5 min read

How Shem Named the Temple Mount Before Abraham Arrived

Shem called the mountain Shalem. Abraham called it Yireh. God fused both names into Jerusalem, a place that named itself through every person who stood on it.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Shem Builds a House on the Mountain
  2. Abraham Names the Same Mountain
  3. The Heavenly Voice Moses Heard
  4. What the Name Holds

Shem Builds a House on the Mountain

Before Abraham climbed it, before David captured the city below it, before a single stone of the Temple was laid, a man called Shem already knew the mountain. He had survived the flood in the ark of his father Noah. He had walked out onto a remade world and found his way to a particular ridge above the valley, and what he built there was not a home in any ordinary sense. He called the place Shalem, from the root that means wholeness, completeness, peace. The name carried everything he had experienced: the water receding, the covenant with the rainbow, the world starting again. He called it what it felt like to stand there. He called it what it was.

He was also, by the time Abraham arrived, functioning as a priest-king. The Talmud, in tractate Nedarim, identifies Shem with Melchizedek, the mysterious figure in Genesis who emerges from nowhere to bring bread and wine to Abraham after his battle victories and to bless him in the name of El Elyon, God Most High. Abraham receives this blessing and gives Melchizedek a tenth of everything. The tradition reads this exchange as the first formal acknowledgment that this particular place on earth has priestly authority, that something in the ground there generates blessing and requires consecration.

Abraham Names the Same Mountain

Centuries after Shem, Abraham climbed the same mountain with his son. God had told him to take Isaac, his only son, the one he loved, and offer him there as a burnt offering. He built the altar. He bound his son. He raised the knife. The angel stopped him, and he found a ram caught in a thicket behind him, and the test was over. Abraham named the place Yireh, meaning God will see or God will provide, from the root that means seeing, perceiving, the divine gaze landing on a specific place in the world and not moving away from it.

Two men, separated by generations, stood on the same ground and gave it names from their most extreme experiences of the divine. Shem had survived the destruction of the whole world and found peace. Abraham had survived the near-destruction of his entire future and found providence. They named the place from the inside of what they had been through. And then God fused the names: Yeru-Shalem. Jerusalem. God will see peace. Providence and wholeness together, in one word, on one mountain.

The Heavenly Voice Moses Heard

The Tikkunei Zohar, the mystical compilation of thirteenth-century Castile, preserves a tradition about Moses and the Temple Mount that extends the pattern further. Moses never entered the land. He died on Mount Nebo and looked across the Jordan at everything he would not reach. But a heavenly voice reached him there, promising what was coming: the Messiah who would arise from the people Israel, and the Third Temple, which would not be built by human hands but would descend from above, already complete, already assembled in the higher worlds, awaiting only the moment to materialize below.

This means the mountain had already been set aside before Shem named it. Before Abraham climbed it. Before Moses looked toward it from across the river. The Tikkunei Zohar reads the entire sequence of namings and sanctifications as revelation of what was always there, not a human construction of holiness but a gradual uncovering of a holiness that preceded all of them. The mountain chose its names by choosing the people who stood on it and what they were forced to understand.

What the Name Holds

The rabbinic tradition preserved a debate about why the name is Yeru-Shalem rather than one or the other alone. The answer is that God did not want to honor one patriarch's naming at the expense of another's. Shem had been there first and had called it right. Abraham had been there second and had called it right from a different direction. Both were correct. Both were necessary. The city could not be only Shalem, which would make it about completion without encounter. It could not be only Yireh, which would make it about encounter without arrival. The combination holds the whole thing: divine seeing that ends in peace, providence that produces wholeness.

Every time the city is named afterward, in psalms and prophecies and prayers, both men are inside the word. Shem walked backward from the flood into something new. Abraham walked forward up the mountain without knowing what he would find. Their two directions of approach are preserved in the syllables that have been spoken over this ground for three thousand years.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Book of Jubilees 6:1Book of Jubilees

Book of Jubilees turns to Noah at the Temple.

