Parshat Devarim6 min read

The Rephaim Stood at Israel's Border and Would Not Move

Giants marked the edge of the promised land, and Jewish sources remember them as bodies shaped from the deepest human fear of what waits ahead.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Og Made the Land Feel Impossible
  2. Shemhazai's Giants and the Flood They Survived
  3. Why the Rephaim Would Not Rise
  4. Esau's Land and the Border the Giants Held

Og of Bashan did not need to do anything to be dangerous. He only had to be where he was.

Sifrei Devarim, the tannaitic midrash on Deuteronomy shaped in the early centuries of the Common Era, reads the verse about Og and his fortress city Ashteroth together as a pair. The text explains that each element doubled the threat. Og in a different city would be formidable but approachable. Any lesser king in Ashteroth would have been terrifying because of the walls and history of that place. Together, the king and the city created something that pure military calculation could not adequately answer. Israel had a divine promise. Israel also had to look at what stood in front of that promise and decide whether the promise was strong enough to move their feet forward.

Og Made the Land Feel Impossible

The Rephaim enter Jewish memory as bodies large enough to turn promise into panic. They are not simply large men. They are the visible shape of inherited dread, the reason that generations before Israel had looked at the same terrain and turned back. Their name in Hebrew carries a weight the text exploits deliberately. The Rephaim are associated with the dead, with shadows, with things that should have ended but did not. Og is a remnant of them, a leftover of the old world that keeps surviving into the new one.

That is what makes him mythologically significant rather than merely historically inconvenient. He is a man who should have died in the flood. Rabbinic tradition, drawing on his enormous bedstead described in Deuteronomy (3:11), suggests Og survived the flood by riding on the outside of Noah's ark, clinging to the wood. He outlasted the judgment that was supposed to end his kind. By the time Israel reaches the promised land, they are facing someone who has already survived one divine verdict against the old world. The ordinary categories of war do not quite apply.

Shemhazai's Giants and the Flood They Survived

The Rephaim do not arrive from nowhere. They trace back, in the tradition, to the Watchers who descended to earth before the flood. Shemhazai led a group of heavenly beings who came down to the human world, took wives, and fathered enormous children. These children, the Nephilim and their descendants, filled the earth with violence and consumed everything the land could produce. God brought the flood in part because of what these giants had done to creation.

But giants are hard to finish completely. Shemhazai himself repented and hangs suspended between heaven and earth to this day as a kind of living monument to his transgression. Azazel, who did not repent, is buried in the desert with chains binding him until the final accounting. Their offspring, or the lines descended from hybrid unions, kept appearing in the narratives long after the flood was supposed to have ended them. Og may have been one of these survivors. The tradition does not require a clean genealogy. It requires the sight of something ancient and wrong standing in Israel's path.

Why the Rephaim Would Not Rise

Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, a midrashic compilation from around the eighth century CE, preserves a stark pronouncement about the resurrection. Rabbi Yochanan teaches that not everyone who dies will be raised. The wicked of the nations of the world will not stand at the final judgment. The Rephaim are among those who will remain in their graves when the righteous of Israel rise to life. The giants who towered over human history will have no final reversal. Their size in this world will not translate into presence in the world to come.

That judgment has a theological logic. The Rephaim represent the excess of the old world, a time when physical power was treated as its own justification. The world to come has a different measure. What the Rephaim embodied, the overwhelming of ordinary human proportion, is exactly what will not be relevant when the time comes to stand before God. The graves that hold them will not open. They made fear physical in this world. They will not be part of the world where fear is replaced.

Esau's Land and the Border the Giants Held

The tradition extends to geography as well as genealogy. Targum Jonathan on Deuteronomy 2 explains why Israel could not take Esau's land even though Israel carried a divine mandate to inherit. The answer is not military. It is ethical. Esau honored his father Isaac, and that act of honoring earned Esau's descendants an eternal land grant. The same logic protects Moab and Ammon, whose ancestors were the sons of Lot. God's grants do not expire because a more powerful nation arrives with a competing claim.

The Rephaim who lived in those territories mattered for different reasons. They gave the landscape its reputation for difficulty and danger. Israel had to navigate between the permitted and the forbidden, the land God was giving and the land God was protecting for others, while enormous ancestral enemies marked the edges. The border was not only military. It was a map of covenants, and the giants stood at the crossings where those covenants touched.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Sifrei Devarim 4:1Sifrei Devarim

Take the story of Og, King of Bashan. We find him mentioned in the book of Devarim (Deuteronomy). Now, Og wasn't just any king; he was a giant, a remnant of the Rephaim, a race of giants whose very name inspires awe. The Sifrei Devarim, an early rabbinic commentary on Deuteronomy, points out something crucial about the verse "and Og the king of Bashan, who dwelt in Ashteroth." It wasn’t just Og himself that made him formidable, but also the place he inhabited, Ashteroth.

