6 min read

Saul, Joseph, and Moses Were Three Leaders Chosen Against Their Will

Moses refused the burning bush. Joseph was thrown in a pit. Saul hid among the baggage. Three men chosen against their will by God.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Burning Bush and the Man Who Would Not Go
  2. The Man Who Did Not Volunteer for Egypt
  3. The King Found Among the Baggage
  4. Samuel's Ghost and the Shape of Saul's End

The Burning Bush and the Man Who Would Not Go

Moses was in the middle of Midian, herding sheep that were not his, when the bush appeared. He had been in Midian for forty years. He had fled Egypt as a fugitive after killing an Egyptian taskmaster, had married Zipporah, had a son, had settled into the rhythms of someone who intended to stay settled. He was eighty years old. The bush caught fire and did not burn, and God spoke from the fire, and what God said was: go back to Egypt.

Moses proposed every alternative he could think of. He said: who am I to go to Pharaoh? He said: what is Your name, so I can tell the people who sent me? He said: they will not believe me. He said: I am not a man of words, I am heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue. He said: please send the message by the hand of whomever You will send.

That last one drew a rebuke. God told Moses that his brother Aaron would speak for him, that the words would be provided, that the signs would be given. But Moses had to go. The tradition notes that God's patience with these objections was not unlimited. At one point, the text says, God's anger burned against Moses. Not enough to change the decision. Enough to let Moses know he had pressed his case as far as it could be pressed.

The Man Who Did Not Volunteer for Egypt

Joseph did not choose Egypt. His brothers threw him into a pit. The pit was dry, the tradition notes: no water, but the snakes and scorpions he might have expected were absent because God had cleared them out. He was seventeen, sitting in a dry pit in Dothan, listening to his brothers negotiate over his sale price. Twenty pieces of silver. He was taken out of the pit and handed over to Ishmaelite traders and walked to Egypt in chains.

Everything that followed, the years in Potiphar's house, the false accusation, the years in prison, the interpretation of Pharaoh's dreams, the administration of the entire Egyptian food supply during seven years of famine, all of it traces back to a sale that Joseph did not consent to and a decision his brothers made without him. The most powerful Israelite who ever held a position in the courts of Egypt arrived there as cargo.

The tradition observes that Joseph resisted every subsequent temptation with the same consistency. Potiphar's wife offered him status and safety and pleasure. He ran from her so fast he left his garment in her hands. The man who had every reason to take what the moment offered, who had been cheated of his inheritance by his brothers, kept refusing to take what he had not been given. The pattern of his entire life was refusal: of the pit, of the wrong offer, of the shortcuts to power. What came to him came because he would not reach for it.

The King Found Among the Baggage

When the prophet Samuel announced Saul as king before the entire assembly of Israel at Mizpah, Saul was not there. Samuel had the lot cast, and it came up with the tribe of Benjamin, and then the family of Kish, and then the specific individual: Saul son of Kish. And when they looked for Saul, he was hiding among the baggage.

This is the tradition's portrait of the first king of Israel: not standing forward, not presenting himself, not seizing the moment of his elevation. He was hiding. The text says he was a head taller than any other man in Israel, the most physically impressive person in the nation, and on the day he was called to lead them, he was crouching behind the equipment.

The tradition takes this seriously as more than an accident of character. Saul's hiding was read as modesty appropriate to leadership. The man who hides from his own coronation is not, at that moment, the man who will later misuse his crown. Saul's beginning was correct. His humility at the moment of selection was exactly the quality the role required. The tragedy of his kingship was not in how it started but in how it was sustained, in the later decisions where the king who had hidden from the role began to cling to it instead.

Samuel's Ghost and the Shape of Saul's End

The night before the battle of Gilboa, when the Philistine army was arrayed against him and God had fallen silent, Saul went to the medium at Endor and asked her to raise Samuel. Samuel came up. He was not pleased to be disturbed. His first words to Saul were: why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?

