6 min read

Aaron Kept the Manna in a Jar You Could See Through

The Torah uses a word for the manna jar that appears nowhere else. The rabbis cracked it open and found a linguistic argument hiding a theology of witness.

There is a word in the Torah that appears exactly once. In the entire Hebrew Bible. One time. And then never again. The word is tzintzeneth, and it shows up in a single verse in Exodus 16, in a single instruction from Moses to Aaron about how to preserve a sample of manna for the generations who would come later. "Take a tzintzeneth, and put an omer-full of manna therein, and lay it up before the Lord, to be kept for your generations" (Exodus 16:33).

A tzintzeneth. Whatever that is.

The rabbis of the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, the tannaitic midrash on Exodus compiled in second-century Palestine out of the teachings of the school of Rabbi Ishmael, refused to leave the word alone. The Torah, they assumed, was economical with its vocabulary. If a common word for "jar" would have worked, the Torah would have used it. But it did not. It used a word so rare that the rabbis of the second century were still wondering what it was. And so, in classic rabbinic fashion, they started guessing, but they guessed with method.

Maybe it was silver, they said. A silver jar would preserve food, silver being valuable and dignified. Maybe it was iron, because iron is permanent. Maybe lead, soft enough to shape but heavy enough to sit still for a thousand years. Maybe copper, maybe tin, maybe some alloy of the above. The Mekhilta runs through the catalog of possible metals the way a jeweler goes through a drawer of settings. None of them feel right. Each one has the same fatal flaw. You cannot see through it.

And then the rabbis noticed something hiding inside the Hebrew word itself.

The root of tzintzeneth, if you read it with the ear of a second-century rabbi who loved playing with consonants, sounds like the root metztith, which means "to see through." The rabbis treat this as a signature. The word is not describing a material. It is describing a property. The jar has to be something you can look into. And the one common container in the ancient Near East that would be transparent enough to see through was not metal at all. It was earthenware fired until the walls became so thin they allowed light through. Or, in a more literal reading preferred by later commentators, glass, which in the land of Israel was made out of sand and fired clay.

The Mekhilta's conclusion is almost disappointingly practical. The jar had to be glass. Or something like glass. A vessel that Israelites could walk up to, in whatever future century they were standing in, and literally see the manna inside. Not held in a sealed metal box. Not hidden behind a curtain. Visible. On display. The whole point, the rabbis insist, was witness.

Everything else in the Tabernacle was guarded. The Ark of the Covenant was closed. The two stone tablets Moses brought down from Sinai were sealed inside the Ark. The Torah scroll itself, according to the tradition preserved in the Bavli Bava Batra 14a, a tractate of the Babylonian Talmud redacted in the sixth century CE, was placed on a ledge next to the Ark but not inside it. You could not see those objects. They were for the priests, for Moses, for the high priest once a year on Yom Kippur. But the manna jar was different. The manna jar was a piece of evidence.

Here is what the rabbis wanted a future generation to be able to say. Imagine a grandchild, maybe three centuries after the Exodus, standing in the courtyard of Solomon's Temple in tenth-century BCE Jerusalem, looking at a small glass jar with a handful of what looked like white crystals inside. The grandchild has never known slavery. Has never seen a plague. Has never watched the sea stand up like a wall. And a parent points at the jar and says, that is the bread God gave your ancestors in the wilderness. Not metaphor. Not a story. That. Look at it. It has been here since the first year after we left Egypt. It has not rotted. It has not decayed. It is still as fresh as the morning it was gathered.

The Mekhilta's linguistic investigation turns out to be a theology of visibility. Faith, the rabbis are saying, is not pure abstraction. Sometimes faith needs a physical object you can look at. Sometimes it needs to be literally transparent. Sometimes it needs to sit in a glass jar on a shelf, and when the grandchild asks the parent how do we know this all happened, the parent can walk them to the jar and the grandchild can see the answer.

There is a further detail that the rabbis were quietly aware of when they made this reading. The jar of manna was never recovered after the destruction of the First Temple in 586 BCE. According to the tradition in Bavli Yoma 53b, also a tractate of the Babylonian Talmud redacted in the sixth century CE, King Josiah of Judah, in the late seventh century BCE, hid the Ark and its associated objects, including the manna jar, in an underground chamber prepared by Solomon specifically for that purpose, when he sensed the coming destruction. The jar went into the dark. The see-through vessel was buried somewhere no human eye could reach it.

And yet the rabbis of the Mekhilta, writing eight centuries later in the second century CE, after the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans in 70 CE, still wrote about the jar in the present tense. They still described the glass. They still described the visible manna. They still described the instruction Moses gave to Aaron as if it were a living commandment with a surviving object at its center. Louis Ginzberg, in his Legends of the Jews published in seven volumes between 1909 and 1938 in Philadelphia (see the full Ginzberg collection in our database), wrote that the rabbis believed the jar, along with the Ark, would return when the redemption came, and that some future generation would look at the manna inside and understand the miracle the way the first generation had.

A single hapax legomenon. One word that shows up exactly once in the Hebrew Bible. And the rabbis of the second century decoded it into a theology of witness, a theology that says the Torah, when it bothers to use a rare word, is usually pointing at something you are meant to see through.

Moses told Aaron to take a jar. The jar had to be a kind you could look into. Because some miracles are only finished when the next generation can see them with their own eyes.

← All myths