4 min read

Ham Looked at Noah Naked and Would Not Cover Him

Wine put Noah on the tent floor. Ham looked and went to tell. His brothers walked in backward, a garment across both shoulders.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Garment on Two Shoulders
  2. The Curse That Missed Ham
  3. Heat That Would Not Cool
  4. Clothes for the Ones Who Covered

The ground was dry enough to plant. Noah set a vineyard, drank the wine, and lay uncovered inside his tent. Ham came in. He looked. He did not reach for a cloth. He went out and told his brothers what he had seen.

Ham Looked at Noah Naked and Would Not Cover Him Click for full size

The flood had ended. The world was open again. Wine was on the floor. His father slept without a covering. The look took what it wanted.

A Garment on Two Shoulders

Shem and Japheth took a garment. They laid it on both their shoulders so neither would act alone. They walked backward into the tent. Their faces stayed turned away. They covered their father without taking the look Ham had taken.

When Noah woke from the wine he understood what had been done to him. Shame sat in the tent with the empty cup. One son had stood over him and gone to talk. Two sons had refused the gaze and restored the cloth.

The Curse That Missed Ham

Noah could not curse Ham. God had already blessed Noah and his sons when they left the ark, and a human mouth cannot override that blessing. He cursed Canaan, Ham's youngest, the last-born son of the son that had prevented him from begetting a younger son.

"Cursed be Canaan. A servant of servants shall he be to his brothers" (Genesis 9:25).

The sin stayed on Ham. The sentence ran to the child. Canaan would carry what the father's heat had opened and the father's blessing had blocked.

Heat That Would Not Cool

Ham's name is Cham (חם), hot. In the tent that heat had moved first. He had come from a year of dark water in the ark. Desire did not wait for a question. It looked. It told. It uncovered what should have stayed covered, ervah (ערוה), the nakedness that is not for the eye. That heat is the yetzer hara (יצר הרע), the evil inclination, the same side as the primordial snake that heard "cursed are you of all beasts" (Genesis 3:14). Because Ham stood on that side, the curse ran to Canaan.

Shem and Japheth refused that heat. They did not consume what they saw. They covered. Their faces averted, the garment across both shoulders, they put back what Ham's seeing had pulled away. The kabbalistic model of desire is that hour in the tent: one gaze that takes, two backs that restore.

Clothes for the Ones Who Covered

The brothers who walked backward were given garments in return. Shem merited the tallit. Japheth merited the cloak. Garments would shelter their seed. When fire later took Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron from Shem's line, their clothes did not burn. When an angel's fire struck the camp of Sennacherib, sprung from Japheth, the burning sat under his glory, and the glory was the garment. Even Gog, in the last war, is granted a shroud in the Land of Israel.

Ham's line inherited the opposite. Egypt, his son, is pictured with buttocks uncovered, "to the shame of Egypt." Descendants led away captive, naked, exposed. The one who stripped a father is left without a covering. The ones who covered are clothed longer than their own lives.

Noah planted. He drank. He slept. One son looked. Two sons walked backward. The vineyard outlived the flood, and the heat in the tent outlived the man who would not cover his father.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Tikkunei Zohar 73:16Tikkunei Zohar

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sefaria-hosted English translation · CC-BY

It’s a universal struggle, and Jewish tradition has a lot to say about it. In fact, the Tikkunei (spiritual repair) Zohar, a central text of Kabbalah, dives deep into this very conflict.

In Tikkunei Zohar 73, the text tackles the idea of sexual obscenity, or ’ervah. It's not just about sex, though. It’s about the destructive power of unchecked desire and how it can lead us astray. The text connects this to Ḥam, one of Noah’s sons – Ḥam, whose name, interestingly, also means "hot." This "hotness," the text explains, represents the yetzer hara, the evil inclination. It's that little voice whispering temptations, "heating" the body towards transgression, or ’aveirah (a transgression).

Think of it like this: the yetzer hara is like a primordial snake, slithering through our lives, whispering doubts and desires. Remember the serpent in the Garden of Eden? The Tikkunei Zohar draws a direct line: "..cursed are you of all beasts.." (Gen. 3:14). And because Ḥam is linked to this "snake's side," Noah curses his son Canaan, saying, "..cursed is Canaan.." (Gen. 9:25). This isn't about condemning anyone, but about acknowledging the consequences of giving in to the darker impulses.

So, what's the antidote? How do we fight this inner struggle? Well, the Tikkunei Zohar suggests that acts of kindness and generosity are key. It speaks of "the masters of gifts," those who perform acts of kindness toward the Shekhinah, the divine feminine presence, who is considered to be "poor" in this context. Who is always there and needs our help.

These acts are described using verses from Deuteronomy: "..you shall surely open.." (Deut. 15:11), "..You shall surely give.." (Deut. 15:10), "..you shall surely bestow.." (Deut. 15:14). The text emphasizes that there are ten such acts. The Tikkunei Zohar tells us that "the companions have indeed established them, those who are the Masters of the Mishnah (the earliest code of rabbinic law)." In other words, this isn't some new-age invention. These principles are deeply rooted in Jewish tradition. (BT Baba Metzi'a 31b)

Why kindness? Because focusing on giving and helping others shifts our focus away from our own selfish desires. It re-orients us towards something larger than ourselves, reconnecting us to the divine.

