4 min read

God Offered to Use Sunlight to Mark Who Had Bowed to Baal Peor

When Moses asked how to find the Israelites who sinned at Peor, God proposed peeling back the cloud so the sun would mark the guilty.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Problem Moses Brought to God
  2. Rabbi Judan's Reading: The Leaders Failed
  3. Rabbi Nehemiah's Reading: God Marks the Guilty
  4. What the Nations Made of the Fall

The Problem Moses Brought to God

The plague was already running through the camp. Twenty-four thousand would die before Phinehas ended it with a spear through two bodies at once. But before the plague could complete its work, there was a prior question: who, exactly, had sinned? The camp held hundreds of thousands of people. The Moabite women had operated across the whole width of the settlement. How do you find the specific individuals who crossed the line into the shrine of Baal Peor?

God told Moses to take all the heads of the people and impale them before the Lord in the sun (Numbers 25:4). The verse is terse and violent and ambiguous in ways that kept the rabbis arguing.

Rabbi Judan's Reading: The Leaders Failed

Midrash Tanchuma, Balak 19, preserves two readings of the verse, and they pull in opposite directions. Rabbi Judan read it straightforwardly and harshly: the leaders were to be hung because they had not protested. They had watched the moral collapse happening directly under their authority and chosen silence. They had seen the camp's men following Moabite women into the shrine and had said nothing. The sun beats down on the executed men as public spectacle, and the punishment fits the crime precisely. They who stood in prominence without using their prominence to prevent what was happening now stand publicly and permanently exposed.

Silence, in this reading, is a specific form of culpability. A leader is not a bystander. A leader who watches and does nothing is a participant in what results.

Rabbi Nehemiah's Reading: God Marks the Guilty

Rabbi Nehemiah read the same verse in a completely different direction. The leaders were not to be hanged at all. God said to Moses: appoint Sanhedrin judges over the people and let them judge whoever went to Peor. Moses raised the practical objection immediately: but who will identify them? The sinners were not wearing marks. They would blend into the general population. Any trial would require witnesses, identification, proof.

God's answer was direct: I will expose them. Whoever has gone astray, the cloud will be peeled back from above him, and the sun will shine upon him in the midst of the congregation. The cloud of divine presence, which normally covered the camp as a whole, would withdraw locally, precisely, over the person who had bowed to Baal Peor. The sunlight would mark him in front of everyone, identification without ambiguity, evidence without testimony.

What the Nations Made of the Fall

Legends of the Jews preserves the reaction of the surrounding nations to Israel's failure at Peor. They gloated. They had understood, on some level, that Israel had been chosen precisely because of moral character, not because of favoritism. Now, they said, the crown has been taken from Israel's head. Their pride is departed. They are no better than us. The same special status that had separated them was now forfeited, in the nations' reading, by this one catastrophic failure.

Bamidbar Rabbah adds the internal dimension. The women of Moab had not acted spontaneously. They had been organized. Each woman was assigned to a tent, each tent stocked with the fine linen the Israelites had acquired in Egypt, each transaction planned to draw a man deeper into obligation and at last into the shrine. The seduction was systematic, not opportunistic.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Midrash Tanchuma, Balak 19Midrash Tanchuma

(Numb. 25:4:) “Take all the heads of the people, and impale them [before the Lord in the sun].” R. Judan said, “He hanged the heads of the people, because they had not protested about the people who stood out among them like the sun.” R. Nehemiah said, “He did not hang them. Rather the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses, ‘Appoint Sanhedrin (the supreme rabbinic court) heads for them, and let them judge whoever went to Peor.’ He said to him, ‘But who will make such a one known?’ The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, ‘I will expose them. In the case of whoever has gone astray, the cloud shall be peeled back from upon him, and the sun shall shine upon him in the midst of the congregation. Then they will know anyone who has gone astray and hang him.’” You know for yourself that it is so, as stated (in Numb. 25:5), “So Moses said unto the judges of Israel, ‘Each of you kill [those of] his own people [who have been joined to Baal Peor].’”

Full source
Midrash Tehillim 106:7Midrash Tehillim

(Psalm 106:23) states, "Therefore He said He would destroy them, had not Moses His chosen one stood before Him in the breach, to turn back His wrath, lest He destroy them." It’s a verse that hints at incredible danger, and even more incredible intervention. But how did Moses, a single man, manage to change God's mind?

