5 min read

Saul Warned the Kenites Before the Amalekite War

Saul had orders to destroy Amalek completely. His first act was to warn the Kenites to leave. Jethro's old kindness to Moses still carried weight.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Army That Stopped Before It Started
  2. Why a Warrior Remembered a Meal
  3. Jethro's Departure and Its Meaning
  4. The Failure That Followed the Warning

The Army That Stopped Before It Started

Saul had assembled his forces at Telaim: two hundred thousand foot soldiers and ten thousand men of Judah. The command was the same command that had been waiting since Moses: go and strike Amalek. Destroy everything. Do not spare. Do not take spoil. The word herem covered it all, the complete consecration to destruction that had no exceptions.

Saul saw Kenites living in the Amalekite territory and stopped the advance. He sent word to the Kenites: depart, go down from among the Amalekites. Otherwise I will destroy you with them. You showed kindness to all the children of Israel when they came up from Egypt.

The army waited while the Kenites got out.

Why a Warrior Remembered a Meal

The kindness Saul invoked was Jethro's. Moses' father-in-law had sheltered Moses in Midian when Moses was a fugitive from Egypt. He had given Moses his daughter Zipporah in marriage. He had counseled Moses on how to organize the adjudication of disputes among two million people in the wilderness. He had celebrated Israel's deliverance at the sea. When Jethro eventually departed to return to his own people, he went with the intention, the tradition said, of converting his people to the God of Israel.

Jethro had not done these things for all Israel. He had done them for Moses. But the tradition held a principle that made individual acts of kindness to Israel's great men into acts of kindness to the entire people: one who shows love to one of Israel's great ones is counted as having shown love to all Israel. Because Jethro sheltered Moses, his descendants would be sheltered on the day Amalek fell.

The debt was specific, traceable, and recognized centuries after the original act. Saul's armies were the mechanism by which an old kindness received its payment.

Jethro's Departure and Its Meaning

The tradition around Jethro's departure from the camp included a lament. Moses pressed him to stay: you know how we camp in the wilderness, you will be our eyes. Jethro declined and went home. The midrash asked why Moses would need Jethro to be his eyes when he had God for guidance, and the answer cut back toward the parable of the lamp. Even if a man carries a lamp of his own, he still needs a friend to carry one beside him. The divine light was Moses' guidance for all the people. What Jethro offered was the human light of a wise older man who had seen governance and counsel from outside the covenant.

Jethro left, and the community he returned to eventually produced the Kenites who were living among Amalek centuries later when Saul came to execute the divine command. They had retained their identity as people connected to Jethro's household, which is what made Saul's warning possible: he could identify them. He could distinguish them from the Amalekites around them. The long memory of Jethro's kindness preserved them in a moment when everything else in the path of Saul's army was not being preserved.

The Failure That Followed the Warning

The warning to the Kenites was the most faithful act of the entire campaign. What came after it was not.

Saul struck the Amalekites. But he spared Agag, the king. He spared the best livestock and the fattest cattle and everything of value. He destroyed only what he considered worthless and refused. He kept what he judged worth keeping.

When Samuel arrived, he heard the sheep bleating. He asked what the sound was. Saul explained that the people had saved the best animals to sacrifice to God. Samuel told him that the rejection of God's word was the reason God had rejected him as king. The man who had paused an army to honor a generations-old debt to a Midianite's descendants could not finish the task he had been given. He had started right and finished wrong, and the starting right was not enough to cover the finishing wrong.

The Kenites survived because of Jethro's kindness to Moses. Saul's throne did not survive because of Saul's kindness to his own judgment about which animals were worth keeping.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 44:11Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer

The scene is set: Saul, the first king of Israel, is preparing for battle against the Amalekites. This wasn't just any battle. The Amalekites, as we read elsewhere in Torah, held a special place in Israel's history as a particularly vile enemy.

Here's the twist. As Saul approaches the Amalekite camp, he sees some of the children of Israel mingled among them. What's he to do?

Saul calls out, urging them to separate themselves. He quotes to the Kenites: "Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them" (1 Sam. 15:6). Basically, "Get out of there, or you'll get caught in the crossfire!"

Why would Israelites be living among the Amalekites in the first place? That's a story for another time. But the really interesting question is: why are the Kenites – a different group entirely – being singled out for salvation?

The answer, according to Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, lies in an act of kindness. Think back to Jethro, also known as Reuel, the father-in-law of Moses. Remember him? He wasn't even an Israelite! He was a Midianite priest!

