Exodus 38,21. “These are the accounts of the Tabernacle of ‎the Testimony that were rendered according to the ‎commandment of Moses, etc.;” we have already written ‎previously that the construction of the Tabernacle required holy ‎spirit and the knowledge of how G’d used the aleph bet, i.e. ‎the letters of the Torah and their respective combinations that ‎G’d used when He created heaven and earth. (based on ‎‎Yevamot 47).

The subject has been elaborated on further in ‎‎Bereshit Rabbah section 12,14 which quotes the school of ‎Shammai saying that the idea to create the universe crystallized ‎in G’d’s mind at night whereas the execution occurred by day, ‎and that the letter ‎ה‎ written in smaller script in Genesis 2,4 in ‎the word ‎בהבראם‎ is an allusion to the attribute ‎א-ד-נ-י‎, one of G’d’s ‎names, whereas afterwards in the same verse when the Torah ‎writes ‎ביום עשות ה' אלוקים ארץ ושמים‎, “on the day that ‎‎<ihashem< i=""> made earth and heaven,” the apparent repetition is ‎an allusion to the fact that G’d is unique and the exclusive ‎Creator. [Our author must have had a different version of ‎the Bereshit rabbah, as the second comment concerning the ‎attribute ‎א-ד-נ-י‎ is not found in my updated version of that ‎‎Midrash.

Ed.]‎The uniqueness of both Moses and Betzalel paralleled the ‎description of unique attributes possessed by the Creator. ‎Initially, the instructions given by Moses to Betzalel were similar ‎to G’d’s formulating the thought of creating a universe, whereas ‎the execution paralleled the words ‎ביום עשות ה' אלוקים‎, G’d in His ‎capacity as Hashem carrying out His plan to create the ‎universe. The numerical value of the first letters of the opening ‎words in our portion, ‎אלה פקודי המשכן‎ i.e. ‎א'פ'ה'‏‎ have a combined ‎value of 86, equivalent to the letters in the name of G’d when it is ‎spelled ‎א-ל-ה-י-ם‎, i.e. His attribute of ‎א-ד-נ-י‎, the word signifying ‎the attribute of Justice.

The respective last letters in the same ‎sequence of words are ‎ה'י'נ‎ equaling 65, or the numerical value of ‎the attribute ‎א-ד-נ-י‎. When we examine the respective first and ‎final letters in the second half of the introductory verse of our ‎portion, i.e. ‎משכן העדות‎, we find that the letters ‎מ'ה‎ correspond to ‎the holy name of G’d consisting of 45 letters, whereas the final ‎letters in these words, i.e. ‎ת'נ‎ or 450 i.e. ten times the value of the ‎opening letters.

This suggests that whereas Betzalel was indeed ‎granted great insights, it was Moses, ‎אשר פקד על פי משה‎ who had ‎the highest level of understanding how to manipulate all the ‎letters in the names of G’d‏. An alternate interpretation of the unusual line: ‎אלה פקודי ‏המשכן משכן העדות אשר פקד משה על פי ה' וגו'‏‎. According to a ‎statement in Taanit 8 blessings do not take hold on matters ‎that are subject to being weighed measured or counted.

This ‎poses a problem with respect to the Tabernacle, as its ‎components were subject to being numbered, weighed and ‎measured. In spite of this principle, blessings most certainly were ‎manifest in the process of the construction of the Tabernacle, and ‎its operation without known mishaps for hundreds of years. ‎Scriptural proof for the fact that the Tabernacle was indeed ‎blessed is furnished by Song of Songs 7,5 where we read: ‎עיניך ‏ברכות בחשבון‎,”your eyes are like the pools in Cheshbon,” which, ‎according to Rashi, is to be understood as “your wise men ‎are preoccupied with the calendar and how to adjust it to allow ‎for seasonal factors.”

The root of the word ‎עין‎, “eye,” is the evil ‎use that can be made by one’s eyes, the prime example being the ‎prophet Bileam who would ruin anything that he set his eye on. ‎‎(Compare Zohar I 68) The reason that this is so is that an ‎evil person tries constantly to disrupt other people’s connection ‎to their divine roots which are the source of their being alive. The ‎harm befalling items subject to measuring, weighing or counting, ‎is the result of the evil person’s overpowering desire to acquire ‎for his personal advantage anything that his eye desires.

The ‎above quoted verse from Song of Songs teaches that the leaders ‎of the Jewish people, the “eyes” of the community, as well as ‎their undertakings, were blessed, ‎ברכות‎, even in matters involving ‎counting, weighing and measuring, ‎בחשבון‎. The reason why this ‎is so, is that the average Jew, whenever he contemplates a new ‎phenomenon that he sees with his eyes, automatically relates it ‎to its source, the Creator.

When a Jew encounters phenomena he ‎was not aware of, his respect and awe for the Creator of such ‎phenomena is enhanced beyond what it had been previously. The ‎word ‎ברכות‎ in Song of Songs can have two meanings, one of ‎which is “fountains,” sources of water, “life.” The message of our ‎verse is that seeing that the materials for the Tabernacle were ‎counted not once but repeatedly and still clearly the blessing ‎continued to rest on it, it is proof that this was due to Moses ‎having done the counting, i.e. having given the instructions.

His ‎constant close attachment to the Divine prevented any negative ‎vibes normally associated with counting, measuring and weighing ‎from harming the Tabernacle.‎‎ ‎ Still another interpretation of the opening verse of our ‎portion. We have explained repeatedly that service of the Lord is ‎a concept that manifests itself on two levels. One level is the ‎result of our being aware of miracles performed by the Creator ‎which demonstrate His ability to change what we previously ‎considered as unalterable “laws of nature.”

