6 min read

God Walked to Esau, Ammon, and Moab Before Sinai

Before Israel ever said yes, God walked to Esau, then to Ammon and Moab, holding out the Torah. Each nation asked one question, then turned away.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. God Comes First to the Sons of Esau
  2. The Sons of Ammon and Moab Hear the Same Question
  3. Why the Offer Had to Be Made at All
  4. The Caretaker Who Could Not Be Trusted With Silver
  5. Why the Mountain Stood in No One's Land

The wilderness floor was bare and ownerless, no nation's field, no king's road, and across it God came carrying something He meant to give away. He did not go first to the people waiting at the mountain. He turned aside, toward the red hills where the children of Esau kept their flocks and their grudges, and He held the Torah out to them like a man holding out bread to a stranger who has not yet decided whether to be insulted.

God Comes First to the Sons of Esau

He revealed Himself to the sons of Esau and asked them plainly. "Will you accept the Torah."

They were not fools and they did not laugh in His face. They squinted at the offer the way a buyer squints at livestock, looking for the flaw, and they asked the only sensible question a careful people asks before signing anything. "What is written in it."

God told them one line. "You shall not kill."

That was the end of it. They did not argue the fine points. They did not ask to read further. The words landed and the men of Esau shook their heads, and one of them spoke for all of them with a kind of grim pride. "This is what we inherited from our father," he said, and he meant the blessing the old man Isaac had laid on Esau in the tent, the one that named the sword. By your sword shall you live (Genesis 27:40). The blade was not their habit. It was their birthright, handed down like a name. A law that forbade killing did not ask them to change a custom. It asked them to stop being themselves. So they handed the offer back, and God turned and walked on.

The Sons of Ammon and Moab Hear the Same Question

He came next to the sons of Ammon and Moab, and He did not soften the offer or sweeten it for a second hearing. The same words. "Will you accept the Torah."

The same caution answered Him. "What is written in it."

This time God named a different line. "You shall not commit adultery."

And these men flinched, because the commandment did not merely scold them. It reached back and pointed at the night they came from. They knew their own beginning. Their father was Lot, the nephew of Abraham, and after the fire fell on the cities of the plain Lot's two daughters had lain with him in the dark of a cave, sure the world had ended, and from that act both nations were born. The two daughters of Lot conceived by their father (Genesis 19:36).

So they did not say we would rather keep sinning. They said something harder. "The law you are offering forbids the very thing that made us. How, then, shall we accept it." To take the Torah was to call their own existence a crime. They could not sign a covenant that erased the cave they came from, and so they too gave the scroll back into the wind.

Why the Offer Had to Be Made at All

None of this was God shopping for a buyer. He knew the answers before He knocked. The walking, the asking, the patient repetition of one terrible line per door, all of it was a record being laid down in advance, so that no nation could ever stand up afterward and say it had been cheated. "Had You only come to us," they would have cried, "we would have said yes."

That door was now shut. He had come. He had asked. He had named the cost in their own language, the killing to one house, the forbidden bed to another, choosing for each the single commandment that struck where they lived. Every nation heard the offer in full. Every nation studied the terms and walked away of its own will, and the walking-away was theirs, not His.

The Caretaker Who Could Not Be Trusted With Silver

There were older grounds for doubt, and one of the teachers laid it out as a small bitter parable. The children of Noah, all the families of the earth after the flood, had been given only seven commands to keep, a light load, a handful of rules to live by. They had not kept even those.

Picture a king, he said, who set two stewards over his storehouses, one over the heaps of grain and one over the silver and the gold. The grain-keeper sulked that he had been handed the cheaper goods, and the keeper of the silver turned on him. "Empty man. If you betrayed the king with grain, how much more would you have robbed him of silver and gold." So with the nations. If they could not carry seven commands, how would they ever shoulder the six hundred and thirteen of the whole Torah. The refusals at the red hills and in the country of Lot's sons were not a surprise. They were the last proof of a thing already shown.

Why the Mountain Stood in No One's Land

And there was a reason the giving happened where it did, out on that ownerless ground, far from any nation's border and far from the fields of the tribes themselves. Had the Torah been handed down inside one people's country, the nations would have found their excuse at last. "It was given in their land," they would have said, "not ours. That is why we never took it." So God set the mountain in the open desert that belonged to no one, where no people could claim the law had passed them by, and no tribe among the children waiting below could boast that the fire had chosen its own soil.

