Parshat Korach6 min read

Moses Who Walked Toward the Men Who Hated Him

Moses walked to warn Datan and Aviram before the earth opened. They would not come out to meet him. He gave the warning and left them to the ground.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Walk Across the Camp
  2. Insolence and Dispute
  3. The Warning Spoken to an Empty Door
  4. What Moses Carried from the Calf
  5. When the Ground Opened

Moses did not send a message. He walked.

God had told him to warn the congregation: move away from the tents of Korah, Datan, and Aviram before the earth consumed them (Numbers 16:23-24). Moses heard the instruction clearly. He could have shouted it from across the camp, sent a deputy, or simply let the warning travel by word of mouth. Instead he rose and went on foot to the men who hated him and had spent years working toward his destruction.

That was not in the order. That was Moses.

The Walk Across the Camp

Datan and Aviram had been his enemies since Egypt. The Torah's silence on who exposed his killing of the Egyptian overseer speaks loudly (Exodus 2:14). They had quarreled with him in the wilderness. Now they stood at the heart of Korah's rebellion, and they would not even step outside to meet him when he arrived.

The people watched Moses cross the camp. They saw him stop outside the tent flap. No one opened it. He waited. The fabric did not move. Moses looked at the closed tent, and then he said the words that have survived everything else in the story: It was incumbent upon me to go this far.

Not: I tried. Not: at least I came. He had not come to absolve himself. He had come because the law of rebuke required a human presence, a face, a moment in which the men inside could have chosen to walk toward him. They did not choose it. But they had to have the chance.

Insolence and Dispute

Four kinds of wickedness are named in the tradition, and Datan and Aviram carried two of them: insolence and machloket (מַחֲלֹקֶת), the spirit of dispute that tears a community open. The rabbis read the letters of that word as a compressed verdict. Mem: makah, a blow. Chet: charon, fury. Lamed: likkui, punishment. Kuf: kelala, a curse. Tav: ta'avah, abomination. To carry machloket was to carry all five at once, burning through every room you entered.

Moses entered anyway.

The Warning Spoken to an Empty Door

When he saw they would not come out, Moses turned to the congregation gathered around the tents. He did not pound on the tent, did not demand an audience. He had made the walk. The rest was theirs to accept or refuse.

"Move away from the tents of these wicked men," he told the people. "Touch nothing of theirs, or you will be swept away with them in their sin" (Numbers 16:26). The crowd pulled back like a tide. And then Datan and Aviram did emerge, but not to repent. They came out cursing and blaspheming, standing in the tent doorway with their wives, their children, their infants at their feet. They stood and stared.

Moses turned from them to God. He said: if these men die peacefully, in their beds, the way anyone dies, then say that God did not send me, that I fabricated all of it from my own heart. But if the ground opens and takes them down alive into Gehinnom (גֵּיהִנֹּם), the pit of judgment, then you will know (Numbers 16:28-30). He was not threatening. He was staking his entire life on what he believed the earth would do.

God answered him: you have decided. I will fulfill it.

What Moses Carried from the Calf

The walk to Datan and Aviram was not the first time Moses placed himself between Israel and the fire that was coming for them. After the Golden Calf, he had done it with his own hands. The curse-scroll that should have fallen on the nation, Moses wrote and then erased into the bitter water, so that Israel would drink the accounting rather than be consumed by it outright (Numbers 5:23). The tablet on which God had inscribed "Who reckons the iniquity of the fathers against the children" (Exodus 20:5) had shattered at the mountain's foot. The script flew off the stone and dissolved. What should have remained as permanent judgment passed through Moses's body and dispersed, because Moses chose to stand in its path.

Both acts have the same shape: a disaster with Israel's name on it, and Moses interposing himself between the people and the heat. At the Calf he absorbed the judgment through writing and erasure. At the Korah rebellion he absorbed the moment of decision through the walk, through the face, through the words spoken to a closed flap of cloth. He could not force Datan and Aviram to repent. He could only arrive.

When the Ground Opened

The earth split. Datan and Aviram went down alive, with their households and everything belonging to them (Numbers 16:32-33). The congregation that had watched Moses make his walk now fled from the sound of it, afraid the ground would reach for them as well.

