5 min read

How Elijah Became an Angel and What He Does With Eternity

When the fiery chariot carried Elijah into heaven, he became Sandalphon, tallest of angels, and has been working ever since.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Departure That Was Not a Departure
  2. The Angel With His Feet on the Ground
  3. The Garments of Adam
  4. What He Has Been Doing Since

The Departure That Was Not a Departure

The fiery chariot came for Elijah on the far bank of the Jordan. Elisha watched it. A whirlwind lifted his teacher into the sky, and then the sky closed, and Elisha stood alone with a double portion of spirit and a torn cloak in his hands. The text of Second Kings describes this as Elijah going up. The rabbinic tradition read the same verse and understood something different: not a departure but a reassignment.

The man who had called down drought on Israel, who had stood alone on Carmel against four hundred prophets of Baal, who had run ahead of Ahab's chariot and then collapsed exhausted under a broom tree asking God to let him die, did not stop when the chariot came. He became something larger than what he had been, and from that new height he kept working.

The Angel With His Feet on the Ground

The midrashic tradition identifies the heavenly Elijah with Sandalphon, one of the great angels of the divine court. The name may be Greek in origin, and the figure is vast: Sandalphon's head reaches the Throne of Glory while his feet stand at the base of the firmament. To walk from one end of his body to the other would take five hundred years of travel. He is not merely large. He is a cosmic axis, a living connection between the lowest and highest levels of creation.

In some accounts, Sandalphon was Elijah from the beginning, an angelic being who descended to walk the earth as a prophet and then returned. In others, the transformation happened at the moment of the chariot: the human prophet receiving a celestial body that allowed him to traverse the heavens with four wingbeats carrying him from one end of the world to the other. Either way, the tradition insists on continuity of identity. The angel is the prophet. The prophet is the angel. The name changes; the person does not.

The Garments of Adam

The tradition connects Elijah to the very beginning of human history through a single object: the garments of skin that God made for Adam and Eve when they left the garden. Those garments passed from Adam to Noah, from Noah to Shem, from Shem down through the generations to Elijah, and Elijah wore them when the chariot came. He left them behind for Elisha, along with his mantle. What Elisha received was not merely a cloak. He received a garment that had been worn in the garden before the fall, that had touched the first human bodies that walked on earth, that had been preserved for exactly this moment.

The transmission of the garments becomes a way of locating Elijah in the deepest continuity of Jewish history. He is not a figure from the northern kingdom of Israel, sectarian and regional. He is the inheritor of Adam's covering and the predecessor of the Messianic age. The chariot did not remove him from history. It positioned him to oversee its entire length.

What He Has Been Doing Since

The tradition is specific about Elijah's ongoing activities. He teaches Torah to the greatest sages of each generation in the heavenly academy. He appears at every circumcision, which is why a chair is set aside for him, the Chair of Elijah, at every brit milah. He visits every seder table on Passover night, which is why a cup of wine is poured for him and a door is opened. He attends at the deathbed of the righteous and at the moment of redemption. He is the angel who will announce the coming of the Messiah.

The land of Israel is included in his portfolio. The tradition records that Elijah came to Abraham before the binding of Isaac, and that his connection to the land never severed even after his ascension. Every time the land is sold and then redeemed, every time a stranger is welcomed at the threshold, every time a covenant is renewed, Elijah is said to be present. The fiery chariot did not end his relationship with the earth. It gave him the mobility to maintain that relationship everywhere at once.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Eruvin 45aTalmud Bavli, Eruvin

Didn’t we learn in a mishna that Rabbi Eliezer says: If a person left his Shabbat limit by walking two cubits beyond it, he may reenter his original limit; but if he left his Shabbat limit by walking three cubits beyond it, he may not reenter. What, is it not that Rabbi Eliezer follows his standard line of reasoning, in that he said with regard to the four cubits a person is allotted wherever he is, he is set in the middle of them, i.e., he may walk two cubits in each direction?

The Gemara explains that the four cubits that the Sages gave a person are regarded here as being subsumed within his original limit, and it is for this reason that he said: He may reenter his original limit. Apparently he is of the opinion that the subsuming of one Shabbat limit within another is something significant.

Rabba bar bar Ḥana said to Abaye: Do you raise an objection against our Master, Rabba, from the statement of Rabbi Eliezer? But isn’t the halakha in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer? Abaye said to him: Yes, as I heard from our Master himself that the Rabbis disagree with Rabbi Eliezer only with regard to one who went beyond his limit for a voluntary matter, but with regard to one who went out for a mitzva matter, they agree with him about the subsuming of limits, i.e., that if one limit is subsumed in another, it is permitted to pass between them. This demonstrates that the halakha recognizes the principle of the subsuming of limits.

