Parshat Bereshit6 min read

Why the Sulam Said the Sefirot Split Into Pairs of Partzufim

The Sulam Commentary explains that every Atzilut sefirah splits into a first-three pair and a lower-seven pair, generating Atik, Arikh Anpin, and Yisrael Sabba.

Written by Maggid · Edited by Arthur Sabintsev ·
Table of Contents
  1. How Bina splits into its first three and lower seven
  2. How the same split applies to Keter
  3. What does the fractal pattern actually do?
  4. Why Atik and Arikh Anpin had to be different
  5. How does this change a reader's relationship to the sefirot?
  6. What the reader carries away from the split

The standard Kabbalistic teaching identifies ten sefirot, ten divine emanations, that structure the world of Atzilut. The Sulam Commentary, the twentieth-century commentary by Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag on the Zohar, refuses to leave the structure at ten. The commentary argues that every sefirah of Atzilut further splits into two halves, the "first three" and the "lower seven," and that each half becomes a distinct partzuf, a divine countenance. The split produces a much more articulated divine structure than ten sefirot would suggest.

Two passages of the introduction to the Sulam Commentary explain the mechanism. One describes how the lower seven sefirot of Bina become Yisrael Sabba and Tevuna. The other generalizes the principle. Each sefirah splits, each split produces two partzufim, and the overall result is a divine system organized at the level of partzufim rather than sefirot.

How Bina splits into its first three and lower seven

Sulam Commentary section 42:1 walks the reader through the case of Bina, the third sefirah, often translated as Understanding. Bina, the commentary explains, is itself a complex sefirah that needs to be understood in terms of its upper and lower aspects.

The first three sefirot of Bina in the world of Atzilut are called Abba, the Father, and Imma, the Mother. The lower seven sefirot of Bina are called Yisrael Sabba and Tevuna. The Sulam is precise. Abba and Imma are not separate from Bina. They are the first three sefirot of Bina. Yisrael Sabba and Tevuna are not separate from Bina either. They are the lower seven sefirot of Bina. The four partzufim, Abba, Imma, Yisrael Sabba, Tevuna, are all aspects of the same single sefirah.

The commentary then identifies the Chokhmah of the left in the lower aspect. The illumination of Chochmah that flows into the lower seven of Bina, into Yisrael Sabba and Tevuna, is what earlier Kabbalistic discussions called "the left line." The Sulam is giving the line a precise structural address. It is not a free-floating force. It is a specific illumination at a specific level within a specific sefirah.

How the same split applies to Keter

Sulam Commentary section 59:1 generalizes the principle. The first sefirah, Keter, the Crown, also splits. The first three sefirot of Keter in Atzilut produce the partzuf Atik, the Ancient One, and a counterpart called Nukba, the Female. The lower seven sefirot of Keter produce Arikh Anpin and its Nukba.

The Sulam attaches divine names to the partzufim. Atik is associated with Mah, the divine name representing expansion. Atik's Nukba is associated with Ban, the divine name representing contraction. Arikh Anpin, similarly, is the Mah of the lower seven. Arikh Anpin's Nukba is the Ban. The four partzufim emerging from Keter form a balanced structure. Two are above, two are below. Two represent expansion, two represent contraction.

The commentary explains the function of the split. The first three of Keter, that is Atik and Nukba, bridge upward. They connect Atzilut to the level above. The lower seven, Arikh Anpin and Nukba, bridge downward. They embody the light of the first three in a form accessible to the lower sefirot of Atzilut. The Kabbalistic tradition treats Keter as the sefirah that always connects two adjacent levels. The Sulam's articulation of Keter's four partzufim is the detailed mechanism for that connection.

What does the fractal pattern actually do?

The Sulam treats the first-three-plus-lower-seven split as a fractal pattern that repeats at every sefirah. Bina splits into four partzufim. Keter splits into four partzufim. Zeir Anpin splits into a "big" Zeir Anpin and Nukba for the first three, and a "small" Zeir Anpin and Nukba for the lower seven. The same structure recurs.

The fractal pattern allows the divine system to be both ten sefirot and a much larger set of partzufim simultaneously. The ten count is preserved at the upper level of abstraction. The partzuf count emerges at the level of articulation. The Sulam is making clear that a reader who reads only the ten sefirot is reading at a higher altitude than the divine system actually operates at. The system runs on partzufim, and the partzufim are the working configurations.

Why Atik and Arikh Anpin had to be different

The Sulam Commentary explains why the four partzufim of Keter cannot be collapsed into one. Atik bridges upward. Arikh Anpin bridges downward. If they were the same partzuf, the upward and downward bridging would interfere with each other. The split allows each to do its own job without the other's pull.

The Idra Zuta, which the Sulam is partly commenting on, treats Atik and Arikh Anpin as different aspects of the same Long Face. The Sulam clarifies the relationship. They are not different beings. They are different functional roles of the same Keter, separated into the first-three half and the lower-seven half so that the two functions can be performed by appropriately structured configurations.

How does this change a reader's relationship to the sefirot?

The Sulam Commentary is teaching a reader to stop reading the sefirot as static labels. Each sefirah is, in the Sulam's reading, a structure with internal articulation that becomes visible only when the reader is prepared to count the partzufim that emerge from the split. A reader who knows only that Bina is Understanding has missed Abba, Imma, Yisrael Sabba, and Tevuna. A reader who knows only that Keter is Crown has missed Atik and Arikh Anpin.

The implication is that Kabbalistic practice itself requires the partzuf-level reading. Prayer, in many Kabbalistic frameworks, is addressed to specific partzufim. The Sulam is teaching the reader the directory so that the addresses can be used correctly. Without the directory, prayer could only be addressed to the ten general categories. With the directory, prayer can be addressed to the specific partzuf that handles the particular request.

What the reader carries away from the split

The Sulam leaves the reader with one structural diagram. Every sefirah of Atzilut splits. The first three produce one pair of partzufim. The lower seven produce another. The divine system is not ten emanations. It is forty or more partzufim, organized in a fractal that maintains the appearance of ten at the upper altitude. The Sulam expects the reader to learn this and to read all later Kabbalistic literature with the split in mind. The skill is not optional. It is the entry-level competence for working with Atzilut at any serious level.

← All myths