5 min read

The Pit Was Not Empty and It Was Full of Snakes

The Torah says the pit had no water. The Midrash says what was there instead: snakes and scorpions. Simeon threw Joseph in and nothing bit him.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. No Water, But Something Else
  2. The Price They Agreed On
  3. From the Pit to Potiphar's House
  4. What Egypt Would Pay in Return

No Water, But Something Else

Simeon grabbed Joseph. Not the brothers collectively, not a group decision executed by consensus: Simeon specifically, whose capacity for violence the tradition had already noted and would note again. He grabbed Joseph and threw him into the pit. Joseph landed in the dark at the bottom of a dry cistern. The Torah records that the pit had no water in it.

The rabbis read that line and heard what it was not saying. No water. But something was there. The Legends of the Jews supplies what the Torah omits: the pit was full of snakes and scorpions. Nachashim v'akrabim. Joseph landed among vipers and nothing happened. Not a single bite. Not one sting from the scorpions moving around his feet in the dark. The brothers above him could not see this. They sat down to eat their bread. The Midrash records this detail with barely concealed horror: a miracle was happening at the bottom of the pit, and the men sitting at the edge of it were eating.

The Price They Agreed On

Twenty pieces of silver. The Legends of the Jews records the Midrash's arithmetic on this sum with a specific precision that functions as an indictment. Twenty pieces of silver divided among ten brothers - Reuben was absent, Benjamin was at home - comes to two pieces each, which was the price of a pair of sandals. Joseph, beloved son of Jacob, dreamer of cosmic dreams, survivor of a pit full of snakes: each of his brothers received the equivalent of a pair of shoes for him.

The tradition notes that this was also below the legal price for a slave, which was thirty pieces of silver. They had undervalued him even in the transaction. The man who would feed the known world was sold for less than the market rate.

From the Pit to Potiphar's House

Potiphar purchased Joseph, and the trajectory that had begun at the pit continued upward. Every position Joseph occupied, he improved. Potiphar's household ran better under Joseph's management than it had before. Potiphar noticed. He gave Joseph authority over everything he owned, withheld nothing, trusted him completely with the management of a major household in the Egyptian court.

Then Potiphar's wife. The tradition examined this accusation from every angle. She had been persistent over time, methodical in her seductions, willing to wait and try different approaches. Joseph had refused repeatedly and clearly. When she grabbed his cloak and he fled, the evidence she held in her hands was the physical evidence she used against him. Potiphar threw Joseph in prison, and the Midrash notes that the prison was specifically for the king's prisoners, which is a better class of prison than a man accused of assaulting his master's wife would normally expect. Potiphar may not have fully believed his wife.

What Egypt Would Pay in Return

The divine judgment of Egypt did not ignore what Egypt had done to Joseph. The ten plagues that came decades later were the accounting, though not an accounting that Joseph himself witnessed. What Joseph witnessed was the smaller version: the famine that put all of Egypt's land under his authority. When the grain ran out across the known world and people came to buy, Joseph controlled the terms. Egypt submitted to those terms year by year, surrendering livestock, then land, then finally their own status as free persons, in exchange for bread. The man sold as a slave became the man through whose hands Egypt signed away its independence.

The tradition does not frame this as revenge. Joseph himself refused that framing, repeatedly and explicitly. But the structure of it is visible in the sources, and the rabbis saw it. The pit that was meant to end Joseph became the first step in a sequence that restructured Egypt from the inside.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 1:22Legends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews turns to Simon Threw Joseph Into a Pit Full of Snakes and Scorpions.

The brothers, consumed by jealousy, were plotting against him. Reuben, trying to mitigate the situation, suggested a compromise – a terrible one, but a compromise nonetheless. And the brothers, they agreed.

What happened next is brutal. That Simon, without hesitation, seized Joseph and threw him into a pit. But this wasn't just any pit. Oh no. This pit was swarming with snakes and scorpions. Nachashim v'akrabim. Can you imagine the terror?

If that wasn’t horrifying enough, there was another pit nearby, filled with something truly disgusting: offal. Just… refuse. The worst of the worst.

But it gets worse. Simon, in a fit of cruelty, then instructed his brothers to throw large stones at Joseph. It’s a chilling scene, isn't it? What kind of hatred could drive someone to that?

Later, as the story unfolds, Joseph rises to a position of power in Egypt. He has the chance to exact revenge on his brothers. And here’s where we see the incredible depth of his character. When Simon is held captive in Egypt as a hostage, you might expect Joseph to treat him harshly. To give him the same measure he received.

But no.

Instead, Joseph, showing remarkable forgiveness – rachamim, compassion – orders that Simon be served the finest food. The text specifically mentions “crammed poultry” being set before him at every meal. A sign of abundance, of honor, of complete and utter forgiveness.

