4 min read

God Asked Israel for Consent Before Giving the Commandments

Before issuing a single law at Sinai, God asked Israel whether they accepted His rule. Their answer determined the entire structure of what followed.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Question Before the Law
  2. Sovereignty Before Law
  3. Why God Named the Exodus Instead of the Creation
  4. The Quarreling That Had Delayed All of This

The Question Before the Law

The mountain was already on fire. The people were already gathered at its base, trembling. The moment of revelation had arrived after weeks of preparation and warning. And then, before a single commandment was spoken, God asked a question.

The Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, in Tractate Bachodesh, preserves a dialogue between God and Israel that the plain text of Exodus does not record but that the rabbinic tradition treated as foundational. Before I am the Lord your God came anything else, the Mekhilta inserts an exchange. God turned to the people and asked: Am I the one whose rule you have accepted? The people answered: Yes. Then God replied: Just as you have accepted My rule, now accept My decrees.

Sovereignty Before Law

The sequence is deliberate. God established the relationship first, asked for its acknowledgment, received the yes, and only then proceeded to the content of the obligations. The commandments that follow Sinai are not the terms of a conquest imposed on a defeated population. They are the content of an agreement that Israel has already freely entered. The law arrives not as imposition but as the natural next step after a consent that Israel had already given.

This framing transforms the legal character of the entire Torah. If the commandments had come first, they would be demands from a more powerful party. Because the relationship was established first and the consent obtained first, the commandments are the specific terms of a covenant that Israel has chosen. The Mekhilta is making an argument about the nature of obligation: this is not what a king commands of subjects. This is what a partner accepts from a partner after saying yes.

Why God Named the Exodus Instead of the Creation

The Mekhilta also asks why God identified Himself at Sinai as the God who brought Israel out of Egypt rather than as the God who created heaven and earth. The question has an obvious force. Creation is a far more impressive credential than the liberation of one nation from one empire. If God wanted to establish His authority over all peoples and all times, why invoke a local, particular event?

The answer the Mekhilta preserves is that God was speaking to the specific audience in front of Him. The nations of the world had not been brought out of Egypt. Israel had. The covenant at Sinai was not a universal legal code. It was a specific relationship between God and this people, and the grounding of that relationship had to be in an experience that was theirs alone. The Exodus was the moment when Israel had already accepted God's rule in practice, by following Him into the wilderness with no map and no army. Sinai was asking them to make formal what the Exodus had already demonstrated.

The Quarreling That Had Delayed All of This

The tradition records that the revelation at Sinai was delayed by the quarreling and division within Israel's own camp. The people had not arrived at the mountain in a state of unity. They had arrived with grievances against each other and against Moses, still carrying the tensions of the wilderness. The mountain waited until those divisions were resolved, or at least temporarily suspended, before God descended.

This adds a dimension to the consent question. God asked Am I the one whose rule you accept from a people who had just stopped fighting with each other long enough to stand together. The yes Israel gave was the yes of a community that had not been united a week before. The Mekhilta seems aware of this fragility and treats the consent as genuine despite it, or perhaps because of it. A yes given freely by a divided people means more than a unanimous answer from a crowd that never had any disagreements.

SinaiCommandmentsCovenantDivine SovereigntyMekhilta
← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Mekhilta Tractate Bachodesh 6:3Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

Before God gave a single commandment at Sinai, He made a remarkable statement that the Mekhilta preserves as a kind of divine negotiation. "I am the Lord your God," He declared. Then: "There shall not be unto you other gods." But between these two statements, the Mekhilta inserts a dialogue that changes everything.

God turned to Israel and asked: Am I the one whose rule you have accepted? The people answered: Yes. Then God replied: Just as you have accepted My rule, now accept My decrees.

The sequence matters enormously. God did not begin with laws and prohibitions. He began by establishing a relationship. First comes sovereignty, "I am the Lord your God", which Israel freely accepted. Only after that acceptance did God introduce His commandments. The decrees flow from the relationship, not the other way around.

The Mekhilta is making a profound point about the nature of Torah law. The commandments are not arbitrary impositions from a distant deity. They are the terms of a covenant that Israel entered willingly. Like a king who first wins the loyalty of his subjects through acts of liberation, in this case, the Exodus from Egypt. And only then issues his royal decrees. The people had already experienced God's power and mercy. They had walked through the split sea. They had eaten manna in the wilderness. When God asked "Am I the one whose rule you accepted?" the answer was obvious. And so the commandments became not burdens, but the natural expression of a relationship already forged in freedom.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 2:19Legends of the Jews

You’re marching towards… well, you don't exactly know where, but it's away from Pharaoh! Wouldn't you expect the Divine to hand down the ultimate instruction manual right then and there?

Turns out, there was a bit of a delay. And according to Legends of the Jews, it wasn't just about logistics.

See, right after the Exodus, things weren't exactly peaceful. The Israelites were, to put it mildly, bickering. Major discord, Ginzberg tells us. Imagine the tension! All that pent-up frustration, the uncertainty of the future… it apparently led to some serious infighting.

So, what changed? What made them finally ready to receive the Torah?

The key, it seems, was reaching a state of harmony. It wasn't until the new moon of the third month – Rosh Chodesh Sivan – when they finally arrived at Mount Sinai, that things started to shift. That’s when God said, "The ways of the Torah are ways of loveliness, and all its paths are paths of peace; I will yield the Torah to a nation that dwells in peace and amity." for a second. The Torah, the very foundation of Jewish law and tradition, is intrinsically linked to peace. Not just any peace, but a peace that exists within the community. It wasn’t enough to be free from external oppression; they needed to be free from internal strife as well.

But there's another layer here, a fascinating point about repentance, or teshuvah. Legends of the Jews emphasizes that the Israelites weren't exactly angels upon arrival at Sinai. They had been testing God, questioning His power. Sound familiar? But they changed. They underwent a transformation.

And that’s where it gets really interesting. God, seeing their genuine remorse and their striving for unity, deemed them worthy to receive the Torah. It highlights the incredible power of teshuvah, the ability to turn away from negative behaviors and return to the right path.

So, according to this midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) tradition, the giving of the Torah wasn’t just a Divine act bestowed upon a deserving people. It was a response to their collective effort to create a society based on peace and their individual efforts at self-improvement. It's a potent reminder that preparing ourselves – through inner work and harmonious relationships – is crucial for receiving wisdom and guidance.

Maybe that’s the real lesson here. Are we, individually and collectively, creating the kind of environment where wisdom can flourish? Are we striving for the inner peace and communal harmony that will allow us to truly receive the teachings that can guide us? Because ultimately, maybe the Torah isn't just something we were given once upon a time, but something we continuously earn the right to receive, day after day.

Full source