It follows logically that ‎all His creatures are duty bound to serve Him to the best of their ‎ability.‎The second level of service of G’d stems from our having ‎recognized the Creator’s preeminence by dint of His being the ‎origin of all life, etc., so that as a result of this it is clear that we ‎His creatures are obligated to serve Him as our master. The basic ‎difference between these two levels of serving G’d is whether we ‎would have done so also if He had not resorted to performing ‎miracles in order to bring Himself and His power to our attention. ‎‎[Another difference is that people during whose lifetime ‎no miracles were experienced would feel the need to serve Him ‎merely on the basis of being told that He used to perform ‎miracles.

Ed.]‎If one’s service of G’d is based on our awareness of Him as the ‎Creator, any miracles if and when performed, will be of secondary ‎importance in our relations with Him, as we consider His ability ‎to perform miracles as natural, seeing that He is the Creator of ‎nature. They see in the performance of miracles only proof that ‎the Creator supervises the fate of the Jewish people especially, ‎and intervenes at times of His choosing to prevent great harm ‎befalling His chosen people.‎Prior to the giving of the Torah, the Jewish people’s service of ‎the Lord was based on the miracles they had seen G’d perform in ‎Egypt.

After the giving of the Torah even the physical parts of ‎the Jewish people underwent a process of refinement which ‎enabled them to serve the Lord without constant prompting by ‎G’d demonstrating His power by performing miracles. Ever since ‎they recognized that even the miracles which they had witnessed ‎in Egypt were not intended to show them G’d’s power as a G’d, ‎but were manifestations of His love for His people.‎ Based on the considerations outlined, we will try and explain ‎why we have been commanded to eat Matzah on Passover ‎and to offer certain sacrifices in the Temple, and why on the ‎festival of Shavuot we have been commanded to present ‎two loaves of bread which had to consist of leavened dough, as ‎well as a thanksgiving offering consisting partly of unleavened ‎breads and partly of leavened breads.‎‎Matzah alludes to creatures who serve the Lord due to ‎the impact upon them of G’d’s miracles; even the plain meaning ‎of the text in Exodus 12,15-17 alludes to this as it contains a ‎commandment to eat matzah as a reminder to future ‎generations of the speed, i.e. suddenness, with which the ‎Egyptians reversed their attitude as the masters of the Jews, to ‎driving them out with all possible speed as we know from Exodus ‎‎12,39 which tells us that the departure of the Jews from Egypt ‎occurred in such haste that they did not even have time to allow ‎the dough for next day’s bread to rise before baking.

Consuming ‎the meat of the Passover took place in similar haste, the people ‎being dressed while eating it, ready to begin marching at any ‎moment. (ibid, i.e. ‎ויאפו את הבצק עגות מצות וגו'‏‎, “they baked the ‎dough into matzah cakes etc.,) The symbolic acts that we, ‎the descendants of the generation of Israelites leaving Egypt at ‎that time, perform on the anniversary of that event, all reflect ‎the suddenness and haste in which the redemption literally ‎overtook them.

These acts mirror the impact that G’d’s miracles ‎had on the Jews at that time. In contrast to this, when the same ‎people arrived in the desert of Sinai, prior to receiving the Torah, ‎seven weeks later, they had time to prepare themselves for that ‎event for three days, i.e. the miracles that occurred in connection ‎with that event did not take them by surprise. By that time they ‎had come to realize that G’d’s performing miracles was something ‎‎“natural,” not supernatural, seeing that the source of these ‎‎“miracles” was the same Creator Who had performed the greatest ‎miracles by creating the universe.

When they reflected that out ‎of all the phenomena in the universe that they were aware of it ‎was only G’d Who could have created them by merely uttering ‎the necessary words, they no longer needed “miracles” to ‎persuade them that there was such a power, [even though ‎it remained invisible. Ed.] To reflect their new found ‎insights, the offerings presented on the festival of Shavuot did ‎not require matzah as a symbol of the Israelites’ recognition ‎that their redemption had been a miracle, in the sense of ‎something supernatural performed by G’d.‎The Talmud in B’rachot 54, when stating that 4 types of ‎individuals need to offer thanksgiving offerings (containing also ‎leavened breads) after they had been saved by means of a ‎miraculous event, reflects the sages’ recognition that for the ‎people concerned the miracle had been performed in order that ‎they serve G’d first of all because He demonstrated His ability to ‎transcend the laws of nature.

Subsequently, the people who had ‎learned this lesson would become accustomed to serving the Lord ‎for the same reasons that the Jewish people served Him starting ‎with their experiences at Mount Sinai. This is reflected in the part ‎of the thanksgiving offering consisting of leavened breads. The ‎very fact that this offering consists of these apparently ‎contradictory ingredients, indicates that the person offering it is ‎aware of his own spiritual/philosophical progress.‎Looking at the history of the Jewish people during their ‎march through the desert, the sin of the golden calf represented a ‎spiritual regression to the level of needing miracles to keep them ‎aware of the greatness of the Lord and the duty to serve Him.