But he answered the question Saul had come to ask. God has torn the kingdom from you. Tomorrow you and your sons will be with me here. The battle of Gilboa will kill the house of Saul. The ghost of the man who had anointed Saul king pronounced the verdict from the underworld, and Saul fell on his face and could not rise.

The tradition, even knowing this end, does not abandon Saul. He died on the battlefield, fighting when he could not win, falling on his sword rather than being captured. The same sources that record his failure record his courage at the end. He had been chosen correctly. He had hidden from his coronation out of genuine humility. The man who was found among the baggage fought to the last on Gilboa, and the tradition called him a hero worthy of honor despite everything.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews, IV. Moses In Egypt, The Ascension Of MosesLegends of the Jews

The stories surrounding Moses, our great leader and prophet, offer glimpses into just such an experience. It's more than just receiving the Ten Commandments; it's about a complete transformation and a journey into the heart of the Divine.

In Legends of the Jews, the encounter at the burning bush was a deeply personal one. While the other shepherds saw nothing, Moses alone witnessed the vision. He took just five steps closer, and God, seeing his distress over the suffering of Israel, recognized his worthiness.

God considered this carefully. Too loud, and Moses would be frightened. Too soft, and he wouldn't grasp the gravity of the moment. So, God spoke in the voice of Moses' father, Amram. Imagine the relief Moses must have felt, believing his father was still alive!

"Here am I! What is my father's wish?" he replied.

But it wasn't Amram. "I am not thy father," God said, "I but desired to refrain from terrifying thee, therefore I spoke with thy father's voice. I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob."

What a powerful moment! God invoking the patriarchs! And, interestingly, placing Amram's name before theirs! According to Ginzberg's retelling of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), it was as if Amram ranked even higher. Moses, overcome with reverence, covered his face.

When God revealed his mission – to free the Israelites from Egypt – Moses responded with humility, "Who am I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt?"

God reassured him, promising to deliver Egypt into his hands and, incredibly, to allow him to ascend to the throne of glory, to gaze upon the angels.

This is where the story takes an extraordinary turn.

God commanded Metatron, the Angel of the Face, to escort Moses to the heavens, accompanied by music, song, and a bodyguard of thirty thousand angels! Can you picture that procession?

Understandably, Moses was terrified. "Who art thou?" he asked Metatron.

"I am Enoch, the son of Jared, thy ancestor," the angel replied, "and God has charged me to accompany thee to His throne." Enoch, as in, the Enoch who, Genesis tells us, "walked with God: and he was not; for God took him." (Genesis 5:24)

But Moses protested, "I am but flesh and blood, and I cannot look upon the countenance of an angel."

So Metatron transformed him! According to the story, Moses' flesh became torches of fire, his eyes became Merkabah (the Divine Chariot) wheels (referencing the Divine chariot described by the prophet Ezekiel), his strength became angelic, and his tongue a flame. He ascended, surrounded by his celestial escort.

The journey through the seven heavens is a breathtaking vision.

In the first heaven, Moses saw streams of water and countless windows, each overseen by angels. Metatron identified them: the window of prayer, of supplication, of weeping, of joy, plenitude, starvation, war, peace, and so on. Every aspect of human experience, it seems, has a celestial counterpart.

In the second heaven, he encountered the angel Nuriel, towering three hundred parasangs (an ancient unit of distance) high, surrounded by fifty myriads of angels made of water and fire, all praising God.

The third heaven revealed an angel so immense it would take five hundred years to climb to his height, with seventy thousand heads, each with mouths and tongues, all extolling the Lord. These were the Erelim, appointed over the natural world.

The fourth heaven held a Temple built of fire and precious stones, where angels sang praises to God. Here, Moses learned of the purpose of Venus and Mars: Venus cools the sun, while Mars warms the moon.

In the fifth heaven, he saw the Ishim, angels of snow and fire in perfect harmony, whose sole purpose was to praise God.

