4 min read

Pharaoh Said What Haman Said, and Both Men Were Destroyed

The Midrash drew a line through history connecting Pharaoh, Haman, and Nebuchadnezzar. Every one of them spoke words they would later be forced to unsay.

The rabbis noticed a pattern running through the stories of the most powerful rulers in the Hebrew Bible, and the pattern is this: every tyrant who declared he would not bow to God was eventually forced to praise God with his own mouth.

The teaching comes from Shemot Rabbah 20:10, a passage in the ancient midrash on Exodus that takes as its starting point a verse from Psalms: "Through the greatness of Your power Your enemies will dwindle before You" (Psalms 66:3). Rabbi Berekhya reads the Hebrew word for "dwindle," yekhaḥeshu, as a pun on the word for lying: their own words, he says, will render them liars. What they declared confidently at the height of their power will be turned against them. They will be compelled to say the opposite.

The examples the Midrash brings are striking in their span. Pharaoh said "Who is the Lord, that I should heed Him?" (Exodus 5:2). After the plagues, he said: "The Lord is righteous" (Exodus 9:27). The man who would not let Israel go was circling through the Israelite quarters at night, urging them to leave, blessing them on their way out. Haman, in the Book of Esther, constructed a gallows fifty cubits high for Mordecai, his enemy, and was hanged on it himself with his sons. Nebuchadnezzar, watching the three men walk unharmed through the fire of his furnace, described a fourth figure in the flames and called it "like a son of gods" (Daniel 3:25). He was then, according to the Midrash, visited by an accusing angel who forced him to correct his own words: the angel made Nebuchadnezzar say "His angel" instead, replacing the boast with acknowledgment.

Rabbi Yochanan, quoting Rabbi Elazar son of Rabbi Yosei HaGelili, frames all of this as praise for a kind of cosmic justice: "Say to the good laborer: well done." The wicked were set to execute others; they were executed. They were set to hang others; they were hanged. The Midrash is not gloating. It is identifying a structural principle in how the tradition understands history. The powerful do not simply fall. They are required, at the moment of their fall, to become witnesses against themselves.

The connection between Pharaoh and Haman is not only thematic. The rabbis found it literally in the verses. Pharaoh decreed that every Israelite son born be cast into the Nile (Exodus 1:22). He himself was cast into the sea (Exodus 15:4). The Chronicles of Jerahmeel preserves a tradition that when Haman's fate was sealed, even the trees of the earth volunteered to be the wood of the gallows. Not for cruelty's sake but because justice, when it finally arrives, calls everything to participate. The tree that becomes the instrument of a tyrant's end is, in this telling, acting in accordance with the same principle that moved the waters of the sea against Pharaoh's chariot.

Nebuchadnezzar's forced correction is the most vivid of the three. The Holy One, according to the Midrash, challenges him directly: wicked one from a putrid drop, are you suggesting that I perform injustice against any person? And Nebuchadnezzar, who had built an empire on the premise that he answered to no one, is made to say: "For all His works are truth" (Daniel 4:34). The man who believed he could throw people into furnaces and call the burning a spectacle was taught, by watching three men survive that furnace, that power operates inside a framework he could not see and had not acknowledged.

What the Midrash is building across these three stories is something more than a comforting catalog of comeuppances. It is an argument about language and power. Every one of these rulers made a declaration that was, in the deepest sense, a lie: I am sovereign, I am unchallengeable, I do not recognize any authority above mine. And the tradition says those declarations do not simply go unanswered. They become the very words the speaker must eventually walk back, in public, as witness to their own defeat.

The rabbis who compiled Shemot Rabbah in late antiquity were not living under their own sovereignty. They were subject to empires, familiar with the experience of a people whose existence depended on the goodwill of powers that could revoke that goodwill at any time. The teaching that every Pharaoh eventually has to admit "The Lord is righteous" was not detached theology for them. It was a description of how the world actually worked, stretched across generations, legible only if you could read the pattern that ran through Egyptian papyrus and Babylonian clay and Persian court intrigue all the way down to the present.

The good laborer, Rabbi Yochanan says, should be told: well done. The pattern holds.

← All myths