Parshat Lech Lecha6 min read

Why Abraham's Divided Animals and Samson's Stride Pointed to Messiah

Ginzberg reads Abraham's covenant of the pieces and Samson's superhuman stride as twin pictures of how patriarchal acts and figures point toward Messiah.

Written by Maggid · Edited by Arthur Sabintsev ·
Table of Contents
  1. What it means for Abraham to divide the animals but not the birds
  2. How Abraham drove away the birds of prey as prophecy
  3. What it means for Samson to be sixty ells between his shoulders
  4. How Samson's hair-bell and Zorah-Eshtaol stride showed divine spirit
  5. Why Jacob briefly thought Samson was the Mashiach
  6. How divided animals and superhuman stride share one structural principle

Louis Ginzberg's Legends of the Jews, the early-twentieth-century compilation of midrashic and aggadic narrative, holds two passages on how specific patriarchal acts and exceptional figures point toward the Messianic future. One passage describes Abraham's covenant of the pieces in Genesis 15, with the birds being left undivided as the structural symbol of Israel's wholeness and Abraham driving away the birds of prey as the prophetic prefiguring of the Messiah cutting the heathen in pieces. The other passage describes Samson's superhuman strength of sixty ells between his shoulders, Jacob's brief belief that Samson might be the Mashiach, and the structural disappointment when God revealed Samson's eventual fate.

Both passages share one structural claim. Specific patriarchal acts and specific heroic figures encode prophetic content about the Messianic future that the surface narrative does not always make explicit.

What it means for Abraham to divide the animals but not the birds

Ginzberg's account of the covenant of the pieces opens with the structural reframing of Genesis 15. The Torah records Abraham cutting the animals in half but leaves the deeper meaning to interpretation. The midrashic tradition that Ginzberg compiles fills in the structural significance. The Ginzberg tradition records that Abraham's actions were not just a symbolic gesture. They were a vital act of protection for his descendants.

Had Abraham not divided those animals, Israel would have been overwhelmed by the power of the four kingdoms that would rise throughout history. The structural reading treats the division as a spiritual firewall set in place millennia ago. The curious detail is that Abraham divided the animals except for the birds. The midrash explains this symbolizes Israel's ultimate wholeness and resilience. Despite facing countless trials and tribulations, the Jewish people will endure intact.

How Abraham drove away the birds of prey as prophecy

The midrash extends the structural reading. The birds of prey came down upon the carcasses and Abraham drove them away. This was not just about scavenging birds. This was prophecy. The moment foreshadowed the coming of the Messiah. The Messiah, like Abraham driving away the birds of prey, will cut the heathen in pieces.

Abraham, in his wisdom, told the Messiah to wait for the divinely appointed time. The midrash records this conversation. Abraham talking to the Messiah. The structural picture is striking. The covenant of the pieces was simultaneously an act in Abraham's lifetime and a conversation about the Messianic timing. Just as the time of the Messiah's arrival was revealed to Abraham, so too was the time of the resurrection of the dead. When Abraham laid the halves of the animals opposite each other, they came back to life as a bird flew over them. The structural sign of renewal and future resurrection was operational.

What it means for Samson to be sixty ells between his shoulders

Ginzberg's account of Samson's strength takes up the parallel structural picture. Samson's strength was superhuman. He measured a sixty-ell span between his shoulders. An ell is roughly the length of a forearm. The structural scale was enormous. The first sign of his strength was that he uprooted two massive mountains and rubbed them together. The midrash records the earth-shattering force such an act would require.

Samson was not perfect. He had a physical imperfection. He was maimed in both feet. The structural reminder is that even the mightiest heroes can have their flaws. The midrash compiles this without softening the imperfection. The superhuman strength and the maimed feet existed together as the structural signature of who Samson was.

How Samson's hair-bell and Zorah-Eshtaol stride showed divine spirit

The source of Samson's power was the spirit of God poured out over him. There was a structural sign. Whenever the divine spirit descended, Samson's hair would begin to move, emitting a sound like a bell that could be heard from afar. The structural manifestation of divine power was operational. The midrash compiles this not as poetic flourish but as the audible sign by which others could know the spirit had descended.

His speed matched his strength. When the spirit rested on him, Samson could cover the distance between Zorah and Eshtaol in a single stride. The structural superhumanity extended beyond strength to movement. The midrash compiles this as the visible evidence that ordinary observation could detect when divine empowerment was active in Samson.

Why Jacob briefly thought Samson was the Mashiach

Jacob himself, upon witnessing such might, thought Samson might be the Mashiach, the Messiah. The structural anticipation was real. The midrash records that Jacob's expectation was based on the observable superhumanity. When God showed Jacob Samson's ultimate fate, he realized that this hero-judge, mighty as he was, would not be the one to usher in the new era.

The structural disappointment was operational. Samson's flaws and vulnerabilities, his eventual betrayal by Delilah, his ultimate fate brought him down even though his strength had pointed toward the Messianic. The midrash compiles this as the lesson that observable strength does not automatically indicate the Messianic role. The cosmic system requires additional structural qualifications that Samson did not possess despite his measurable superhumanity.

How divided animals and superhuman stride share one structural principle

The two passages converge on the same kind of structural pointing. Specific acts and specific figures point toward the Messianic future without being themselves the Messiah. Abraham's covenant of the pieces foreshadowed the Messiah's eventual work. Samson's superhuman strength briefly raised the question of whether he was the Messiah. Both anticipations were operational. Both produced specific cosmic content that the surface narrative would not have generated.

The Ginzberg tradition teaches the reader that the prophetic anticipation of Messiah runs through many moments in biblical history. The two passages close with a composite image. An Abraham talking to the Messiah after dividing the animals but leaving the birds whole, and driving away the birds of prey as foreshadowing of the eventual Messianic cutting. A Samson with sixty ells between his shoulders and a hair-bell that rang when the divine spirit descended, briefly mistaken by Jacob for the Mashiach until God showed his eventual fate. A reader, situated within their own anticipations, recognizing that the cosmic system encodes Messianic content into operational acts and figures across the biblical history the midrash documents.

← All myths