The ‎Jewish people only recaptured even the first level of serving the ‎Lord, i.e. through the help of miracles to remind them of Him and ‎His power at the time when the Tabernacle was inaugurated, ‎almost nine months after their having worshipped the golden ‎calf. According to Nachmanides, this is the reason why the ‎Tabernacle is referred to as ‎משכן העדות‎, “Tabernacle of ‎Testimony,” i.e. its consecration bore testimony to the fact that ‎the people had regained their spiritual level as it had been at the ‎time when they had been redeemed from slavery in ‎Egypt.The word ‎פקודי‎ in our verse needs to be understood in ‎the sense of something being lacking, absent, as we know from ‎Numbers 31,49 ‎ולא נפקד ממנו איש‎, “not a single man from us is ‎missing.” [after the punitive expedition against the ‎Midianites) The word appears in a similar sense also repeatedly in ‎the Book of Samuel.

Ed.] The Torah hints that even with ‎the completion of the Tabernacle, the former lofty spiritual level ‎of the Jewish people as it had been at the end of the revelation at ‎Mount Sinai had not been restored.‎ Yet another interpretation of the opening verse in our ‎portion. We need to consider this verse in conjunction with ‎Exodus 40,18 ‎ויקם משה את המשכן וגו'‏‎, “Moses, (personally) erected ‎the Tabernacle, etc.;”‎We have a rule expressed in the Zohar that the ‎Tabernacle represented this lower world, as well as the world ‎beyond earth as well as the Torah, in miniature. [Possibly a ‎reference to Zohar Pekudey, 220 where the author of the ‎Zohar uses the word ‎אלה‎ here and in Genesis 2,4 ‎אלה תולדות השמים ‏והארץ‎, as a basis for this comparison.

Ed.]‎Nachmanides quotes Genesis 18,19 ‎כי ידעתיו למען אשר יצוה את ‏בניו....ושמרו דרך ה' לעשות צדקה ומשפט‎, where he explains the ‎expression ‎דרך ה'‏‎ to mean the “attributes that G’d has revealed of ‎Himself.” The Torah credits Avraham in that verse as emulating ‎G’d’s attributes of ‎שלום וחסד‎, “peace and loving kindness, etc.” ‎These attributes are also reflected in the legislation we read in the ‎Torah, as we find commandments that clearly reflect the need for ‎us to be kind even to the undeserving, such as helping one’s ‎enemy to load or unload his donkey, whereas some of the ‎commandments clearly reflect the attribute of Justice, such as to ‎ensure that people convicted of deliberate wrongdoing be ‎punished in accordance with the law.

Similarly, other attributes ‎that reflect G’d’s attributes are represented in different parts of ‎Torah legislation. The requirement to wear phylacteries is ‎understood as reflecting the fact that G’d represents ‎תפארת‎, ‎‎“glory,” and that is why we recite a benediction when putting on ‎phylacteries which describes G’d as having distinguished us with ‎glory, i.e. ‎עוטר ישראל בתפארה‎.‎ When Betzalel constructed the Tabernacle and all its ‎components, i.e. the candlestick which represented the attribute ‎of love, the table which reflected the attribute of awe, and the ‎furnishings representing other Divine attributes, he constructed ‎a miniature replica of the universe.‎Our sages in B’rachot 55 alluded to this when they said: ‎Betzalel knew how to combine the letters of the holy tongue that ‎had been used by G’d when He created the universe.

This enabled ‎Betzalel to fashion the various furnishings of the Tabernacle so ‎that they reflected the attributes which we mentioned. According ‎to the Talmud there the name ‎בצלאל‎ is a combination of the two ‎words: ‎בצל א-ל‎, “in the Lord’s shadow,” i.e. his soul must have ‎been present when G’d created the universe and have absorbed ‎the secret of how G’d had done so. Betzalel did not know, ‎however, to which particular commandment in the Torah each ‎one of the vessels he fashioned corresponded.

It was therefore left ‎for Moses himself to reveal the relationship between each vessel ‎and utensil used in the Tabernacle and how it related to a ‎particular commandment in the Torah. This is hinted at in the ‎verse in Exodus 40,18 which describes Moses as erecting the ‎Tabernacle. According to tradition, Betzalel and his helpers had ‎vainly attempted to do this, and they had to call on Moses to do ‎this. (Tanchuma yashan, 8) “Erecting” the Tabernacle, does ‎not refer to the mere physical act of arranging all the boards, etc, ‎in their proper order, but it is a term used to describe Moses as ‎ensuring that the Tabernacle would fulfill the functions for which ‎it had been made, i.e. to mirror Torah philosophy.

The reason ‎that the Tabernacle had to be completely dismantled each time ‎the Israelites broke camp and had to be re-erected anew when ‎they encamped was that their trek through the desert was ‎intended to elevate the “sparks” that had fallen off the ‎‎Shechinah, a task that would be accomplished in stages each ‎time it was erected again. [The concept of these “sparks” ‎has been discussed on pages 21-22.

Ed.]‎We know through the Baal Shem Tov how the spiritual ‎elevations, ‎עליות‎, of these “sparks, ‎נצוצות‎, work. When these ‎sparks come face to face with something of a mundane or secular ‎nature, or even more so when they encounter something actually ‎evil or sinful, they grasp the opportunity to serve their Creator. ‎‎[If I have understood the concept correctly, it is based on every ‎phenomenon in the universe containing an element of sanctity, ‎קדושה‎, though it may be almost completely hidden. [The ‎‎“fallen” sparks that once were part of the Shechinah, due to ‎their sacred origin, are able to locate that element of Divinity ‎within the phenomenon in question.