Then, a few months later, on the new moon of the first month, something even more profound happened: "the earth became visible." The waters were receding. We find this echoed in (Genesis 8:13), which also notes the revealing of the earth's surface. But Jubilees provides that extra layer of chronological detail.

The timeline gets even more specific. In the fifth week of the seventh year – – the verse says "the waters disappeared from above the earth." And on the seventeenth day of the second month, the earth was finally, completely dry.

What followed next? Noah didn't rush. He waited. Waited until the twenty-seventh of the month. That's when "he opened the ark, and sent forth from it beasts, and cattle, and birds, and every moving thing." scene. The unleashing of life back onto the planet. The air filled with the sounds of animals, the ground teeming with creatures. A new beginning for all living things.

Finally, on the new moon of the third month, Noah himself emerged from the ark. And his very first act? He "built an altar on that mountain." An offering of gratitude. A recognition of the divine hand that guided them through the storm.

Jubilees gives us more than just dates; it gives us a sense of the emotional weight of these events. The anticipation, the gradual revealing of the world, and ultimately, the act of thanksgiving.

It makes you wonder, doesn’t it? What altars are we building in our own lives? What acts of gratitude are we offering after weathering our own storms? The story of Noah isn't just a tale of survival, but a reminder of the importance of recognizing and appreciating the new beginnings in our lives.

Full source
Book of Jubilees 16:33Book of Jubilees

Holidays is often remembered as something ancient and unchanging, but every tradition has a beginning. the tradition turns to one possible origin story, found in the Book of Jubilees, a text that offers a unique perspective on biblical narratives.

Abraham, not just as a patriarch, but as a pioneer of celebration. The Book of Jubilees – an important Jewish text from the Second Temple period, not included in the Tanakh – paints a picture of Abraham establishing a brand-new festival. This wasn't just any get-together; it was a carefully orchestrated act of devotion, full of symbolism and meaning.

The text details the offerings Abraham made: "seven rams, seven kids, seven sheep, and seven he-goats, and their fruit-offerings and their drink-offerings." A veritable Noah's Ark of sacrificial animals! And what did he do with all that? Well, "he burnt all the fat thereof on the altar, a chosen offering unto the Lord for a sweet smelling savour."

We might find the idea of burning animal fat a little…unappealing today. But remember, in the ancient world, sacrifice was a primary way to communicate with the divine. It was about giving your best, your most valuable possessions, as a token of gratitude and devotion. The "sweet smelling savour" wasn't about pleasing God's nose, but about the intention behind the act.

And the fragrant substances? Oh, they are a whole other level of sensory experience. "And morning and evening he burnt fragrant substances, frankincense and galbanum, and stacte, and nard, and myrrh, and spice, and costum; all these seven he offered, crushed, mixed together in equal parts (and) pure." Imagine the aroma! A carefully crafted blend of exotic scents, filling the air, elevating the experience beyond the mundane. It was a multi-sensory experience!

But the celebration wasn't just about offerings and aromas. It was about community, too, albeit a very exclusive one. "And he celebrated this feast during seven days, rejoicing with all his heart and with all his soul, he and all those who were in his house; and there was no stranger with him, nor any that was uncircumcised." This detail tells us a lot about identity and belonging in Abraham's time. The celebration was for those within the covenant, a shared experience of faith and connection. No outsiders allowed.

Seven days of rejoicing! Can you imagine the energy, the commitment to celebration? It wasn't a fleeting moment, but a sustained immersion in joy and gratitude. This wasn't just a ritual; it was a way of life, a conscious choice to dedicate time and energy to expressing faith.

So, what can we take away from this glimpse into Abraham's festival? Perhaps it's a reminder that traditions, even the most ancient ones, have a starting point. They are born out of specific circumstances, beliefs, and desires. And maybe, just maybe, it's an invitation to think about the rituals and celebrations in our own lives. What do they mean to us? What values do they express? And how can we make them more meaningful, more authentic, more…fragrant?