Rabbi Barachia, citing Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon, offers a parable. Imagine a prosecutor, filled with accusations against the king’s son. Just as the king is about to act, a guard steps forward, blocking the prosecutor. The prosecutor, seeing this, backs down. That guard, in this story, is Moses. He steps into the breach, shielding the Israelites from the full force of God's anger.

Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman provides another image. This time, a king is furious with his son. He's about to sign a decree that would have terrible consequences. But a loyal guard snatches the document from his hand, preventing the king from acting on his rage. The act of preventing harm. It’s a powerful idea, isn't it? That even in the face of divine wrath, intercession is possible.

What exactly had the Israelites done to warrant such a severe response? According to Rav Huna, also citing Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman, the incident of Baal Peor was the breaking point. Baal Peor, a Moabite deity, was associated with licentious and idolatrous practices. The Israelites' involvement was a profound betrayal. We read, "And he lifted up his hand against them," referring to the divine judgment they faced. And what was the cause? “Because they rebelled against Him and spoke against Him.”

Rabbi Yudan even invokes an oath, swearing in the name of Moses himself. He alludes to (Daniel 12:7), "And he lifted up his right and his left hand to heaven," connecting Moses's intercession with a divine oath. It emphasizes the gravity of the situation and the immense effort required to avert disaster.

Rabbi Yudan, son of Rabbi Yudan, adds a crucial element: the power of speech. Quoting (Leviticus 5:4), "If a person swears to express with his lips…," he suggests that rebellious and blasphemous speech contributed to the crisis. Our words, it seems, have the power to invite blessing or destruction.

What's so striking about these interpretations in Midrash Tehillim? They paint a picture of a God who, while capable of intense anger, is also open to persuasion, to the possibility of mercy. And they highlight the role of a leader, like Moses, who is willing to stand in the gap, to advocate for his people even when they seem undeserving. It reminds us that even when we feel we've reached the point of no return, intercession, repentance, and perhaps most importantly, a change in our words and actions, can alter the course of events. Even divine ones.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 20:23Bamidbar Rabbah

The story of the Israelites and their encounter with the daughters of Moab is a stark reminder. It's a tale of temptation, idolatry, and the devastating consequences of losing sight of our values.

The Torah tells us, "The people began to engage in harlotry with the daughters of Moav" (Numbers 25:1). But Bamidbar Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic teachings on the Book of Numbers, doesn't just leave it there. It explores the context, drawing a fascinating parallel. Remember the Exodus? "Speak to the children of Israel, and they will return and encamp before Pi HaḤirot" (Exodus 14:2). What's Pi HaḤirot? According to Bamidbar Rabbah, it’s a place associated with harlotry. But because the Israelites behaved chastely then, it was called Pi HaḤirot– hinting at ḥerut, freedom.

The text contrasts this with the story at hand: "But these, who abandoned themselves to the women, it is written ‘the people began to engage in harlotry [with the daughters of Moav].’" Notice something? The text uses the term "the people" here, not "Israel." Bamidbar Rabbah points out a pattern: "Every place that it says 'the people,' it is an expression of denigration, but everywhere that it says 'Israel,' it is an expression of praise.": "The people were as complainers" (Numbers 11:1); "the people spoke against God and against Moses" (Numbers 21:5). It's a subtle but powerful distinction.

The text drives home a critical point: actions have roots. "The people began to engage in harlotry – cast a staff into the air, it falls on its place of origin." This isn’t just a random event; it’s part of a pattern. Bamidbar Rabbah even connects it back to the story of Lot and his daughters (Genesis 19:30–37). Remember that story? "Her sister taught her; that is why the verse spared the younger, and did not state what she had done explicitly, but rather, ‘she lay with him’ (Genesis 19:35). But regarding the elder it is written: ‘She lay with her father.’" The implications are clear: "She who began with harlotry initially, her daughters completed the task after her; ‘to engage in harlotry with the daughters of Moav.’"

But how did it all unfold? "They invited the people to the offerings of their gods, and the people ate, and prostrated themselves to their gods" (Numbers 25:2). According to Bamidbar Rabbah, they were following Bilam’s advice: "Behold, they were for the children of Israel, by the word of Bilam, to commit trespass against the Lord" (Numbers 31:16). The text paints a vivid picture. They crafted curtains, seated harlots within, and stocked their hands with precious vessels. An elderly woman acted as a lookout, luring Israelites with the promise of fine goods from Beit She’an.