The sixth heaven housed the Irin ve-kadishin, "Watchers" and "Holy Ones," led by an angel made of hail.

Finally, in the seventh heaven, Moses encountered the terrifying angels Af ("Anger") and Hemah ("Wrath"), forged from black and red fire, created to execute God's will. Metatron reassured Moses, calming his fears.

He also saw Samael, the angel of death, and prayed not to fall into his hands. He beheld the seraphim with their six wings, covering their faces and feet in humility before the Shekhinah (Divine Presence), and singing, "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of His glory."

And he saw the Hayyot, the holy creatures supporting God's throne, and Zagzagel, the prince of the Torah and wisdom, who teaches the Torah in seventy languages. According to the tradition, it was from this angel that Moses learned the ten mysteries!

After witnessing all this, Moses declared, "I will not leave the heavens unless Thou grantest me a gift."

And God replied, "I will give thee the Torah, and men shall call it the Law of Moses."

So, what are we to make of this incredible journey? It’s more than just a fantastical tale. It's a powerful metaphor for spiritual transformation, for overcoming our human limitations to encounter the Divine. Moses’ ascent wasn't just a physical journey; it was a journey of the soul, a preparation for receiving the Torah and leading his people. It reminds us that even in our own lives, we have the potential to rise above our limitations and connect with something greater than ourselves.

Full source
Legends of the Jews, I. Joseph, Joseph Resists TemptationLegends of the Jews

We all face temptations, big and small. But It's a story of desire, power, and ultimately, unwavering faith.

In Legends of the Jews, compiled by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, Zuleika didn't just casually flirt. She was persistent. She tried everything – entreaties, tears, and finally, outright force. One day, seizing an opportunity when everyone was at the annual Nile festival, Zuleika feigned illness and plotted her move.

She transformed the house into a sensory overload. She adorned herself in princely garments, precious jewels, and fragrant perfumes – cassia, frankincense, myrrh, and aloes. She waited for Joseph in the vestibule, the path he had to take to do his daily work. Can you picture the scene? The air thick with perfume, Zuleika radiant, and Joseph walking in from the fields, completely unsuspecting.

When Joseph saw her, he turned back. But Zuleika called out, urging him to continue. He entered, trying to focus on his work, but Zuleika stood before him, repeating her desires. For a fleeting moment, Joseph wavered. This was the first and last time his steadfastness deserted him, even if it was just for an instant.

What snapped him out of it? According to Ginzberg's retelling, the images of his mother Rachel, his aunt Leah, and his father Jacob appeared before him. Jacob's image spoke, reminding Joseph that his brothers' names would be engraved on the breastplate of the High Priest. Did he want his name to be among them, or would he forfeit this honor through sinful conduct?

Wow. The weight of family, of legacy, pressing down on him in that moment.

This vision, especially the image of his father, brought Joseph back to his senses. Zuleika, startled by the sudden change in his face, asked what was wrong. Joseph exclaimed, "I see my father!" Zuleika scoffed, "Where is he? There is none in the house." Joseph replied, "Thou belongest to a people that is like unto the ass, it perceiveth nothing. But I belong to those who can see things." It's a powerful statement about spiritual awareness, about seeing beyond the immediate.

He fled, but the temptation returned. The text says that the Lord Himself appeared to Joseph, holding the Eben Shetiyah (אֶבֶן שְׁתִיָּה), the Foundation Stone, and warned him that if he touched her, He would cast away the stone upon which the world is founded, and the world would fall to ruin. The stakes couldn't be higher!

As Joseph tried to escape again, Zuleika grabbed his garment. She threatened him with a sword, demanding he submit to her desires. Joseph, with a quick, energetic motion, wrenched himself free, leaving a piece of his garment in her hand.

