4 min read

Forty-Five Kings Came for Joshua and Lost

After the conquest, a dead king's son united forty-five rulers against Joshua and sent a letter: prepare for war in thirty days. Joshua was acquitted by angels.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Letter From Armenia
  2. Shobach's Letter
  3. The Trial of Joshua
  4. The Battle

The Letter From Armenia

Thirty-one kings were dead. The land had been divided among the twelve tribes, the borders drawn in the aftermath of campaigns that had taken years. Israel had sung its victory song, the song of thanksgiving for everything God had done since Egypt, and it seemed, in the specific quiet of that moment, as if the wars were over.

Then the letter arrived from Armenia.

The son of one of the thirty-one kings had spent years building something. Shobach, who had become king of Armenia after his father's death, had traveled to the courts of Persia and Media, making his case, calling in debts, building relationships with rulers who had their own reasons to fear what was happening in Canaan. He assembled forty-five kings plus the warrior Japheth, all pointed at the same target. The coalition took years to build and a single letter to deploy.

Shobach's Letter

The letter's language combined contempt with scrupulous fairness. It called Joshua "thou wolf of the desert," which was not diplomatic. It then reviewed, with apparent precision, everything Joshua had done: the king of Jericho, the king of Ai, every defeat of every nation in the conquest. It named the specific tactics, the specific betrayals where applicable, the specific methods that had won each campaign. The letter was the work of a man who had spent years studying his enemy with concentrated hatred.

It ended with a thirty-day deadline. "Prepare yourself," it said. "We are coming."

Joshua read it and did not reply in kind. He brought the letter before the elders of Israel and sat with them in council. What the tradition records next is not a military planning session but a legal proceeding.

The Trial of Joshua

The elders called Joshua to account. Not for the coming battle but for the past one. They reviewed his conduct of the conquest, every campaign, every king, every alliance made and broken, every decision that could be questioned. Was the conquest just? Had Joshua acted within the boundaries of what God had commanded? The charges that Shobach's letter implied were examined one by one.

The angels came. The tradition records that the heavenly court convened alongside the earthly one, that the examination of Joshua's conduct happened simultaneously in two places, and that the verdict was the same in both: Joshua had acted faithfully. The conquest had been conducted within the terms God had set. The thirty-one kings had received their advance warning. The nations that had chosen peace had been permitted to leave. What followed had followed from their own choices.

Joshua was acquitted. The elders confirmed it. The heavenly court confirmed it. The coalition from Armenia had expected to find a man morally weakened by the accounting of his deeds. Instead they found a commander who had just been formally vindicated by the highest available authorities.

The Battle

The forty-five kings came. Joshua met them. The tradition does not preserve every detail of the campaign, but the outcome is clear: the coalition that had taken years to assemble was defeated. The thirty days of warning expired, the armies arrived, and what Shobach had built with years of diplomatic labor collapsed in battle against a people whose leader had just been acquitted in two courts at once.

The tradition reads Shobach's defeat as a consequence of the timing. He had sent his letter, unknowingly, at exactly the moment when Joshua's legitimacy was being examined and confirmed. The acquittal preceded the battle. The man who marched against Joshua marched against someone who had just been declared righteous by the court of heaven, and the tradition does not suggest he had a serious chance of winning.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Midrash Tehillim 3:4Midrash Tehillim

King David certainly knew that feeling. In the Midrash Tehillim, a beautiful collection of interpretations on the Book of Psalms, we find a powerful meditation on the verse, "Many are rising against me" (Psalm 3:2). But who are these "many"?

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) doesn't just see a multitude; it sees a multitude of stature. Think giants, both literally and figuratively. It brings up Shobach, the commander of the Syrian army. Why was he called Shobach? Well, the Midrash tells us it's because his stature was like a "shobach" - a rod or staff, implying he was incredibly tall. We even see a play on words here. The text notes his name was also "Shophach" (in (1 Chronicles 19:1)8) and connects this to the Hebrew word for shedding blood. A fearsome warrior,.

