Parshat Reeh6 min read

Why Desert Snakes Shrink Before Canaan and Shechitah Needs Gullet

Sifrei Devarim reads the desert snakes shrinking before Canaan and shechitah requiring the gullet and windpipe as twin pictures of how detail anchors covenant.

Written by Maggid · Edited by Arthur Sabintsev ·
Table of Contents
  1. What it means for the desert snakes to be like olive-press beams
  2. How the a fortiori argument extends from snakes to the seven nations
  3. What it means for shechitah to extend to deer and hart
  4. How Rebbi reads as He commanded you to specify the gullet and windpipe cut
  5. How olive-beam-snakes and shechitah-gullet share one structural principle

Sifrei Devarim, the classical halakhic Midrash on Deuteronomy, holds two passages on how detail anchors covenant through specific operational mechanisms. One passage reads Deuteronomy 1:19's and we journeyed from Chorev, and we went through all that great and fearful desert with the structural image of snakes as large as the beams of an olive press and scorpions as large as bows stretched out before them, the a fortiori argument that if God could subdue these unnatural creatures the seven nations of Canaan would be a smaller obstacle, and Deuteronomy 1:20's Moses as conduit rather than acting on his own authority. The other passage reads the shechitah rules with Rabbi Elazar Hakappar deriving that wild animals like deer and hart require shechitah just as domesticated animals do while birds require shechitah only by rabbinic decree, and Rebbi reading Deuteronomy 12:21's as He commanded you as alluding to the specific commandments given to Moses about cutting both gullet and windpipe for animals but majority of either for birds.

Both passages share one structural claim. Detail anchors covenant through specific operational mechanisms that the midrash documents.

What it means for the desert snakes to be like olive-press beams

Sifrei Devarim's account of the desert journey opens with Deuteronomy 1:19: and we journeyed from Chorev, and we went through all that great and fearful desert. The Aggadic tradition records the Rabbis diving into the meaning. What exactly made the desert so great and fearful?

The Sages paint a structural picture. Snakes as large as the beams of an olive press and scorpions as large as bows stretched out before them. These were not garden-variety creepy crawlies. These were monstrous, unnatural threats. The structural image is operational. Why tell us this? It is not just to give us the heebie-jeebies. The Sifrei Devarim uses this description to make a powerful argument. If God could subdue such unnatural, terrifying creatures for the Israelites, then surely He could help them overcome the natural obstacles that lay ahead, like the seven nations inhabiting Canaan.

How the a fortiori argument extends from snakes to the seven nations

This is what is called an a fortiori argument. If something is true in one case, it is even more true in a stronger, related case. If God could conquer the super-sized snakes and scorpions, conquering the Canaanites would be a smaller matter, relatively speaking. The structural a fortiori is operational.

The next verse, Deuteronomy 1:20, states, and I said to you, as the Lord has spoken. Here, Moses is reminding the people that he is not just speaking his own mind. He is conveying a message, a divine directive. It is not Moses saying you got this. It is God speaking through Moses, reassuring them that victory is assured. Sifrei Devarim emphasizes that Moses is not acting on his own authority. He is a messenger, a conduit for the Divine will. This reinforces the idea that the upcoming battles are not just about military might, but about faith and obedience. The structural messenger-role is operational.

What it means for shechitah to extend to deer and hart

Sifrei Devarim's account of shechitah takes up the parallel structural picture. The rabbis are wrestling with a crucial question about kosher slaughter, or shechitah. If the Torah permits us to eat deer and hart freely, why not apply that same logic to all non-sacrificial animals, known as chullin?

The answer lies in the precise wording. The verse specifies as the deer and the hart are to be eaten. This seemingly redundant phrase contains a vital exclusion. Just as certain parts of the deer and hart, specifically, the fats and blood, are forbidden, so too are the fats and blood of chullin animals. Even in permitted animals, certain restrictions apply. Rabbi Elazar Hakappar takes the analysis a step further. The verse is not teaching us something new, but reinforcing an existing law: just as a domesticated animal requires shechitah, so too do wild animals like deer and hart. A bird, however, requires shechitah only by rabbinic decree, a structural distinction worth noting.

How Rebbi reads as He commanded you to specify the gullet and windpipe cut

Then comes Rebbi, often referring to Rabbi Judah haNasi, the redactor of the Mishnah. He focuses on the phrase as He commanded you found later in Deuteronomy 12:21. This alludes to the specific commandments given to Moses regarding shechitah. What are those commandments? They pertain to the proper location for the cut, the gullet and windpipe, and the minimum requirement for the cut to be considered valid.

In the case of a bird, the majority of either the gullet or windpipe must be severed. In the case of a domesticated animal or deer and hart, both must be severed. The structural specificity is operational. These seemingly small details, gleaned from careful reading and interpretation, form the bedrock of Jewish dietary law. The Torah is not just a collection of stories and laws. It is a living text, constantly being explored and understood through the lens of rabbinic wisdom. Even in the simple act of eating, we can find layers of meaning and connection to our tradition.

How olive-beam-snakes and shechitah-gullet share one structural principle

The two passages converge on the same kind of structural detail-anchoring. Detail anchors covenant through specific operational mechanisms. The olive-beam snakes and bow-sized scorpions encode the structural a fortiori that extends God's protection from the unnatural desert threats to the natural Canaanite obstacles. The shechitah of deer and hart encodes the structural extension from domesticated to wild animals, with Rebbi's reading of the gullet-and-windpipe cut and the bird's majority-of-either as the structural specifics. Both situations show that the cosmic system anchors covenant in specific operational details rather than vague generalities.

The Sifrei Devarim tradition teaches the reader that they participate in the same structural detail-anchoring. The two passages close with a composite image. A desert journey through olive-beam snakes and bow-sized scorpions whose conquest grounds the a fortiori promise that the seven nations will also fall through Moses as the messenger-conduit. A shechitah whose cut covers both gullet and windpipe for animals including deer and hart while birds require majority of either, with Rebbi's reading of as He commanded you naming the structural specifics. A reader, situated within their own covenant-detail, recognizing that the cosmic system anchors both with the operational precision the midrash documents.

← All myths