They are able to utilize any ‎of the Divine attributes they encounter and respond to it in kind, ‎be it love, awe, harmony or any of the attributes of G’d. ‎Ed.] When they do this they elevate the respective ‎phenomenon to a higher spiritual level, i.e. it is a kind of ‎repentance for their erstwhile negligence without which they ‎would not have “fallen off” the main body of the Shechinah ‎in the first place.‎When the Tabernacle was dismantled, it had lost its cohesion ‎to the various attributes of G’d, something that had been ‎established when it had last been erected.

By having dismantled ‎the Tabernacle, the Israelites had contributed to the spiritual ‎rehabilitation of these “sparks,” as they had been presented with ‎an opportunity to elevate these phenomena to a higher spiritual ‎‎niveau while they were “in limbo,” so to speak. The ‎Israelites therefore were directly instrumental in “salvaging” part ‎of the Shechinah. Seeing that during the period that the ‎Tabernacle had been dismantled the holy attributes of G’d had ‎had an opportunity to be used negatively, i.e. the attribute of ‎love had been used to love that which is evil, or the attribute of ‎harmony had been used to organise a rebellion against G’d, [as ‎had been the case during the building of the Tower after the ‎deluge, Ed.] the Israelites in the desert, where most of these ‎‎“sparks” had taken refuge on earth, had become instrumental in ‎contributing to the restoration of the Shechinah to its full ‎glory.If, after having established the connection with the Divine ‎attribute contained within a phenomenon one does not exploit ‎this good fortune and make this attribute part of one’s ‎personality, one will forfeit all the benefits that one’s discovery ‎had presented.

The reason for this is that good attributes that ‎remain in a vacuum are worse than good attributes never ‎discovered. Possessing ‎אהבת השם‎ “a love for G’d,” without ‎following this up by performing the commandments in the Torah ‎that reflect this attribute, results in one’s losing even the ‎theoretical, or “platonic” love of G’d. As soon as the Jewish people ‎became aware that they had become an instrument for restoring ‎one of the “sparks” to the Shechinah, they would re-erect ‎the Tabernacle and make a point of observing the ‎commandments associated with that attribute meticulously.

As ‎only Moses was on a level that enabled him to understand all ‎these connections between the terrestrial world and its celestial ‎counterpart, it was his task to erect the Tabernacle (each time). ‎He thereby connected the appropriate sections in the appropriate ‎manner. ‎ ‎ All this is alluded to in the words: ‎אלה פקודי המשכן משכן העדות‎. The ‎word ‎עדות‎ is a reference to the Torah and its commandments; the ‎word ‎פקד‎ means that a connection was established, a union, much ‎as when a husband joins his wife in the marital bed in order to ‎jointly produce a child which is the visible symbol of their union. ‎‎[We read in Genesis 21,1 that Hashem ‎פקד את שרה ‏‎, ‎as a result of which she became pregnant.

In other words, the ‎union of Avraham and Sarah was finally completed when Sarah ‎conceived Yitzchok. Ed.]‎If, G’d forbid, attributes such as love and awe, etc., instead of ‎being utilized in accordance with Torah principles are “wasted” ‎on unworthy objects or ideas, the Torah, or its representative the ‎Tabernacle, is perceived as not enjoying ‎מנוחה‎ a state of calm ‎satisfaction; similarly, if these attributes are abused by being ‎squandered on useless objects or alien concepts and their ‎representatives, G’d is in a state of restlessness, His mind not ‎being at ease.‎There is still another aspect to this subject of the attributes of ‎G’d and our duty to emulate them.

When the attributes of G’d are ‎constantly being emulated by His creatures, in this case by the ‎Jewish people, this results in this “union” influencing the ‎dispensation of G’d’s largesse due to the connection to our Divine ‎source being a constant, never interrupted for even a brief period. ‎Putting the various vessels of the Tabernacle to use on a daily ‎basis, seeing that each represented part of a Divine attribute, the ‎unbroken connection was assured.

Only in the desert, or ‎subsequently in Jerusalem, the site of the Temple, was it possible ‎to ensure that unbroken contact with the Divine origin of these ‎attributes, which served as a reminder to G’d that His people were ‎serving Him by trying to emulate His attributes. The distinction ‎possessed by the city of Jerusalem in this regard, was also ‎accorded to Shiloh and other locations where the Tabernacle ‎stood before Solomon built the Temple, though only on an ad hoc ‎basis.‎‎ The difference between the status of Shiloh and Jerusalem ‎was symbolised by the Tabernacle in Shiloh, which, though not ‎being a collapsible structure as the one in the desert, did not have ‎a permanent solid roof (although it functioned for more than 300 ‎years). (Compare Zevachim 112) The Torah had alluded to ‎this distinction when speaking of ‎מנוחה ‏‎ and ‎נחלה‎ as separate ‎concepts in Deuteronomy 12,9.

The stage of ‎נחלה‎, ancestrally ‎owned territory, would not be reached until the erection of ‎Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem. [The capital of Israel that ‎had been captured only during the latter part of David’s reign, ‎more than 450 years after Joshua crossed the Jordon with the ‎people. Ed.] The author sees an allusion to this already in ‎Exodus 25,15, where the Torah refers to the poles that were to be ‎used to carry the Holy Ark were to remain permanently in the ‎rings attached to the Ark for that purpose, and that they were ‎not to be removed even temporarily under any circumstances. ‎The reader will ask himself why the Torah added this restrictive ‎clause as applicable only to the poles used to carry the Ark, and ‎not to the poles used to carry the Table, for instance?

