4 min read

Moses Blessed Eleven Tribes and Said Nothing About Shimon

Eleven tribes received a final blessing from Moses. Shimon received silence. The rabbis called it a debt unpaid, carried from Shittim to the plains of Moab.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Eleventh Blessing
  2. Two Debtors Before the King
  3. Levi's Debt and Shimon's Debt
  4. The Silence as Verdict

The Eleventh Blessing

Moses stood before the nation and blessed them. He went through the tribes one by one, finding the right word for each, drawing on everything he knew about each tribe's character, its history, its territory, its future. He blessed Reuben. He blessed Judah. He blessed Levi, Benjamin, Joseph, Zebulun, Issachar, Gad, Dan, Naphtali, Asher. He finished. The blessing was over. Shimon's name had not been spoken.

This is not the kind of absence you can attribute to oversight. Moses was dying. He was making his final testament. Every tribe in the text is there for a reason. Shimon is missing for a reason. The sages of Sifrei Devarim knew this and they explained the silence with a parable about debt and credit and the arithmetic of moral history.

Two Debtors Before the King

Two men borrow from a king. The first repays his debt and then borrows again, which means the king now holds a fresh claim on him, a current obligation that the borrower is actively working to meet. The second fails to repay the original loan and then borrows a second time on top of the first, which means the king now holds two claims, neither of which is being addressed. The question is not which man owes more. The question is which man is in worse standing with the king.

The answer is obvious: the man who has compounded a failure with a second failure stands worse than the man who discharged his first debt before taking on a second. The first man's new borrowing is a sign of ongoing relationship. The second man's new borrowing is a sign that the original failure has been buried rather than resolved.

Levi's Debt and Shimon's Debt

The two debtors are Levi and Shimon. Both tribes carry an earlier debt: the violence at Shechem, when Shimon and Levi killed the men of a city in retaliation for the assault on their sister Dinah. Jacob rebuked both of them on his deathbed. Both were sanctioned in the original tribal cursing. Both entered Moses' farewell address carrying that original mark.

But Levi paid its debt. At the golden calf, when Moses came down from Sinai and found the people worshiping an idol, it was the Levites who responded to his call, who took up their swords, who moved through the camp and restored order at enormous cost. The very capacity for violent action that had earned Levi's censure at Shechem was directed, at the golden calf, in service of the covenant. Levi discharged the original debt through subsequent devotion. The tribe that had used its force wrongly used it rightly when it mattered most.

Shimon did not pay its debt. Instead, at Shittim, the tribe compounded it. The man who brought a Midianite woman into the camp in full view of Moses and the weeping congregation at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting was Zimri son of Salu, a Simeonite leader. Shimon's representative at the crisis of Baal Peor was not a man trying to hold the covenant together. He was a man making a public demonstration of contempt for it.

The Silence as Verdict

Moses could not bless what had not discharged its debt. He could not speak Shimon's name in the register of blessing when the name was still attached to an unpaid account. The silence in Deuteronomy 33 is not punishment in the ordinary sense. It is an accurate ledger. Levi borrowed, repaid, and borrowed again; Moses blessed Levi. Shimon borrowed, failed to repay, and borrowed again; Moses said nothing.

The Midrash Tanchuma takes note of the fact that the Torah itself records Shimon's territory as carved out from within Judah's, a tribe without a coherent geographic identity of its own. The silence at the blessing is not the only mark Shimon carries. It is the final one.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Sifrei Devarim 349:1Sifrei Devarim

A curious absence: Why does Levi get a blessing ("And of Levi he said"), but not Shimon?

The Sifrei Devarim, an early halakhic midrash on the Book of Deuteronomy, digs into this very question. It all comes down to a matter of debts, spiritual debts, that is.

The Sifrei paints a picture using a parable: Imagine two people who borrow money from a king. One repays their debt, but then borrows again. The other? They not only fail to repay their initial loan, but they take out another one! Which one is in deeper trouble?

