabbah (5th-century Palestine) and from the midrashic tradition, records the mockery in exact terms: look at this son of Puti, whose maternal grandfather fattened calves for idol worship, and he dares to slay a prince of Israel. The mockers were doing a classic strategy of contamination by lineage. They could not argue that Zimri had not sinned. They could not argue that the plague had not stopped when Phinehas acted. They could not dispute the outcome or the causation. So they went to the bloodline. He came from impure stock. His act was tainted by origin. Disregard the result and look at the ancestry.

The same logic that had driven the seduction at Shittim - the appeal to kinship and shared ancestry made by the Moabite women to the Israelite men - was now being deployed in reverse: Phinehas's kinship with Jethro, with Midian, with the very category of person that Zimri's sin had implicated, was supposed to disqualify him retroactively from the act of enforcement that had just saved thousands of lives.

What God Said to Moses

God's response was to make the identity claim publicly and permanently in the text of Torah itself. God told Moses to record the following: Phinehas the son of Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest. Not the son of Puti. Not the grandson of the Midianite idol priest. The son of Eleazar. The grandson of Aaron. The man who had turned My wrath away from the children of Israel, who was zealous for My sake among them, so that I did not consume the children of Israel in My jealousy.

The Ginzberg tradition notes the deliberateness of the identification. God did not say Phinehas and leave the lineage to inference. God named the line three generations back, going up through Eleazar to Aaron, the line of priestly holiness, the line that defined who Phinehas was for the purposes of the covenant and the priesthood and everything that followed. The maternal line, the Jethro connection, the Midianite grandfather - God bypassed all of it and identified Phinehas by the line that mattered for what he had just done.

What the Covenant of Peace Actually Gave Him

After the identification, God gave Phinehas the brit shalom, the covenant of peace, and the brit kehunah olam, the covenant of everlasting priesthood. The covenant of peace is striking given what Phinehas had just done with a lance. He had not acted in peace. He had acted in zeal, in violence, in the execution of a judgment that left two bodies on a shaft of metal. The peace God offered him was not the peace of the act but the peace of what the act had accomplished: the plague stopped, the wrath turned aside, Israel still standing on the east bank of the Jordan rather than destroyed at Shittim.

Phinehas threw the two bodies on the ground and cried out to God afterward: why have You slain twenty-four thousand for the sins of these two? The angels were furious at his audacity. Who was he to question the Almighty? God told them to leave him in peace. He is a zealot, God said, the son of a zealot. He preserved the seed of Abraham. The identity God named was not just genealogical. It was the shape of a man who had acted when no one else could, had survived twelve miracles, had ended a plague, and was now standing in a camp full of corpses asking God to explain why it had taken so long.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

7 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 6:68Legends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews turns to Phinehas and the Patriarchs.

Ouch.

This "spiteful remark," as Ginzberg describes it, refers to Phinehas's maternal lineage. his mother was descended not only from Joseph, but also from Jethro, the Midianite priest who later converted to Judaism. Before his conversion, Jethro had been a priest of idols. So, Phinehas was getting slammed for his ancestry.

God, however, wasn't having it. He says to Moses, "Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, hast turned My wrath away from the children of Israel, hence I offer him My greeting of peace, for it was he who, zealous for My sake, preserved the seed of Abraham."

Notice anything interesting in that sentence? God specifically identifies Phinehas as the son of Eleazar and the grandson of Aaron, the High Priest. Why? That He wanted to silence Phinehas’s critics. They were conveniently ignoring the fact that he was also the grandson of Aaron, the High Priest, focusing only on his connection to the former idol-worshiper.

God goes even further. He doesn't just offer peace; He instructs Moses to tell Phinehas: "With thy mouth hast thou defended Israel, therefore as thy priest's portion shalt thou receive the jawbone of animals; with thy lance didst thou aim at the bellies of the shameless couple, hence shalt thou receive the bellies of the animals; and as with thy arm thou didst labor to slay the sinners, so for thy portion shalt thou receive the shoulder of the animals. As, moreover, thou didst strive to make peace among mankind, so shalt thou bestow the priestly blessing upon My children, and bless them with peace."

This is a beautiful example of middot keneged middot – measure for measure. The Zohar tells us about this principle, that our actions are responded to in kind. Because of how he acted, he will be rewarded accordingly.

And there's more! As a reward for his pious deed, God appointed Phinehas as a priest with full priestly rights, enabling him to claim the twenty-four priestly tributes. According to Midrash Rabbah, this was a way of permanently silencing his detractors and solidifying his position.