The mishna teaches: All who go out to save lives may return to their original locations on Shabbat. The Gemara asks: Does this mean that he may return to his original place even if he went out more than two thousand cubits beyond his limit? Didn’t the first clause say that a person who was permitted to travel beyond his Shabbat limit is allotted two thousand cubits, and no more?

Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: What this means is that they may return with their weapons to their original locations, provided they are within two thousand cubits. The Gemara asks: What is the difficulty with returning home in this situation? Perhaps in the case where people went out to fight and save lives the law is different, and they are allowed to go home even if they went more than two thousand cubits beyond the limit.

Rather, if there is a difficulty, this is the difficulty: As we learned in a mishna in tractate Rosh HaShana, at first they would take the witnesses who had come to Jerusalem from a distant place on Shabbat to testify that they had seen the new moon, and bring them into a special courtyard, and they would not move from there the entire day. This was in accordance with the law governing one who was permitted to go out beyond his limit, as once he fulfilled his mission, he was no longer permitted to move beyond four cubits.

However, Rabban Gamliel the Elder instituted that they should have two thousand cubits in each direction, so that witnesses not refrain from coming to testify. And it is not only these whom the Sages said are given two thousand cubits in the place that they have reached, but even a midwife who comes to deliver a child, and one who comes to rescue Jews from an invasion of gentile troops or from a river or a collapsed building or a fire; they are like the inhabitants of the town at which they arrive, and they have two thousand cubits in each direction.

The question may be raised: Are they given no more than two thousand cubits? Didn’t it say in the mishna: All who go out to save lives may return to their original locations on Shabbat, which indicates that they may walk even more than two thousand cubits?

In response, Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: We must not infer from the mishna that they may go home even if they went out more than two thousand cubits from their limit, but rather that they may return with their weapons to their original locations, provided that they are within two thousand cubits. As it was taught in the Tosefta: At first those returning from a rescue mission would place their weapons in the first house that they encountered upon their return, i.e., the house nearest the wall, to avoid carrying on Shabbat any more than necessary.

Once, their enemies noticed that they were no longer carrying their weapons, and they chased after them; and the defenders entered the house to take up their weapons and fight, and their enemies entered after them, causing great confusion. In the chaos, the defenders began to push one another, and they killed more of each other than their enemies killed of them. At that time the Sages instituted that they should return to their locations, i.e., their destinations, with their weapons.

The Gemara cites an alternate resolution that Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: This is not difficult. Here, in the mishna in Rosh HaShana where they only permitted two thousand cubits, it is referring to a situation where the Jews defeated the nations of the world, i.e., the gentiles, in battle; in such a case there is no concern and they need not return to their original locations. Whereas here, in the mishna which indicates that the Sages permitted even more than two thousand cubits, it is referring to a situation where the nations of the world defeated themselves, i.e., the Jews, whom the Gemara refers to euphemistically as themselves; in such a case the Sages allowed the defeated soldiers to return to their original locations.

Since the Gemara discussed war on Shabbat, the Gemara cites Rav Yehuda, who said that Rav said: With regard to gentiles who besieged Jewish towns, they may not go out to fight against them with their weapons, nor may they desecrate Shabbat in any other way due to them, but rather they must wait until after Shabbat.

That was also taught in a baraita, with a caveat: With regard to gentiles who besieged, etc. In what case is this said? It is said in a case where the gentiles came and besieged the town with regard to monetary matters, i.e., banditry. However, if they came with regard to lives, i.e., there is concern that the gentiles will attack, they may go out against them with their weapons, and they may desecrate Shabbat due to them.

And with regard to a town that is located near the border, even if the gentiles did not come with regard to lives, but rather with regard to matters of hay and straw, i.e., to raid and spoil the town, they may go out against them with their weapons, and they may desecrate Shabbat due to them, as the border must be carefully guarded, in order to prevent enemies from gaining a foothold there.

Rav Yosef bar Manyumi said that Rav Naḥman said: And Babylonia is considered like a town located near the border, and war may be waged there on Shabbat even if the gentiles came for financial gain. And this means the city of Neharde’a, which was located near the border.

Rabbi Dostai of the town of Biri expounded: What is the meaning of that which is written: “And they told David, saying: Behold, the Philistines are fighting against Ke’ila, and they rob the threshing floors” (i Samuel 23:1), after which David asked God how he should respond.

It was taught in a baraita: Ke’ila was a town located near the border, and the Philistines came only with regard to matters of hay and straw, as it is written: “And they rob the threshing floors.” And in the next verse it is written: “Therefore David inquired of the Lord, saying: Shall I go and smite these Philistines? And the Lord said to David: Go and smite the Philistines, and save Ke’ila” (i Samuel 23:2), which indicates that war may be waged in a border town on Shabbat, even with regard to monetary matters.

