It’s a question that’s plagued humanity for millennia, and Jewish tradition grapples with it head-on. Today, we’re diving into a passage from Da'at Tevunot, a profound Kabbalistic text, that attempts to illuminate this very conundrum.
The core idea is this: If God, blessed be He, only wanted to reveal His attributes of pure goodness – and let's be clear, according to this text, all of God's characteristics are good – there would be no evil in the world. Simple, right? Because revealing goodness would only bring more goodness. There wouldn’t be any action, anything at all, that could be considered evil.
But here's where it gets interesting. The text argues that God also wants to reveal His Singularity, His absolute Oneness. And within that desire to reveal Oneness lies a twist.
According to Da'at Tevunot, revealing Singularity necessarily involves negating evil. It requires actively pushing evil away from existence and power. Think of it as a cosmic purification. In order for the full spectrum of God's Oneness to be revealed, evil has to be addressed, confronted, and ultimately negated. It’s a relegation, a pushing away, a setting boundaries.
Now, you might be thinking, "Isn't this like saying you need foolishness to understand wisdom, or cruelty to appreciate piety? Don't we need opposites to understand each other?"
The text anticipates this very question and gives us a crucial distinction. It's true, we often understand things by contrasting them with their opposites. But, according to Da'at Tevunot, understanding characteristics of goodness doesn't require actively creating or experiencing evil.
Instead, understanding good requires focusing within the realm of goodness itself, understanding what makes those characteristics good in the first place. The negation of evil isn’t contained within the characteristics of goodness themselves. Rather, the negation of evil falls under the umbrella of Singularity – the ultimate Oneness that excludes all otherness. All goodness, in this view, is a manifestation of that Oneness.
The text concludes with a warning: don't mix types! Don't confuse the categories. The kind of understanding that comes from contrasting opposites is different from the kind of understanding that comes from recognizing the singular source of all goodness.
So, what does this all mean for us? Perhaps it suggests that the existence of evil isn't a flaw in God's creation, but rather a necessary component in the grand revelation of God's ultimate Oneness. It’s a challenging concept, one that invites us to look beyond the immediate suffering and to consider the larger, more profound purpose at play. And it encourages us, even in the face of difficulty, to remember the singular source of all goodness, and to strive to emulate that goodness in our own lives.