Imagine the turmoil. Zuleika, rejected, heartbroken, and now exposed. She kissed and caressed the fragment of cloth, but quickly realized the danger she was in. She feared Joseph would betray her. So, she concocted a story, accusing him of attempted assault.

Her friends, returning from the Nile festival, advised her to accuse Joseph before her husband, Potiphar. She even enlisted their help, having them falsely claim that Joseph had made improper advances toward them as well.

She further staged the scene, putting on ordinary clothes, lying in bed, and placing Joseph's torn garment beside her. She summoned the men of her house and told them a fabricated story of Joseph's alleged outrage. The men, enraged, reported the false accusation to Potiphar.

Potiphar, influenced by his wife's accusations and the complaints of other men, had Joseph flogged. While being beaten, Joseph cried out to God, proclaiming his innocence and questioning why he should die for a false accusation.

Then, in a twist worthy of a divine intervention, God opened the mouth of Zuleika's eleven-month-old child. The baby spoke, revealing Zuleika's lies and recounting the true events. The people were astonished, and Potiphar, abashed, stopped the beating.

The matter was brought to court, where priests served as judges. The torn garment was examined, and the location of the tear suggested that Zuleika had tried to hold Joseph fast. The judges concluded that Joseph was not deserving of the death penalty but sentenced him to incarceration for staining Zuleika's name.

Even Potiphar, convinced of Joseph's innocence, admitted that he had to imprison him to protect his children from any lingering suspicion.

So, what are we to make of this story? It's a reminder that temptation can come in many forms, that even the most righteous among us can waver. But it's also a evidence of the power of faith, family, and divine intervention in helping us overcome our weaknesses. And perhaps, most importantly, it is a reminder that even when falsely accused, as Joseph was, truth and justice will eventually prevail. The story of Joseph isn't just an ancient tale; it's a timeless lesson for us all.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 3:26Legends of the Jews

The stories surrounding his reign are filled with drama, piety, and some truly perplexing decisions.

One of Saul's very first acts, as recounted in Legends of the Jews, was his triumphant assault on Nahash, the king of the Ammonites. Now, Nahash wasn't just any adversary. He'd demanded that the Gileadites remove an injunction – a specific prohibition – from the Torah. This particular one barred Ammonites from joining the congregation of Israel. Saul's victory here wasn’t just military; it was a statement about upholding Jewish law.

It’s in his campaign against the Philistines that we really see Saul’s character – both his strengths and, well, his complexities. His son, Jonathan, unwittingly broke a severe ban that Saul had declared: no one was to taste food on a certain day. Can you imagine the pressure? Saul, bound by his oath, was ready to put his own son to death!

The way Jonathan’s transgression was revealed is straight out of an epic. According to Legends of the Jews, the stones in the breastplate of the high priest were used to discern the truth. All the stones shone brightly, except for the one representing the tribe of Benjamin – Jonathan's tribe. It had lost its brilliance. Through a process of casting lots, it was determined that Jonathan was the cause.

Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. Saul only relented from executing Jonathan when it became clear that his son’s transgression was accidental. An atonement was made – a burnt offering, and Jonathan's weight in gold, paid to the sanctuary. Imagine the scene!

It doesn't stop there. During that same war, Saul was deeply concerned with the proper observance of sacrificial laws. He rebuked his warriors for eating the sacrificial meat before the blood had been sprinkled on the altar. He even made it his personal mission to ensure the slaughtering knife – the knife used for ritual slaughter, known as a chalaf – was in the prescribed condition, adhering to all the intricate laws of kashrut (Jewish dietary law).

As a reward for his zeal, an angel supposedly brought him a sword, because, incredibly, Saul was the only one in the entire army who possessed one! It’s a detail that highlights both Saul’s unique position and perhaps the desperate circumstances of the Israelite army at the time.

