4 min read

Abraham Gave Lot First Choice and Watched the Quarrel Kill Him

Abraham had every right to the pasture. He gave it to Lot. The sages traced every disaster that followed to the moment the herdsmen first quarreled.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Herdsmen Who Started Everything
  2. What Abraham Did Not Do
  3. Where the Quarrel Led
  4. The Well Before the Covenant

The Herdsmen Who Started Everything

The quarrel was about grass. Abraham's herdsmen and Lot's herdsmen were competing for the same pasture in Canaan, and the land could not support both herds at full strength. The conflict was practical and easily resolved by anyone willing to move.

What was not easily resolved was the direction of the settlement. Lot looked toward the Jordan valley and saw that it was well-watered, like the garden of the Lord, like Egypt. He chose it. He moved his tents toward Sodom, where the men were wicked and sinners against God to an extreme degree. The text places these facts side by side without comment. The beautiful land. The terrible city. Lot walked into both of them simultaneously.

The teachers of Roman Palestine looked at that walk and said: the quarrel started it. Peace does not come from strife. Strife goes somewhere, and where it goes is usually somewhere the parties involved would not have chosen if they had seen it coming.

What Abraham Did Not Do

Abraham was the elder. He was the patriarch. He was the man to whom God had already promised the whole territory. He had every legal and moral claim to any piece of Canaan he wanted, and he could have exercised that claim against a nephew who was alive only because Abraham had rescued him from the eastern kings. The Sifrei Devarim, working through Deuteronomy 25:11, used Abraham's choice as its first exhibit in an argument about conflict resolution: peace does not proceed from strife.

He walked over to Lot and said: please, let there be no strife between you and me, between your herdsmen and my herdsmen, for we are brothers. Look at the whole land before you. If you take the left, I will take the right. If you take the right, I will take the left. You choose first.

He gave away the right of priority. He gave away the advantage of age. He gave away the claim that God's promise gave him. He gave Lot the choice because he preferred the resolution of strife to the exercise of rights.

Where the Quarrel Led

Lot chose the valley. He moved east. He pitched his tents toward Sodom and then he moved inside it. When the four kings raided the five, Lot was taken captive with everything he owned and carried into the north. Abraham received word, armed his trained men, pursued to Dan, and brought Lot back along with all the goods and people who had been taken.

Then Sodom fell. The angels came, the cities burned, Lot's wife became a pillar of salt looking back at the destruction, and Lot escaped to a cave in the mountains with his two daughters. What happened in that cave the Torah records without comment. The daughters of Lot became the mothers of Moab and Ammon.

None of this would have happened if Lot had not chosen the Jordan valley. He chose it because the herdsmen quarreled. The quarrel set the trajectory, and the trajectory ended in a cave above burning cities.

The Well Before the Covenant

When Abraham made his covenant with Abimelech, he did not rush to seal it. He stopped first and corrected Abimelech about a well that had been wrongfully seized by Abimelech's servants. He reproved before he reconciled. The tradition reads this as an instance of the same principle: correction leads to love, and there is no lasting peace without honest confrontation of the wrong that preceded it.

Abraham's peace with Lot was also genuine, but it required no correction because Abraham absorbed the loss himself. He gave Lot first choice and took the remainder. The peace was real because the sacrifice was real. Abraham did not negotiate a settlement that left both parties feeling slightly aggrieved. He conceded entirely and walked toward Hebron and the hills while Lot walked toward the valley and the disaster waiting inside it.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Sifrei Devarim 292:1Sifrei Devarim

This particular passage, Sifrei Devarim 292, takes a rather dim view of disagreements.

The passage starts with the verse from Deuteronomy (25:11), "If men strive together.." But the interpretation that follows is what’s truly eye-opening.

The Sifrei wastes no time in declaring that "Peace does not proceed from strife." It's a pretty direct statement, isn't it? And to drive the point home, it immediately throws us back to a story The familiar version gives us: the separation of Avram (later Abraham) and Lot.

Remember that story? (Genesis 13:7) tells us, "And there was a quarrel between the herdsmen of Avram's cattle and the herdsmen of Lot's cattle." And the Sifrei asks a pointed question: "What is it that caused Lot to part from Avram?"

The answer, of course, is a quarrel! A simple, perhaps even petty, argument led to a major division, separating two figures who were family, and whose destinies were intertwined. It's a potent example of how conflict can fracture even the closest bonds.

But the Sifrei doesn’t stop there. It then cites another verse, seemingly unrelated: "If there be a quarrel among men, etc." (referring back to (Deuteronomy 25:1)-2). And it asks, "What caused this one to receive stripes?" (referring to the punishment mentioned in that verse).

Again, the answer is: a quarrel. for a second.

According to this interpretation, quarrels aren't just unpleasant, they're actively destructive. They lead to separation, they lead to punishment. They are the antithesis of peace and harmony.

What's the takeaway here? Is the Torah telling us to avoid all conflict at all costs? Maybe. Or perhaps it's a reminder to be mindful of how easily disagreements can escalate, and to actively work towards resolution rather than fueling the fire.

It's a powerful lesson, and one that feels incredibly relevant today. Maybe the next time we find ourselves in the heat of an argument, we can remember the story of Avram and Lot, and ask ourselves: is this quarrel truly worth the cost?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:206Legends of the Jews

The Torah is full of moments like that, and the story of Abraham and Abimelech is a perfect example.

Before Abraham finalized his covenant with Abimelech, king of the Philistines, he actually had to call him out! He reproved him about a well. Now, this might seem insignificant, but the sages teach us that "Correction leads to love," and "There is no peace without correction." (I'm unable to find an exact source for this quote, but the concept is found within Jewish wisdom literature.) Essentially, sometimes you have to address the elephant in the room to move forward.

So, what was the issue with the well? Well, Abraham's herdsmen and Abimelech's herdsmen had a dispute. They decided to settle it with an ordeal – a trial by water, so to speak. The agreement was that the well would belong to whoever’s sheep the waters rose for, allowing them to drink. Sounds fair enough. But Abimelech’s shepherds cheated! They disregarded the agreement and just took the well for themselves. Not cool.

As a witness, and a lasting symbol that the well belonged to him, Abraham set aside seven sheep. These sheep, according to some interpretations, corresponded to the seven Mitzvot (commandments) B’nei Noach – the seven Noahide Laws. These are the laws that apply to all of humanity, not just the Jewish people. Think of them as the basic rules for a civilized society.

Now, here's where it gets really interesting. According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, God responds to Abraham's act of giving the seven sheep with a prophecy, a rather sobering one. God says, "You gave him seven sheep. As you live, the Philistines will one day slay seven righteous men – Samson, Hophni, Phinehas, and Saul with his three sons." Ouch.

And it doesn’t stop there. The prophecy continues: "They will destroy seven holy places, and they will keep the holy Ark in their country as booty of war for a period of seven months, and furthermore only the seventh generation of your descendants will be able to rejoice in the possession of the land promised to them." Talk about long-term consequences!

After all this, after Abimelech acknowledged Abraham's right to the well, Abraham named the place Be'er Sheva (בְּאֵר שֶׁבַע). The simple translation is the "Well of the Oath" or "Well of Seven," because that’s where they both swore a covenant of friendship.

This whole story really makes you think. Did Abraham know the weight of his actions and the prophecy they would unleash? It’s a reminder that even seemingly small disputes, resolved or unresolved, can have repercussions that stretch far beyond what we can imagine. It emphasizes the importance of acting with integrity, and recognizing that our choices, both good and bad, can ripple through generations.

Full source