Our author ‎suggests as an answer to this question that we remember that he ‎had described the very trek of the Israelites through the desert as ‎a spiritual ascent, i.e. return of the “sparks” that had fallen from ‎the Shechinah in disgrace on a previous occasion, and that it ‎had been the act of dismantling the Tabernacle that had enabled ‎these “sparks” to grasp an opportunity to rehabilitate ‎themselves. (compare pages 533-534).

Clearly, the process of the ‎fallen sparks could not continue indefinitely, for how long would ‎G’d rebuke the same evildoers to return in penitence without ‎finally giving up and subjecting them to their deserved ‎punishment? On the other hand, it is perfectly plausible to hold ‎up a reminder to sinners, that there is a method through which ‎they could rehabilitate themselves.‎The Holy Ark’s function is to serve as a reminder to man that ‎at all times he must strive to repent and rehabilitate himself in ‎the eyes of the Lord.

The regulation that the poles that serve to ‎carry the Holy Ark in the desert, [although once it had ‎been positioned in the Temple, the Ark was never to be removed ‎from there so that its poles became strictly symbolic in nature, ‎Ed.] served as this reminder. The “sparks” themselves, are ‎not only to be viewed as parts of the Shechinah which had ‎somehow gone astray, but they symbolize parts of the human ‎personality which had gone astray and were in need of ‎rehabilitation.

Man (and in the first instance the Jewish man) is ‎supposed to be the “carrier” of the throne of G’d, in a sense ‎similar to the poles of the Holy Ark on top of which were the ‎cherubs between whose outstretched wings the Shechinah is ‎presumed to reside while the Ark is within the Temple. ‎‎[Some of these words are my own, but I am confident that ‎they supplement the exegesis of our author. Ed.] It did ‎not matter that the Ark, physically, once it had come to a place ‎of ‎מנוחה ונחלה‎ as stated in Deuteronomy 12,9 would no longer be ‎in motion.

It is enough that we keep before our mind’s eye the ‎picture of the Holy Ark to remind us of the need to constantly ‎strive to rehabilitate any weakness in our personality that ‎manifested itself through our not emulating one of G’d’s ‎attributes by transgressing one of His commandments. ‎It is this thought that prompted our sages in Keritut 6 ‎to state that whenever we pray we must always include the ‎habitual sinners in our prayers, i.e. express the wish that they too ‎turn to G’d for forgiveness of their sins by changing their ‎lifestyles.

This is our contribution to “repatriating” holy sparks ‎that had gone astray.‎ Yet another aspect of the opening verse of our portion. ‎‎[Our author, as is his custom, endeavours to explore the ‎different meanings that the same word (root) has on different ‎occasions. Ed.]It is a fact that many people although ‎going through the motions of performing the commandments of ‎the Torah do not thereby achieve a spiritual level that provides a ‎תענוג‎, spiritually pleasurable experience, for their Creator.

In ‎other words, although they have tried “to catch the train or ‎plane,” and establish a close connection with their Creator they ‎find that they have been left behind.‎It is necessary for a Jew,-seeing he is the beneficiary of the ‎Torah- to serve G’d in a manner that affords G’d the ‎תענוג‎ or ‎נחת ‏רוח‎, that we have discussed on numerous occasions. This is also ‎alluded to in the opening verse of our portion where the word ‎פקודי‎ refers to the connection or union of the parts of the ‎Tabernacle and by implication to the connection or union ‎between the creature and its G’d, seeing that we explained that ‎the Tabernacle was a miniature of the universe.

If further proof ‎were needed for this interpretation, we need only look at the ‎word ‎משכן‎ itself to realize that is a slightly abbreviated form of ‎the word ‎שכינה‎, “Divine Presence.” The erection of the ‎משכן‎ in the ‎‎“lower” part of the universe, i.e. on earth, became the key to this ‎uninterrupted connection between the celestial and the ‎terrestrial part of the universe. The word ‎עדות‎ or a derivative of it ‎‎, i.e. ‎עדי עדיים‎ in Ezekiel 16,7 refers to the ‎נחת רוח‎, “wellbeing of a ‎spiritual dimension,” that G’d experiences when the Tabernacle ‎fulfills its function on earth as planned.‎ Still another exegesis of the first verse of our portion, this ‎time including the concluding words of that verse:‎עבודת הלוים ביד ‏איתמר בן אהרן הכהן‎, “through the service of the Levites under the ‎direction of Ittamar, a son of the High Priest Aaron.”‎It is a generally accepted rule that G’d constantly channels ‎loving kindness and mercy to His people Israel, and if nonetheless ‎we find that from time to time the Jewish people appear to be ‎victims of evil, this is only a prelude to their eventually being ‎rehabilitated and elevated to a higher level than previously.

G’d ‎would never allow evil to happen unless this evil were capable of ‎serving as a prelude to good. In other words: G’d does not channel ‎evil in the direction of the Jewish people, period. In our verse this ‎concept is also alluded to when both the Levites and priests are ‎mentioned, the former as representing Justice and Judgment, ‎‎[as when the Levites executed the idol worshipping ‎Israelites during the episode of the golden calf, Ed.]

The ‎word ‎כהן‎ is an allusion to the attribute of ‎חסד‎, loving kindness, an ‎attribute personified by Aaron during all the years that He was ‎High Priest, whereas the attribute of Justice was something that ‎had to be called upon only on rare occasions. What this means is ‎that the attribute of Justice is not even able to function unless ‎the attribute of ‎חסד‎ “supervises” i.e. tempers it, so that it does ‎not take center stage exclusively.

