Two Gaster Exempla on the Travelers Who Followed Wisdom
Gaster's Exempla preserves two traveler-tales: a charitable merchant who bought fifty years from the Angel of Death, and a scribe whose silence saved his life.
Table of Contents
The Exempla of the Rabbis, Moses Gaster's 1924 anthology of medieval Jewish folktales, preserves two short narratives about travelers whose adherence to traditional maxims changed the course of their lives.
The first is a merchant whose habit of charity bought him fifty extra years from the Angel of Death. The second is a poor scribe who remembered the maxim about not rebuking the wicked and survived a queen's false accusation as a result. Two travelers. Two maxims. Two specific dividends paid by adherence.
The Merchant Who Gave to the Blind Man
Exempla 387 tells of a merchant traveling on a road. An innkeeper requests permission to travel with him. The merchant agrees. Near a town they meet a blind man. The merchant gives the blind man something. The innkeeper refuses, saying he does not know the man.
The Angel of Death meets them on the road. The merchant is spared for fifty additional years on the strength of his charity. The innkeeper is permitted to live as well, but only because he expresses an intention to tell the story of the meeting for the glory of the Holy One. The Angel does not grant equal credit. The merchant earns fifty years by giving. The innkeeper earns continued life by promising to publish the lesson.
The teaching is operational. The exemplum closes with the question the Angel's mercy implicitly raises. If a man be saved by giving once, how much more will he be saved by making a habit of it? The merchant's gift was, in the exemplum's framing, perhaps a one-time act. The habitual giver, the closing question implies, is purchasing a life-extension on a scale the one-time giver only sampled.
The Scribe Who Did Not Rebuke
Exempla 3 describes a poor man traveling to find work. He has just heard the maxim rebuke not the wicked lest you make an enemy. He arrives in a new town. A man asks a scribe to write a petition for a small coin. The scribe refuses. The poor traveler, remembering the maxim, writes the petition himself.
The king sees the beautiful writing and is delighted. He appoints the traveler court scribe on the spot. The career change is dramatic.
One day, going out of town with the king, the new court scribe remembers he has left his pen and ink at the palace. He returns to fetch them. He finds a knight in the queen's chambers. The scribe, remembering the second half of the maxim, says nothing. He leaves silently.
The queen, frightened that she has been seen, tears her own clothes and accuses the scribe of having abused her. The king receives the false accusation. The king sends the scribe out of town with a letter that, unbeknownst to him, instructs the recipient to kill the bearer.
The story continues across several more reversals, with the scribe's continued adherence to traditional maxims producing further escapes. The teaching, in the exemplum's structure, is that the maxims work. The poor man who began the journey carrying only a few inherited sayings survived a queen's false accusation, a king's death-warrant, and several subsequent traps because he kept following the wisdom he had been given.
What the Two Travelers Demonstrate
Read the two passages together and the editorial logic of The Exempla of the Rabbis becomes legible. Gaster preserved these tales because the tales make a working argument about how traditional maxims function.
The maxims are not poetry. They are operational instructions. The merchant who gave to the blind man activated the charity-extends-life mechanism that the rabbis had been describing. The scribe who refused to rebuke the wicked activated the keep-quiet-when-it-saves-you mechanism the rabbis had also been describing. The mechanisms work, in the Exempla's reading, because the divine economy has installed them as actual structural features of the world.
Why the Stories Were Preserved
The Exempla tradition preserved these stories for medieval Jewish readers who needed concrete proof that adherence to traditional sayings paid dividends. The proof was not abstract. It was narrative. A specific merchant on a specific road. A specific scribe at a specific palace. Each one had followed a maxim. Each one had received a specific reward the maxim had implicitly promised.