5 min read

Balaam Devised the Tent, the Wine, and the Idol of Peor

When prophecy failed and sorcery failed, Balaam told Balak the only remaining attack: linen goods at tent doors, wine inside, women, and the idol of Peor.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Stick and Where It Lands
  2. Linen and Prices at the Entrance
  3. What Peor Required and Why Israel Stayed
  4. The Spring That Had Watered Sodom

The Stick and Where It Lands

The Moabites were the children of Lot's eldest daughter, born in a cave after Sodom burned, and the tradition held that their origins could not be fully escaped. Throw the stick up in the air, the proverb ran, and it always comes back to the place where it started. The Moabites had tried conventional warfare against Israel and had not been able to touch them. Balak had hired a prophet of genuine power to curse them from three different high places and had received three blessings instead. Sorcery had failed. Prophecy had failed. And so the Moabites returned to the tool that had always been in their hand: transgression dressed as hospitality.

Balaam had advised it specifically. Having failed to destroy Israel from outside, he told Balak that the divine protection was not unconditional. It lifted when Israel sinned. The vulnerability was internal, always had been. Get them to sin, and the protection would withdraw on its own, and no curse would be needed because God would do the work Balak had hired Balaam to do. The operation that followed was not improvised. It was planned in stages, each stage calibrated to move an Israelite man one step further from where he had been standing when he woke up that morning.

Linen and Prices at the Entrance

The tents went up at the border. Older Moabite women sat at the entrances with linen goods for sale, the prices genuinely attractive, the goods genuinely real. There was nothing suspicious about the first transaction. Men came to buy, to browse, to engage in the ordinary commerce of an encampment near a settled population. The Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginzberg's synthesis published between 1909 and 1938, drawing from Numbers Rabbah (5th-century Palestine) and the Talmud Bavli, is specific about the sequence: nothing transgressive happened at the door. The transgression was inside.

Once a man was inside the tent, a younger woman was waiting. She poured wine from a jug of Ammonite wine. She spoke to him first about family - don't we share ancestors? Don't Moab and Israel both descend from Abraham's line? She made the appeal to shared heritage and kinship. The wine worked the way wine works. When the man was comfortable, she brought out the idol of Peor from beneath her clothing, where it had been concealed - the Targum Pseudo-Jonathan specifies that the idol was smuggled in under the bundles of linen goods, hidden within the ordinary commerce that had drawn the man inside in the first place.

What Peor Required and Why Israel Stayed

The worship of Peor had a specific character. The tradition describes it as one of the most degrading forms of idol service ever devised: the worshiper was required to expose themselves before the image. It was designed to reach something in the worshiper that no other form of religious transgression touched, a degradation so specific and personal that the attachment it created was extraordinarily difficult to break. The Targum uses the image of a nail driven into wood: you could not pull Israel free from Peor without breaking the wood itself.

This was the achievement of Balaam's plan. Not a military conquest. Not a plague sent from outside. An operation that began with linen goods at attractive prices and ended with Israel worshiping an idol by which they had been deliberately degraded, each man having walked himself through the stages of the seduction without any of them seeming obviously fatal.

The Spring That Had Watered Sodom

The tradition adds a further detail that reframes the Shittim episode entirely. The spring at Shittim, from which Israel was drinking while all this was happening, was the same spring that had once watered Sodom. After Sodom burned, the spring remained. For generations no one drew from it. Then Israel arrived at the border of Canaan and needed water and found it and drank. The Legends of the Jews records the tradition: this spring was called the Well of Lewdness, and Israel's drinking from it was the soil in which Balaam's seduction plan germinated. The people who had been known for their chastity before Shittim were not so known after. The water had done what water from that source was always going to do.

The operations of the individual women and the individual tents and the individual encounters between Israelite men and Moabite wine were the visible mechanism of a catastrophe whose roots ran back to Sodom. The stick had come back to where it started. The Moabites, born from Sodom's shadow, had used the spring that ran from Sodom's ground, and the result was the sin of Peor, twenty-four thousand dead of plague, and a crisis that required Phinehas's lance to end.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 20:23Bamidbar Rabbah

The story of the Israelites and their encounter with the daughters of Moab is a stark reminder. It's a tale of temptation, idolatry, and the devastating consequences of losing sight of our values.

The Torah tells us, "The people began to engage in harlotry with the daughters of Moav" (Numbers 25:1). But Bamidbar Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic teachings on the Book of Numbers, doesn't just leave it there. It explores the context, drawing a fascinating parallel. Remember the Exodus? "Speak to the children of Israel, and they will return and encamp before Pi HaḤirot" (Exodus 14:2). What's Pi HaḤirot? According to Bamidbar Rabbah, it’s a place associated with harlotry. But because the Israelites behaved chastely then, it was called Pi HaḤirot– hinting at ḥerut, freedom.