The message of Tikkunei Zohar 73 is about recognizing the power of both good and evil within us. We all have the potential to succumb to our yetzer hara, but we also have the power to choose a different path – a path of generosity, kindness, and connection to something sacred. And that, perhaps, is the most powerful weapon we have in this constant, internal battle.

Full source
Midrash Aggadah, Genesis 9:23Midrash Aggadah

Translation of the source text.Midrash Aggadah (Buber), Public Domain, on Sefaria · CC-BY-SA

"And Shem and Japheth took" (Genesis 9:23). Therefore Shem merited the prayer-shawl (tallit) and Japheth the cloak (simlah). And for this reason the garments of Nadab and Abihu were not burned. And Sennacherib, who was of the descendants of the sons of Japheth, when the angel entered to burn them, did not burn their garments, as it is said, "And under his glory there shall be kindled a burning like the burning of fire" (Isaiah 10:16), and what is "his glory" but his garments, for they honor him. And "a garment rolled in blood" (Isaiah 9:4). Gog, who is of the descendants of Esau, of Japheth, He grants him burial in the Land of Israel; but Egypt, who is of the descendants of Ham, of them it is said, "and with buttocks uncovered, to the shame of Egypt" (Isaiah 20:4), because he saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside, and was mocking his father.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:77Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

The familiar story is this: Noah gets a little too happy with the grape juice after the flood, and..well, let's just say he wasn't dressed for the occasion. His son Ham sees him this way, and instead of helping, he makes fun of his father.

His other two sons, Shem and Japheth? They react completely differently. They grab a garment, and, walking backward so as not to gaze upon their father's nakedness, they respectfully cover him.

So, what happens next? According to Legends of the Jews, as retold by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, Ham pays a price for his disrespect. His descendants, the Egyptians and Ethiopians, are led away captive and into exile, naked and exposed. Ouch.

Shem and Japheth? They get rewarded. The descendants of Shem, the Assyrians, receive divine protection. Even when an angel of the Lord burns them in their camp, their garments remain unsinged.

And the blessings don't stop there. The story doesn’t end with just the immediate aftermath of Noah's... unfortunate episode. It stretches out into the future, even into the messianic age.

We're told that when Gog – a figure often associated with the end times and a great battle – suffers his defeat, God Himself will provide shrouds and burial places for him and his multitude, who are considered the posterity of Japheth. for a second. Even in defeat, even for the "bad guys," there's a measure of divine compassion and respect offered because of an ancestor’s act of kindness.

It's a powerful reminder that our actions, even the seemingly small ones, have ripples. They affect not only ourselves but also our descendants. And while punishment might seem harsh, the reward for respect and kindness can be incredibly far-reaching.

So, the next time you're faced with a choice – to mock or to help, to disrespect or to honor – remember the story of Noah and his sons. Remember the nakedness, the averted faces, and the unsinged garments. It might just give you the nudge you need to do the right thing. What do you think?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:75Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

It's a story of survival, new beginnings..and a rather unfortunate curse.

The familiar version gives us the tale: the great flood recedes, the ark rests on Mount Ararat, and Noah, his family, and all the animals disembark to repopulate the earth. A moment of profound hope. But then, things take a turn. Noah plants a vineyard, makes wine, and, well, gets drunk. In his inebriated state, he disrobes. His son, Ham, sees his father's nakedness and tells his brothers, Shem and Japheth. They, in turn, respectfully cover their father without looking at him.

When Noah awakens from his stupor, he learns what has transpired. And instead of directly cursing Ham, the perpetrator, he curses Ham's youngest son, Canaan.

Why Canaan? This is a question that has puzzled commentators for centuries. Ginzberg, in his Legends of the Jews, suggests that Noah couldn’t curse Ham directly because God had already blessed Noah and his sons as they left the ark. A divine blessing, it seems, is a powerful thing. So, Noah, unable to harm Ham himself, directs the curse at Canaan, "the last-born son of the son that had prevented him from begetting a younger son." Ouch.

But the story doesn't end there. The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), specifically Tanhuma Noah 13, goes into vivid detail about the alleged physical consequences of Ham's transgression. It says that the descendants of Ham through Canaan were cursed with specific physical traits: red eyes because Ham looked upon his father's nakedness; misshapen lips because he spoke about it; twisted, curly hair because he twisted his head to look; and nakedness because he didn't cover his father.

This idea of "measure for measure" – middah k’neged middah – is a recurring theme in Jewish thought. The way we act in the world, the tradition teaches, comes back to us. As we find in Midrash Rabbah, God's justice is precise and proportionate. Ham's disrespect, in this understanding, leads to a specific, tangible consequence for his descendants.

This story certainly raises a lot of questions. Is it a just curse? What does it say about inherited guilt? And how should we interpret these physical characteristics attributed to Canaan's descendants?

The tale of Noah's curse on Canaan is a complex one, steeped in questions of divine justice, familial responsibility, and the enduring impact of our actions.

Full source