6 min read

Balaam Climbed Three Mountains and Blessed Israel Each Time

Balak hired the most feared curser in the ancient world to destroy Israel. The curses came out as blessings no matter which hilltop they tried.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Donkey Saw First
  2. What Balak Had Calculated Correctly
  3. The Wilderness That Spoke
  4. The God Who Argued Both Sides
  5. Why the Donkey Saw It First

The Donkey Saw First

Balaam was riding his donkey through the hills of Moab when she stopped. He hit her. She pressed against the wall, crushing his foot. He hit her again. She sat down. He hit her a third time. Then God opened her mouth and she asked him why he kept hitting her. Balaam answered the talking donkey without losing his composure, as though this were a recognizable kind of conversation. Only after the exchange did his own eyes open and he saw what the donkey had seen all along: an angel standing in the road with a drawn sword, blocking the path three times.

The greatest diviner in the ancient Near East had needed three beatings and a talking animal to perceive what his mount had understood immediately. This detail appears in both the Torah's account and in Josephus's retelling in his Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93 CE. Both versions find the irony load-bearing. The man hired for his supernatural sight could not see what was directly in front of him until an animal made the point impossible to ignore.

What Balak Had Calculated Correctly

Balak of Moab was a military strategist who understood his situation with uncomfortable clarity. Israel had already destroyed Sihon king of the Amorites and Og king of Bashan, two powers that had seemed formidable. They were now camped on his border. Balak had done the arithmetic and knew he could not beat them in a straight fight. So he hired Balaam, a prophet near the Euphrates whose curses were legendary, to destroy Israel with words.

God told Balaam not to go. Balaam went anyway, under conditions, after a second delegation arrived with more impressive credentials and more money. The conditions were that he could only speak what God put in his mouth. He presumably thought this was a formality. It was not.

Every time Balaam opened his mouth to curse Israel, blessings came out. Not ambiguous language, not hedged prophecy, but direct predictions of Israel's future greatness, the subjugation of its enemies, a star rising from Jacob. Balak's anger grew with each blessing. He kept moving Balaam to different hilltops, hoping a different angle on the Israelite camp would change the results. It did not. The blessings came from each vantage point, more extravagant each time. By the third mountain, Balaam was describing Israel as a nation that would outlast every empire in sight.

The Wilderness That Spoke

What Balaam was looking at from those hilltops, the rabbis of Bamidbar Rabbah understood as something more than a military encampment. They found in the Hebrew name for wilderness, hamidbar, a pun on hamediber, the one who speaks. The wilderness was not a place of abandonment. It was the longest conversation in the tradition's memory, a place where God spoke continuously to Israel even when Israel was complaining, wandering, doubting.

What survived four hundred years of Egyptian slavery, the Sifrei Devarim noted, was not just numbers and genetics. Israel had kept its names in Egypt. It had kept its language. It had kept the signs of its covenant. Surrounded by a civilization built on absorption, it had remained recognizably itself. This was what Balaam was seeing from the mountain: not a collection of wandering tribes but a people with a coherent center that four centuries of attempted erasure had failed to touch.

The God Who Argued Both Sides

Shemot Rabbah, the midrash on Exodus, observed something unusual about how God operated in relation to Israel during the Exodus period: in human courts, the prosecutor and the defender are always different people. God was both simultaneously, making the case against Egypt and defending Israel in the same breath, playing every role in the divine court at once. This was what Israel was: the nation for whom God argued its own case when it could not argue for itself.

The image of God as a king watching his only son with obsessive parental care, asking every servant at every hour whether the child has eaten, whether he has come home safely, this comes from Vayikra Rabbah, the fifth-century midrash on Leviticus. God watched Israel through Moses the same way, giving daily commands about the Israelites' welfare with the urgency of a father who cannot stop checking on a beloved child. Balaam, standing on his hilltops, was looking at the object of that surveillance. Every attempt to curse it returned as blessing because the thing he was aiming at had been held too carefully to fall to a hired prophet's word.