The text contrasts this with the story at hand: "But these, who abandoned themselves to the women, it is written ‘the people began to engage in harlotry [with the daughters of Moav].’" Notice something? The text uses the term "the people" here, not "Israel." Bamidbar Rabbah points out a pattern: "Every place that it says 'the people,' it is an expression of denigration, but everywhere that it says 'Israel,' it is an expression of praise.": "The people were as complainers" (Numbers 11:1); "the people spoke against God and against Moses" (Numbers 21:5). It's a subtle but powerful distinction.

The text drives home a critical point: actions have roots. "The people began to engage in harlotry – cast a staff into the air, it falls on its place of origin." This isn’t just a random event; it’s part of a pattern. Bamidbar Rabbah even connects it back to the story of Lot and his daughters (Genesis 19:30–37). Remember that story? "Her sister taught her; that is why the verse spared the younger, and did not state what she had done explicitly, but rather, ‘she lay with him’ (Genesis 19:35). But regarding the elder it is written: ‘She lay with her father.’" The implications are clear: "She who began with harlotry initially, her daughters completed the task after her; ‘to engage in harlotry with the daughters of Moav.’"

But how did it all unfold? "They invited the people to the offerings of their gods, and the people ate, and prostrated themselves to their gods" (Numbers 25:2). According to Bamidbar Rabbah, they were following Bilam’s advice: "Behold, they were for the children of Israel, by the word of Bilam, to commit trespass against the Lord" (Numbers 31:16). The text paints a vivid picture. They crafted curtains, seated harlots within, and stocked their hands with precious vessels. An elderly woman acted as a lookout, luring Israelites with the promise of fine goods from Beit She’an.

The temptation was many-sided. They’d offer wine (before it was prohibited to drink wine made by gentiles), and say things like, "Why is it that we love you and you hate us? Take this vessel for yourself at no cost. Is it not that 'we are all the children of one man' (Genesis 42:11), the sons of Teraḥ, father of Abraham?" They even offered kosher-style food. "You do not wish to eat from our slaughter and from our cooking, we have calves and roosters; slaughter in accordance with your mitzva and eat." A young woman would come out adorned and perfumed and seduce him.

The trap was set. "Immediately, she would give him wine to drink and Satan was inflamed within him, and he strayed after her, as it is stated: 'Harlotry, wine and new wine capture the heart' (Hosea 4:11)." Then came the ultimate test. "I will not submit to you until you slaughter this to Peor, and prostrate yourself to it." At first, the Israelite might resist: "To idolatry I do not prostrate myself." But she'd minimize it: "You are doing nothing more than exposing yourself." And tragically, many succumbed. "He strayed after her and did so. This is what the Sages said: One who defecates to Baal Peor, that is its worship, as it is stated: 'They prostrated themselves to their gods.'"

The consequences were severe. "Israel adhered [vayitzamed] to Baal Peor, and the wrath of the Lord was enflamed against Israel" (Numbers 25:3). Vayitzamed – initially, they would enter discreetly, but ultimately, they would enter in pairs [tzemidim], as in a yoke [tzemed] of cattle. Or, like a person who is constant [tzamid] in his labor.

Rabbi Levi offers a chilling comparison: "This is a harsher decree than the calf, as regarding the calf it is written: 'Remove the gold rings' (Exodus 32:2), but here, vayitzamed, like bracelets." The scale of the tragedy was immense. At the calf, three thousand fell, but here, twenty-four thousand.

So, what was the response? "The Lord said to Moses: Take all the leaders of the people, and hang them for the Lord opposite the sun, and the enflamed wrath of the Lord will be withdrawn from Israel" (Numbers 25:4). Rabbi Yudan suggests they hanged the leaders for failing to properly reprove the people. Rabbi Nehemya offers a different interpretation: God instructed Moses to empanel heads of the Sanhedrin, a rabbinical court, to judge those who went astray with Peor.

The story concludes with a stark reminder of accountability: "So Moses said to Israel's officials: Each of you slay those of his men [who attached themselves to Baal Peor]" (Numbers 25:5).

What do we take away from this disturbing narrative? It’s a potent reminder of the seductive power of temptation, the importance of staying true to our values, and the devastating consequences of succumbing to external pressures. It's a call to be vigilant, to choose wisely, and to remember that our actions have far-reaching consequences, echoing through generations. Can we learn from the mistakes of the past? Can we resist the allure of the fleeting and prioritize the enduring? That's the challenge this ancient story lays before us.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:55Legends of the Jews

It all boils down to a simple, yet profound observation: "Throw the stick up in the air it will always return to its original place."

