5 min read

The Midianite Who Told Balak to Back Down

When Balak called a war council against Israel, one voice said stop. He cited four generations of history and walked out when no one listened.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Council Balak Called
  2. Reuel Read the Record Before Giving Advice
  3. What Happened to the Ones Who Tried
  4. When No One Listened

The Council Balak Called

Balak looked at what Israel had done to the Amorite kings and wanted a policy. The normal tools had failed. Armies had failed. The cities of Sihon and Og were gone and the news of it was still moving through every kingdom in the region. Fear had taken root in Moab before Israel had crossed a single border of Moabite territory, which meant the fear was based on history rather than direct threat, and history-based fear is harder to argue away than the fear that comes from seeing an army at the gate.

He called counsel. He summoned Balaam son of Beor and the Midianite elders, and he asked what could be done against a people whose God had already rewritten the record of nations. The question was not rhetorical. He needed an answer that would work.

Balaam summoned two men to speak: Reuel the Midianite and Job the Uzite. Reuel answered first.

Reuel Read the Record Before Giving Advice

He did not flatter the king. He did not frame his counsel as a contribution to Balak's strategy. He told Balak directly: desist from the Hebrews, do not stretch out a hand against them, because the Lord chose them long ago and anyone who has touched them has been answered for it.

Then he made his case with names. Abraham went down to Egypt with his household and came out with silver and gold and cattle and servants, protected through the entire stay. Isaac survived the hostility of his neighbors in Canaan, watched others try to seize the wells his father had dug, and outlasted all of them without a military campaign. Jacob left with a staff across the Jordan and returned with enough people and livestock to become a threat his father-in-law tried to contain and could not. Joseph fell lower than any of them, into a pit, into slavery, into a foreign prison, and from that prison rose to the second seat of the most powerful government in the world, and from that seat fed the entire region through seven years of famine while his enemies starved.

This was not sentiment about divine favor. This was a four-generation brief on what happened to the people who opposed the family of Abraham and what happened to the family itself. The pattern was legible to anyone willing to look at the record rather than at the military assessment on the table in front of them.

What Happened to the Ones Who Tried

Reuel named them. Pharaoh had tried twice across two generations and lost both times in different ways. The men of Shechem had tried and the city was gone. The kings of Canaan whom Israel had already encountered had tried and the territory had changed hands. Each case was different in its particulars. The shared feature in every case was the attempt to harm this family and the consequence that came from it.

He was not claiming that Israel was invincible in a military sense. He was claiming that there was a force engaged on their behalf that did not behave the way military forces behaved, that did not require armies to win engagements, that operated through the same logic as the original promise made to Abraham: I will bless those who bless you, and curse those who curse you. Reuel had been around long enough to have watched this principle at work. He was not willing to pretend he hadn't seen it.

When No One Listened

Job the Uzite spoke after Reuel. His counsel followed the same line. There was no human weapon that would work against this people. The historical pattern was clear. The risks were not acceptable. The council should advise the king to leave Israel alone.

Balak did not take the advice. He was a king looking at a people camped on the plains of Moab, and no amount of historical argument about Abraham's migration to Egypt was going to satisfy the fear he felt looking at their numbers. He wanted a curse. He had decided before the council met that what he needed was Balaam, and after Reuel and Job had spoken he moved in that direction anyway. Reuel and Job rose and left. The tradition records the fact of their departure as a record of what they chose not to participate in.

Reuel went back to his home and became, in the tradition's longer account, the father-in-law of Moses. The man who had told Balak to desist from the Hebrews would later shelter the man who would lead them out of Egypt, and his daughter Zipporah would become Moses's wife, and his counsel at Sinai would shape the governance of the Israelite community in the desert. His warning at Balak's council had been ignored. Everything he had predicted about what happened to the people who opposed Israel proved accurate in the years that followed.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 4:26Legends of the Jews

Sometimes, it's not just about armies and strategies, but about the advice whispered in the ears of kings.

That's the situation King Balak finds himself in. He’s worried about the Israelites, this growing, powerful group on his borders. "What shall we do unto Israel?" he asks Balaam, the famed diviner. "We have tried several devices against this people, but we could not prevail over it. Now let me hear thy opinion."

Balaam, in turn, suggests bringing in the king's counselors. So, Reuel the Midianite and Job the Uzite are summoned.

He basically tells Balak to leave the Israelites alone. "If it seemeth good to the king, let him desist from the Hebrews, and let him not stretch forth his hand against them, for the Lord chose them in days of old." Reuel reminds Balak that the God of the Israelites "took them as the lot of His inheritance from amongst all the nations of the earth, and who is there that hath dared stretch forth his hand against them with impunity, but that their God avenged the evil done unto them?"

It's a powerful argument, steeped in history. Reuel then proceeds to recount some of the amazing things God had done for Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Think about the weight of those names!

He even brings up a more recent example: Joseph. "Verily, thy grandfather, the Pharaoh of former days, raised Joseph the son of Jacob above all the princes of Egypt, because he discerned his wisdom, for through his wisdom he rescued all the inhabitants of the land from the famine." Reuel is saying, "Remember what happened when Egypt welcomed Jacob and his sons? Blessings followed!"

