4 min read

Joshua Kept His Oath to People Who Tricked Him

The Gibeonites posed as travelers from far away to trick Joshua into a covenant. He honored it anyway, to show what an oath meant to Israel.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Performance at the Gate
  2. Why Joshua Kept the Oath
  3. What the Gibeonites Became
  4. What Saul Later Broke

The Performance at the Gate

The Gibeonites had prepared everything in advance. The worn sandals. The moldy bread. The cracked wineskins that looked like they had been filled and emptied a dozen times on a long journey. They arrived at Joshua's camp dressed as travelers from a distant country, and they told him they had heard of the God of Israel and had come from far away to make peace. The performance was careful and convincing.

Joshua made a covenant with them. He swore an oath in God's name that he would not harm them. The princes of Israel swore along with him.

Three days later, Israel discovered that the Gibeonites were their neighbors, one of the nations of Canaan that the conquest proclamation had already addressed. The worn sandals had been deliberately scuffed. The bread had been fresh that morning when they left. The evidence of a long journey had been manufactured in the hours before the meeting. Everything was fabricated.

Why Joshua Kept the Oath

The people of Israel were furious. They had followed Joshua across the Jordan, through Jericho and Ai, through weeks of hard campaigning. They had accepted real risk. Now they discovered their commander had bound the entire nation to protect a city of people who had manipulated their way under that protection through theater. The popular pressure to simply nullify the covenant on grounds of fraud was substantial.

Joshua kept his word anyway. The tradition is unambiguous about his reasoning: the oath had been sworn in God's name. The fact that the Gibeonites had not deserved it was irrelevant to the weight of the oath. An oath sworn in God's name is not conditioned on the worthiness of its recipient. It is conditioned only on the character of the one who swore it. Joshua had sworn. The oath stood.

What the Gibeonites Became

Joshua did not make them equals. He gathered the Gibeonites before him and told them what their deception had cost. They would be servants to the community, hewers of wood and drawers of water for the altar and the sanctuary. The covenant would protect their lives but not their status. They had come in through a back door and would live accordingly, occupying the spaces that servants occupied, performing the labor that made the sanctuary function but receiving no share in the honor of it.

The Gibeonites accepted these terms. They had obtained protection from someone they had deceived. They were in no position to negotiate dignity as well. The tradition notes that they became the Nethinim, the temple servants, whose descendants served in the sanctuary for generations. The deception had worked in the narrow sense: they survived. But it had also determined the shape of every generation after them.

What Saul Later Broke

Centuries after Joshua, King Saul violated the oath. The tradition does not record a dramatic moment of renunciation. Saul's break with the Gibeonites happened incrementally, through a policy of pressure and displacement that eventually became outright violence. He killed some of them. He drove others from their settlements. He treated a sworn covenant as an inconvenient arrangement made by a previous generation that a current king had the authority to revoke.

The consequences arrived after Saul's death, during David's reign. Famine struck Israel for three years. David inquired and received the answer directly: the famine was a consequence of Saul's broken oath. God does not forget what was sworn in His name, even when the king who broke the oath is dead. David went to the surviving Gibeonites and asked what would satisfy them. They named their terms. David honored them. The famine ended.

The tradition placed this account beside Joshua's original oath deliberately. Joshua honored what he had sworn to people who had tricked him, and Israel prospered. Saul violated what his predecessor had sworn, and Israel starved. The chain of consequence ran across three centuries.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 1:15Legends of the Jews

The Gibeonites were a Canaanite group who cleverly tricked Joshua into making a covenant with them. They knew the Israelites were conquering the land, and so they pretended to be travelers from a distant country, thereby getting Joshua to swear an oath to protect them.

Here's the thing: Joshua and the Israelites soon discovered the ruse! They realized the Gibeonites were actually their neighbors, people they were supposed to drive out of the land. So, what do you do?

Well, Joshua, bound by his oath, kept his word. He spared the Gibeonites, but relegated them to being servants. According to Legends of the Jews, Joshua kept his promise to them, "in order to sanctify the name of God, by showing the world how sacred an oath is to the Israelites." It was all about upholding the sanctity of an oath, showing the world that the Israelites honored their commitments, even when based on deception. It wasn't about liking the Gibeonites, or even thinking they deserved mercy. It was about something bigger: the reputation of the Israelite people, and ultimately, the name of God.

The story doesn't end there. As time went on, it became clear that the Gibeonites weren't exactly model citizens. They weren't worthy of being fully integrated into the Jewish community. So, King David, following Joshua's lead in a way, took a further step. He permanently excluded them.

And here’s the kicker: this exclusion, according to the tradition, wasn’t just for David's time. It was forever! "A sentence that will remain in force even in the Messianic time," Ginzberg tells us in Legends of the Jews. Even in the idealized future, the Gibeonites would remain separate.