It's a powerful example, isn’t it? Even after such profound betrayal and suffering, Joseph chooses a different path. He chooses compassion. He chooses to rise above the bitterness and hatred.

The story of Joseph is a complex one, full of twists and turns, but in moments like these, we see a glimmer of hope. A reminder that even in the face of unimaginable cruelty, forgiveness is possible. And maybe, just maybe, that's a lesson we can all take to heart.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:30Legends of the Jews

His own brothers, driven by jealousy, threw him into a pit. But the story doesn't end there, does it? He's pulled out, not to be rescued and returned home, but to be sold.

Here’s the kicker: the price.

In Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginzberg tells how the Midianites sold Joseph for a measly twenty pieces of silver. Just twenty!

What could you even buy with twenty pieces of silver back then? Well, apparently, enough for a pair of shoes for each of his brothers.

This detail echoes through the ages, finding its way into the words of the prophet Amos: "Thus 'they sold the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes.'" (Amos 2:6, 8:6). It's a gut-wrenching indictment of the brothers' actions, boiling down the immense betrayal to something as commonplace as footwear.

But why so little? Joseph was known for his beauty!

Ginzberg explains that the ordeal in the pit had taken its toll. Imagine the terror, the darkness, the venomous creatures… According to the legends, the snakes and scorpions left him looking… well, not his best. His complexion was gone, replaced by a sallow, sickly pallor.

So, the Midianites felt justified in paying less. They didn't see the inner strength, the potential for greatness, the divine spark within this young man. They just saw a damaged piece of merchandise.

Isn’t it a chilling thought? How easily appearances can deceive? How quickly we can undervalue someone based on superficial circumstances?

Joseph's story, even in this small detail, serves as a potent reminder. It urges us to look beyond the surface, to recognize the inherent worth in every individual, and to remember that sometimes, the most valuable things are hidden beneath layers of hardship and pain. His journey, which began with such a betrayal, would ultimately lead to redemption, not just for himself, but for his entire family. But that, as they say, is another story…

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:101Legends of the Jews

Take the tale of Joseph and Potiphar's wife. The familiar version gives us the broad strokes: Joseph rises to power in Egypt, and his master’s wife tries to seduce him. But let’s delve a little deeper

The Legends of the Jews, that magnificent collection of rabbinic lore compiled by Louis Ginzberg, gives us some fascinating details. In this version, Potiphar's wife (whose name isn’t given in the biblical text) becomes utterly consumed by her desire for Joseph. It's an "unholy passion," Ginzberg tells us, and it festers within her.

So, how bad does it get? So bad that her husband notices. "Why is thy countenance fallen?" he asks, seeing her distress. And she replies, feigning illness, "I have a pain at my heart, and the groanings of my spirit oppress me." It's a pretty dramatic scene, wouldn't you say?

Then comes a moment of intense confrontation. She corners Joseph, overcome with desperation. "I will throttle myself," she cries, "or I will jump into a well or a pit, if thou wilt not yield thyself to me."

Joseph, ever the composed one, tries to reason with her. He appeals to her sense of responsibility. "Remember," he says gently, "if thou makest away with thyself, thy husband's concubine, Asteho, thy rival, will maltreat thy children, and extirpate thy memory from the earth."

Now, here's where things get really interesting. Joseph's attempt at de-escalation backfires spectacularly. Instead of calming her, his words only fuel her passion. Why? Because she misinterprets his concern as affection. "There, seest thou, thou dost love me now!" she exclaims. "It sufficeth for me that thou takest thought for me and for the safety of my children. I expect now that my desire will be fulfilled."

She's convinced that his words are a sign, a secret admission of love. She's blinded by her own desires, unable to see Joseph's true motivations. The story emphasizes that "She did not know that Joseph spoke as he did for the sake of God, and not for her sake." He’s trying to do the right thing, to avoid sin and protect her family, but she only sees what she wants to see.

It's a powerful reminder of how easily we can misinterpret situations when our emotions are running high. How often do we project our own desires onto others, seeing what we want to see rather than what's actually there? This moment in the Joseph story, expanded upon in Legends of the Jews, isn’t just a tale of attempted seduction; it's a cautionary tale about the power – and the potential danger – of unchecked desire.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:115Legends of the Jews

The story of Joseph, as told in Genesis, is full of trials. Sold into slavery in Egypt, he rises through the ranks, only to face a temptation that could cost him everything. The familiar story centers on Potiphar's wife.

The text He wasn't just avoiding punishment, or worrying about what people would think. No, his primary concern, the Legends tell us, was to "sanctify the Name of God, blessed be He, before the whole world." It wasn’t just about personal morality; it was about representing something far bigger than himself. It was about Kiddush (the sanctification blessing over wine) Hashem, sanctifying God's name.