So, what can we learn from Phinehas's story? Perhaps it's that doing the right thing isn't always easy. You might face criticism, your past might be used against you. But if your intentions are pure and your actions are righteous, divine recognition. And even a few extra priestly perks, may just be in store for you. It reminds us to look beyond superficial judgments and recognize the good in others, regardless of their background.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:66Legends of the Jews

The story doesn't end there. According to Legends of the Jews, compiled by Ginzberg, Phinehas wasn't satisfied with simply punishing the offenders. He felt compelled to reconcile God with Israel.

The scene: he throws the two dead bodies, a stark reminder of the transgression, onto the ground. And then, he cries out to God, "Why, alas! Hast Thou on account of the sins of these two slain twenty-four thousand Israelites!" He's referring, of course, to the devastating plague that struck Israel as a consequence of their sin. Twenty-four thousand lives lost!

The angels? Well, they weren't impressed. They wanted to strike Phinehas down for his audacity. Can you blame them? Who was he to question the Almighty? But then, God intervenes. "Leave him in peace," He commands. "He is a zealot, the son of a zealot, and an appeaser of wrath, the son of an appeaser of wrath." God calls him a zealot – a kanai in Hebrew, someone passionately devoted, even to the point of being uncompromising. But it's not just him. His father, too, was a zealot, and both father and son were considered "appeasers of wrath." They had a knack for turning away divine anger.

What does this tell us? It suggests that even extreme actions, when motivated by a genuine desire to defend God's honor and protect the community, can be seen as righteous. But it also highlights the inherent danger in such zeal. It's a tightrope walk, isn't it?

Phinehas took decisive, even violent, action. And it's seen as devotion by God. Is that something we should all be striving for? Perhaps the lesson isn't about condoning violence, but about the burning need to stand up for what we believe in, and the importance of seeking reconciliation, even after taking drastic measures. It's a complex legacy, one that challenges us to examine our own motivations and actions, and to consider the potential consequences – both intended and unintended – of our zeal.

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus 6:25Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus

The Torah says Elazar son of Aharon married a daughter of Putiel, and she bore Phinehas (Exodus 6:25). Who is this Putiel that the Torah mentions nowhere else? Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on (Exodus 6:25) answers without hesitation: Putiel is Jethro, Moses' father-in-law, the priest of Midian who left idolatry to serve the God of Israel.

The name Putiel, the midrashic reading suggests, comes from the Hebrew pitem, to fatten. Jethro once fattened calves for idolatry before he turned. His daughter, then, a granddaughter of a former idolater, becomes the mother of Phinehas, the priest whose single act of zeal halted the plague at Baal-Peor (Numbers 25).

The meturgeman is doing something daring here. He is saying that the priest who becomes the great defender of Israelite purity against foreign seduction was himself born from a convert household. The grandson of a former pagan priest becomes the zealot for the God of Israel. Phinehas's ancestry is not a shame to hide; it is proof that the covenant is open to anyone who chooses it fully.

The takeaway: a single ancestor's turn toward God can launch a dynasty of holiness. Jethro left Midian, and his great-grandson stood in the breach for all Israel.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 38:2Yalkut Shimoni on Nach

Another interpretation: [he was called Putiel] because at first he fattened [pittem] calves for idols. Kenite [from kanah, "acquired"], because he acquired Heaven for himself and acquired Torah for himself.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma, Pinchas 1Midrash Tanchuma

(Numb. 25:11) “Phinehas ben Elazar […].” What reason did the Holy One, blessed be He, have for tracing the lineage of Phinehas after this act (of slaying Zimri in Numb. 25:8)? [The reason was] that, when Zimri was pierced along with Cozbi, the tribes rose up against [Phinehas] and said, “Did you see the son (actually, grandson) of Puti? This man, whose mother's father fattened calves for idolatry, has killed a tribal prince of Israel!” Therefore Scripture has come to trace his lineage [through his paternal grandfather] (in Numb. 25:11), “Phinehas the son of Eliezer, [who is] the son of Aaron the priest.” (Numb. 25:12:) “Therefore I hereby grant My covenant of peace.” Great is the peace that He gave, as the world only functions according to peace. And the Torah is [likewise] completely peace, as stated (Prov. 3:17), “Her ways are pleasant ways, and all her paths are peace.” If someone comes from a journey, we inquire of his peace (wellbeing). So too in the morning, we inquire of his peace, and in the evening we inquire of his peace. And we read the recital of the Shema and we conclude [its blessings] with peace, “who spreads the cover of peace.” And in prayer, we conclude, “Who blesses His people Israel with peace.” (Numb. 25:12:) “Therefore I hereby grant [My covenant of peace],” as he still survives. And so it says (in Mal. 2:5), “My covenant was with him, [a covenant of] life and peace.” (Numb. 25:13:) “And it shall belong to him and to his seed after him […, because he was zealous for his God] and atoned for the Children of Israel.” Since atonement is spoken of in connection with him, did he offer a sacrifice? [The mention of atonement is] simply to teach you that when anyone sheds the blood of the wicked, it is as if he had offered a sacrifice.