Did Jethro show loving-kindness, or chesed in Hebrew, to all of Israel? No. The text explicitly points out: he showed loving-kindness to Moses. Just Moses!

But here's the kicker: because Jethro showed kindness to Moses, one of the great leaders of Israel, it was considered as if he had shown kindness to the entire nation. And because of this single act of chesed, his descendants, the Kenites, were saved from the Amalekites. They were spared from destruction generations later because of the merit earned by their ancestor!

Isn't that incredible?

This story, packed into a single paragraph in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 44, speaks volumes. It's not just about battlefield strategy or ancient grudges. It’s about the ripple effect of good deeds. It suggests that kindness, especially towards those in positions of leadership or influence, can have consequences far beyond what we can imagine. It echoes the idea that we are all interconnected, and that our actions – even seemingly small ones – can have a profound impact on the world around us.

So, the next time you're considering an act of kindness, remember Jethro and the Kenites. Remember that you never truly know how far your chesed might reach.

Full source
Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai 18:26Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai

"Moses sent his father-in-law away" (Exodus 18:27). Rabbi Yehoshua says: he sent him away with the honor of the world. Rabbi Elazar HaModai says: he gave him many gifts. Jethro said to him: I am going to bring the people of my province to conversion. From the answer he gave them, know what they said to him: "Do not leave us, please" (Numbers 10:31). They said to him: you gave us good and beautiful counsel, and the Omnipresent agreed with your words; do not leave us. He said to them: what is a lamp for, except in a place of darkness? What does a lamp do between the sun and the moon? You are the sun, and Aaron is the moon. Rather, I am going to bring the people of my province to conversion, so that I may bring them under the wings of Heaven. One might think he went and did not return. Scripture therefore teaches, "The children of the Kenite, Moses' father-in-law, went up from the city of palms with the children of Judah to the wilderness of Judah, which is in the south of Arad; and he went and dwelt with the people" (Judges 1:16). "People" means only Torah, as it says, "Surely you are the people, and wisdom will die with you" (Job 12:2). From here they said: as long as a sage exists, his wisdom exists; when he dies, his wisdom is lost with him. So too, when Rabbi Nathan died, his wisdom was lost with him. They went and dwelt beside Jabez, as it says, "The families of scribes who dwelt at Jabez: Tirathites, Shimeathites, Sucathites. These are the Kenites who came from Hammath, father of the house of Rechab" (1 Chronicles 2:55). Just as he loved Torah, so his children loved Torah after him. For the Omnipresent says to Jeremiah, "Go to the house of the Rechabites and give them wine to drink" (Jeremiah 35:2). Jeremiah set before the sons of the house of the Rechabites bowls full of wine and cups and said to them, "Drink wine." He said to them: the Omnipresent told me that you should drink wine. They said to him: our father commanded us not to drink wine all the days that this house is destroyed, and it had not yet been destroyed. Rather, he told us: be mourners over it, for in the end it will be destroyed. He told us not to anoint ourselves, not to cut our hair, and not to live in houses; "and we listened and did according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us" (Jeremiah 35:8).

Therefore they were called Shimeathites, Tirathites, and Sucathites. Tirathites: because they did not want to cut their hair. Sucathites: because they did not want to anoint themselves. Shimeathites: because they listened to their father's voice. Another interpretation: Tirathites, because they heard the shofar blast from Sinai; another, because they sounded the alarm in their prayers and were answered. Shimeathites, because they listened to the words of Torah; another, because their prayer was heard. Sucathites, because they dwelt in booths, as it is written, "We dwelt in tents" (Jeremiah 35:10); another, because they sheltered Israel and protected them. There was a case of one who said, "The offering of the house of water-drinkers today," and a heavenly voice went out from the Holy of Holies and said to them: the One who accepted the offering of your fathers in the wilderness will accept your offering at this hour. Who are these? The Kenites who came from Hammath, father of the house of Rechab. The prophet who saw that the Temple would in the future be destroyed arose and decreed three decrees upon his children: that they not drink wine, not build houses, and not plant vineyards, as it says, "We will drink no wine, for Jonadab son of Rechab our father commanded us, saying: You shall not drink wine, you or your children, forever; you shall not build a house, sow seed, or plant a vineyard, nor shall you have one, for you shall live in tents all your days, so that you may live many days upon the land where you sojourn" (Jeremiah 35:6-7). From where did he learn that abstaining from wine lengthens days? Four were burning after the earth and were not found as they should be: Cain, Noah, Lot, and Uzziah. Cain: "Cain was a worker of the ground" (Genesis 4:2). Noah: "Noah, the man of the ground, began" (Genesis 9:20). Lot: "Lot lifted up his eyes and saw the whole plain of the Jordan" (Genesis 13:10). Uzziah: "for he loved the soil" (2 Chronicles 26:10).