His advice is clear: "Now, therefore, if it seem good in thine eyes, leave off from destroying the children of Israel, and if it be not thy will that they dwell in Egypt, send them forth from here, that they may go to the land of Canaan, the land wherein their ancestors sojourned." Let them go back to Eretz Yisrael, the Land of Israel.

What’s striking here is the appeal to historical precedent and, frankly, enlightened self-interest. Reuel isn't just saying "be nice." He's saying, "Messing with these people has consequences. Look at history!" It's a fascinating insight into the political calculations, the moral questions, and the ever-present shadow of the Divine that shaped the ancient world. It makes you wonder, doesn't it, about the advice being given – and ignored – by leaders today.

Full source
Chronicles of Jerahmeel XLVIChronicles of Jerahmeel (Gaster, 1899)

When Pharaoh sought counsel on what to do about the growing Israelite population, he summoned three men: Reuel the Midianite, Job, and Balaam of Petor. Their answers determined the fate of nations.

Reuel pleaded for mercy. He recounted how God punished every king who harmed Abraham's family. Pharaoh struck with plagues for taking Sarah, Abimelech's household struck with barrenness for the same. "Whoever stretches forth his hand against them, their God takes vengeance." For this good counsel, Reuel was rewarded: his descendant Zipporah would marry Moses. Balaam gave the opposite advice, destroy them. He was later killed by the sword. Job stayed silent, neither defending nor condemning Israel. For his silence, he was sentenced to suffer.

After Moses left Cush, he came to Midian, where Reuel, now called Jethro, promptly threw him in a pit for ten years. Only Zipporah had mercy, secretly feeding Moses bread and water. When she finally convinced her father to check on the prisoner, they found him alive, standing upright, praying. In Jethro's garden stood a sapphire staff planted in the ground. Every mighty warrior who had tried to marry Zipporah had attempted to uproot it and failed. Moses pulled it out effortlessly, like lifting a branch from a thicket. Engraved on it was the Ineffable Name of God.

This was no ordinary staff. According to the Chronicles of Jerahmeel, a 12th-century Hebrew chronicle translated by Moses Gaster in 1899, it had passed from Adam to Noah to Shem to Abraham to Isaac to Jacob to Joseph, and finally to Reuel. It was the staff Moses wielded when he returned to Egypt, tamed the lions guarding Pharaoh's gate, turned the Nile to blood, and split the Red Sea into twelve paths, one for each tribe. Even Pharaoh survived the drowning, pulled from the sea by Michael, Gabriel, and Uriel, and deposited in Nineveh, where he lived another five hundred years.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:29Legends of the Jews

It’s a scene ripe with drama, intrigue, and conflicting advice.

The story begins, as many of the best stories do, with a betrayal. Jethro, also known as Reuel, later to become Moses' father-in-law, dared to speak out against Pharaoh’s growing hostility towards the Hebrews. That Pharaoh was "exceedingly wroth with him," and Jethro was promptly dismissed from his position in disgrace, forced to flee to Midian. Ouch. Imagine the courage it took to stand up to a king, especially one as powerful as Pharaoh!

Left without Jethro's counsel, Pharaoh turned to other advisors, seeking their opinions on how to deal with the growing "problem" of the Hebrew population. First up was Job. Yes, that Job, the one of immense suffering and unwavering faith. And what was his advice? Well, not much, actually. As the text recounts, Job essentially washed his hands of the situation, saying, "Behold, all the inhabitants of the land are in thy power. Let the king do as seemeth good in his eyes." It's a bit disappointing, isn't it? Especially coming from someone known for his moral fortitude.

Finally, Pharaoh called upon Balaam. Balaam, a fascinating and complex figure, was a non-Israelite prophet known for his powerful blessings and curses (Numbers 22-24). Now, Balaam's advice is where things get really interesting. According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, Balaam essentially warned Pharaoh that any attempt to destroy the Hebrews through methods that had challenged their forefathers would fail. "From all that the king may devise against the Hebrews, they will be delivered," Balaam declared.

He reminded Pharaoh that the Hebrews’ God had saved Abraham from the fiery furnace, as we see in the Book of Genesis and elaborated upon in various Midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) traditions. "If thou thinkest to diminish them by the flaming fire, thou wilt not prevail over them, for their God delivered Abraham their father from the furnace." He further pointed out that Isaac had been spared from sacrifice, referencing the binding of Isaac (Akeidah) in Genesis 22. "Perhaps thou thinkest to destroy them with a sword, but their father Isaac was delivered from being slaughtered by the sword.” And, he added, even the back-breaking labor that Jacob endured while working for Laban couldn't break the Hebrews. "And if thou thinkest to reduce them through hard and rigorous labor, thou wilt also not prevail, for their father Jacob served Laban in all manner of hard work, and yet he prospered.”

So, what WAS Balaam's advice? His suggestion was chilling: target the newborn male children by throwing them into the Nile. "If it please the king, let him order all the male children that shall be born in Israel from this day forward to be thrown into the water. Thereby canst thou wipe out their name, for neither any of them nor any of their fathers was tried in this way.”