The commentary explains: Even if Og wasn't so intimidating, living in Ashteroth would have made defeating him a challenge, because the land itself was formidable. And even if the land wasn't so difficult, Og's fearsome reputation as king would have been enough. But the reality? Both the king and the land were incredibly intimidating! Ashteroth, And Edrei was the very site of the war!: A giant king, in a fortified city, known for its strength.

This reminds us that sometimes, the challenge isn't just one thing, but a combination of factors that amplify the difficulty. Overcoming such odds makes the victory all the more meaningful.

Let’s shift our focus slightly. The book of Devarim opens with Moses beginning to explain the Torah "Across the Jordan, in the land of Moav." But the Hebrew word used for "began" here is ho'il. What does ho'il really mean?

The verse says, "Across the Jordan, in the land of Moav, Moses ho'il (began) to explain." The Sifrei Devarim explores the meaning of ho'il. On one hand, ho'alah means "beginning," just like in the Book of Judges where it says, "Begin (hoel) now and stay overnight so that you will be refreshed," or in Chronicles, "and now you have begun (hoalta) to bless the house of your servant." So in this sense, Moses is beginning to explain the Torah.

But the sages offer another, equally valid interpretation: that ho'alah also means "swearing," like in Exodus, "And Moses swore (vayoel) to remain with the man," or in Samuel, "And Saul beswore (vayoel) the people." In this understanding, Moses isn't just starting to explain, but is making a solemn declaration, almost like he's swearing an oath as he begins to teach the Torah.

Isn't that fascinating? The very first word describing Moses's teaching is layered with meaning, hinting at both a fresh start and a deep commitment.

Perhaps, then, every new beginning requires not just action, but a sense of solemn dedication. A recognition of the weight and importance of what we are undertaking. Just like facing Og in his formidable city, or like Moses beginning to teach the Torah, we too must approach our challenges with both courage and commitment, understanding that the greatest victories often come from overcoming the most daunting obstacles.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:16Legends of the Jews

We've heard tales of Watchers, haven't we? The ones who dared to defy the divine. One such story revolves around Shemhazai. He, along with others, rebelled and descended to Earth. But Shemhazai eventually repented. Can you picture it? As the legends tell us, he hangs suspended between heaven and earth to this very day, a constant reminder of his transgression.

What about Azazel? He wasn't quite as keen on repentance. He persisted in leading humanity astray, tempting them with earthly desires. This is why, according to tradition, two goats were sacrificed on Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. One was for God, asking for forgiveness for Israel's sins. The other? That goat was for Azazel, symbolically bearing the weight of those sins. A powerful image, isn't it?

Not all temptations came from rebellious angels. Naamah, the sister of Tubal-cain, possessed a beauty so potent that, unlike the pious Istehar, she allegedly led angels astray herself! From her union with Shamdon, the legends say, sprang Asmodeus, a powerful demon. The Zohar tells us that the descendants of Cain, Naamah included, were known for their lack of shame and their indulgence in all sorts of depravities.

In Ginzberg's retelling in, Legends of the Jews, both the men and women of Cain's line walked around naked and engaged in lewd practices. It was the beauty and sensuality of these women that tempted the angels from their righteous path. These weren't just passive victims,!

But the angels weren't without their own transformations either. Once they rebelled and descended to Earth, they lost their celestial qualities. They became embodied, making unions with the daughters of men possible. And what came of these unions? Giants.

These weren't just any giants, though. They were known for their immense strength and, crucially, for their sinfulness. They had many names, each reflecting a different aspect of their nature. They were called the Emim, a name that suggests they inspired fear.

They were also known as the Rephaim, because, as the legends say, just one look at them could make your heart grow weak. Or the Gibborim, simply "giants," emphasizing their enormous size – some accounts even claiming their thigh measured eighteen ells! Midrash Rabbah mentions the Zamzummim, acknowledging them as great masters in war. The Anakim, were said to be so tall that they could touch the sun with their necks! Then there were the Ivvim, who, like the snake, possessed a keen understanding of the land.

And finally, perhaps the most well-known name: the Nephilim. This name carries a heavy weight, suggesting that they brought about the world's downfall, and ultimately fell themselves. Quite a legacy, isn't it?