Full source
Sifrei Bamidbar 131:3Sifrei Bamidbar

The Torah, in the book of Numbers (Bamidbar), hints at a very similar situation involving Pinchas, a figure known for his zealousness.

So, who was Pinchas and why was his lineage under attack?

The story unfolds after a period of, shall we say, questionable behavior by some of the Israelites. But before we get too deep, let's meet the players. Pinchas, a key figure in this drama, stepped up to stop a public display of immorality. His decisive action was seen by G-d as turning away divine wrath from the rest of the community. Pretty important stuff. But not everyone saw it that way.

In Sifrei Bamidbar, the tribe of Shimon, smarting from Pinchas’s actions, decided to launch a counter-attack. But instead of addressing the act itself, they went for a personal, genealogical jab. "Would the son of this 'fattener' seek to uproot an entire tribe from Israel! Don't we know whose son he is?"

Ouch.

Who was this "fattener" they were talking about? Yitro, Moses’ father-in-law. The implication? That Yitro, before converting to Judaism, had "fattened calves for idolatry." A not-so-subtle way of saying, "Pinchas comes from a tainted line. How can we trust him?" It's the ancient equivalent of a political smear campaign. Pinchas's lineage, specifically his connection to Yitro, was being used to discredit his righteous act. They weren't arguing about the merits of his deed, but attacking his family tree!

But here’s where the story takes a beautiful turn.

The text says that when G-d saw Pinchas being “cheapened thus,” He stepped in. And not with a booming voice from the heavens (though that would be impressive!). Instead, G-d began to trace Pinchas's OWN illustrious lineage. As we read in (Numbers 25:11), “Pinchas, the son of Elazar, the son of Aaron the Cohein (priest) turned My wrath away from the children of Israel.”

See what happened there? G-d didn't deny Yitro's past. Instead, He highlighted Pinchas's direct lineage to the priesthood, emphasizing his pedigree of piety and zeal. Sifrei Bamidbar elaborates: “a Cohein, the son of a Cohein; a zealot, the son of a zealot. turner away of wrath, the son of a turner away of wrath.”

It’s a powerful affirmation. A reminder that we are not solely defined by our ancestors’ missteps, but also by the righteous acts we choose to perform ourselves.

The Zohar, a central text of Kabbalah, often explores the deeper meanings behind such stories. While it doesn’t directly comment on this specific passage, its teachings on tikkun (spiritual repair) olam, repairing the world, offer a relevant perspective. Pinchas’s actions, despite the criticism leveled against him, were ultimately seen as contributing to that repair.

This story isn't just a historical anecdote. It's a lesson about judgment, about lineage, and about the power of individual action. It challenges us to look beyond superficial criticisms and recognize the inherent worth and potential within each person, regardless of their family history. Are we focusing on the "sins of the father," or recognizing the potential for righteousness in the son? And maybe, just maybe, it's a reminder to be a little kinder in our own judgments, recognizing that we all come from imperfect pasts, but that we all have the power to create a more righteous future.

Full source
Midrash Aggadah, Numbers 25:11Midrash Aggadah

"Pinchas son of Elazar," and so forth. Why did Scripture see fit to give Pinchas a genealogy? Because they were disparaging him and saying, "Look at this son of Puti! The son of the daughters of Jethro, who was a priest of Midian, and whose maternal grandfather used to fatten calves for idolatry, and today he has become the prince of a tribe!" And from where do we know that his mother was of the daughters of Jethro? As it is said, "And Elazar son of Aaron took for himself a wife from the daughters of Putiel, and she bore him Pinchas" (Exodus 6:25). Therefore the Holy One, blessed be He, traces his lineage by the name of Aaron, and not by the name of Jethro.

Full source