This was a tactic that hadn’t been used before, a way to circumvent the protective hand that had guided the patriarchs. A truly horrific suggestion! It’s a stark reminder of the depths of cruelty to which fear and prejudice can lead. We read in (Exodus 1:22), "Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, ‘Every boy that is born to the Hebrews you shall throw into the Nile, but you shall let every girl live.’"

What's so fascinating about this whole episode is the way it highlights the power of memory and the weight of history. Pharaoh and his advisors weren't just dealing with a present-day population; they were confronting a people deeply connected to their past, a past filled with divine interventions and miraculous escapes. Did Pharaoh truly believe he could outsmart the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? Maybe. Or perhaps he was simply blinded by fear and a desperate desire to maintain control. It makes you wonder: what "advice" are we listening to today that might lead us down a similarly dark path?

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 1:32Shemot Rabbah

Like a well, for instance. It's more than just a source of water; it’s often a meeting place, a place of destiny. Our sages point this out in Shemot Rabbah, noting how the well is a recurring motif when finding a partner in the stories of our patriarchs. The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) sees in this a continuation of a pattern established by the patriarchs. Isaac, Jacob, and Moses – all were connected to their wives at a well.

The Midrash reminds us, "Isaac came from going to Be’er laḥai ro’i" (Genesis 24:62). Be’er laḥai ro’i, "the well of the Living One who sees me," was where God appeared to Hagar. It was near this very spring that Isaac met Rebecca, who was returning with Abraham’s servant, Eliezer, and eventually became his wife (Genesis 24:63-67).

Then there's Jacob. "He saw, and behold, there was a well in the field" (Genesis 29:2). It was at that well that Jacob first laid eyes on Rachel (Genesis 29:10-11), the woman he would work fourteen years to marry.

We have Moses. "And he sat alongside the well." The story unfolds: "The priest of Midian had seven daughters; they came and they drew water and filled the troughs to give their father’s flock to drink" (Exodus 2:16).

This brings up an interesting question. The Midrash asks, "But doesn’t the Holy One blessed be He hate idol worship, and yet He provided Moses haven with an idol worshipper?" This is where the story of Yitro, Moses' future father-in-law, takes a fascinating turn.

Our Rabbis teach that Yitro, initially a priest of idol worship, realized the emptiness of his practices. He renounced idolatry and, according to the Midrash, even offered his position to the townspeople. When they rejected him and ostracized him, his daughters were forced to tend the flocks themselves.

"They came and they drew." The Midrash explains that they arrived early because they feared the shepherds. "The shepherds came and drove them away; Moses rose and rescued them and gave their flocks to drink" (Genesis 2:17). But wait, if Yitro was the priest, why were his daughters being driven away?

The Shemot Rabbah explains that because Yitro had rejected idolatry, the townspeople treated his daughters as outcasts, much like a divorced woman. "He drove out the man" (Genesis 3:24) – just as humanity was banished from Eden, Yitro's daughters were being banished from the community.

"Moses rose and rescued them." The Midrash emphasizes that Moses wasn't just helping; he was enacting justice. He saw an injustice and acted. Rabbi Yoḥanan, in the name of Rabbi Eliezer son of Rabbi Yosei HaGelili, even suggests the shepherds' intentions were sexually inappropriate, aligning with the verse "The betrothed young woman screamed, and there was no one to rescue her" (Deuteronomy 22:27). Alternatively, some Rabbis say that the shepherds actually cast them into the water and Moses saved them. Vayoshian, the text notes, is an expression of saving from water.

Moses not only rescued them but also "gave their flocks to drink," mirroring Jacob's actions for Rachel. When the daughters returned home early, their father, Reuel (another name for Yitro, meaning "companion to God"), questioned them. "Why were you quick to come today?" (Exodus 2:18).

"They said: An Egyptian man saved us from the shepherds and also drew water for us and gave the flock to drink" (Exodus 2:19). But was Moses really an Egyptian? The Midrash offers a clever interpretation: either he was dressed as an Egyptian, or the daughters were speaking metaphorically. Just as someone bitten by a snake might inadvertently save another while seeking relief, Moses' past actions (killing the Egyptian) led him to this encounter.

"He said to his daughters: Where is he? Why did you leave the man? Call him so that he will eat bread" (Exodus 2:20). Yitro recognized something special in Moses. According to the Midrash, he saw a connection to the patriarchs, those who found blessing at the well. He also hoped that Moses might marry one of his daughters, as "eating bread" can be a euphemism for marriage, like in (Genesis 39:6).

And so, Tzipora, meaning "bird," ran after Moses and brought him back. The Midrash adds that she was named Tzipora because she purified the house like a bird – a reference to the bird's role in purifying a house afflicted with leprosy (Leviticus 14:48-53).

What can we glean from this interplay of a story? It seems the well is more than just a place to quench thirst. It is a place of encounter, a place of destiny, a place where righteous action can change the course of history. And sometimes, the most unexpected places, even those associated with the pain of exile and rejection, can become the very place where redemption begins.

Full source