What does this all mean? It seems like it's a complex dance between justice, mercy, and the absolute importance of keeping one's word. It raises some profound questions: What do we do when we realize we've made a mistake? How do we balance the needs of the present with the promises of the past? And how do we ensure that our actions reflect the values we claim to hold dear? These are questions that continue to resonate today.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:17Legends of the Jews

The story of Joshua and the Gibeonites is a powerful lesson in just that. Joshua, successor to Moses, found himself in a bit of a quandary. He'd made an alliance with the Gibeonites, a people who weren't exactly on anyone's "most trustworthy" list. They'd secured this treaty through trickery, pretending to be from a far-off land to avoid being slaughtered like the other Canaanite tribes (Joshua 9).

So, what did Joshua do when the Gibeonites were attacked? He hesitated. He really did. As Ginzberg tells us in Legends of the Jews, Joshua wasn't sure if he should come to their aid. After all, they’d deceived him!

Then, God spoke. The message? Profound. "If thou dost not bring near them that are far off, thou wilt remove them that are near by." It's a bit cryptic, isn't it? What it means is this: neglecting your obligations to those who are distant, even if they aren't the most deserving, can ultimately undermine your relationships with those who are close. Your integrity, once compromised, is hard to repair.

That was enough for Joshua. Duty called, and he answered.

And here's where the story gets truly epic.

God, it seems, was pretty pleased with Joshua's decision. In fact, He granted Joshua a few extraordinary favors in this conflict. Remember those hailstones that Moses held back during the plagues in Egypt? The ones ready to fall upon the Egyptians? According to the ancient stories, they were still hanging up there, waiting. Now, they were unleashed upon the Canaanites attacking the Gibeonites! Talk about divine intervention!

But the real showstopper? The sun standing still. Yes, you read that right. The sun. Stopped. In the sky.

The Zohar, the foundational text of Jewish mysticism, speaks of great wonders that have occurred since the creation of the world. And this, the sun standing still, was considered the sixth of these monumental events. Imagine the scene! A battle raging, and the sun just… pauses. Time seemingly suspended.

Why? So that Joshua and his army could complete their victory. So they could fulfill their oath to protect the Gibeonites.

It's a reminder that keeping our promises, even the ones we regret making, can lead to the miraculous. That sometimes, doing the right thing, even when it's hard, opens the door to something truly extraordinary.

What promises are you struggling to keep today? What "Gibeonites" are you hesitant to defend? Maybe, just maybe, this ancient story can offer a little bit of courage, a little bit of faith, and a whole lot of perspective.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:73Legends of the Jews

The story revolves around a famine in Israel, a famine attributed to King Saul's transgression against the Gibeonites. long ago, Joshua had made a pact with the Gibeonites, promising to protect them. But Saul, in his zeal, had broken that promise, attempting to exterminate them. And now, years later, the land was suffering.

So, what to do? How do you appease not only the Gibeonites, but also, seemingly, God himself? The answer, as relayed in II Samuel 21, is a grim one: the surrender of seven of Saul's descendants to the Gibeonites, who would then execute them.

How exactly were these seven individuals chosen? According to the Legends of the Jews, as retold by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, a rather. unique method was employed. All of Saul's descendants were made to pass before the Aron Hakodesh (Ark of the Law), the sacred chest containing the luchot (tablets) of the Ten Commandments. Those who were "arrested" before it, meaning, those who couldn't pass, were deemed the designated victims.

The scene: each member of Saul's lineage, walking past this powerful symbol of God's law, their fate hanging in the balance. A moment of terrifying suspense.

Mephibosheth, Jonathan's son and Saul's grandson, was almost among those chosen. But here's where the narrative takes a slight turn, highlighting the power of prayer and loyalty. David, who had a deep bond with Jonathan, prayed that Mephibosheth be spared. And, according to the Legends, his prayer was answered. Mephibosheth was allowed to pass by the Ark unchecked.

But why was David's prayer so effective? Ginzberg suggests an additional reason: Mephibosheth wasn't just the son of David's friend; he was also David's teacher, instructing him in the Torah. This adds another layer to their relationship, emphasizing the respect and affection David held for him.

It's a dark and disturbing episode, no doubt. The execution of Saul's descendants is a harsh reminder of the consequences of broken promises and the complexities of divine justice. But according to the Legends, this grim act had an unexpected, positive outcome.

The heathen, witnessing this act of atonement, were deeply moved. "There is no God like unto the God of Israel," they exclaimed, "there is no nation like unto the nation of Israel; the wrong inflicted upon wretched proselytes has been expiated by the sons of kings." This display of Jewish justice, however severe, inspired awe and admiration.

The Legends go on to state that this event led to the conversion of one hundred and fifty thousand heathens to Judaism. A staggering number! It seems that even in the face of tragedy, the Jewish commitment to justice, however difficult, could inspire and transform.

What are we to make of this story? It’s a challenging one, forcing us to confront difficult questions about collective responsibility, the nature of justice, and the long shadow of the past. Can an act of violence, even one intended to atone for past sins, truly bring about a positive outcome? And can genuine faith truly emerge from the darkest of circumstances? Perhaps the story invites us to consider how we, too, confront the complexities of justice in our own lives and in the world around us.

Full source