5 min read

The Night Before the Binding of Isaac Lives Inside Song of Songs

Song of Songs opens with a lover searching through the dark. The rabbis say that night was the one before Abraham rose to take Isaac to Moriah.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Night That Is Not Named
  2. Two Loves That Could Not Both Survive
  3. Isaac Was Not a Silent Object
  4. The Shofar That Echoes Every Year

The Night That Is Not Named

The Torah says Abraham rose early in the morning. Genesis 22:3 is specific about the morning. It is not specific about the night before. Abraham had the command. He knew what he was going to do when the sun came up. He knew who was going with him and what he would be asked to carry when they reached the mountain. The Torah passes over the night in silence, and the tradition found that silence almost unbearable.

Yalkut Shimoni, the thirteenth-century anthology, reaches across the canon to fill it. The night of Song of Songs 3:1, the night a beloved lies on her bed and rises to search for the one her soul loves through the streets of the city, is identified as the night before the Akeidah. The lover in the dark is Abraham. The one being sought, from whom the night feels like absence and whose presence is the only thing that could make the morning bearable, is God.

Two Loves That Could Not Both Survive

Abraham waited a hundred years for Isaac. God promised him that the covenant would continue through this child, that from Isaac would come a people as numerous as the stars. Then came the command to offer the child on Moriah. Abraham held two loves that the command had placed in direct opposition: love of God, which had governed everything in his life since Ur of the Chaldeans, and love of the promised son, which was also love of the covenant itself, since Isaac was the covenant in human form.

The night before the journey was the night those two loves stood unresolved. By morning Abraham would rise and saddle the donkey and take the wood and the knife and the son. The resolution would be enacted in motion before it was understood in the mind. But the night held the full weight of what he had been asked, undistracted by action, and Yalkut Shimoni says he spent it searching, like a lover in the dark streets of the Song, for the Presence that had given him both the son and the command.

Isaac Was Not a Silent Object

The Legends of the Jews, Ginzberg's synthesis of the aggadic tradition published in the early twentieth century, insists that Isaac went to Moriah knowing what was planned. He was thirty-seven years old, the tradition reckoned, old enough to understand what his father carried, old enough to refuse if he chose to refuse, and he did not refuse. He asked to be bound tightly so he would not flinch and cause his father to sin by striking an imperfect sacrifice. He was not a passive child led by an obedient patriarch. He was a man making his own offering in full knowledge of what the offering cost.

The tradition held this because it needed Isaac's participation to make the Akeidah coherent as a moral event rather than simply as a test of Abraham's obedience. A father sacrificing an unaware child is a tragedy. A father and son walking together toward the same altar, both choosing the same God over the same loss, is something the tradition could call holy.

The Shofar That Echoes Every Year

God promised that the ram's horn blown at Moriah would echo through history. Every Rosh Hashanah, when the shofar sounds, the tradition says God hears in it the horn of the ram that was caught in the thicket when Isaac was released. The blast does not merely remind God of the Akeidah. It carries the merit of that morning, the merit of a father who did not withhold and a son who did not run, forward into every generation's appeal for the year to come.

The princes of the nations are bound in that same moment, the tradition adds. The shofar that breaks the silence of Rosh Hashanah is also the sound that loosens what was bound against Israel, the heavenly accusers who would press charges against a people that does not always live up to its covenant. Abraham's binding of Isaac became the mechanism for unbinding the judgment that Israel would otherwise face without defense. The night of searching in the Song of Songs opened into a morning that still reverberates at the new year's turn.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 986:43Yalkut Shimoni on Nach

The Yalkut Shimoni, a compilation of rabbinic commentary on the Bible, offers us fascinating glimpses into these connections. the story turns to one small piece, specifically Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 986, and see what treasures we can unearth.

The passage begins with a verse from the Song of Songs (3:1): "On my bed at night…" The Yalkut Shimoni immediately links this to a very specific, incredibly powerful moment: the Akeidah, the binding of Yitzchak (Isaac) by Avraham (Abraham). That night, heavy with uncertainty and profound commitment, is the "night" referred to here. It's a night of intense spiritual struggle, a turning point in our narrative.

Then comes another verse, (Song of Songs 3:4): “I held him and would not let him go…” The Yalkut Shimoni connects this to David, specifically when he acquired the threshing floor from Aravnah the Jebusite. This threshing floor, of course, would become the site of the Holy Temple. The text adds a strange detail: David found Aravnah's skull under the altar, yet HaMakom, "the Place" – a name for God – did not reject Israel's offerings. What are we to make of this juxtaposition of the sacred and the macabre? Perhaps it reminds us that even in moments of holiness, the echoes of the past, even the unsettling ones, remain.