Moses was not vindicated. Vindication belongs to men who act for outcomes. The walk had already ended when he said it was incumbent upon him to come this far. What happened afterward was between them and the earth. Moses had crossed the camp, stood at the door, spoken his warning to a crowd, and stepped back.

They went down. He was still standing.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 18:12Bamidbar Rabbah

The story of Moses and the rebellion of Korah, Datan, and Aviram in the Book of Numbers gives us a powerful example.

The Torah tells us, “The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: ‘Speak to the congregation, saying: Withdraw from around the dwellings of Korah, Datan, and Aviram’” (Numbers 16:23-24). But the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), specifically Bamidbar Rabbah, pauses on this moment, revealing a fascinating detail. Even though Moses received the instruction directly from God, he didn’t immediately order the people to withdraw. Instead, he went to Datan and Aviram himself to warn them. As it is stated, "Moses arose and went to Datan and Aviram" (Numbers 16:25).

Why? To show just how far he was willing to go to try and save them. Even though they were wicked and rebellious, Moses extended himself, hoping to placate them. The text emphasizes how difficult these men were to deal with. They wouldn’t even come out to meet him! Seeing their stubbornness, Moses acknowledges, "It was incumbent upon me to go this far." (Numbers 16:25)

Then he speaks to the congregation, warning them: “Depart now, away from the tents of these wicked men, and do not touch anything that is theirs, lest you be destroyed for all their sins” (Numbers 16:26).

But what made them wicked? Bamidbar Rabbah, drawing on earlier rabbinic teachings, identifies four characteristics of wickedness. It’s a bit of a moral checklist, if you will. First, one who raises a hand to strike another, even without actually hitting them, is considered wicked. This comes from (Exodus 2:13), where it says, "Why do you strike your counterpart," using the future tense takeh. Second, someone who borrows and doesn’t repay is wicked, based on (Psalms 37:21): “Wicked is one who borrows and does not repay; righteous is one who is gracious and gives.” Thirdly, insolence – lacking shame in the presence of those greater than you – marks a wicked person, as (Proverbs 21:29) states: “The wicked man is insolent before him, but the upright discerns his way.” And finally, someone who is constantly engaged in dispute, in maḥloket, is considered wicked.

According to the Rabbis, Datan and Aviram embodied at least two of these traits: insolence and dispute. The Midrash even breaks down the Hebrew word maḥloket itself, offering a chilling interpretation: mem for maka (smiting), ḥet for ḥaron (fury), lamed for likui (punishment), kof for kelala (curse), and tav for to’eva (abomination). Some even say it signifies takhlit, the end, as it brings extermination to the world. Powerful stuff.

So, the people heed Moses's warning and withdraw. But Datan and Aviram, ever defiant, "emerged and stood at the entrance of their tents, with their wives, and their children, and their infants" (Numbers 16:27). Bamidbar Rabbah paints a vivid picture: they emerged cursing and blaspheming. Their defiance is compared to the Philistine who stood taunting the Israelites for forty days (1 (Samuel 17:1)6).

Then comes Moses's famous declaration: "With this you will know that the Lord has sent me to perform all these actions, as it is not from my heart" (Numbers 16:28). Essentially, he's saying, "If these men die a natural death, then I'm a liar." The Midrash uses a fascinating analogy here: a king's daughter, a groomsman, and a claim about her virginity. The point? Moses is so certain of his mission that he's willing to put everything on the line.

He then calls upon God to create a unique and terrible punishment. "But if the Lord creates a creation, and the ground opens its mouth and swallows them and everything that is theirs, and they descend alive into the abyss, you shall know that these people have scorned the Lord" (Numbers 16:30). He even suggests that if God hasn't already created such a mouth in the earth, now would be a good time to do so!

God, in turn, seems to grant Moses this extraordinary power. The text quotes (Job 22:28): "You decide something, and He will fulfill it for you, and light will shine upon your ways."

The earth does open up, swallowing Korah, Datan, Aviram, and all that belonged to them. A terrifying end, and a powerful reminder of the consequences of rebellion and wickedness.

But I keep coming back to that initial moment. That moment when Moses, despite everything, chose to walk toward his adversaries, to give them one last chance. It speaks volumes about the complexities of leadership, the burden of responsibility, and the enduring hope, even in the face of profound wickedness, that redemption is still possible. What does that moment mean to you?

