Parshat Vayetzei5 min read

Issachar Was Born Because of a Bargain That Echoed the Garden

The mandrake bargain between Leah and Rachel repeated the pattern of Eden. The rabbis saw in Issachar a corrective to what the garden had broken.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. What Reuben Found in the Field
  2. The Garden in Miniature
  3. Issachar the Strong-Boned Donkey
  4. Singleness of Heart
  5. What the Patriarchs' Names Said About Issachar

What Reuben Found in the Field

Reuben was a child when he went out into the wheat fields during the harvest and found dudaim. The Hebrew word is usually translated as mandrakes, a plant whose roots resemble a human figure and which ancient tradition associated with fertility and desire. He brought them home to his mother Leah. Rachel, who had been watching from across the household, wanted them. She had everything Jacob's love could give her, but she had no children, and the mandrakes were associated with what she most lacked. She asked Leah for them.

Leah said: you have taken my husband. Now you will take my son's mandrakes too? Rachel answered with a bargain: give me the mandrakes, and Jacob will sleep in your tent tonight. Leah gave up the plants and gained the night. From that night came Issachar.

The Garden in Miniature

The rabbis in Bereshit Rabbah, the great midrashic commentary on Genesis compiled in the Land of Israel approximately in the fifth century CE, were drawn to the strangeness of the exchange. Something in the bargain over the mandrakes recalled the transaction in the garden that had changed the world: desire for a particular plant, an exchange between two figures who should have trusted each other more than they did, consequences neither of them fully anticipated at the moment of the trade. The garden gave the world mortality. The mandrake exchange gave the world a tribe.

Leah's willingness to trade what she had for what she wanted was not condemned. It was treated as a form of religious determination. Legends of the Jews records that God rewarded Leah specifically because she left no means untried in her pursuit of bringing all twelve tribes into the world. The Midrash does not describe her bargaining as shameful. It describes it as the expression of a woman who understood that the twelve sons of Jacob were not accidental, that each birth was a piece of a larger structure, and who pursued that structure with the intensity of someone who had seen the plan and intended to be part of it.

Issachar the Strong-Boned Donkey

Jacob's deathbed blessing of Issachar in Genesis 49 is striking. Issachar is a strong-boned donkey, lying between the sheepfolds. He saw rest, that it was good, and the land, that it was pleasant; and he bowed his shoulder to bear. A donkey. Not a lion, not an eagle, not a spreading vine. The rabbis of Bereshit Rabbah treat the comparison as praise rather than insult: as a donkey's bones are prominent, heavy, and built for endurance, so Issachar's strength was in carrying the weight of Torah scholarship across difficult terrain without stopping. His bones were designed for a load that would have broken a more delicate creature.

The three rows of Torah scholars who sat before the Sanhedrin, in the rabbinic reading, are encoded in the phrase lying between the sheepfolds. The scholars who bore the intellectual weight of the entire legal tradition across generations were the tribe that grew from the mandrake bargain, from the night Leah traded a plant for her husband's attention and produced the man whose descendants would carry the Torah on their bones.

Singleness of Heart

Legends of the Jews describes Issachar's character as defined by what it calls singleness of heart. He was not complicated. He was not ambitious for power or wealth or reputation. He knew what he was for, and he did it without distraction. The sons whose names carry this simplicity forward: Tola, meaning worm, which the Midrash reads as the silkworm that produces its thread from its own mouth, and Puvah, whose name the tradition connects to the wisdom that speaks. The tribe of scholars who came from Issachar was not prestigious in the way the warriors and kings of other tribes were prestigious. Their strength was the kind that goes unremarked, the kind that holds the weight of accumulated knowledge and keeps it from falling when generations pass and memories fade.

What the Patriarchs' Names Said About Issachar

The sons of Issachar had names that the rabbinic tradition treated as self-interpreting prophecies. Legends of the Jews notes that the names of his descendants were read as encoding the character of the men who would come from him: men whose learning was visible in everything they said, whose scholarship came out of them the way silk comes out of a worm's mouth, naturally and continuously and in a form that others could use. The tribe born from a plant bargained for in a field became the tribe whose mouths shaped the oral tradition that kept the written Torah alive through every generation that followed.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 98:12Bereshit Rabbah

It wasn't just a simple story; it was a portal to layers of meaning, hidden connections, and profound insights. Take Jacob's blessing to his son Issachar in (Genesis 49:14-15): “Issachar is a strong-boned donkey, lying between the sheepfolds. He saw rest, that it was good, and the land, that it was pleasant; and he bowed his shoulder to bear, and he became subject to a tribute of labor.” Sounds straightforward.

"Issachar is a strong-boned donkey" – the rabbis of the Bereshit Rabbah immediately jump on that image. Just as a donkey's bones are prominent, so too, they say, was Issachar's learning obvious for all to see. Their knowledge shone through them. “Lying between the sheepfolds” – this, according to the Rabbah, refers to the three rows of Torah scholars who would sit before the Sanhedrin, the ancient Jewish high court, when they deliberated. Imagine the scene: rows upon rows of brilliant minds, all dedicated to understanding and interpreting the Law.