The ground was neutral. The offer had been universal. When at last the words came down in thunder, they fell to the only people left who had not yet said no.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Mekhilta Tractate Bachodesh 5:8Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

Before giving the Torah to Israel, God first offered it to every other nation on earth. The Mekhilta records one of the most dramatic of these encounters, the moment God approached the descendants of the wicked Esau.

God came and revealed Himself to the sons of Esau and asked them a simple question: "Will you accept the Torah?" They did not refuse outright. Instead, they asked what any reasonable person would ask: "What is written in it?"

God answered: "You shall not kill."

That was enough. The sons of Esau rejected the Torah immediately. Their reasoning was blunt and unapologetic. "This is what we inherited from our father," they said, pointing to the blessing Isaac gave to Esau in (Genesis 27:40): "By your sword shall you live." Violence was not just their practice, it was their birthright, their inheritance, their identity. A Torah that forbade killing was incompatible with everything they were.

This midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) does more than explain why Israel alone received the Torah. It reveals the rabbis' understanding that the Torah was never imposed on anyone. It was offered freely, and each nation had the chance to accept or reject it based on its own values.

The sons of Esau were not punished for refusing. They were simply told what the Torah required, and they made their choice. The commandment "You shall not kill" was not a minor clause buried in fine print. It was the very first thing God told them, because it was the most fundamental incompatibility between their way of life and the Torah's demands.

Full source
Mekhilta Tractate Bachodesh 5:9Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

After being rejected by the sons of Esau, God turned to the sons of Ammon and Moab and made the same offer: "Will you accept the Torah?" The Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael records their response with the same pattern of inquiry and refusal.

The sons of Ammon and Moab asked: "What is written in it?" God answered with the commandment: "You shall not commit adultery."

Their rejection was immediate and rooted in their own origin story. They pointed out that their entire nation was born from incest. Their ancestor Lot, nephew of Abraham, had fathered both Ammon and Moab through relations with his own daughters, as recorded in (Genesis 19:36): "And the two daughters of Lot conceived by their father." The very existence of these peoples was the result of the act the Torah would prohibit.

Their objection carried a brutal logic: "How, then, shall we accept it?" They were not merely saying they preferred to continue sinning. They were arguing that accepting a law against sexual immorality would retroactively delegitimize their own founding. To accept the Torah's prohibition would be to condemn the act that brought their nation into being.

Like the sons of Esau before them, the sons of Ammon and Moab were offered a genuine choice and declined it honestly. Each nation stumbled over the specific commandment that struck closest to home. God did not exempt any people from the offer. But each people, confronted with the Torah's demands, chose their own identity over the covenant.

Full source
Mekhilta Tractate Bachodesh 5:11Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

R. Shimon b. Elazar said: If the sons of Noach could not abide by the seven mitzvoth (commandments) commanded them, how much more so (could they not abide) by all the mitzvoth of the Torah! An analogy: A king appoints two caretakers, one over stores of grain, and one over stores of silver and gold. The first bridles at not having been appointed over the stores of silver and gold, and the second says to him: Empty one, if you were faithless with grain, how much more so with silver and gold! If the sons of Noach could not abide by seven mitzvoth alone, how much more so (could they not abide by the six hundred and thirteen mitzvoth (of the Torah)! Why was the Torah not given in Eretz Yisrael? So as not to provide a pretext to the nations of the world, viz. Because it was not given in our land, that is why we did not accept it. Variantly: So as not to rouse contention among the tribes, one saying, it was given in my land; the other: it was given in my land. That is why it was given in the open desert. In three settings was the Torah given, desert, fire, and water. Just as these are free for all, so, Torah.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 2:23Legends of the Jews

It involves a divine tour, some hard "nos," and a resounding "yes" that changed everything.

The story goes that before God presented the Torah to Israel, He offered it to all the nations of the world. According to Legends of the Jews, compiled by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, the intention was clear: to eliminate any future excuses. No one could later claim, "If only we had been given the chance, we would have embraced the Torah!"

So, God approached the descendants of Esau, the Edomites. "Will you accept the Torah?" He asked. They inquired about its contents. God replied, "Thou shalt not kill." The Edomites balked. "But our father, Esau, was blessed with the words, 'By thy sword shalt thou live!'" they exclaimed. "To accept this would be to deny our very essence." They declined.

Next, God went to the children of Lot, the Moabites and Ammonites. "Will you accept the Torah?" Again, the question of content arose. "Thou shalt not commit unchastity," God responded. Their rejection was swift. "But we are descended from unchastity!" they argued. "This we cannot accept."