Rabbi Nathan says: greater is the covenant that the Holy One, blessed be He, made with the children of Jethro than the covenant He made with the children of David, for the covenant made with David was made only on condition: "If your children keep My covenant and My testimony that I teach them, their children also forever shall sit upon your throne" (Psalms 132:12). But the covenant made with Jonadab son of Rechab was not made on condition, as it says, "Therefore thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: there shall not be cut off from Jonadab son of Rechab a man standing before Me all the days" (Jeremiah 35:19). Some say he married his daughters to priests, and high priests arose from him, and the Omnipresent gave him a covenant that high priests would never cease from him. Rabban Shimon said: has not the high priesthood already ceased? How, then, do I uphold "there shall not be cut off from Jonadab a man"? It means that Sanhedrin judges never ceased from him. If one who was from the nations of the lands and from the families of the soil, because he acted from love, was given by the Omnipresent from love, how much more so those who were from Israel. Rabbi Yohanan said: concerning this, wicked Balaam cried out and said, "Strong is your dwelling" (Numbers 24:21). He said: how much strength came to him because of the two loaves of bread about which Scripture says, "Call him, and let him eat bread" (Exodus 2:20): He gives reward to him and to his children until the end of all generations. Concerning them Scripture says, "These were the potters" (1 Chronicles 4:23): these are the children of Jonadab son of Rechab, who knew the power of the world's formation. Another interpretation: their livelihood came without constraint. Another: they guarded the oath of their father's commandment. Rabbi Abbahu said: Jethro merited that from his descendants came those who spread great Torah teachers in Israel. Who was this? Jabez, as it says, "Jabez called upon the God of Israel, saying: If You will surely bless me, enlarge my border, and Your hand will be with me, and You will make me from evil, so that it does not pain me; and God brought what he asked" (1 Chronicles 4:10). "If You will surely bless me": in Torah study. "Enlarge my border": with disciples. "Your hand will be with me": that I not forget my learning. "You will make me from evil": that You establish companions like me. "So that it does not pain me": that the evil inclination not pain me from repeating my learning. "God brought what he asked": this teaches that He gave him what he asked, and so forth. This is Rabbi Nathan's teaching. Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi says: "If You will surely bless me": with fruitfulness and multiplication. "Enlarge my border": with sons and daughters. "Your hand will be with me": in commerce. "You will make me from evil": the life You gave me should have neither eye sickness, toothache, nor headache. "So that it does not pain me": if You do this for me; and if not, I will go down in anguish to Sheol. Rabbi Hananiah ben Gamliel says: these words were said only in the second year, when Moses set the camp divisions over Israel. When did he set them? In the second year, as it says, "Each man by his banner, with signs according to their fathers' houses" (Numbers 2:2).

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma, Yitro 4Midrash Tanchuma

18:1). Jethro was known by seven names. He was called Jethro (yitro) because he added (yater) a chapter to the law, that is, the chapter dealing with judges. He was called Hobab (hobab) because he loved (hiba) the law. When he came to the Holy Land, they offered him the fields of Jericho, but he said: “I brought none of my possessions with me, and I abandoned all I owned in order to study the Torah, shall I now sow and reap when I should be studying Torah?” They told him: “There is a man studying the law in a certain area that is in a desolate place in the desert, and it lacks even wheat.” When they heard this, they went there, as it is said: And the children of the Kenite, Moses’ father-in-law, went up out of the city of the palm trees with the children of Judah, unto the wilderness of Judah, which is in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt with the people (Judg. 1:16). They went there and found Jabez sitting in the house of study, and the priests, the Levites, and the rulers were sitting with him, and all the Israelites were sitting there. And so they said to him (Jabez): “We are converts, how can we sit there among them?” Thereupon they seated themselves at the entrance to the school and listened and learned, as it is said: The families of scribes that dwelt at Jabez: the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, the Succathites. These are the Kenites (I Chron. 2:55). They were called tiratim (Tirathites) because they sat at the gate (sha’ar), shime’atim (Shimeathites) because they listened (from shama, “to hear”) and learned, and sukhatim (Succathites) because the Israelites made it clear to them (from mesakhim, “looked after them”). Another explanation (of Tirathites). Whenever the Israelites were confronted by danger they would blow (matri’in) their shofars, and they (Kenites) would hear them.

