"and vashel mevushal": to make one liable (both) for what is raw and for what is cooked. You say this. But perhaps (the meaning is) to make him liable for what is overly roasted? It is, therefore, written, "but roasted in fire." How, then, is "vashel mevushal" to be understood? As (to make him liable for) what is raw and what is cooked.