A Kabbalist Student Accused His Teacher of Teaching Two Gods
In The Wars of God, a student accused his kabbalist teacher of describing the divine emanations in language that sounded like separate gods.
Table of Contents
The Letter That Was Actually an Accusation
The student opened by saying his soul yearned for profound words, burning from the lofty heavens, that he was parched and needed to be quenched. It sounds like devotion. It was the opening move in an ambush.
The exchange is preserved in The Wars of God, a medieval kabbalistic work whose very title signals that the arguments inside are not gentle. The student had studied Kabbalah with a teacher, and he had arrived at a conclusion that alarmed him: his teacher, in describing the divine emanations, had spoken in terms that sounded like separate powers. Ten sefirot. Ten distinct attributes. Ten faces of the infinite. The student heard in that language something very close to ten gods.
Hillel and the Charge of Belittling the Sages
He said so directly. He accused the teacher of being harsh, of failing to follow the gentle path. He invoked Hillel, the first-century sage, and his most famous teaching: what is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. The student was arguing that the teacher's Kabbalistic language was hateful to the Jewish understanding of divine unity, and the teacher should therefore stop using it.
He also accused the teacher of belittling the sages of Israel. Not a minor charge. In a tradition where the authority of the rabbis is foundational, claiming that a teacher's words undermine the sages is claiming that the teacher has stepped outside the bounds of legitimate Jewish thought.
The Teacher's Defense
The teacher did not back down. He denied any intention to belittle the sages or to introduce foreign theology into the tradition. He pointed to endemic debate and even mockery as features of Jewish learning, citing Rabbi Abahu, a third-century Caesarean amora known for sharp exchange. He was not alone in using difficult language about divine structure. The entire Kabbalistic tradition had been using it for centuries.
The defense rests on a distinction the Kabbalistic tradition had been working out since Sefer Yetzirah, probably composed between the third and sixth centuries CE, first described the ten sefirot. The sefirot are not gods. They are not beings with independent will. They are the ten primary modes by which the infinite becomes knowable, ten facets of one light, each coloring the same light differently. Keter, Hokhmah, Binah, down through Yesod to Malkhut: the names are not names of ten different beings but descriptions of ten different aspects of one divine reality.
The Rainbow and the Presence
The Kabbalistic sources assembled in the student's dispute include the tradition of the rainbow of the Shekhinah. The rainbow set in the clouds after the flood (Genesis 9:13) has a heavenly counterpart in mystical thought, an arch of the Shekhinah's light above the highest heaven. Ezekiel's vision describes it precisely: like the appearance of the bow which shines in the clouds on a day of rain, such was the appearance of the surrounding radiance (Ezekiel 1:28). The rainbow is not a separate god. It is a feature of the divine presence, a spectrum of one light.
The thirty-two paths of wisdom, developed from Sefer Yetzirah's combination of the ten sefirot and the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet, are the structural grammar of creation. The letters are not independent powers. The sefirot are not independent powers. They are the ways in which one will builds a world that creatures can inhabit and understand.
← All myths