What new traditions can we create that express our values?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:193Legends of the Jews

The moment Moses departed this world, a heavenly voice, a bat kol, rang out. Can you imagine the sound? It declared, "Moses, servant of the Lord, thou that art faithful in His house, even as thou hast seen the reward that is laid up for the pious in the world to come, so also thou wilt be worthy of seeing the life of the world that shall be in the future time. Thou and all Israel, ye shall see the rebuilding of the Temple and the advent of the Mashiach, the Messiah, behold the beauty of the Lord, and meditate in His Temple."

It’s a breathtaking image, isn’t it? A promise of future glory, not just for Moses, but for all of Israel. According to this legend, Moses wasn't just stepping into some static afterlife. He was stepping into a future where he, and all of Israel, would witness the ultimate redemption: the rebuilt Temple, the arrival of the Mashiach, and the chance to dwell in God's presence. Think about the weight of that promise.

That’s not all. According to the Legends of the Jews, compiled by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, Moses' role as teacher wouldn't end with his earthly life. Instead, in the world to come, he would continue to guide and instruct the people of Israel.

The people, eager to learn, approach Abraham, the patriarch, requesting instruction in the Torah, the sacred teachings. But Abraham, in his humility, directs them to Isaac, saying, "Go to Isaac, he hath studied more of the Torah than ever I studied."

But Isaac, too, defers. He sends them on to Jacob, explaining, "Go to Jacob, he hath had more converse with the sages than ever I had."

And finally, Jacob sends them to the one who truly holds the key: "Go to Moses," he says, "he was instructed in the Torah by God Himself."

What a powerful image! Even in the world to come, Moses remains the ultimate teacher, the one who received divine instruction directly from God. It speaks volumes about the enduring importance of learning and teaching, of the passing down of wisdom from generation to generation. It’s a beautiful illustration of how Moses’ legacy, his impact on the Jewish people, extends beyond his earthly existence, continuing to shape their spiritual journey in the world to come. It makes you wonder, what kind of legacy will we leave behind?

Full source
Tikkunei Zohar 53:10Tikkunei Zohar

The Tikkunei (spiritual repair) Zohar, a companion work to the Zohar itself, dives deep into the mysteries of creation and the hidden meanings within the Torah. In Tikkunei Zohar 53, we find a fascinating perspective on the Temple in Jerusalem.

That God showed someone – it doesn’t specify who, but it implies a prophet or someone with divine insight – that the Temple, built by human hands, was destined for destruction. A sobering thought. All that effort, all that devotion, seemingly for naught. But the narrative doesn’t end there.

It continues with a powerful promise: The Temple will be rebuilt, but this time, not by human hands, but by the hand of the Kadosh Baruch Hu, the Blessed Holy One himself. It's a radical shift.

The text then brings in verses from the Torah to support this idea. "The abode of the God of old," from (Deuteronomy 33:27), and "the sanctuary of Ha-Shem, Your hands have established," from (Exodus 15:17), hint at a divine involvement that transcends human construction. Ha-Shem, of course, is a way of referring to God that avoids saying the divine name directly.

And then, a powerful quote from (Haggai 2:9): "Great shall be the glory of this House, the latter more than the first.." This isn't just a restoration; it's a transformation. It's not just about rebuilding what was lost, but about creating something even more glorious, even more profound.

Finally, the text cites (Zechariah 2:9): "And I shall be for it, says Yud Yud, a wall of fire round about.." Yud Yud (י״י) is yet another way of referring to God's name. This verse paints a vivid image of divine protection, a Temple surrounded by a fiery, unbreachable barrier. It’s not just a physical structure anymore; it's a place of divine presence, shielded and sanctified.

So, what does this all mean? It’s not just about a building, is it? It's about the cyclical nature of creation and destruction, of hope and despair. It's about the promise that even when things fall apart, there's always the potential for something new, something better, something divinely inspired to rise from the ashes. Maybe the Temples are metaphors for something within each of us. The potential for destruction, but also the promise of an even grander, more glorious rebuilding.

Full source