The interpretation doesn't stop there. Rabbi Yitzchak offers another understanding of "I held him and would not let him go…" He suggests that until the Mishkan – the Tabernacle – was erected, prophecy was found even among idol worshippers! Once the Mishkan was built, prophecy was withdrawn from them and reserved for the Jewish people. This idea is supported by the verse "Then I and Your people will be distinguished…" (Exodus 33:16).

Now, someone might object: what about Balaam? He was a non-Jewish prophet! The response given is fascinating: Balaam's prophecy wasn't for his benefit. His words, as found in Numbers, like "Who counted the dust of Jacob…", "He does not look at evil in Jacob…", "How goodly are your tents, O Jacob…", "A star has gone forth from Jacob…" and "A ruler shall come out of Jacob…", all praised Israel, even if Balaam himself harbored ill intentions. His prophetic abilities served a purpose beyond his own understanding or merit.

Finally, the Yalkut Shimoni returns to the opening verse, "On my bed at night…" This time, it's interpreted as a consequence of neglecting Torah and mitzvot (commandments). Because of this neglect, night is joined to night. "In the past," the text says, "it illuminated for me between night and night, between the night of Egypt and the night of Bavel (Babylon), but now night is joined to night." This paints a picture of a decline, a spiritual darkness where the redemptive moments of the past – the Exodus from Egypt, the return from Babylonian exile – no longer offer illumination. The nights of hardship become continuous, unbroken.

What's the takeaway from this short passage? It's a reminder that our actions have consequences, and that neglecting our spiritual heritage can lead to darkness. But it’s also an invitation to find connections between different eras, to see how the binding of Isaac, David's acquisition of the Temple site, and even the prophecies of a non-Jewish prophet like Balaam, all contribute to the unfolding story of the Jewish people. These ancient texts challenge us to illuminate the present by understanding the echoes of the past.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:232Legends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews turns to Abraham, The Binding of Isaac.

The Torah gives us a glimpse, but the Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg, drawing on centuries of midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) tradition, fleshes it out, giving us a deeply human and profoundly moving exchange.

The scene: father and son, walking side by side. Isaac, ever observant, breaks the silence. "Behold, the fire and the wood," he says to Abraham, "but where then is the lamb for a burnt offering before the Lord?" A simple question, yet loaded with unspoken dread.

Abraham's response? It's not the curt, almost evasive answer we find in the biblical text. Instead, according to the Legends of the Jews, Abraham says, "The Lord hath chosen thee, my son, for a perfect burnt offering, instead of the lamb."

Pause for a moment. Can you feel the weight of those words? The unimaginable grief and faith intertwined?

And Isaac's reaction is even more startling. He doesn't recoil in horror. He doesn't plead for his life. Instead, he says, "I will do all that the Lord hath spoken to thee with joy and cheerfulness of heart."

Joy? Cheerfulness? How can that be? Is this blind obedience? Or something more profound?

Abraham, still confronting the enormity of it all, presses his son further. "Is there in thy heart any thought or counsel concerning this which is not proper? Tell me, my son, I pray thee! O my son, conceal it not from me." He needs to know. He needs to be absolutely certain.

And Isaac, in a moment of breathtaking selflessness, responds, "As the Lord liveth, and as thy soul liveth, there is nothing in my heart to cause me to deviate either to the right or the left from the word that He hath spoken unto thee. Neither limb nor muscle hath moved or stirred on account of this, nor is there in my heart any thought or evil counsel concerning this. But I am joyful and cheerful of heart in this matter, and I say, Blessed is the Lord who has this day chosen me to be a burnt offering before Him."

It's a powerful statement, a evidence of Isaac's unwavering faith and trust. But it also raises so many questions, doesn't it? Was this truly Isaac's own will, or was it simply an acceptance of his father's authority? Did he understand the full implications of his sacrifice?

Perhaps the most compelling element of this legend is the sheer humanity on display. We see a father struggling with an impossible command, a son confronting his own mortality. It's a reminder that even in the most sacred of stories, we can find echoes of our own lives, our own struggles with faith, duty, and sacrifice.

The Akeidah isn't just about divine testing. It's about the agonizing choices we face, the difficult conversations we must have, and the enduring power of love and faith, even in the face of the unthinkable. What does this story tell us about the nature of sacrifice? About the relationship between parent and child? And about the depths of our own capacity for faith? These are the questions that linger long after the story ends.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:257Legends of the Jews

The story goes that after Abraham proved his unwavering faith by being willing to sacrifice his son, Isaac, God intervened. A ram, caught in a thicket, was offered instead. But what happened after that? Did you ever wonder if there were more to the conversation between God and Abraham?