The ‎משכן‎ itself may be viewed as ‎an instrument designed to “sweeten” even the attribute of Justice ‎when it momentarily overshadows the attribute of loving ‎kindness. [all this refers, of course, only to how G’d deals ‎with the Jewish people. Ed.] The line stating that a priest, ‎i.e. Ittamar, son of Aaron, was in charge of what the Levites did in ‎connection with the Tabernacle, is meant to alert the reader to ‎these concepts.‎ Exodus 38,22. “and Betzalel, son of Uri, son of Chur, of the ‎tribe of Yehudah, executed all that G’d had commanded ‎Moses.”

A look at Rashi will reveal that in fact it is ‎remarkable that the Torah did not write: “which Moses ‎commanded Betzalel”, but wrote “which G’d commanded Moses.” ‎This suggests that Betzalel had divined even the sequence of ‎things that Moses had not revealed to him either deliberately or ‎because he had forgotten. For example: Moses had instructed ‎Bezalel to construct the furnishings of the Tabernacle before he ‎had given him details for constructing the structure that was to ‎house these furnishings. (Compare Jerusalem Talmud Peyah ‎‎1,1 According to the version there when Moses instructed ‎Betzalel to first construct the furnishings, Betzalel queried this ‎wondering if Moses had heard it in that order on Mount Sinai.) ‎Upon hearing this, Moses reminded himself that G’d had in fact ‎told him to construct the structure housing the furnishings first. ‎He complimented Betzalel, saying that apparently he had stood in ‎G’d’s shade at the time G’d had spoken to Moses.

As a result, ‎Betzalel constructed the structure, i.e. the boards and “carpets” ‎serving as the ceiling of the Tabernacle, before he proceeded to ‎fashion the furnishings.‎I believe that it is in order to elaborate on this somewhat. ‎When a person gets out of bed in the morning he needs to wash ‎forthwith, i.e. as a prelude to reiterating that he accepts the ‎kingdom of heaven, i.e. the commandments of the Torah, anew. ‎This includes his faith in G’d, Who is the Creator of all the ‎phenomena that we can perceive with our senses.

Subsequent to ‎this it is incumbent on the person to turn to G’d in prayer, and ‎after that to study some of the Torah. This is followed by the ‎performance of various commandments in the order in which the ‎opportunity to do so presents itself. All of this is designed to ‎teach us the attributes of the Creator and help us to have ‎absolute faith in Him and to enable us to emulate His attributes.‎‎“Faith” in the Creator consists of two levels.

It begins with ‎what we call “little faith,” i.e. faith based on the most basic ‎intellectual faculties every human being is endowed with, which ‎dictates that the universe as we know it could not have come into ‎existence on its on, but must have been created by a Supreme ‎Intelligence, that Intelligence which for want of a better word we ‎call “G’d.”‎After having realized this and having accepted it, we proceed ‎to a more profound level of ‎אמונה‎, “faith,” a level which results ‎from our intellectual faculties having been refined through the ‎study of G’d’s Torah.

The level of “faith” that results from ‎studying Torah is known as ‎השראת שכינה‎, Divine inspiration.‎ It is important to realize that the tribe of Levi who was ‎singled out by G’d to perform special religious duties on behalf of ‎the whole nation, was appointed twice. The male members of this ‎tribe became distinctive at the time they had completed the first ‎month of their lives. (Numbers 3,15) They were included in the ‎census already at that tender age, whereas the other Israelites had ‎to await their 20th birthday before they could be included in the ‎census. (Numbers 1,3).‎The concept of 12 tribes [excluding the Levites, ‎Ed.] alluded to the commandments of the Creator handed ‎down in the Torah, and that is why they had been given the ‎collective name ‎מטות‎, “staffs,” as the commandments by which ‎Israelites guide themselves, and which are their main support ‎during their lifetime on earth serve as their support, [in the sense ‎of a walking cane.]

They draw on this support to maintain and ‎reinforce their faith in G’d. Performance of the commandments ‎refines our intellect. The tribe of Levi is a special example of this ‎as pointed out in Bamidbar Rabbah 1,12 where the author of ‎the Midrash draws our attention to the fact that this tribe ‎had to be counted in the proximity of the Tabernacle, as it had ‎proven during the episode of the golden calf that it had absolute ‎faith in G’d, and although a tiny minority (about 5%) of the ‎nation, had risked their lives on behalf of G’d, by executing idol ‎worshipping members of the nation. (Exodus 32,27-28).We already explained that there are two levels of faith in G’d, ‎and corresponding to that the Levites were counted on two ‎levels. (at 30 days, and again when they reached the age of 30 ‎years, (compare Numbers 4,23 et al) By that time their intellects ‎had matured to the extent that they could be described as their ‎faith in G’d reflecting the higher level.

Their duties in and around ‎the Tabernacle made it mandatory that they had spiritually ‎matured enough to carry them out while thinking the ‎appropriate religious thoughts.‎Initially, G’d had commanded Moses to teach the Jewish ‎people first about the Tabernacle, i.e. to instruct them in the ‎ways to have faith in G’d on the basic level, i.e. to believe that He ‎is the Creator of all phenomena perceived by the senses.

The ‎visible symbol of that faith was the structure called ‎משכן‎. Only ‎afterwards was Moses to teach them about the furnishings in the ‎Tabernacle, the variety of attributes of the Creator, as symbolized ‎in the Tabernacle by the various vessels and furnishings, or in the ‎Torah by the various commandments. Moses, believing that the ‎Jewish people as a whole had already attained the second and ‎higher level of faith, considered it appropriate to acquaint them ‎immediately with the details of the vessels to be used in the ‎Tabernacle.

