5 min read

Gabriel Held the Coals Above Jerusalem for Six Years Before Letting Go

When God commanded Gabriel to destroy Jerusalem, the angel lifted the coals and then held them there for six years, waiting to see if the city would turn.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Coals That Were Not Released
  2. How the Midrash Found Gabriel in Doubled Speech
  3. The Six Years and What They Were For
  4. Haman and the Same Delay
  5. What the City Did With Six Years

The Coals That Were Not Released

The command had been given. Ezekiel saw it happen: God told the man clothed in linen to go between the wheels beneath the cherub and fill his hands with glowing coals from between the cherubim and scatter them over the city. The man went in. He took the coals.

And then he waited.

Vayikra Rabbah, the fifth-century Palestinian midrash, says that Gabriel held the fire above Jerusalem for six years. Babylon had not yet come. The Temple was standing. The destruction was decided in heaven but had not yet fallen. For six years, the fire hovered above the city while God watched to see whether the city would turn.

How the Midrash Found Gabriel in Doubled Speech

The section of Vayikra Rabbah that contains this tradition arrives at Gabriel from a grammatical question. Why does the Torah sometimes double its language, saying that God spoke and then saying that God spoke again in the same verse? The rabbis developed a rule: doubled speech always requires deeper reading. Something is being communicated by the repetition that the single instance would not convey.

The midrash worked through examples. The Book of Esther's repeated speech patterns. The prophet Ahijah's doubled words. Each example added a layer to the rule. Then it arrived at Ezekiel 10:2, where God says to the man clothed in linen: Come to between the galgal beneath the cherub and fill your hands.

The doubled command in this verse, the come and the fill and the go and scatter, was read as evidence of a hesitation built into the command itself. God commanded, and then commanded again, because something in the space between the first command and the second command was not simple.

The Six Years and What They Were For

Gabriel was the instrument of the fire, the angel who stood between the cherubim and the city. He understood what the six-year pause meant. Every day the coals remained lifted was a day the city could turn. The destruction was not inevitable in the way that gravity is inevitable. It was decided, but decided in a way that left space for the decision to be responded to.

The tradition about Gabriel holding fire is not a story about divine hesitation or weakness. It is a story about the specific mechanics of divine judgment. The decree was real. The fire was real. Gabriel held it because holding it was part of the decree, not a circumvention of it. The pause was built in.

The question the midrash does not answer directly, but which the six years asks implicitly: what was happening in Jerusalem during those years? The tradition suggests that the acts of charity still moving through the streets were part of what the fire was waiting to burn out. Not that charity prolonged the city infinitely, but that its presence calibrated the weight of what was being judged. Jerusalem was not Sodom. It had not become entirely what it was being punished for being.

Haman and the Same Delay

Vayikra Rabbah arrives at Gabriel through a surprising route. The chapter that contains the six-year tradition also discusses Haman's plan to destroy the Jews of Persia. The connection is not obvious on the surface, but the midrash sees a structural parallel: in both cases, destruction was decreed and then delayed. In Haman's case, the delay was the twelve months between the casting of the lot and the thirteenth of Adar, a delay that turned out to be exactly the time needed for Esther and Mordecai to act.

The midrash reads these paired delays as evidence for a principle: when divine justice operates through human instruments, the instrument includes the delay. The delay is not a defect. It is the mechanism by which the justice is completed rather than merely executed.

Gabriel holding the coals for six years and Haman's twelve months of waiting are the same structure. Time is given. The response to the time given is what determines whether the end of the time brings mercy or destruction.

What the City Did With Six Years

Jerusalem did not turn. The fire fell. The Temple burned. The people went into exile. But the six years had passed first, and the fire was held through every one of them. The judgment was not instant. The city had six years of coals hovering above it in the angelic world while ordinary life continued below.

This is how Vayikra Rabbah understood destruction. Not as a lightning strike from a God who had decided and acted in the same moment. But as a process in which the decision was real, the instrument was prepared, and the pause between the decision and its execution was itself an act of mercy, offered without announcement, visible only to the angels who understood what was being held and why.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Vayikra Rabbah 26:8Vayikra Rabbah

For the sages, repeated words are clues that lead deeper into the verse. Vayikra Rabbah, a Midrash on the book of Leviticus, dedicates itself to uncovering these hidden layers. And in Vayikra Rabbah 26, we find some fascinating examples.

The passage starts with the verse, "The Lord said to Moses: Speak to the priests, sons of Aaron [and say to them]." The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) points out the double language: "said…and say." The rule, the Rabbis suggest, is that "Wherever the verse uses the term said (or speaking) twice for the same statement…it requires expounding." The double phrase "speak…and say" becomes the opening for interpretation.

The Midrash brings other examples. Remember the story of Esther? "King Ahasuerus said and he said to Queen Esther: [Who is he…who is so presumptuous to do so?]" (Esther 7:5). Why the double "he said?" One explanation is quite intriguing: Ahasuerus was essentially telling Esther, "If it's Haman, great, but if you're thinking of someone else, say it's him anyway!" The pressure lands directly on Esther.

Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi offers a different take. He suggests that initially, Ahasuerus wasn't aware of Esther's Jewish identity, so he spoke to her through an interpreter. But once he knew, he spoke directly to her. The double "said" reflects this shift in their relationship.

The Midrash then turns to the Book of Kings: "The man of God approached and said to the king of Israel, and he said: So said the Lord" (I (Kings 20:2)8). Again, "said…he said." The first "said" is the prophecy: Ahab would have victory over Ben Hadad. The second "said" carries a warning: Don't spare him! Because, as the prophet makes clear, God set up all kinds of snares and nets to deliver Ben Hadad into Ahab's hands. If Ahab lets him go, Ahab’s life would be forfeit. He would pay for it with his own life, and his people for Ben Hadad’s people. And, this came to pass, as Ahab disobeyed and suffered the consequences.

Perhaps the most striking example involves the prophet Ezekiel. "He said to the man clothed in linen, and he said: [Come to between the galgal beneath the cherub and fill your hands with smoldering coals from between the cherubs, and cast them upon the city]" (Ezekiel 10:2). Here, God tells an angel to take coals and destroy the city. But the angel can’t just grab them himself! He needs help from a cherub. So the angel turns to the cherub and says, essentially, "God has decreed this, but I don't have permission to enter your space. Can you do me a solid and give me two coals so I don't get burned?"

Rabbi Pinḥas adds that the cherub even cooled the coals down for the angel! Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin, quoting Rabbi Levi, says that the angel Gabriel held those coals for six years, hoping Israel would repent. But they didn't. So Gabriel sought to destroy them.

But then, God intervenes! "Gabriel, Gabriel," He says, "there are people among them who perform charitable acts for one another." Ezekiel sees "the form of a man's hand" on the cherubs (Ezekiel 10:8), representing God's preventing Gabriel from casting the coals.

Rabbi Abba, in the name of Rabbi Berekhya, makes a powerful statement: What sustains the world, both above and below? It's tzedakah – the charitable acts we perform with our own hands. That's why it says, "For Your righteousness [vetzidkatekha], God, reaches the heavens…" (Psalms 71:19). It’s our acts of kindness that connect us to the divine.

So, what does all this have to do with "speak to the priests…and say to them"? The Midrash returns to our original verse. The first "speak" refers to a mitzvah corpse – a body with no one to care for it. In that case, a priest must become ritually impure to bury the deceased. The second "say," however, clarifies that for other situations, a priest may not become impure.

See how much meaning is packed into those two little words? It's not just repetition. It's nuance, clarification, and a window into the complexities of Jewish law and ethics.

Vayikra Rabbah 26 reminds us that even the smallest details in the Torah can hold profound significance. It invites us to look deeper, to listen more closely, and to find the hidden connections that link us to each other and to the divine. And it reminds us that even small acts of kindness, performed with our own hands, can have a world-changing impact. What small act of kindness will you perform today?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:11Legends of the Jews

Picture a cave deep in the earth, hidden from the eyes of a murderous king. No parents, no comfort, just the cold, hard stone and the echoing silence. Abraham, newly born, was left to fend for himself. According to Legends of the Jews, he began to wail, as any infant would.

God, in his infinite compassion, sent the angel Gabriel down to sustain him. And how did Gabriel do that? He made milk flow from the little finger of Abraham's right hand! For ten days, little Abraham suckled at his own hand, growing stronger each day.

Then, something remarkable happened. He got up and walked. Not just a few wobbly steps, but a confident stride to the edge of the valley. He ventures out of the cave. As night fell, and the stars blazed into life, Abraham, in his innocence, exclaimed, "These are the gods!" The vastness of the night sky, the twinkling lights – it must have been an awesome sight.

Dawn broke, and the stars faded. "I will not pay worship to these," he declared, "for they are no gods." He realized that their power was fleeting, dependent on the sun.

Then the sun rose, a glorious spectacle of light and warmth. "This is my god," Abraham proclaimed, "him will I extol!" It's easy to see why he thought so. The sun gives life, sustains the world, and banishes the darkness.

But as the day waned, the sun set, and Abraham, once again, was left in twilight. "He is no god," he said, his search continuing.

Then he saw the moon, serene and beautiful in the night sky. He called her his god, the one to whom he would pay divine homage. But then, the moon, too, was obscured, perhaps by clouds, perhaps by the natural cycle of its phases.

And Abraham cried out, his voice echoing in the darkness, "This, too, is no god! There is One who sets them all in motion."

This is such a powerful moment. Abraham's journey wasn't about finding the right celestial body to worship. It was about understanding that everything he saw, everything that seemed powerful and divine, was ultimately just a creation. It pointed to something beyond itself, something greater, a single, unifying force behind all of existence. Abraham recognized that there has to be One who sets them all in motion.

What a journey. From a lonely baby in a cave to a seeker of truth, Abraham teaches us that the search for meaning is a lifelong quest. And maybe, just maybe, the answer isn't in the stars, the sun, or the moon, but in recognizing the One who created them all.

Full source