Why the Donkey Saw It First

The rabbis never quite let go of the donkey detail. What protected Israel was not invisible. It was perfectly visible to anyone paying attention. The donkey saw it. The angel with the drawn sword was simply there, standing in the road. What Balaam lacked was not access to the truth but willingness to look at it without the filter of what Balak was paying him to find.

He blessed Israel three times on three different mountains. He described its future with more precision than he had been hired to provide. Then he went home to Balak and the curses he had been hired to deliver went with him, unspoken. The most feared curser in the ancient world had stood on every available hilltop and found nothing in his mouth but the future of the people he had come to destroy.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Antiquities IV.1-3Antiquities of the Jews (Josephus)

A donkey saw an angel before the greatest prophet of the ancient Near East did. That detail alone tells you everything about the story of Balaam.

Balak, the king of Moab, was terrified. The Israelites had crushed Sihon king of the Amorites and Og king of Bashan, two formidable powers. And were now camped on his border. Balak could not beat them in battle, so he tried something else. He and the Midianites hired Balaam, a prophet who lived near the Euphrates and whose curses were legendary, to come and destroy Israel with words.

God told Balaam not to go. Balaam told the ambassadors. They came back with bigger bribes. Balaam asked God again. And this time, God let him go, but with a warning. On the road, an angel with a drawn sword blocked the path. The donkey saw it. Balaam did not. Three times the animal swerved or stopped, and three times Balaam struck her. Then the donkey spoke in a human voice and asked him why he was beating her after years of faithful service (Numbers 22:28). Only then did Balaam's eyes open. The angel rebuked him: the animal had more spiritual perception than the prophet himself.

Balaam arrived at Balak's court and was brought to a mountain overlooking the Israelite camp. Seven altars were built, seven bulls and seven rams sacrificed. Balak wanted a curse. What he got was the opposite. The spirit of God seized Balaam, and he poured out one of the most extravagant blessings in all of ancient literature: Israel would possess innumerable good things, fill the earth and seas with their glory, and have descendants more plentiful than the stars. Their enemies would come to fight and never return victorious.

Balak was furious. He tried again, more altars, more sacrifices, a different mountain. Same result. God would not allow a single curse against Israel. Balaam himself admitted it plainly: "When the Spirit of God seizes upon us, nothing that we say is our own." The man hired to destroy Israel became the instrument of its greatest prophecy of blessing.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 23:10Bamidbar Rabbah

It all revolves around the verse, "For you are coming to the land of Canaan." Seemingly straightforward. But the Rabbis, with their insatiable curiosity and profound insights, dig deeper.

They point to a verse in Jeremiah (2:31): “You, the generation, see the word of the Lord: Have I been a wilderness [hamidbar] for Israel?” But Instead of reading hamidbar, "a wilderness," the Rabbis suggest we read it as hamedaber, "Have I spoken to Israel?" It’s a clever play on words, a homiletical interpretation that opens up a whole new avenue of understanding.

The commentary Matnot Kehuna brilliantly elaborates on this: "Did I merely speak but not fulfill?" It’s a rhetorical question, of course. The implication is clear: God's word is not empty. God doesn't just make promises; God delivers.

The rabbis don't stop there. They tackle another word in Jeremiah: “Pitch darkness [mapeleya]” (Jeremiah 2:31). What does mapeleya mean? Does it mean God promised to take them to the land but was late in doing so? The text argues no, mapeleya signifies lateness, drawing a parallel to (Exodus 9:32): “But the wheat and the spelt were not struck, [as they are late ripening [afilot]]." The delay isn't a sign of God's failure, but part of a natural process, like the ripening of crops.

And finally, we come back to Canaan. What is Canaan? According to the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), it's "a land of merchandise in which there is trade." They draw on (Isaiah 23:8): “Whose merchants are princes, its peddlers [kinaneha] the eminent of the land." Canaan isn’t just a place; it’s a hub of activity, a place of opportunity and prosperity.

So what's the takeaway here? The Rabbis are reminding us that God's promises are reliable, even if they seem delayed. The journey may take us through a wilderness, but it leads to a land of abundance. It's a powerful message of hope and trust.