Betzalel, having a more realistic view of the spiritual ‎level of his peers, considered that they should first become ‎familiar with more basic aspects of faith in the Lord as symbolized ‎by the structure called ‎משכן‎, Tabernacle.‎Having said this we can also solve the problem raised by ‎Nachmanides in connection with Exodus 19,4 where the Torah ‎writes: ‎אתם ראיתם אשר עשיתי למצרים....ואביא אתכם אלי‎, “you have ‎seen what I have done to Egypt……. and I have brought you to ‎Me.”

Nachmanides questions the wording there as at that point ‎the Jewish people had not yet experienced the revelation at ‎Mount Sinai and had not yet been given the Torah. We may best ‎understand this by remembering that while in Egypt the Jewish ‎people (the generation experiencing the redemption, not the ‎Israelites who had come to Egypt with Yaakov and their children) ‎had not believed in the G’d of Avraham at all, -to wit their failure ‎to circumcise their male children- so that the redemption was the ‎starting point from which their faith in G’d as the Creator and as ‎the G’d of Israel must be counted.

True faith of the whole people ‎did not commence until the first day of the month of Sivan, when ‎for the first time, the Torah describes the Jewish people as united, ‎i.e. ‎ויחן ישראל ‏‎, “Israel encamped,” (singular mode) as opposed to ‎all previous encampments when the Torah always writes: ‎ויחנו ‏ישראל‎, Israel encamped, (plural mode). At that time they did not ‎know yet how to serve the G’d Whom they all believed in as the ‎Creator and as the G’d of their forefathers.

This nuance is also ‎evident in Onkelos’ rendering the end of Exodus 19,4 ‎ואביא אתכם ‏אלי‎, usually translated as “I have brought you to Me,” as: ‎וקרבית ‏יתכון לפולחני‎, “I have brought you near to perform service for ‎Me.” ‎ ‎ Another approach to the verse: ‎ובצלאל בן אורי....עשה את כל ‏אשר צוה ה' את משה‎, a look at Rashi who emphasizes the ‎word ‎כל‎ in this verse as an allusion to Exodus 35,32 where ‎Betzalel’s function is not only described as executive, i.e. someone ‎meticulously carrying out instructions, but as ‎לחשוב מחשבות‎, ‎‎“contributing original ideas of his own.”

This is explained even ‎better when we look at psalms 119,59 ‎חשבתי דרכי וגו'‏‎, “I have ‎considered my ways, etc.” On psalms 121,5 ‎‏ ה' צלך‎, “the Lord is ‎your shadow,” a most difficult statement, the Midrash Shocher ‎Tov explains that just as man’s actions are reflected by his ‎shadow, so G’d also acts in a manner that reflects what man had ‎done. For example; G’d says that “when you (the collective soul of ‎the Jewish people) cry, I too join in your cries.”

Therefore, as long ‎as we (the collective soul of the Jewish people) do not forget ‎Jerusalem (while we are in exile), we can be assured that G’d will ‎not forget Jerusalem either. (psalms 137,5). Keeping this in mind ‎we learn how important it is that we carefully consider every step ‎we take in life, as if it is in the wrong direction, G’d may follow ‎our footsteps to our detriment. This is not only a warning but ‎also a compliment, so that we do not consider our actions as ‎insignificant in this great universe, believing that what we do or ‎do not do, does not matter to G’d anyways.‎When these considerations are applied to Betzalel, whose ‎very name meant that he had been in G’d’s shadow, he would ‎certainly have to have in mind the appropriate thoughts when ‎fashioning each one of the many vessels used in the Tabernacle. ‎The word ‎בצלאל‎ can just as easily be translated as ‎א-ל הוא הצל שלו‎, ‎‎“G’d is his shadow.”‎Man’s body, according to our sages, consists of 248 limbs, an ‎allusion to the 248 positive commandments in the Torah, as well ‎as of 365 tendons, corresponding to the 365 negative ‎commandments in the Torah.

This has been explained in ‎‎Kohelet Rabbah (Kohelet 1,3) on the words: ‎והארץ ‏לעולם עומדת‎, “but the earth endures forever,” as an allusion to the ‎structure of the celestial regions, i.e. just as man has 248 limbs ‎and 365 tendons there are parallel phenomena in heaven. Both ‎the inhabitants of heaven and those of earth share components ‎that correspond to the positive and negative commandments ‎found in the Torah, [and enumerated as such by our sages. ‎Ed.]

Seeing that the Tabernacle was designed as the home ‎of the Shechinah on earth, it is natural that it contained ‎components that are parallel, [otherwise how would G’d ‎feel “at home,” in it? Ed.] This is what is meant when the ‎Torah wrote that Betzalel constructed all the components in ‎strict compliance with what G’d had commanded Moses. All the ‎individual components of the Tabernacle conformed to the ‎commandments of the Torah.‎When understood along these lines, Rashi’s query how ‎this was possible, seeing that at the time Moses was given these ‎instructions most of the commandments in the Torah had not ‎yet been revealed and communicated to the people; in fact they ‎were only communicated to Moses when the latter was in the ‎Tabernacle. (Compare Leviticus 1,1 ‎ויקרא אל משה וידבר ה' אליו מאהל ‏מועד לאמור‎, “He called (invited) to Moses, and spoke to him from ‎the Tabernacle saying, etc.” (instructing him to communicate ‎G’d’s commandments to the people.)