What do we take away from these stories? They paint a picture of a king striving to do what he believed was right, according to the laws and customs of his time. But they also show us the complexities of leadership, the burdens of piety, and the challenges of balancing justice with mercy. It makes you wonder: how would we have acted in Saul's place?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 3:28Legends of the Jews

It's a question the ancient rabbis grappled with, especially when trying to understand the tragic figure of King Saul.

Saul, the first king of Israel, a towering figure of strength and courage. But his reign was… complicated. He ultimately fell from grace, paving the way for David. But why?

when we look at Saul's missteps – and let's be honest, he had a few – they don’t seem quite as… grave as some of David's later sins. So, what gives? Why was the kingdom taken from Saul and given to another?

Well, the rabbis offer a fascinating, and somewhat surprising, explanation. It wasn't necessarily the severity of Saul's sins, but rather a fundamental flaw in his character: his excessive mildness.

Imagine a leader who's too… nice. Too forgiving. Too reluctant to wield the necessary authority. That, according to the sages, was Saul's problem. A ruler, they argued, needs a certain… firmness. A willingness to make tough decisions, even unpopular ones. Saul's compassion, admirable in a private citizen, proved to be a liability on the throne. He was, in a way, too good for the job.

But there's more to it. The rabbis, in their infinite wisdom, also suggest that Saul’s family lineage played a role. According to Legends of the Jews (Ginzberg), Saul's family possessed such impeccable nobility that his descendants might have become excessively proud and arrogant, potentially jeopardizing the very fabric of Israelite society. A fascinating piece of social commentary, isn't it? A preventative measure, if you will, against future tyranny.

The pivotal moment, of course, comes with the Amalekites. Saul was commanded to utterly destroy them, a command he only partially obeyed. And it was then that Samuel, the prophet, delivered the devastating news: the kingdom would be taken from him and given to another.

But here's where the story gets really interesting. Samuel didn't reveal the name of Saul's successor at that moment. Instead, he provided a sign. A cryptic clue: the one who would cut off the corner of Saul's mantle would be the next king. A secret, symbolic act that would identify the chosen one.

Later, as the story goes, David finds himself in a cave with Saul. An opportunity presents itself, and David, in a moment of both audacity and reverence, cuts off a piece of Saul's skirt. It’s a sign of disrespect, yes, but also a potent symbol of the transfer of power.

And Saul, upon realizing what David had done, understood. He knew, with absolute certainty, that David was his destined successor. He recognized the sign. The mantle, quite literally, had been passed.

It’s a powerful scene, full of layers of meaning. It speaks to destiny, to leadership, and to the complex relationship between those who hold power and those who are destined to inherit it. It also gives us a glimpse into the rabbinic understanding of divine justice and the qualities required for true leadership.

So, what can we take away from this ancient story? Perhaps that leadership is not simply about inherent goodness, or even about avoiding mistakes. Perhaps it's about a complex combination of character, circumstance, and a willingness to make the difficult choices that define a nation’s destiny. And maybe, just maybe, it's also about recognizing the signs when the time comes to pass the mantle on.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 3:35Legends of the Jews

Saul's end was that of a hero and a righteous person. Can you Despite his flaws, despite his errors, he died a man redeemed. The stories tell us his final days were filled with regret, particularly over the execution of the priests of Nob. This remorse, they say, secured him pardon in the eyes of God.

It's fascinating, isn't it? The tradition goes even further, suggesting Saul's piety was so profound that even David couldn't match it! The comparison is striking. David, with his many wives and concubines, versus Saul, who had only one wife. And consider this: when faced with mortal danger from his son Absalom, David hesitated, fearing for his life. But Saul, knowing he wouldn't survive his final battle, still went forth.

The picture painted is of a man who led a saintly life within his own home. He observed the priestly laws of purity, maintaining a state of ritual cleanliness, a concept known as taharah (ritual purity) in Hebrew. He was, in many ways, a righteous man trapped in a role he may not have been fully prepared for.

The narratives don’t shy away from comparing the two kings. We're told that God even reproached David for cursing Saul in his prayers. The man who would become the greatest king in Israel being rebuked for speaking ill of his predecessor.