So, what do we take away from these stories? They offer a glimpse into a world where the boundaries between heaven and earth are blurred, where angels can fall and humans can tempt, and where the consequences of sin are felt on a cosmic scale. They remind us that the struggle between good and evil is not just an abstract concept, but a very real and ongoing battle, both within ourselves and in the world around us. And maybe, just maybe, they encourage us to reflect on our own choices and the paths we choose to walk.

Full source
Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 34:2Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer

The Jewish tradition wrestles with this question, and some of the answers… well, they’re to one particularly fascinating and, frankly, a little scary passage from Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, Chapter 34. This text, a compilation of stories and interpretations from around the 8th century CE, deals with some big themes: resurrection, judgment, and the ultimate fate of souls.

Rabbi Jochanan, a prominent sage of the Talmudic period, makes a stark pronouncement. He says that everyone will be resurrected at the time of the techiyat ha-metim (תחיית המתים), the resurrection of the dead… except for one particularly awful group: the generation of the Flood. Everyone else gets a shot at redemption, a chance to face judgment, but not them. Why?

Rabbi Jochanan bases his argument on a verse from (Isaiah 26:14): "The dead shall not live, the deceased (Rephaim) shall not rise." Now, who exactly are the "dead" and the "Rephaim?"

The passage explains that "the dead who shall not live" refers to the heathens, the non-believers, who are likened to carcasses of cattle. Strong words! These individuals, while not ideal, will be resurrected for the Day of Judgment. They get their chance to answer for their actions. But the generation of the Flood? They are the Rephaim, and according to this interpretation, they will not rise, not even for judgment.

So, what's so uniquely terrible about the generation of the Flood? What did they do to earn this ultimate exclusion? Well, the Torah tells us they filled the earth with violence and corruption (Genesis 6:11-13). It was so bad that God regretted creating humanity and decided to wipe the slate clean with the Flood. But this passage suggests their punishment extends even beyond physical destruction.

Here's where it gets even more unsettling. The text continues, saying that the souls of the generation of the Flood become winds – accursed winds that injure the sons of men. Think of them as malevolent spirits, forever seeking to cause harm. And, ultimately, in the future world, the Holy One, blessed be He, will destroy them completely, so they can't harm even a single Israelite. This final destruction is also supported by (Isaiah 26:14), "Therefore hast thou visited and destroyed them, and made all their memory to perish."

Wow.

This isn’t just about punishment; it’s about complete erasure. It’s about removing a source of evil from the world, not just physically, but spiritually. The idea that souls can become malevolent forces is a powerful and disturbing one. It speaks to the enduring consequences of our actions, and the potential for evil to persist even beyond death.

What are we to make of this? Is it meant to be taken literally? Perhaps. Or maybe it's a powerful metaphor for the enduring impact of extreme wickedness. It reminds us that our actions have consequences, not just for ourselves, but for the world around us, and perhaps, according to this passage, even for the spiritual realms. It's a chilling reminder of the importance of striving for good, and the potential for our choices to leave a lasting, even eternal, mark.

Full source
Targum Jonathan on Deuteronomy 2Targum Jonathan

The Targum Jonathan on (Deuteronomy 2) adds a theological bombshell that the Hebrew text only hints at. God commands Israel not to touch the land of Esau, not because of a treaty or military risk, but "on account of the honour which he did unto his father." Esau's reward for honoring Isaac is an eternal land grant. The Aramaic translators turned a brief command into a lesson about the power of honoring parents.

The same logic extends to Moab and Ammon. Israel cannot take their land either, because God gave it to the children of Lot. And the Targum specifies that Ammon's protection comes "for the sake of Abraham's righteousness." Lot's descendants inherit land not through their own merit but through their ancestor's connection to Abraham. Merit, in the Targum's theology, is transferable across generations.

The chapter is haunted by giants. The Targum identifies the Emthanaia, the Emethanee, and the Zimthanee, all local names for the same terrifying race. It adds that these giants "perished in the Flood," linking them directly to the antediluvian Nephilim of (Genesis 6). The Hebrew text calls them Rephaim and moves on. The Targum wants you to know these were the descendants of the beings who provoked God to drown the world.

When Israel finally faces Sihon king of Heshbon, the Targum adds a cosmic detail to explain the terror Israel inspired. The nations were afraid because "the sun and moon had stood still and ceased from speaking their song for the space of a day and a half." This references Joshua's miracle at Gibeon. But the Targum says the celestial bodies stopped singing. In Aramaic theology, the sun and moon praise God continuously, and their silence was the most terrifying omen imaginable.

Sihon refused to let Israel pass because "the Lord had hardened the form of his spirit." The Targum echoes the Pharaoh pattern. God hardens the hearts of those already destined for destruction.

Full source