Betzalel’s having stood in ‎G’d’s shadow at the time when Moses had heard the instructions ‎while on Mount Sinai, was aware of what G’d had told Moses at ‎the time, so that he was able to query what he thought was a ‎lapse of memory on the part of his great leader. The laws of the ‎Torah were first communicated to Moses as a potential, whereas ‎once the Tabernacle had been erected (also called Tent of ‎Testimony), G’d repeated His instructions as an actual, i.e. as ‎applicable as and when capable of being performed.‎ Exodus 38,23. “and at his side, Oholiov son of Achisamach ‎of the tribe of Dan, carver and designer, etc.;” Our sages in ‎‎Chagigah 14 comment on the words ‎חרש וחושב‎ by ‎explaining that the word ‎חרש‎, or ‎חרשים‎ refers to a wise student, ‎who as soon as he opens his mouth causes his teachers to become ‎even wiser when they hear his questions, whereas ‎חרשים‎ are ‎people who when they open their mouths cause others to fall ‎silent, acknowledging superior knowledge.‎Perhaps the Talmud refers to two levels of serving G’d; the ‎first uses his intellect, i.e. the common sense G’d has endowed ‎him with to do so, whereas the second does so by contemplating ‎the enormity of the ‎אין סוף‎, the indescribable superiority of the ‎Creator, something that our common sense cannot even try to ‎comprehend.

This distinction has been alluded to in Numbers ‎‎12,8 [where the subject is Miriam and Aaron having ‎compared their statures as prophets to that of Moses, ‎Ed.] When G’d explains to them that Moses’ stature of ‎prophecy enables him to ‎תמונת ה' יביט‎, “to conceptually visualize ‎the Creator as if he saw a picture of Him,” He alluded to the ‎Divine assistance Moses enjoyed when visualizing such difficult ‎concepts.

He would only have been able to do so if he had first ‎abandoned and negated any attempt to comprehend G’d’s essence ‎by applying ordinary human intellect. People on that level are ‎described in the Torah as ‎חרש‎, having made themselves deaf to ‎‎“normal” ways of perceiving and comprehending phenomena ‎they see. When a person, after having been granted such ‎superhuman perceptions and insights, reverts to his day to day ‎routine, a residue of his experiences while he was on a higher ‎level remains, i.e. he is filled with ‎שפע‎, divinely transmitted ‎spiritual largesse.

As a result he is able to perform the work ‎performed by embroiderers both on blue woolen fabrics, ‎תכלת‎, ‎and on purple and crimson coloured woolen fabrics, ‎ארגמן‎. ‎‎[The finished product of Oholiov’s handiwork reflected ‎that he had been divinely inspired. Ed.]‎ Exodus 39,3. “they hammered out sheets of gold and cut ‎threads to be worked into the blue wool, etc.;” ….., “the work ‎of a skilful craftsman.”

A major criterion of the ‎categories of work prohibited to be performed on the Sabbath is ‎called ‎מלאכת מחשבת‎, “work requiring skill.” In order to obtain a ‎more detailed definition of this, the Talmud refers us to all the ‎kinds of work needing skill that were performed in the ‎construction of the Tabernacle. (Compare Beytzah, 13) ‎What the Talmud means is the kind of work performed by ‎Betzalel in connection with the Tabernacle, all of which required ‎for him to be inspired by G’d specifically so that he could carry it ‎out.

Seeing that the Tabernacle symbolized the creation of the ‎universe, it is plausible that the type of work, [creative ‎activity, for want of a better expression. Ed.] performed ‎by G’d during those 6 days, (though He only uttered the directive ‎by word of mouth) is what we are to abstain from on the day that ‎G’d abstained from creative activity.‎According to Bereshit Rabbah 12,15, G’d commenced ‎creating the universe by employing only the attribute of Justice, ‎but when He saw that the universe would not be able to be stable ‎and could not endure, He co-opted the attribute of Mercy.‎When G’d created the universe, He had also prepared all the ‎materials that would be required to ensure that the “work” was ‎carried out successfully, i.e. all the gold, silver and copper, etc; ‎originally, He had planned to use only gold.

Upon reflection, He ‎decided that it would be better to use primarily silver. Betzalel ‎similarly, used many different kinds of materials in order to create ‎a Tabernacle that would be a fair replica of the universe G’d had ‎created at the time. Just as G’d decided to co-opt the attribute of ‎Mercy to the attribute of Justice when He was in the process of ‎creating the universe, so Betzalel and his assistants proceeded ‎after first working with chunks of gold to beat the gold into thin ‎sheets, i.e. [as when covering the wooden boards with sheets of ‎gold, (Exodus 26,29) not make them nor the shittim wood ‎the exclusive material, and to make golden threads to interweave ‎with blue wool, etc., so that the precious metal gold would not be ‎the exclusive or even predominant raw material.

The composition ‎of different materials used in the making of the Tabernacle ‎demonstrated that though gold may be the most precious ‎material, unless the universe also contained less precious ‎materials it just would not be a “universe.”‎‎[This editor finds it difficult to accept that G’d, Who ‎according to all of our sages, intended for man, and amongst man ‎Israel, to be the crowning achievement of the creation, originally ‎intended to only use the attribute of Justice.

It is much easier to ‎understand the fact that the term Hashem is not mentioned ‎in the Torah until G’d had created a free-willed human being, one ‎that could rebel against Him, made the involvement of the ‎attribute of Mercy necessary, is much more plausible, especially ‎when we accept the principle of ‎סוף מעשה במחשבה תחלה‎, “the ‎final product was the original vision of the Creator”, as we sing in ‎לכה דודי‎ every Friday night. Ed.].‎