5 min read

God Gave the Torah in Public and Prefaced Reward Before Commandment

R. Yossi reads a verse from Isaiah to prove the Torah was given openly to all who wanted it, and that God announced the reward before He gave the law.

Table of Contents
  1. Not in Darkness, Not in Secret
  2. Reward Announced Before the Law Was Given
  3. What Shabbat and Shemitah Prove
  4. What the Public Giving Changes

There is a rabbinic tradition that explains why the Torah was given in the wilderness and not in the Land of Israel. The Land had owners. The wilderness belonged to everyone. If God had given the Torah on private property, a nation might claim ownership of it. By giving it in an ownerless place, He made it available to any person who chose to receive it.

R. Yossi, whose teaching is preserved in the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael -- a tannaitic midrash on Exodus compiled in the second and third centuries by the school of Rabbi Ishmael in Roman Palestine -- approaches this idea from a different direction. He quotes (Isaiah 45:19): "Not in secrecy did I speak, in a place of darkness." And he builds from that single verse a complete account of how the Torah was given and on what terms.

Not in Darkness, Not in Secret

The verse from Isaiah (45:19) was written in the sixth century BCE, addressed to the exiles in Babylon. But R. Yossi reads it as God describing the original Sinai revelation. From the very beginning, He says, when I gave it, I did not give it in secret or in a dark, dusky land. The giving was public. There were witnesses. The smoke and the fire at Sinai (Exodus 19:18) were not just drama -- they were visibility. Every Israelite stood at the foot of the mountain. The event was not restricted to a priestly caste or a learned elite.

The continuation of (Isaiah 45:19) reinforces this: "I did not say to the seed of Jacob, 'Seek Me in vain.'" The Mekhilta's reading glosses this as: I did not give the commandments as a pledge to be taken back, or as a gesture with no substance behind it. The seeking was not going to be futile. "I am the Lord, who speaks righteousness, who declares what is just" -- the giver of the Torah is also the guarantor that it means something.

Reward Announced Before the Law Was Given

What R. Yossi adds next is striking. He argues that God prefaced the reward for the commandments before He gave the commandments themselves. The evidence: (Exodus 16:5), which describes the double portion of manna on the sixth day to prepare for Shabbat, was given before the Shabbat law was formally commanded at Sinai. And (Leviticus 25:21), which promises the blessing of the sixth year's harvest in anticipation of the shemitah (sabbatical year), was structured so that the blessing preceded the requirement.

This is not a minor point for R. Yossi. The sequence matters theologically. God is not a legislator who lists punishments first to coerce compliance. He is a covenantal partner who announces the benefit before binding His people to the obligation. You will have enough manna. You will have enough in the sixth year. And then: here is the law that asks something of you in return.

What Shabbat and Shemitah Prove

R. Yossi anticipates an objection: maybe the advance reward applies only to Shabbat and shemitah, since those are the specific cases he cited. Perhaps other commandments operate on different terms. He dismisses this limitation by citing (Psalms 105:44-45): "And He gave them the lands of nations. Why? So that they keep His statutes and observe His laws." The inheritance of the Land itself is framed as a reward given for the keeping of commandments -- and yet Israel received the inheritance while still in the process of learning to keep them.

The reward for the whole of the Torah, in this reading, is not withheld until performance is complete. It precedes the full performance. This is not laxity about obligation. It is a structural statement about the covenantal relationship: God does not deal with Israel as an employer who pays after work is done. He deals with them as a covenantal partner who has already committed to the relationship and demonstrates that commitment before demanding what the relationship requires.

What the Public Giving Changes

The emphasis on publicity in R. Yossi's reading has a corollary that he does not spell out but that the tradition makes explicit elsewhere. A gift given in darkness, in secret, to a select few, creates a caste. A gift given in the open wilderness, announced without concealment, available to anyone who stood at the mountain, creates a different kind of people. The Mekhilta's 1,517 texts on Exodus preserve many traditions about who was at Sinai -- not only the Israelites, but traditions that say the nations also heard the voice and had their chance to receive the Torah, and declined.

The refusal of the nations is part of what makes Israel's acceptance meaningful. They said yes at a revelation that was public and open. They did not receive a private gift. They responded to an offer made in the wilderness, in broad day, announced without secrecy -- exactly as the verse from (Isaiah 45:19) describes. "Not in a place of darkness." In the wilderness, at the mountain, with fire and smoke and a voice the whole camp heard.

R. Yossi's reading from the Mekhilta insists that this publicness was not incidental. It was built into the nature of the giving. The Torah was given where anyone could come, announced in advance with its reward, spoken by a God who said openly: this is what I am offering, these are the terms, seek Me and you will not seek in vain.

← All myths