Then came the children of Ishmael. "Do you want to accept the Torah?" God asked. "What is written therein?" they countered. "Thou shalt not steal," God answered. Their reply echoed the previous rejections. "But God promised our father, 'His hand will be against every man!'" they proclaimed. "To abstain from taking what we want goes against that very promise." They refused the Torah.

As we find in Midrash Rabbah, the other nations of the world offered similar reasons. They clung to their ancestral customs, their familiar ways. "We cannot give up the law of our fathers," they said. "Give it to your people, Israel."

Finally, God turned to Israel. "Will you accept the Torah?" he asked. "What is written therein?" they responded. "Six hundred and thirteen commandments," God replied. And then came the pivotal moment. Without hesitation, Israel declared, "All that the Lord has spoken, we will do and we will be obedient!" (Exodus 24:7).

But the story doesn't end there. the verse says, Israel then proclaimed: "O Lord of the world! We acted in accordance with Thy commandments before they were revealed to us." They went on to provide example after example of how their ancestors had already embodied the Torah's principles. Jacob, they said, fulfilled the first of the Ten Commandments by commanding his family to put away their foreign gods. Abraham obeyed the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain. Joseph remembered the Sabbath. Isaac honored his parents. Judah refrained from murder. Joseph resisted adultery. The sons of Jacob refused to steal. Abraham bore true witness and didn't covet.

What are we to make of this extraordinary narrative? Why did all the other nations refuse the Torah? Was it simply a matter of conflicting cultural values, or was there something deeper at play? And what about Israel's eager acceptance? Was it blind faith, or a profound recognition of something already present within their collective soul? Perhaps the story reminds us that accepting a higher calling requires a willingness to let go of familiar comforts and embrace a path of greater responsibility. It suggests that the Torah wasn't just a set of rules, but a reflection of a deeper truth that resonated with the soul of Israel.

Full source
Sifrei Devarim 343Sifrei Devarim

Another interpretation: "And he said: The LORD came from Sinai" (Deuteronomy 33:2). When the Holy One, blessed be He, was revealed to give the Torah to Israel, it was not to Israel alone that He revealed Himself, but to all the nations. First He went to the children of Esau and said to them: Do you accept the Torah? They said to Him: What is written in it? He said to them: "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13). They said: The very nature of those people and of their father is to murder, as it is said: "And the hands are the hands of Esau" (Genesis 27:22), and: "By your sword you shall live" (Genesis 27:40). He went to the children of Ammon and Moab and said to them: Do you accept the Torah? They said to Him: What is written in it? He said to them: "You shall not commit adultery" (Exodus 20:13). They said to Him: Our very nature is sexual immorality, as it is said: "Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father" (Genesis 19:36). He went to the children of Ishmael and said to them: Do you accept the Torah? They said to Him: What is written in it? He said to them: "You shall not steal" (Exodus 20:13). They said to Him: The very nature of our father was to be a brigand, as it is said: "And he shall be a wild man" (Genesis 16:12). And so He asked each and every nation whether they would accept the Torah, as it is said: "All the kings of the earth shall give You thanks, O LORD, for they have heard the words of Your mouth" (Psalms 138:4). Might one think they heard and accepted? The verse states: "And I will execute vengeance in anger and fury upon the nations that have not hearkened" (Micah 5:14). Not only did they not hearken, but even the seven commandments that the children of Noah accepted upon themselves they could not uphold, until they cast them off. When the Holy One, blessed be He, saw this, He gave them to Israel. So too Israel accepted the Torah with its interpretations and its fine details. Therefore it is said: "And he said: The LORD came from Sinai, and rose from Seir unto them" (Deuteronomy 33:2).

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 286:10Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

Another interpretation: so as not to cast strife among the tribes, that this one should not say, in my land the Torah was given, and that one say, in my land the Torah was given. Therefore the Torah was given in the wilderness, publicly, openly, in a place that belongs to no one [ownerless]. In three things the Torah was likened: to wilderness, to fire, and to water, to tell you that just as these are free of charge, so too the words of Torah are free of charge to all who come into the world.

"Who brought you out of the house of bondage": they were slaves to kings. Or is it rather that they were slaves to slaves? When it says "and He redeemed you from the house of bondage, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt" (Deuteronomy 7:8), behold, they were slaves to kings and not slaves to slaves.

Full source