The Gemara refutes this proof by asking: What is David’s dilemma? If you say that he had a halakhic question and was in doubt whether it was permitted or prohibited to fight the Philistines on Shabbat, it is possible to respond: But the court of Samuel from Rama was then in existence, and rather than inquire by way of the Urim VeTummim he should have inquired of the Great Sanhedrin.

Rather, he asked: Will he succeed or will he not succeed in his war? The Gemara comments: This is also precise in the language of the verse, as it is written in the response to David’s query: “Go and smite the Philistines, and save Ke’ila.” Learn from this, from the assurance that God gave David of his victory, that this was the subject of his inquiry.

MISHNA: With regard to a person who was sitting along the road on Shabbat eve toward nightfall, unaware that he was within the city’s Shabbat limit, and when he stood up after Shabbat had already commenced, he saw that he was near the town, i.e., within its limit, since he had not intended to acquire his place of residence in the town, he may not enter it, but rather he measures two thousand cubits from his place; this is the statement of Rabbi Meir.

Rabbi Yehuda says: He may enter the town. Rabbi Yehuda said: It once happened that Rabbi Tarfon entered a town on Shabbat without intention from the beginning of Shabbat to establish residence in the city.

GEMARA: It was taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yehuda said: It once happened that Rabbi Tarfon was walking along the way on Shabbat eve, and night fell upon him, and he spent the night outside the town. In the morning, cowherds who came to graze their cattle outside the town found him and said to him: Master, the town is before you; enter. He entered and sat in the study hall and taught the entire day. This indicates that one is permitted to enter.

The other Rabbis said to Rabbi Yehuda: Do you bring proof from there? Perhaps he had it in mind the day before to acquire residence in the city, or perhaps the study hall was subsumed within his Shabbat limit. If the study hall was within two thousand cubits of the spot where he established residence, all agree that he may enter there.

MISHNA: With regard to one who was sleeping along the road on Shabbat eve and did not know that night had fallen, he has two thousand cubits in each direction; this is the statement of Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Nuri, who maintains that knowledge and awareness are not necessary for one to acquire residence, but rather, a person’s presence in a given location establishes residence there.

But the Rabbis say: He has only four cubits, as since he did not knowingly acquire residence, he did not establish a Shabbat limit. Rabbi Eliezer says: He has only four cubits total and he is in the middle of them, i.e., he has two cubits in each direction.

Rabbi Yehuda says: He may walk four cubits in any direction he wishes. But Rabbi Yehuda agrees that if he selected for himself the direction in which he wants to walk those four cubits, he cannot retract and walk four cubits in a different direction.

With regard to a case where there were two people in this situation, positioned in such a way that part of the four cubits of one were subsumed within the four cubits of the other, they may each bring food and eat together in the shared area in the middle,

Full source
Targum Jonathan on Genesis 27:15Targum Jonathan

Forget fig leaves – the story is far more dazzling than that! According to tradition, before the infamous bite of the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve weren't just naked, they were clothed – body and soul – in garments of pure light!

That: radiating beings, draped in divine luminescence. Some say these original garments were woven from clouds of glory, shimmering and ethereal. Others describe them as being made of holy, luminous letters given to them by God, shining like a torch, broad at the bottom and narrow at the top. Can you picture it?

Then, everything changed. They ate from the Tree of Knowledge, and poof, the garments of light vanished. (Genesis 3:21) tells us, "And the Lord God made garments of skins for Adam and his wife, and clothed them." But what were these garments of skin?

The sages debate. Some say they were created in the twilight of the sixth day, right before the first Sabbath. According to some traditions, these weren't just any skins. They were smooth as a fingernail, beautiful as a jewel, almost horn-like in substance! Others suggest goatskin or camel's wool. And then there's the rather unsettling idea that they were made from the very serpent who tempted them!

What happened to these garments after the expulsion? This is where the story gets really interesting. Adam supposedly passed them down to Seth, then to Methuselah, and finally to Noah, who brought them on the ark. After the flood, they ended up with Ham (or, according to some accounts, were stolen by Nimrod).

Now, Nimrod wearing Adam's garments? That's a potent image. Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) Tanhuma says when Nimrod wore them, he looked just like Adam, and all the creatures bowed down to him, mistaking him for their king!

Eventually, these powerful garments ended up with Esau after he defeated Nimrod. And yes, these were the clothes Jacob wore when he tricked his father, Isaac, to receive the blessing meant for his brother. (Genesis 27:15) tells us, "Rebecca then took the best clothes of her older son Esau, which were there in the house, and had her younger son Jacob put them on." The Targum Pseudo-Yonathan confirms that it was Adam's garments that Rebecca gave to Jacob. Isaac smelled the scent of those garments – the scent of Eden, perhaps – and bestowed the blessing.

