4 min read

Mordecai Called a Fast and Named Nineveh as the Standard

He did not name Moses on the mountain. At the palace gate in Shushan he quoted a foreign king who had sat down in ashes and starved his beasts.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Gate Did Not Get a Jewish Precedent
  2. The King Left His Crown in the Ashes
  3. He Would Not Let the City Split
  4. Passover Night Without Bread
  5. They Cried the Way Nineveh Cried
Mordecai Called a Fast and Named Nineveh as the Standard Click for full size

The Gate Did Not Get a Jewish Precedent

Mordecai stood at the palace gate in Shushan with the decree still wet on the copy in his hand. Jews had gathered because they could smell what the writing meant. He did not open with Moses on the mountain for forty days. He did not name Elijah at Horeb, or David on the bare earth. He named Nineveh.

The name landed like a slap. Nineveh had been Assyria's capital. In 722 BCE that city had erased the Northern Kingdom and swallowed ten tribes. No map in a Jewish house had a worse mark on it. Mordecai held it up as the standard anyway.

The King Left His Crown in the Ashes

He quoted the Book of Jonah almost word for word (Jonah 3:6-9). The king of Nineveh rose from his throne, took off his crown, put on sackcloth, and sat in ashes. He decreed that no person and no animal would eat or drink. He commanded every throat to cry to God with full force. Then the line Mordecai needed:

"Let every person turn from his evil way, and from the violence that is in his hands."

"O people of Israel," Mordecai said, "you are dear and precious to your Father in heaven." He was using Nineveh as the measure, not as a compliment. That city had no covenant. It had no fathers to quote. It had done the whole turn, at once, and God had relented.

He Would Not Let the City Split

Some in the crowd wanted a Jewish fast for the Jews who felt like fasting, and a Seder for the rest. Mordecai refused the split. Heaven had once declined to call a day good because that day had only divided water from water. Gehenna had been arranged on a second day that never won that word. He would not praise a community that divided itself with a decree of death on the table.

One fast. Whole city. No hedge under it.

Passover Night Without Bread

He called a fast of three days and three nights, without food or water, from the thirteenth of Nisan through the fifteenth. The fifteenth was the first night of Passover, the night of wine and bread and the story of leaving Egypt.

He knew what he was asking. The same people who had walked through the sea were being counted for slaughter in Persia. He was asking them to spend the night of the Seder hungry, using the old rescue as a claim they would not lean on until their mouths had done the Nineveh work first.

They Cried the Way Nineveh Cried

Sackcloth went on. Throats opened. Beasts in the yards went unfed because the king of Nineveh had not exempted his herds, and Mordecai would not let Shushan do less than a city that had no promise in its pocket.

No one in that gate could know yet whether the decree would bend. They only knew the standard had been named, and it was not Sinai. It was a foreign king in ashes, and a people who had turned from the violence in their own hands.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Legends of the Jews 12:160Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

We all face those moments, personally and collectively, where things feel impossibly dark. What then?

Well, let's dip into the story of Mordecai, from the Book of Esther. A truly terrifying decree has been issued: the annihilation of the Jewish people. Not a great situation, to put it mildly. What’s he going to do? Fight back? Scheme? Hide?

He does something else entirely. He calls for a fast.

It’s not just any fast. Mordecai doesn’t just say, "Hey, skip lunch, folks." According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, he gives a powerful, impassioned speech, invoking the story of Nineveh.

Remember Nineveh? The wicked city from the Book of Jonah? Jonah, you might recall, was sent to warn them of their impending doom. And what did they do? They repented. Completely.

Mordecai reminds the people of Israel of this story, saying, "O people of Israel, thou art dear and precious to thy Father in heaven." He urges them to follow Nineveh’s example. To really get what they did.

And what did Nineveh do, exactly? Mordecai spells it out, drawing directly from the biblical text (Jonah 3:6-9): "The king arose from his throne, laid his crown from him, covered himself with sackcloth, and sat in ashes…" It was a full-blown, top-to-bottom humbling. A complete and utter acknowledgement of wrongdoing.