Bamidbar Rabbah 23 invites us to examine our own expectations and perceptions of God. Do we see God as a reliable partner, even when things don't go according to our timeline? Or do we question God's faithfulness when faced with challenges and delays? It's a question worth pondering, isn't it?

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 15:29Shemot Rabbah

Shemot Rabbah turns to How God Relates to Israel Around the Exodus.

The passage starts with the verse, "This month shall be for you" (Exodus 12:2), which refers to the month of Nissan, the month of Passover. Then, it launches into a comparison: human justice versus divine justice. Imagine a courtroom. Usually, you have one person prosecuting, laying out the case against the accused, and another defending, arguing for their innocence. These are distinct roles. The prosecutor doesn't suddenly switch to defense, and vice versa.

Says Shemot Rabbah, the Holy One, blessed be He, isn't like that. God defends and prosecutes. How can that be?

The Midrash, the interpretive text, then gives a series of powerful examples from the prophet Isaiah. "The mouth that said: 'Alas, a sinful nation' (Isaiah 1:4), is the mouth that said: 'Open the gates, and let the righteous nation enter' (Isaiah 26:2)." The same divine voice that cries out in disappointment and rebuke also extends an invitation to redemption and righteousness!

It goes on: "The mouth that said: 'A people laden with iniquity' (Isaiah 1:4), is that which said: 'Your people shall all be righteous' (Isaiah 60:21)." God sees our flaws, our burdens of wrongdoing, but simultaneously envisions and declares our potential for complete righteousness. It’s a both/and, not an either/or.

And again: "The mouth that said: 'Children who deal corruptly' (Isaiah 1:4), is that which said: 'And all your children will be disciples of the Lord' (Isaiah 54:13)." Even when we, as children of God, mess up, the divine promise of guidance and learning remains. We are always students, always capable of growth.

The litany continues, each example highlighting this duality: condemnation alongside promise, rejection alongside embrace. "Even if you increase your prayers, I will not hear" (Isaiah 1:15) is juxtaposed with "It will be, before they call, I will answer" (Isaiah 65:24). And perhaps most strikingly, "Your New Moons and your festivals My soul despises" (Isaiah 1:14) is paired with "It will be that on every New Moon […all flesh will come to prostrate themselves to Me]" (Isaiah 66:23).

Why the specific mention of "Your New Moons?" (Chodesheichem in Hebrew). Because, the Midrash explains, the months themselves are a gift to Israel, a symbol of renewal and hope. "This month shall be for you," it says, circling back to the original verse.

So, what does it all mean? It seems to me that this passage offers a profound insight into the nature of God's relationship with humanity. It's not a simple, one-dimensional picture. It's a complex, dynamic interplay of judgment and mercy, rebuke and love. God holds us to account, yes, but never abandons the hope for our transformation.

This idea, that God can simultaneously be the source of both our greatest challenges and our greatest comfort, is a powerful one. It suggests that even in our darkest moments, we are not alone, and that the possibility of redemption is always within reach. Maybe that's why the Rabbis wanted to highlight this idea as they contemplated the Exodus – the ultimate story of going from the depths of slavery to the heights of freedom. A story where the One who brings the plagues is the same One who parts the sea.

Full source
Sifrei Devarim 301:9Sifrei Devarim

The verse states, "and he became there a nation." But what does that really mean? Sifrei Devarim, an early rabbinic commentary on Deuteronomy, suggests this simple phrase carries immense weight. It tells us that even in the depths of Egyptian servitude, Israel was distinctive. They possessed something unique, something that set them apart, even before the Exodus.

What was it like there? What was that distinctiveness born from?

The text continues, "and he saw our pain." It wasn't just abstract suffering; it was a visceral reality witnessed by the Divine. The Sifrei connects this to (Exodus 1:16), "And you see on the birthstool..." image for a moment. Midwives, ordered to kill newborn Hebrew boys. The most vulnerable moment of new life tainted by the most brutal act of oppression. This wasn't some distant historical event; it was intimate, personal, and agonizing. It was pain.