The temptation was many-sided. They’d offer wine (before it was prohibited to drink wine made by gentiles), and say things like, "Why is it that we love you and you hate us? Take this vessel for yourself at no cost. Is it not that 'we are all the children of one man' (Genesis 42:11), the sons of Teraḥ, father of Abraham?" They even offered kosher-style food. "You do not wish to eat from our slaughter and from our cooking, we have calves and roosters; slaughter in accordance with your mitzva and eat." A young woman would come out adorned and perfumed and seduce him.

The trap was set. "Immediately, she would give him wine to drink and Satan was inflamed within him, and he strayed after her, as it is stated: 'Harlotry, wine and new wine capture the heart' (Hosea 4:11)." Then came the ultimate test. "I will not submit to you until you slaughter this to Peor, and prostrate yourself to it." At first, the Israelite might resist: "To idolatry I do not prostrate myself." But she'd minimize it: "You are doing nothing more than exposing yourself." And tragically, many succumbed. "He strayed after her and did so. This is what the Sages said: One who defecates to Baal Peor, that is its worship, as it is stated: 'They prostrated themselves to their gods.'"

The consequences were severe. "Israel adhered [vayitzamed] to Baal Peor, and the wrath of the Lord was enflamed against Israel" (Numbers 25:3). Vayitzamed – initially, they would enter discreetly, but ultimately, they would enter in pairs [tzemidim], as in a yoke [tzemed] of cattle. Or, like a person who is constant [tzamid] in his labor.

Rabbi Levi offers a chilling comparison: "This is a harsher decree than the calf, as regarding the calf it is written: 'Remove the gold rings' (Exodus 32:2), but here, vayitzamed, like bracelets." The scale of the tragedy was immense. At the calf, three thousand fell, but here, twenty-four thousand.

So, what was the response? "The Lord said to Moses: Take all the leaders of the people, and hang them for the Lord opposite the sun, and the enflamed wrath of the Lord will be withdrawn from Israel" (Numbers 25:4). Rabbi Yudan suggests they hanged the leaders for failing to properly reprove the people. Rabbi Nehemya offers a different interpretation: God instructed Moses to empanel heads of the Sanhedrin, a rabbinical court, to judge those who went astray with Peor.

The story concludes with a stark reminder of accountability: "So Moses said to Israel's officials: Each of you slay those of his men [who attached themselves to Baal Peor]" (Numbers 25:5).

What do we take away from this disturbing narrative? It’s a potent reminder of the seductive power of temptation, the importance of staying true to our values, and the devastating consequences of succumbing to external pressures. It's a call to be vigilant, to choose wisely, and to remember that our actions have far-reaching consequences, echoing through generations. Can we learn from the mistakes of the past? Can we resist the allure of the fleeting and prioritize the enduring? That's the challenge this ancient story lays before us.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:70Legends of the Jews

Why the glee? Because, according to this legend (Ginzberg, Legends of the Jews, Vol. 3, p. 311), the other nations understood something profound: God had chosen Israel, had given them the Torah, precisely because of their moral purity. It wasn't just blind favoritism, it was about their character. Their integrity.

"Now," these nations gloated, "the crown has been taken from Israel's head, their pride is departed, for now they are no better than we." Ouch. They believed Israel had squandered its special status, becoming just another run-of-the-mill, morally compromised nation. The very thing that set them apart, their commitment to a higher standard, had vanished.

God, seeing the depths of Israel's fall, doesn't abandon them. Instead, He sends a plague upon the sinners at Shittim. Harsh? Maybe. But the purpose, according to the legend, was purification. A cleansing.

The legend concludes that through this harrowing experience, Israel could once again be proud of their lineage, their commitment to God's laws, the very things that distinguished them from all other nations. They learned, perhaps the hard way, that their special relationship with God wasn't a free pass, but a responsibility. A responsibility to live up to the high standards He had set for them.

So, what does this all mean for us today? Maybe it's a reminder that being "chosen," whatever that means in your own life, isn't a guarantee of success or moral superiority. It’s an ongoing process of striving, of falling, and of rising again, hopefully a little wiser each time. It is about the constant struggle to live up to the values we claim to hold dear, even when it's difficult.

Full source