This parable perfectly illustrates the relationship between the tribes of Shimon and Levi, and their actions throughout the Torah. According to the Sifrei, both tribes initially "borrowed" together in the story of Shechem (Genesis 34:25). Remember that harrowing tale? Shimon and Levi, angered by the violation of their sister Dinah, took matters into their own hands. They violently attacked the city of Shechem, killing all the men. The verse reads, "And there took, two sons of Jacob, Shimon and Levi, each man his sword, and came upon the city secure, (in that the men were ailing from the circumcision), and they killed every male." A brutal act,.

So, both tribes started with this shared "debt." But here's where their paths diverge.

Levi, the Sifrei argues, actually repaid his debt, at least partially, during the incident of the Golden Calf (Exodus 32:26). When Moses called out, "Whoever is for the L-rd, (let him come) to me!" it was the sons of Levi who rallied to his side, taking a stand against idolatry. This act of loyalty, of righteous zeal, is seen as a repayment of their earlier transgression. Atonement, of sorts. According to this midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), this demonstrates that Levi paid back what he borrowed in the desert.

But the story doesn't end there for Levi. The Sifrei then points to the episode of Shittim (Numbers 25:11), where Pinchas (a Levite) acts decisively to stop the Israelites from intermarrying and worshipping foreign gods. The text says, "Pinchas the son of Elazar the son of Aaron the Cohein turned My wrath away from the children of Israel when he raged My rage in their midst, and I did not consume the children of Israel in My wrath." This act, too, is seen as a righteous one, but according to the Sifrei, this is a second "borrowing".

What about Shimon? Sadly, the Sifrei suggests that Shimon never made that repayment. Worse, the tribe "borrowed" again in the story of Zimri (Numbers 25:14). Zimri, a prince of the tribe of Shimon, brazenly flaunted his relationship with a Midianite woman, defying God’s law. The Sifrei emphasizes: "And the name of the man of Israel who was smitten, who was smitten together with the Midianite woman, was Zimri the son of Salu, chief of a father's house in the house of Shimon."

So, according to this midrashic reading, Levi, despite some further "borrowing," at least attempted to atone for the sin at Shechem. Shimon, however, doubled down on the initial transgression.

This interpretation in Sifrei Devarim offers a powerful lens through which to view the blessings and curses bestowed upon the tribes. It's not just about singular actions, but about the long-term trajectory of a people. Do they strive to repair their mistakes, or do they continue down a path of transgression? It's a question that resonates far beyond the ancient tribes of Israel, doesn't it? It challenges us to examine our own actions, our own debts, and the kind of legacy we are building.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma, Devarim 4Midrash Tanchuma

(Deut. 2:3:) “You have had enough of going about this mountain.” This text is related (to Cant. 2:7=3:5), “I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem by gazelles or by hinds of the field….” There are three oaths in the book of Canticles that the Holy One, blessed be He, adjured [Israel]. Why? One in which the Holy One, blessed be He, adjured Israel not to reveal the end; [a second] that they would not force the end; [a third] that they would not rebel against the [other] kingdoms. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to them, “If you fulfill the oaths, fine; but if not, I will permit your flesh [to be prey], as with gazelles or hinds of the field, [the injury of which] no one makes a claim or demands. So shall I not make a claim about your blood. (Deut. 2:31:) “And the Lord said unto me], ‘See I have begun to give Sihon and his land over to you.” It is also written (in Amos 2:9), “Yet I destroyed the Amorite before (you) [them].” By virtue of what? By virtue of the Torah, which the sages had taught. Our masters have said, “Sihon was difficult [to overcome]. His height was like a wall tower, and he was stronger than all creatures. He was taller than any tower on earth, but his feet reached to the earth. So no creature was able to stand before him, just as it says (Amos 2:9, cont.), “yet I destroyed his fruit above and his roots below.” What did the Holy One, blessed be He, do? He bound the ministering angel that belonged to him and to his land. Then he cast him from his place and handed him over to Israel. Therefore it is written (ibid.), “yet I destroyed his fruit above and his roots below.” Our masters have said, “Sihon and Og were stronger than Pharaoh and his armies. And just as they uttered a song over the fall of Pharaoh, so were they worthy to utter a song at their fall. It is simply that David came and uttered a song over them, as stated (in Ps. 136:17, 19) ‘To the One who smote great kings […]; Sihon, king of the Amorites […].’”

Full source