But there's more to the story! Remember those garments of light? According to some, Adam and Eve's repentance earned them a new set of those! And in the End of Days, it is said that God will dress the Messiah in a garment of light so radiant that it will shine from one end of the world to the other! As we find in Pesikta de-Rabbi Eliezer, the Jews will bask in its light and say, "Blessed is the hour in which the Messiah was created."

This concept of a "chain midrash," linking generations from Adam to the Messiah, pops up in other traditions too, like the staff of Moses, the book the angel Raziel gave Adam, and the glowing stone called the Tzohar.

The lineage of these garments isn't always consistent. Some accounts, like the one in Midrash Tanhuma, have the garment going to the evil king Nimrod, while others say it went from Noah to Shem to Abraham, who then passed it to Isaac. Sefer ha-Zikhronot even includes the garments of Adam and Eve among the eight things created on the first day of Creation!

How can we reconcile these different versions? Well, as Genesis Rabbah 20:12 points out, the Hebrew word for "light" (or, spelled with an aleph) is very similar to the word for "skin" or "leather" (or, spelled with an ayin). In (Genesis 3:21), it's spelled with an ayin, but Rabbi Meir's Torah scroll apparently had it written with an aleph!

The Zohar goes even further, explaining that Adam was initially dressed in garments of light, like the angels. According to Zohar 2:229b, Adam couldn't even enter the Garden without them! It was only after the expulsion that he needed garments of skin.

What does it all mean? Rabbi Tzadok ha-Kohen (a priest) of Lublin suggests something truly profound: that the sin of Adam and Eve, followed by their repentance, actually elevated them to a higher state than before! The garments of skin were replaced by even more glorious garments of light! As Rabbi Yosef Hayim of Baghdad suggests in Ben Yehoyada, Torah study can even reverse the process, transforming those garments of skin back into garments of light.

So, the next time you read about Adam and Eve, remember: it's not just a story about nakedness and shame. It's a story about divine radiance, lost innocence, and the potential for transformation. It's a story about how even after we stumble, we can still find our way back to the light.

Full source
Tikkunei Zohar 59:15Tikkunei Zohar

The Tikkunei (spiritual repair) Zohar, a mystical companion to the Zohar itself, tackles this feeling head-on, using some pretty powerful imagery. In Tikkunei Zohar 59, we find the prophet Elijah descending to share a profound secret, one that involves plowing fields, forbidden mixtures, and… milk and meat?

" Now, what could that possibly mean on a deeper level?

Elijah doesn't waste any time. He declares that this verse holds a major key to understanding the cosmos. The image of the ox and donkey yoked together represents a fundamental imbalance. He says that when Israel – referred to here as the "first-born" and the "Middle Pillar" – fails to bring forth the proper "fruit" to the house of Yod Heh Vav Heh (Y”Y, a reference to God’s name), things go awry. Milk becomes mixed with meat. The ox and the donkey are forced together. A kilayim, a forbidden mixture, is created.

kilayim. That’s a big deal in Jewish law. It refers to the prohibition of mixing certain things – different kinds of seeds in a field, wool and linen in clothing, and yes, milk and meat. But here, it's not just about dietary laws or agricultural practices. It's a metaphor for a deeper spiritual disharmony.

Rabbi Shim’on, a central figure in the Zohar, isn't so sure he understands this right away. He challenges Elijah. "Elijah, Elijah!" he exclaims, "The ox comes from the side of purity, and the donkey from the side of defilement. Isn't this a forbidden mixture of good and evil? But milk is pure, and meat is also pure!" Rabbi Shim’on is pointing out that, on the surface, the forbidden mixture seems to be one of two things that should be okay on their own. It’s not immediately obvious why they should be forbidden.

So, what's really going on here? What's this "fruit" that needs to be brought to the house of God? What is this forbidden mixture that’s causing so much trouble?

Perhaps the "fruit" represents our good deeds, our acts of kindness, our efforts to bring holiness into the world. And maybe, just maybe, when we neglect these actions, when we fail to offer our best selves, we create a situation where opposing forces – the pure and the impure – become entangled in a way that disrupts the divine order.

The mixing of milk and meat, both seemingly pure in themselves, then becomes a symbol of how even good things, when misplaced or mishandled, can contribute to imbalance. It’s a potent reminder that purity alone isn't enough. Intention, context, and proper alignment are crucial.

It's a challenging concept, isn't it? It suggests that we all have a role to play in maintaining cosmic harmony. It’s not just about following the rules, but about actively participating in the ongoing work of tikkun olam – repairing the world. What do you think? How can we avoid creating these forbidden mixtures in our own lives? What "fruit" can we bring forth to help restore balance?

Full source