Then there's Goliath, the Philistine giant, whose height, as described in (1 Samuel 17:4), was "six cubits and a span." That's one big dude! These figures represent the sheer size of the obstacles David faced. It wasn’t just about the number of enemies, but their overwhelming presence.

The Midrash doesn't stop there. It expands the concept of "many" to include those who are great in Torah knowledge. And here, we encounter two complex figures: Doeg and Ahithophel. Doeg was no ordinary herdsman; (1 Samuel 21:8) describes him as "the chiefest of the herdsmen that belonged to Saul", essentially, the head of the court. He was a man of power, influence, and seemingly, wisdom.

And Ahithophel? According to (2 (Samuel 16:2)3), "The counsel of Ahithophel…was as if a man inquired of the word of God." His advice was considered divine! Imagine the betrayal, the pain, of having someone you trusted, someone whose wisdom you revered, turn against you. These weren't just enemies; they were intellectual and spiritual giants.

The Midrash then explores the personal anguish of betrayal with the line: "A man of my rank." But it pointedly notes, "it is not written 'a man,' for he was not a man but an angel." What does this mean? It suggests that the betrayal felt so profound, so unnatural, that it was as if it came from something beyond human nature.

This idea is further emphasized by quoting (Psalm 55:13-15): "For it is not an enemy who reproached me, then I could bear it… But you, a man like myself, my companion… We who enjoyed a friendly intimacy." The pain of betrayal is always sharper when it comes from someone close, someone you considered an equal, a friend. It cuts deeper because it shatters the trust you placed in them.

So, when David cries out, "Many are rising against me," he’s not just talking about a large number of opponents. He’s talking about the quality of that opposition. He’s facing giants in stature, giants in Torah knowledge, and the agonizing betrayal of those he held dear.

What does this teach us? Maybe that opposition is inevitable. Maybe that it often comes from unexpected places. And maybe, most importantly, that even in the face of overwhelming odds and profound betrayal, we can find the strength to persevere, just as King David did. It's a reminder that even when surrounded by giants, both literal and figurative, we are not alone in our struggles. We, too, can find the courage to face those rising against us.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:44Legends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews turns to Trial of Joshua.

Then there's the hope for the future, the desire for lasting peace: "Thus shall all Thine enemies perish, O Lord, and the wicked shall be like chaff driven by the wind, and Thy beloved shall be like trees planted by the waters." It's a beautiful image, isn't it? The wicked, ephemeral and easily scattered, versus the righteous, deeply rooted and flourishing.

As we find in Ginzberg's Legends of the Jews, the battles didn't simply stop after the initial conquest. Joshua’s most challenging fight, the one that truly tested his mettle, came after the land was subdued. It was a war against.. the Armenians!

Apparently, among the thirty-one kings slain by Joshua, one had a son named Shobach, who became king of Armenia. Consumed by vengeance, Shobach united forty-five kings of Persia and Media, and even secured the aid of the renowned hero Japheth.

Can you imagine the sheer scale of this threat? This coalition sent Joshua a rather… colorful letter, letting him know exactly what they thought of him and their intentions. It went something like this: "The noble, distinguished council of the kings of Persia and Media to Joshua, peace! Thou wolf of the desert, we well know what thou didst to our kinsmen. Thou didst destroy our palaces; without pity thou didst slay young and old; our fathers thou didst mow down with the sword; and their cities thou didst turn into desert. Know, then, that in the space of thirty days, we shall come to thee, we, the forty-five kings, each having sixty thousand warriors under him, all them armed with bows and arrows, girt about with swords, all of us skilled in the ways of war, and with us the hero Japheth. Prepare now for the combat, and say not afterward that we took thee at unawares."

A "wolf of the desert," no less! It's quite the insult, but also a clear declaration of war. Forty-five kings, each commanding sixty thousand warriors. That's a massive force, and they're giving Joshua fair warning. What would you do in that situation?

It makes you wonder: What kind of courage does it take to face such overwhelming odds? And what does it say about the nature of leadership, that even after achieving so much, Joshua had to confront an even greater challenge? It's a reminder that the journey toward peace is rarely easy, and that even after the initial victory, there are always new battles to be fought.

Full source