Well, according to Legends of the Jews, God told Abraham something profound. He acknowledged Abraham's faithfulness, but also foretold a future where Abraham's descendants would falter. "Thy children will sin before me in time to come," God said, "and I will sit in judgment upon them on the New Year's Day."

Heavy stuff. But there's hope woven in. God continued, revealing a path to redemption. "If they desire that I should grant them pardon," He said, "they shall blow the ram's horn on that day, and I, mindful of the ram that was substituted for Isaac as a sacrifice, will forgive them for their sins." The sound of the shofar, a primal, ancient sound, is a direct appeal to God's mercy, a reminder of Abraham's devotion and the ram that stood in place of his son.

The story doesn't end there. The Lord then revealed even more about the future. Abraham learned that the Temple, which would one day stand on the very spot where he nearly sacrificed Isaac, would be destroyed. And just as the ram struggled from one tree only to be caught in another, Abraham's children would be scattered, moving from kingdom to kingdom.

As Ginzberg retells it in Legends of the Jews, they would be delivered from Babylonia only to be subjugated by Media. Rescued from Media, they would be enslaved by Greece. Escaping from Greece, they would serve Rome. A cycle of liberation and oppression, a pattern of hope and hardship.

Yet, even within this prophecy of exile and suffering, there’s an unwavering promise: "yet in the end they would be redeemed in a final redemption, at the sound of the ram's horn." This final redemption, echoing the words of Isaiah (27:13) that on that day "the Lord God shall blow the trumpet," signifies a complete and ultimate deliverance. As the prophet Zechariah envisions (9:14) "the Lord shall be seen over them, and his arrow shall go forth as the lightning: and the Lord God shall blow the trumpet, and shall go with whirlwinds of the south."

So, when we hear the shofar blast on Rosh Hashanah (the Jewish New Year), we're not just observing a tradition. We’re participating in a cosmic drama that began with Abraham, a drama of sin, forgiveness, exile, and, ultimately, redemption. We are, in that moment, both remembering the past and calling out for a better future. A future where the echoes of the shofar herald not just another year, but the final, complete, and resounding redemption we’ve been waiting for.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 56:5Bereshit Rabbah

"And they came to the place that God had told him, and Abraham built there the altar" (Genesis 22:9). And Isaac, where was he? Rabbi Levi said: He took him and hid him, saying, "Lest that one who reviled him cast a stone and disqualify him from the offering." "And Abraham built there the altar, and bound Isaac his son." Rabbi Chofni bar Yitzchak said: All the while our father Abraham was binding Isaac his son below, the Holy One, blessed be He, was subduing the princes of the worshipers of stars above. But did He do so? Rather, when Israel acted recklessly in the days of Jeremiah, the Holy One, blessed be He, said to them, "What do you suppose, that these bound ones stand fast?" as it is said, "For while entangled like thorns, and drunken as with their drink" (Nahum 1:10). [Read not "while entangled like thorns" (ad sirim sevukhim) but rather] "while the princes are entangled" (ad sarim sevukhim), "and drunken as with their drink" (ki-sav'am sevuim) [meaning] those bound ones were loosed, as it is written, "They shall be consumed like fully dry stubble" (Nahum 1:10). At the hour when our father Abraham stretched out his hand to take the knife to slaughter his son, the ministering angels wept. This is what is written, "Behold, their valiant ones cry outside" (Isaiah 33:7). What is "outside" (chutzah)? Rabbi Azaryah said: "Outside" [is to be understood as] "It is strange (chitzah hu) for the creature to slaughter his son." And what were they saying? "The highways are desolate" (Isaiah 33:8): Abraham no longer receives the passersby and the wayfarers.

"The wayfarer has ceased" (Isaiah 33:8), just as you say, "It had ceased to be with Sarah" (Genesis 18:11). "He has broken the covenant" (Isaiah 33:8), "And My covenant I will establish with Isaac" (Genesis 17:21). "He has despised the cities" (Isaiah 33:8), "And he dwelt between Kadesh" (Genesis 20:1). "He has not regarded man" (Isaiah 33:8): The merit of Abraham did not avail, [which is] astonishing!

And who shall tell you that the verse speaks of none but the ministering angels? "Above" (mi-maal) is said here, and "above" is said elsewhere, "Seraphim were standing above Him" (Isaiah 6:2).

Full source