This idea sets the stage for a rather scandalous episode in the desert. The Moabite nation, born from the, shall we say, unconventional relationship between Lot and his daughter, couldn't escape its origins, according to the ancient narratives. As we learn in Numbers 25, they followed the advice of the sorcerer Balaam to tempt the Israelites into immorality. Their plan? To exploit the Israelites' weaknesses and lead them away from God.

The Moabites set up camp, filling their tents with alluring women adorned with beautiful things. Older women were strategically placed at the tent entrances, their mission being to entice passing Israelites. It was a carefully orchestrated trap.

Let's say an Israelite happens by, wanting to buy something. According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, the older woman at the entrance might say something like, "Dost thou not wish to buy linen garments that were made in Bet-Shan?" She'd show him a sample, name a price, and then slyly add, "Go within, and thou wilt see wares still more beautiful."

Intrigue piqued, he enters the tent. Inside, he's greeted by a young, richly adorned woman, perfumed and ready to make a deal. She offers him a ridiculously low price, urging him to "make himself at home" and choose whatever he likes. Then comes the wine, and the invitation to drink together.

The woman might say, "Why do we love ye while you hate us? Are we not all descendants of one man? Was not Terah our ancestor as much as yours?" She continues, "If thou wilt not eat of our sacrifices or what we have cooked, here are calves and fowl that thou mayest slaughter in accordance with thy law." It's a calculated appeal to kinship and shared heritage, designed to lower his guard.

But here's where it gets truly insidious. Once the Israelite is under the influence of the wine, the woman's true intentions come to light. She'll only satisfy his desires, the story goes, after he worships Peor, the god of the Moabites.

Now, the worship of Peor wasn't exactly dignified. It involved baring oneself completely. The Israelites, perhaps blinded by lust and the effects of the wine, didn't see the inherent evil in this act. They were willing to follow the Moabite women's lead, and in doing so, they succumbed to both unchastity and idolatry.

The descent was gradual. At first, the men were ashamed, committing these acts in secret. But as we often see, shame erodes over time. Soon, they were engaging in these lewd acts openly, two by two, losing any sense of discretion or morality.

What's the takeaway here? It's a cautionary tale about the power of temptation, the importance of staying true to one's values, and the seductive nature of assimilation. It also highlights how easily a nation can be led astray when its people compromise their principles. The story also reveals the ever present threat of internal corruption, of losing one's way not through external force, but through internal weakness. A sobering thought, isn't it?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 3:106Legends of the Jews

A reader can see them as just… well, sacrifices. But in the Jewish mystical tradition, everything has deeper significance, a symbolic echo connecting the earthly and the divine. The offerings brought in the Mishkan (Tabernacle) and later the Temple weren’t random. The animals, the numbers – they all spoke volumes.

Ginzberg, in his Legends of the Jews, paints a fascinating picture. He explains how the different species of animals offered as sacrifices corresponded to the different ranks of Israel's leaders.

The twelve bullocks? Those were for the kings. Powerful, majestic animals for the most powerful figures in the land. The twelve rams? They represented the princes of the tribes, leaders in their own right, but operating within a more defined structure. Then came the twelve kids of the goats, for the governors. And finally, the twelve sheep, for the government officials. It's a whole hierarchy reflected in the sacrificial offerings!

The symbolism doesn’t stop there. The twenty-four oxen offered as a peace offering… they corresponded to the twenty-four books of the Hebrew Scriptures, wouldn’t you know it! In this case, "books" refers to the number of books as they were traditionally counted. They were also meant to serve as atonement for the twenty-four thousand men who, tragically, succumbed to the plague after worshipping Peor. That's a serious connection, linking spiritual transgression and atonement through the Temple service.

And what about those other numbers? The sixty rams of the peace offering. They corresponded to the sixty myriads, that's six hundred thousand, of Israel's fighting hosts. The sixty he-goats? Ginzberg tells us those are linked to the sixty empires. That’s a big number, isn't it? Throughout history, empires rose and fell, and here they are, all represented in the Temple service. And finally, the sixty he-lambs.. those pointed toward the building of the Second Temple, which measured sixty cubits in height and sixty in width. A perfect match!

So, what does it all mean? Well, it suggests that the Temple service was more than just a ritual. It was a symbolic language, a way of connecting the earthly realm with the divine, of representing the entire cosmos in miniature. Every animal, every number, every action had a deeper resonance, a hidden meaning waiting to be unlocked. What other secrets are hidden within the scriptures, waiting to be uncovered?

Full source