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 9:48Bamidbar Rabbah

What does it all mean?, drawing on the tradition of Jewish tradition to unravel this mystery.

The Torah tells us, "The priest shall write these curses in a scroll, and erase it in the water of bitterness" (Numbers 5:23). But who is this priest, and what's the deal with the scroll? Bamidbar Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic commentaries on the Book of Numbers, offers some fascinating insights. It suggests that the "priest" here refers to Moses himself. And this "scroll"? Well, that's where things get really interesting.

The text hints it’s related to the tablets upon which the Ten Commandments were written, specifically the commandment "Who reckons the iniquity of the fathers [against the children]" (Exodus 20:5). But a question arises: did Moses actually write the curses? Wouldn't that be God's job? Bamidbar Rabbah clarifies: because Israel strayed and worshipped the Golden Calf, God essentially delegated the task to Moses. "He gave to Moses" (Exodus 31:18), the Torah says, and that's why the curses are attributed to him.

Why is the tablet called a "scroll"? Here's where the miraculous comes in. The commentary suggests the tablet, incredibly, could be furled and unfurled like a scroll! A mind-bending image, isn't it?

Then comes the "erasing" of the curses in the water of bitterness. This is connected to the shattering of the first set of tablets after the sin of the Golden Calf. As Bamidbar Rabbah explains, because of Israel's iniquity, Moses shattered the tablets, and the script miraculously flew off. It was this erasure, this loss of divine inscription, that Israel symbolically drank in the bitter water. A potent image of consequence and regret.

The ritual continues: "He shall give the woman to drink the water of bitterness that causes curse, and the water that causes curse will enter her for bitterness" (Numbers 5:24). This act of "giving to drink" echoes Moses' actions with the Golden Calf, where "He gave the children of Israel to drink" (Exodus 32:20). It's a parallel, suggesting a similar kind of examination or testing. They were examined "like sotot"

Then there's the meal offering of jealousy. Bamidbar Rabbah interprets this as symbolizing the tablets themselves, which God was initially sending but then, due to Israel's actions, seemingly took back. Waving the meal offering before the Lord is seen as Moses restoring the script to the tablets. And bringing it near the altar? That represents the tablets being shattered at the foot of Mount Sinai, where Moses built an altar to receive the Torah (Exodus 24:4).

But what about the curses themselves? "The priest shall take a handful from the meal offering… as Moses advocated on behalf of Israel from what was written on the tablets: 'Who performs kindness for the thousands [of generations], for those who love Me' (Exodus 20:6)." Moses uses the very words of the Torah to plead for mercy, reminding God of the patriarchs' love and urging Him to remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel (Exodus 32:13). Only after this intercession does the ritual proceed.

The text then describes the grim outcome: "He shall give her the water to drink, and it will be, if she was defiled… the water that causes curse will enter her." Bamidbar Rabbah connects this to the aftermath of the Golden Calf, saying that all the sinners died an unnatural death when they drank.

The text even touches on a debate Rabbi Eliezer had with a noblewoman about why the Israelites died three deaths for the sin of the calf. The story is intriguing, but perhaps more interesting is the follow-up with his students after turning the woman away. Rabbi Berekhya, in the name of Rabbi Elazar, explains the different fates: those with witnesses and forewarning were executed by the court; those with witnesses but no forewarning were examined like the sotah; and those with neither died in the plague.

Finally, the passage concludes with a glimmer of hope. "And if the woman was not defiled, and she is pure, she will be absolved and will conceive offspring" (Numbers 5:28). The commentary sees this as referring to the upright people and specifically the tribe of Levi, who, because of their purity, merited sacred service. And those upright Israelites? They are the ones whose offspring ultimately entered the Promised Land, fulfilling God's promise to Abraham (Exodus 33:1). "I will sow her in the land for Me” (Hosea 2:25).

So, what do we take away from all this? The story of the sotah, as interpreted by Bamidbar Rabbah, is far more than just a strange ritual. It's a story about sin, consequence, divine forgiveness, and the enduring power of intercession. It's a reminder that even in the face of profound transgression, hope and redemption are always possible. And perhaps, most importantly, it highlights the crucial role of Moses, not just as a lawgiver, but as a compassionate advocate for his people. Isn't it amazing how much depth can be found in even the most challenging passages of Torah?