There’s a powerful story connected to this. Remember when David, in his youth, cut off a corner of Saul's mantle? Well, the tradition says that in his old age, David was punished for this act of disrespect. He was afflicted with a cold that no amount of clothing could cure. A shiver down the spine, perhaps, as a reminder of the respect due to even a fallen king.

The ultimate redemption of Saul, though, may be the most striking. When a great famine struck the land during David’s reign, God revealed the cause: Saul’s remains hadn't been buried with the honor he deserved. And at that very moment, a heavenly voice, a bat kol, a divine echo, resounded, calling Saul "the elect of God."

What does this tell us? Perhaps it’s a lesson in the complexities of leadership, the weight of responsibility, and the possibility of redemption. Even in failure, even in death, Saul, the first king of Israel, found grace. His story, though tragic, serves as a powerful reminder that even our mistakes can be a path toward ultimate recognition and, perhaps, even forgiveness.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 3:33Legends of the Jews

The Bible gives us a glimpse, but the full, dramatic story… well, that's where the legends come in.

The scene: Saul, desperate and abandoned by God, seeks guidance from a medium. She conjures up the ghost of Samuel, the prophet who once anointed him king. But what exactly was said in that shadowy space between worlds? The biblical text is frustratingly brief.

The Legends of the Jews, that incredible collection of rabbinic stories compiled by Louis Ginzberg, fleshes it out. According to this telling, Samuel isn't exactly thrilled to be roused from his eternal slumber. He's none too happy about being disturbed. In fact, one of his first reproaches to Saul is, "Was it not enough for thee to enkindle the wrath of thy Creator by calling up the spirits of the dead, must thou need change me into an idol? For is it not said that like unto the worshippers so shall the worshipped be punished?"

Wow.

Samuel accuses Saul of practically turning him into an idol! The fear is that by summoning him, Saul risks blurring the lines between seeking divine guidance and engaging in forbidden practices. It's a reminder that even in moments of desperation, the line between seeking help and crossing into dangerous territory can be dangerously thin.

Finally, though, Samuel relents and delivers God's decree: the kingdom will be torn from Saul and given to David. But here's where it gets really interesting. Saul protests, "These are not the words thou spakest to me before." He remembers a different prophecy, a more favorable one.

And Samuel's response? It's chilling. "When we dwelt together, I was in the world of lies. Now I abide in the world of truth, and thou heardest lying words from me, for I feared thy wrath and thy revenge. Now I abide in the world of truth, and thou hearest words of truth from me." In life, Samuel admits, he might have softened his words, sugarcoated the truth out of fear of Saul's reaction. But now, in the world of truth, there's no room for such compromises. It's a stark reminder of the weight of responsibility that comes with prophecy, and the potential for even the most righteous figures to be swayed by human concerns.

According to Legends of the Jews, Samuel then bluntly tells Saul that he deserved his fate because he disobeyed God's command to utterly destroy the Amalekites. This refers back to a specific episode in Saul's reign, where he spared the Amalekite king and kept some of their livestock, a direct violation of God's orders.

In a moment of pure desperation, Saul asks if there's any way to escape his fate. "Can I still save myself by flight?" And Samuel’s answer is surprising: "Yes, if thou fleest, thou art safe. But if thou acceptest God's judgment, by to-morrow thou wilt be united with me in Paradise."

What a complex, bittersweet conclusion! Samuel offers Saul a choice: try to evade destiny, or accept it and find peace in the afterlife. It's a powerful illustration of free will versus divine decree, and the ultimate choice rests with Saul.

Saul does not flee. He accepts his fate and dies in battle the next day, fulfilling Samuel's prophecy. It’s a tragic end for a king who started with so much promise, a cautionary tale about the consequences of disobedience and the enduring power of truth, even when it's delivered from beyond the grave.

Full source