Then there's "and our toil." The commentary links this to the horrific decree in (Exodus 1:22): "Every son that is born shall you cast in the river." This wasn’t just hard work; this was the systematic destruction of their future, the active erasure of their lineage. Imagine the fear, the desperation, the impossible choices parents had to make. It's a chilling reminder of the depths of human cruelty.

The Sifrei goes on. “Great and mighty,” it says, connecting it to (Exodus 1:7): “And the children of Israel were fruitful and teemed and multiplied and became exceedingly strong, and the land was filled with them.” Paradoxical, isn’t it? Even under the crushing weight of slavery, the Israelites thrived. Their numbers swelled. Their spirit, it seems, refused to be extinguished. Was it pure resilience? Divine blessing? Perhaps a mixture of both.

And finally, “and populous,” drawing a parallel to (Ezekiel 16:7): "I made you as numerous as the plants of the field; you increased and grew, and you entered the prime, etc." This image of flourishing, of growth, is striking, especially juxtaposed against the earlier descriptions of pain and toil. It paints a picture of a people not just surviving, but growing, even in the most hostile environment.

So, what are we to take away from this brief but powerful exploration of a few words? It seems that nationhood, true nationhood, isn't just about territory or political power. It's forged in the fires of shared suffering, in the unwavering commitment to life in the face of death, and in the persistent hope for a better future. It's about maintaining a distinct identity, even when everything seems designed to erase it.

It makes you wonder, doesn’t it? What does it mean for us today? What does it mean to be part of a people with such a history? Perhaps it’s a call to remember, to empathize, and to continue striving for a world where no one suffers such pain and toil. A world where everyone has the opportunity to flourish.

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 2:5Vayikra Rabbah

Vayikra Rabbah turns to God Watches Over Israel Like a King Over His Only Son.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai, a giant in the world of Jewish mysticism and a figure readers often encounter in the Zohar, had a fascinating way of explaining God's relationship with the Jewish people. He tells a story, a mashal, about a king and his only son. This king, he says, would constantly ask his household members about the son: "Did he eat? Did he drink? Did he go to school? Did he come home?" It’s a picture of constant, almost obsessive, care.

Rabbi Shimon then equates this to God's relationship with Moses. Every single day, God would command Moses: "Say to the children of Israel," "Command the children of Israel." It's as if God is constantly checking in, making sure His children, the Israelites, are doing what they need to do. This image, drawn from Vayikra Rabbah, a Midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) collection on the Book of Leviticus, paints a picture of a God deeply invested in the well-being of His people.

There's another layer to this, a different angle on the same idea. Rabbi Yehuda bar Simon offers a different mashal, another parable. He speaks of a craftsman creating a crown for the king. Someone passing by asks what he’s doing, and the craftsman replies that he’s making a crown. The passerby then urges him to adorn it with as many gems and pearls as possible, to use emeralds and jewels galore. Why? Because this crown will be placed on the king’s head! It's about reflecting glory back to the source.

Similarly, Rabbi Yehuda bar Simon suggests that God tells Moses: "To whatever extent you can praise Israel, praise; to exalt them and glorify them, glorify." Why? "Because I am destined to be glorified through them," as it says in (Isaiah 49:3), "You are My servant, Israel, in whom I glory."

So, what are we to make of these two stories found in Vayikra Rabbah? Are they contradictory? Not at all. They complement each other beautifully. The first mashal emphasizes God's constant care and attention, like a loving parent. The second highlights the idea that the Jewish people, in their actions and their very being, are meant to reflect God's glory back to Him.: we are, in a way, both the beloved child being watched over and the sparkling jewels adorning the crown. It's a powerful image of a relationship built on love, responsibility, and mutual glorification. It's a reminder that we are not just passive recipients of God's grace, but active participants in a divine partnership. So, the next time you feel like someone’s watching over you, or the next time you strive to do something great, remember these stories. Remember that you are part of something much bigger, something ancient and enduring.

Full source