It wasn’t just the humans, either! "Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste anything; let them not feed, nor drink water," Mordecai continues, quoting the decree of the King of Nineveh. Even the animals fasted. The whole city, from the most powerful to the most vulnerable, participated in this act of repentance. “Let them be covered with sackcloth, both man and beast, and let them cry mightily unto God.”

And the key, the absolutely essential ingredient? Turning away from their evil ways. Mordecai quotes the decree: "…yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands."

The fast wasn't just about going hungry. It was about profound, internal change. It was about recognizing the darkness within and actively choosing to move towards the light.

And what happened in Nineveh? "Then God repented Him of the evil He had designed to bring upon them, and He did it not.” God saw their sincerity, their complete transformation, and relented.

So, Mordecai concludes with a plea: "Now, then, let us follow their example, let us hold a fast, mayhap God will have mercy upon us." Maybe, just maybe, if they follow the path of Nineveh, they too can avert disaster.

A reminder that even in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds, true change, true repentance, can alter the course of history. What “Nineveh moment” are we in right now? And what would it truly take to turn things around? What inner work are we being called to do?

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 4:6Bereshit Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

Pretty impressive. But unlike the other days, there's no resounding declaration of "that it was good." Why this omission? The rabbis of old certainly wrestled with this question, and their answers are, well, pretty.

The Bereshit Rabbah, that incredible collection of rabbinic interpretations of Genesis, delves right into this mystery. One interpretation highlights a potential problem: Did God truly make the firmament? Seems like a simple question but Ben Zoma, a sage known for his profound insights (and sometimes, as the text delicately puts it, stirring up "commotion in the world"), pointed out that the heavens were made by God's word, by the "breath of His mouth," as (Psalm 33:6) tells us. So why does the Torah use the verb “made” here? It implies a more involved process than just divine speech!

Then there's the missing "that it was good." Why is this refrain absent on the second day? Rabbi Yoḥanan, citing Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥalafta, offers a rather bleak reason: Gehenna, or hell, was created on the second day. (Isaiah 30:33) even hints at this, saying "For the inferno is arranged from yesterday" – a day with a yesterday, but no day before yesterday. A chilling thought!

That's not all. Rabbi Ḥanina suggests that the problem wasn't hellfire, but division itself. "And let it divide between water and water," God commands. Rabbi Tavyomei takes this further, arguing that even division intended for the betterment of the world isn't deemed "good," so how much more so division that causes turmoil? Pretty deep. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman offers a different angle, focusing on the element of water. He proposes that the creation of water wasn’t finished on the second day. It wasn't until the third day, when the waters gathered into seas and dry land appeared (Genesis 1:9), that the work was complete. That's why the phrase "that it was good" appears twice on the third day – once for finishing the waters, and once for the new creations of land and vegetation.

There's even a story about a noblewoman who challenged Rabbi Yosei on this very issue. She argued that omitting "that it was good" on the second day and then trying to compensate with a general statement later doesn't quite work. It's like giving everyone a maneh (a unit of currency) except one person, and then giving a small amount to everyone. Sure, they all have something, but one person is still shortchanged.

Rabbi Levi, in the name of Rabbi Tanḥum bar Ḥanilai, takes a more prophetic approach. He sees a connection between the creation narrative and the future. "He tells the outcome from the outset" (Isaiah 46:10), meaning that from the very beginning, God knew that Moses, who was described as "good" (Exodus 2:2), would later stumble at the waters of Meriva (Numbers 20:12–13) and be punished because of it. Therefore, the omission of "that it was good" on the day water was separated foreshadows this future event.

Finally, Rabbi Simon, citing Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, presents a powerful analogy: a king with a ruthless legion. Because the legion is so destructive, the king doesn't want his name associated with it. Similarly, because water was the instrument of punishment for the generation of the Flood, the generation of Enosh, and the generation of the Dispersion, God chooses not to associate "that it was good" with its creation on the second day.

So, what does it all mean? Perhaps the omission serves as a reminder that creation is an ongoing process, not a one-time event. Maybe it highlights the inherent tension between order and chaos, separation and unity. Or maybe, just maybe, it’s a subtle hint that even in the most divine of creations, there's always room for improvement, for growth, and for a future where even the seemingly incomplete can ultimately be deemed "very good."

Full source