Who were the Kenites? They were the descendants of Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses. It is said concerning them: Cast thy bread upon the waters, for thou shalt find it after many days (Eccles. 11:1). In reward for (his invitation to Moses): Call him that he may eat bread (Exod. 2:20). (This alludes to the bread. Regarding water) it is said concerning Moses (mosheh): Because I drew (meshah) him (out of the water (ibid., v. 10). Therefore the descendants of Jethro merited sitting in the chamber of hewn stone.

Solomon had declared: Wherefore I praise the dead that are already dead more than the living that are yet alive (Eccles. 4:2). However, later he retracted this statement, saying: A living dog is better than a dead lion (ibid. 9:4). They replied to him: Solomon, you were merely prattling, making no sense at all. First you said: Wherefore I praise the dead that are already dead, but now you say: A living dog is better than a dead lion. He retorted: I say to you: The prophet cried out: O ye dry bones, hear the word of the Lord (Ezek. 37:4), and they hearkened to him, but the prophet also called out to the living: Hear ye the word of the Lord, O house of Jacob (Jer. 2:4), and they did not listen nor pay heed to him. Thus it says of them: For it is a rebellious people, lying children, children that refuse to hear the teaching of the Lord (Isa. 30:9).

Full source
Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 49:1Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer

The story starts, as so many do, with a commandment. God tells Saul, the first king of Israel, to utterly destroy Amalek. Wipe them out. Erase their memory from under heaven. A pretty harsh command. What did Amalek do to deserve such a fate? Well, they attacked the Israelites from the rear as they were wandering in the desert, exhausted and vulnerable after the Exodus from Egypt (Exodus 17:8-16). A cowardly act, forever etched in the memory of the Jewish people.

Saul… he doesn't quite follow through. He defeats Amalek, yes, but he spares Agag, the Amalekite king, and allows his soldiers to keep the best livestock. A decision that will have far-reaching consequences, as we learn in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, chapter 49.

Why did Saul disobey? The people claim they spared the animals for sacrifices. A noble gesture. To offer the best of the spoils to God. But Samuel, the prophet, isn't buying it. He confronts Saul with those famous words: "Has the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams" (1 (Samuel 15:2)2).

Ouch. That stings. Samuel makes it clear: obedience to God's will is paramount. No amount of ritual sacrifice can compensate for direct disobedience. The mitzvah, the commandment, was clear: destroy Amalek.

But here's where it gets really interesting. That God wanted to utterly destroy and cut off all the seed of Amalek. But Saul’s incomplete execution of the divine command has consequences that ripple through generations. He spared "any vile man except Agag," as it is said, "But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen" (1 Sam. 15:9). He left a remnant.

And that remnant, that seed of Amalek, becomes a symbol. Not just of a historical enemy, but of something deeper. Something that continues to threaten the Jewish people throughout history. Amalek becomes a metaphor for the forces of evil that seek to undermine goodness and justice in the world. Did Saul's good intentions (sacrificing to God) outweigh his disobedience? Did his partial obedience actually create a greater problem down the line? And what does this say about our own lives? How often do we compromise, thinking we know better than the divine plan? How often do we leave remnants of negativity, thinking they won't matter?

The story of Saul and Amalek isn't just an ancient tale of war and obedience. It's a timeless reminder that sometimes, the hardest thing to do is to follow through completely, to eradicate the seeds of negativity, even when it's difficult or unpopular. Because those seeds, left untended, can grow into something far more dangerous than we ever imagined.

Full source
Midrash Shmuel 18:3Midrash Shmuel

"And Saul said to the Kenite, 'Go,'" etc., [and you showed kindness to all the children of Israel] (1 Samuel 15:6). But did he show kindness to all Israel? [Did he not show kindness only to Moses alone?] Rabbi Elazar said: Jethro showed kindness to Moses, "Call him, that he may eat bread" (Exodus 2:20). Rabbi Simon said: he fed him as his wages, "and moreover he drew water for us and watered the flock" (Exodus 2:19). [Rather, it is to teach you that anyone who shows kindness to one of the great ones of Israel, they account it to him as though he had done it for all Israel.]

Full source