What about the phrase, “He saw rest, that it was good”? Here, the Bereshit Rabbah equates "rest" with the Torah itself, referencing (Proverbs 4:2), “For a good lesson I have given you; [My Torah]." The Torah is the ultimate source of rest, of spiritual fulfillment. "And the land, that it was pleasant" – this too, is the Torah, echoing (Job 11:9): "]Its measure is] longer than the earth…" The Torah's wisdom is boundless, stretching beyond earthly limits.

“He bent his shoulder to bear” – this is the yoke of Torah, the commitment to studying and living by its teachings. “And he became subject to a tribute of labor” – this, the Rabbah says, refers to the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin who came from the tribe of Issachar. What a powerhouse of legal and spiritual authority!

But wait, there's more! The Bereshit Rabbah offers another interpretation, focusing on the land of Issachar. Just as a donkey is low on either end and high in the middle, so too, the land of Issachar had valleys on either side and a mountain – Mount Tavor – in the middle. “Lying between the sheepfolds” – these are two valleys, the Valley of Pislan and the Valley of Yizre’el. “He saw rest, that it was good” – this is Tinam, a town on the border of Issachar. “And the land, that it was pleasant [na’ema]” – this is Na’im, another town nearby. It’s like the rabbis are painting a geographical portrait alongside a spiritual one.

“He bent his shoulder to bear” – now it's the yoke of the Land of Israel, the responsibility of settling and cultivating the land, fulfilling the mitzvot (commandments) associated with it. “He became subject to a tribute [mas] of labor” – here we get a fascinating disagreement between Rabbi Elazar and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman. Rabbi Elazar says that unlike other tribes, Issachar didn't leave any remnants of the Canaanite nations in their territory. They were thorough in their conquest. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman counters that Issachar did leave remnants, but these remnants were payers of taxes [misim]. Rav Asi adds that because they paid taxes, it was as though they were subjugated. A complex picture of power, responsibility, and compromise.

Finally, the Bereshit Rabbah offers one more intriguing perspective: “Issachar is a strong-boned donkey” – the cows of Issachar were fat and plentiful! The tribe would take them out to sea, and the nations of the world would be amazed by their size. But the Israelites would say, "You're amazed by these cows? You should see the owners of these cows when they're engaged in Torah study!" This led to many proselytes converting to Judaism.

And Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon, in the name of Rav Aḥa, adds a playful twist: “Issachar is a strong-boned [garem] donkey” – Issachar, a donkey caused his existence [legarmeih]! This refers to the story of Leah and Rachel, where Leah gave Rachel mandrakes in exchange for a night with Jacob. How did Leah know when Jacob was coming home? She heard his donkey braying! That night, Leah conceived Issachar. (see Bereshit Rabba 99:10)

What do we take away from all this? The rabbis of the Bereshit Rabbah saw in Jacob's blessing a multi-layered prophecy. It was about Issachar's dedication to Torah study, the richness of their land, their role in the Sanhedrin, and even the circumstances of Issachar's conception. It's a reminder that the Torah is not just a text to be read, but a world to be explored, a source of endless wisdom and inspiration. It's a evidence of the power of interpretation, the beauty of tradition, and the enduring relevance of ancient texts. What layers of meaning might you find within these verses?

Full source
Legends of the Jews, II. The Sons Of Jacob, Issachar's Singleness Of HeartLegends of the Jews

The familiar telling remembers the big names – Abraham, Moses, David. But what about the seemingly quieter figures, the ones whose stories whisper rather than shout? the life of Issachar, one of Jacob's twelve sons.

His story, as recounted in Ginzberg’s Legends of the Jews, isn’t one of dramatic battles or prophetic pronouncements. Instead, it’s a story of simplicity, of integrity, and of a "singleness of heart" that earned him divine favor.

Issachar’s very birth is intertwined with a fascinating tale. Remember the dudaim? Those "fragrant apples" (some say mandrakes) that Reuben, Leah's son, found in the field? The story goes that Rachel, Jacob's beloved but barren wife, desperately wanted them. Leah, in exchange for letting Rachel have them, bargained for a night with Jacob. As the story goes, she felt that since she was already married to Jacob, she was entitled to his attention. "Jacob is mine, and I am the wife of his youth!" she exclaimed (Ginzberg referencing the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary)). And so, Leah conceived Issachar.

In Ginzberg's retelling, an angel appeared to Jacob and explained that Rachel would only have two sons, because she chose continence, while Leah would bear six, because she desired to be with her husband, not because of evil inclination, but for the sake of children. Rachel did not even eat the dudaim, but put them in the house of the Lord, and gave them to the priest.

Later in life, Issachar followed a simple path: tilling the land, bringing the first fruits to the priest, and then sharing the rest with his family and the needy. He married late, at thirty years old, because his hard work consumed his strength. His father, Jacob, recognized his yosher lev – his "singleness of heart" – and blessed him. Why? Because Issachar’s sincerity was so complete that God aided him.