The scene. Zuleika, Potiphar's wife, overcome by desire, makes her intentions clear. Joseph recoils. She argues, “Why are you refusing me? I'm a married woman! No one will ever know!"

Her logic is chillingly pragmatic, isn't it? Based entirely on outcomes rather than principles.

But Joseph's response, as the Legends frame it, is powerful: "If the unmarried women of the heathen are prohibited unto us, how much more their married women? As the Lord liveth, I will not commit the crime thou biddest me do.”

Boom.

It's a firm, unwavering declaration rooted in his faith. The text points out that Joseph is following a well-trodden path. When facing temptation, "many pious men" utter an oath, a verbal commitment designed to bolster their resolve. It's like drawing a line in the sand, a way to "gather moral courage to control their evil instincts."

It's a fascinating insight into the psychology of resisting temptation. It’s not just about willpower; it’s about employing strategies to strengthen your resolve in the moment of crisis.

Zuleika, blinded by her desire, simply couldn't grasp Joseph's motivation. She sees only the immediate gratification, while he sees the bigger picture. He sees the potential for desecration of God's name, Chilul Hashem, and he chooses to avoid it at all costs.

So, what can we learn from Joseph's struggle? Perhaps it’s that true integrity isn’t just about avoiding wrongdoing when it’s easy, but about actively choosing righteousness even when it's incredibly difficult. Maybe it’s about recognizing that our actions have consequences far beyond ourselves.

And maybe, just maybe, it's about finding our own way to "utter an oath" – to find our own personal strategy – when we face our own moments of temptation.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:219Legends of the Jews

Take the tale of Joseph and his brothers. readers often focus on the coat, the betrayal, the rise to power in Egypt. But what about the moments in between, the motivations, the subtle divine threads woven through it all?

After Joseph, now a powerful figure in Egypt, confronts his brothers, he doesn't immediately reveal himself. Instead, he arranges a series of events that lead to them being imprisoned. Imagine the scene: seventy of Joseph's valiant men escorting his brothers to a prison house where they remained for three long days.

Three days. It might seem arbitrary, but consider this: The text points out that "God never allows the pious to languish in distress longer than three days." It’s as if the narrative is subtly reminding us that even in moments of apparent hardship, a divine hand is at work, ensuring that justice and mercy eventually prevail. The imprisonment was a “Divine dispensation.”

Then, Joseph releases them, all but one. He keeps one brother, likely Simeon, as a hostage. It’s a strategic move, of course, but the text draws a sharp contrast here: Joseph, even in his position of power, declares, "I fear God," and sends the others home. But when the brothers had Joseph in their power, they seemingly gave no thought to God.

This detail highlights a critical difference in character. Even in what might seem like a vengeful act, Joseph maintains a sense of divine accountability. The brothers, on the other hand, only remember God after they find themselves in trouble. It’s a subtle but powerful lesson about the importance of consistent piety, not just turning to faith when the chips are down.

Now, while one brother languishes in an Egyptian prison, the others begin to reflect on their past actions. The text notes that "their conduct was such as is becoming to the pious, who accept their fate with calm resignation, and acknowledge the righteousness of God." They recognize a connection between their current predicament and their past cruelty toward Joseph. They remember how they ignored his pleas for mercy as he wept and begged them not to sell him into slavery. It’s a moment of profound introspection.

Reuben, ever the voice of conscience, reminds them that they have two wrongs to atone for: the wrong against their brother, and the wrong against their father, Jacob. Think of Jacob's anguish, believing his son dead, crying out, "I will go down to the grave to my son mourning." (Genesis 37:35) The brothers are finally facing the consequences of their actions, realizing that their suffering is a direct result of their past sins. The concept of middah k’neged middah, measure for measure, is at play here. As we find in Midrash Rabbah (Bereshit 91:7), the idea is that God punishes people in the same manner in which they sinned.

So, what does this all mean? It’s more than just a story of sibling rivalry and betrayal. It’s a story about accountability, about the long arm of justice, and about the enduring power of faith, even in the face of adversity. It reminds us that our actions have consequences, and that true piety isn't just about outward displays of faith, but about living a life guided by compassion and a deep awareness of the divine. And maybe, just maybe, it suggests that even the most painful chapters in our lives can be part of a larger, divinely orchestrated plan.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Vayeshev 13:10Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Vayeshev

(Genesis 37:24:) "And they took him and cast him into the pit, and the pit was empty; there was no water in it." There was no water in it, but there were serpents and scorpions in it. What did Simeon do? When they put him into the pit, Simeon would give the command, and they would cast great stones upon him in order to kill him. But when he fell into Joseph's hand, Joseph would throw fattened fowl upon him.

Full source