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 745:1Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

"And the men died" teaches that they died an unusual death: their tongues stretched out, they fell upon their navels, and worms came out from their tongues and entered their navels, then came out from their navels and entered their tongues. Rabbi [the edition reads: Nachman bar Yitzchak; alternate reading: Gamliel] said: they died of askara. It was taught: Rabbi Eleazar ben Parta says: Come and see how great the power of evil speech is. From where do we know this? From the spies. If the spies, who brought an evil name upon trees and stones, were punished in this way, how much more so one who brings an evil name upon his fellow. From what proof? Perhaps it was as Rabbi Hanina bar Pappa [said], that the spies spoke a great matter, as explained above. Rather, Rava said: Scripture says, "and the men died" because of "the evil report of the land" that they brought. (Numbers 14:38) Joshua and Caleb took the spies' portion. From where are these matters derived? Scripture says, "Joshua son of Nun and Caleb son of Jephunneh lived from those men." What does "lived" mean? If it means literally that they lived, is it not already written, "not a man of them was left, except Caleb son of Jephunneh and Joshua son of Nun" (Numbers 26:65)? Rather, it means that they lived in their portion. The complainers and the assembly of Korah had no portion in the land. But was it not taught that Joshua and Caleb took their portion? This is no difficulty: one master compares the complainers to the spies, and [one master does not compare them]. As it was taught: "Our father died in the wilderness" [this is Zelophehad]; "and he was not among the assembly" means the assembly of the spies; "who assembled against the Lord" means the complainers; "and he was not in the assembly of Korah" is as it sounds. One master compares the complainers to the spies, and one master does not compare them. Rav Pappa said to Abaye: According to the one who compares them, did Joshua and Caleb trouble themselves to inherit the entire land of Israel? He said to him: We are speaking of the complainers who were in the assembly of Korah.

(Numbers 14:39-45) "The Amalekite and the Canaanite came down" and "struck them and beat them down." Immediately they returned and sat in mourning. From here they said: anyone placed under a ban for one day below, even if they released him below, has no release above until seven days; anyone placed under a ban for seven days below, even if they released him below, has no release above until thirty days; and anyone placed under a ban for thirty days below, even if they released him below, has no release above forever and ever. Therefore it says, "the people mourned greatly." At that moment the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses: Moses, come and appease those poor ones, for their heart has already gone out from within them. He said before Him: Master of the universe, with what shall I appease them? He said to him: Go and appease them with words of Torah, as it says, "Speak to the children of Israel: When you come" and "you make a fire-offering to the Lord" (Numbers 15:2-3). At that moment there was a great quarrel between Israel and the converts, until the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses: Why have these made a quarrel with those? Did I not write for you in My Torah, "As for the congregation, one statute" (Numbers 15:15)? Now it says, "one Torah and one law."

From here they said: There are three kinds among converts. There is a convert who is like a foreigner in every respect; there is a convert likened to a donkey; and there is a convert like Abraham our father. There is a convert who is like a foreigner in every respect. How so? He had carcasses and torn animals in his house, and he said: I will go and convert and be among these people, whose food is good and who have festivals and Sabbaths, while these things will still be eaten in my house. He bent himself and went and converted. In the end, when he returned to his original way, sufferings came upon him for his good, to rescue him from what he had done. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel: My children, just as this one loved you, you too must love him, as it says, "You shall love the convert" (Deuteronomy 10:19). There is a convert likened to a donkey. How so? He went and married a woman from Israel. They said to him: We will not give her to you unless you convert. He bent himself and went and converted. In the end, when he returned to his original way, sufferings came upon him for his good, to rescue him from what he had done. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel: My children, just as this one sought rest from you, you too must give him rest, as it says, "You shall not wrong a convert" (Exodus 22:20). There is a convert like Abraham our father. How so? He went and searched through all the nations of the world. When he saw that they too spoke of Israel's goodness, he said: I will go and convert and enter under the wings of the Shekhinah, as it says, "Let not the foreigner's son say" and so on (Isaiah 56:3). "They defiantly ascended toward the top of the mountain": Zelophehad was among those who defiantly ascended. "But the Ark of the covenant of the Lord and Moses" and so on is written at remez 367.

Full source