As Issachar felt his end approaching, he gathered his sons and imparted his wisdom. His message? Embrace simplicity. Shun greed. Avoid envy and lust. Focus on honest labor and acts of kindness. "Walk in singleness of heart," he urged them, "for upon it resteth the favor of the Lord at all times." He contrasts this with a warning about the future. A future where his descendants would abandon probity, pursue craftiness, and forsake the commandments of the Lord, as Ginzberg draws from tradition.

Issachar's final testament is a powerful declaration of his own blamelessness. "I am one hundred and twenty-two years old," he proclaims, "and I can discern no sin in myself." He had no relations with a woman save his wife, he avoided wine to prevent being led astray, and he never coveted what belonged to another. He loved the Lord with all his might and loved mankind as well.

He instructed his sons to bury him in the Cave of Machpelah in Hebron, alongside his forefathers. He then passed away peacefully, full of years and in possession of all his faculties.

What can we learn from Issachar's life? Perhaps it's a reminder that holiness isn't always about grand gestures or extraordinary feats. Sometimes, it's found in the quiet moments, in the simple acts of kindness, and in the unwavering commitment to integrity.

Issachar’s life challenges us to examine our own hearts. Are we striving for that "singleness of heart?" Are we cultivating simplicity in a world that constantly demands complexity? It’s a question worth pondering, isn’t it? A question that might just lead us closer to the divine favor that Issachar so beautifully embodied.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:141Legends of the Jews

A reader can skim over names and births, but hidden in those details are tales of longing, rivalry, and divine intervention. Take the story of Issachar, Jacob's son. His very name, meaning "a reward," hints at the complex emotions swirling around his arrival.

It was Leah, once again, who gave birth. But why her? This was a reward from God. A reward for what, you might ask? For her deep, pious desire to bring all twelve tribes into the world. Leah wasn't just passively accepting her fate; she was actively working toward this sacred goal, leaving "no means untried."

The real drama unfolds with a little help from some dudaim. What are dudaim, you ask? The text refers to them as plants, and the story goes that Reuben, Leah's eldest, stumbled upon them while tending his father's donkey during the harvest. He tied the donkey to a root of these dudaim, but when he returned, a tragic scene awaited him: the donkey was dead, and the dudaim were uprooted. Apparently, this wasn’t just any plant. There was a deadly secret, a peculiar quality – whoever uprooted it was destined to die.

Reuben being a good son, didn't keep the potentially dangerous plant for himself. Instead, he brought it home to his mother, Leah. This is where things get interesting. Rachel, Jacob's beloved but previously barren wife, desired the dudaim. Perhaps she believed they held the key to conceiving. She asked Leah for the plant.

Leah, in a shrewd move, agreed to give Rachel the dudaim, but on one condition: that Jacob would spend the night with her. Talk about bartering!

The text doesn't shy away from judging Rachel's actions. It states plainly that it was "altogether unbecoming conduct" to trade her husband's affections. The consequence? According to this tradition, she might have lost two tribes because of it. Had she acted differently, she could have borne four sons instead of two. This idea that our actions, even seemingly small ones, can have profound repercussions is a recurring theme in Jewish thought.

And the consequences didn't end there. The narrative suggests a further punishment: Rachel was not permitted to rest in the grave beside her husband. A poignant and lasting separation.

So, what do we make of all this? It's a story filled with human desires, divine rewards, and earthly consequences. It reminds us that even in the interplay of biblical narratives, the personal struggles and choices of individuals can shape the course of history. And it leaves us pondering: what seemingly small choices are we making today that might have unforeseen consequences tomorrow?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 2:4Legends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews turns to Issachar and the Patriarchs.

Issachar is often associated with learning, with scholarship. But did you know that the names of his sons themselves reflect this scholarly bent? It’s pretty remarkable, actually. In the ancient world, names weren't just labels. They were prophecies, blessings, and insights all rolled into one. And when we explore the meanings behind the names of Issachar’s sons, a fascinating picture emerges.

Tola means "worm." A worm? What does that have to do with learning? Well, according to this midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) interpretation, the silk worm is special because of its mouth. It spins silk with its mouth. Similarly, the men of Issachar are known for the wisdom that comes from their mouths. Makes you think differently about worms, doesn't it?

Next up is Puah, which means "madder plant." Now, the madder plant was used to make dye. The idea here is that, just as the madder plant colors everything it touches, the tribe of Issachar colors the whole world with its teachings. (Legends of the Jews). Their knowledge, their wisdom, permeates everything.

Then there's Jashub. Jashub means "the returning one." This one's particularly poignant. The idea is that through the teachings of Issachar, Israel will be turned back to its Heavenly Father. It implies a role of repentance and spiritual return, all stemming from the wisdom of this tribe. What a responsibility!

And finally, we have Shimron. Shimron means "the observing one." Simple and direct, this name indicates that the tribe of Issachar observes the Torah, lives by its laws, and embodies its teachings.

It's incredible, isn't it? Each name, a tiny window into the soul of a tribe, revealing its purpose and its connection to the divine. We see this kind of intricate name-play throughout Jewish tradition – a constant reminder that words have power and meaning is never accidental. So the next time you encounter a name in the Torah, maybe take a moment to consider what hidden depths might lie beneath the surface. You never know what secrets you might uncover.

Full source