4 min read

Solomon Was a Cook Before He Was a King Again

Asmodeus wore Solomon's face and ruled his throne. Solomon wandered for three years telling people his name while they laughed.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The King Nobody Believed
  2. What Three Years on the Road Looks Like
  3. The Fish and the Ring
  4. What the Exile Was For

The King Nobody Believed

Solomon had a name but no throne, a face but no crown, a history that no one he met had any reason to believe. He wandered from city to city telling people he was the king of Israel. They laughed. A beggar claiming to be the wisest monarch alive, walking without retinue or ring or any object of proof, repeating the same absurd claim in every town, was not credible by any standard a reasonable person would apply.

This went on for three years.

The tradition is explicit about why. Asmodeus, king of the demons, had been Solomon's captive for years. When Solomon violated three prohibitions that Deuteronomy laid down for kings, too many horses, too many wives, too much accumulated gold and silver, the divine response was not a warning. It was a removal. Asmodeus was freed, put on Solomon's appearance, sat on Solomon's throne, and ruled Israel while the real king walked the earth unable to prove who he was. The punishment fit the sin exactly: Solomon had placed his confidence in the visible markers of power, and the visible markers were stripped away and given to someone else.

What Three Years on the Road Looks Like

The wandering was not comfortable suffering. Solomon was humiliated, repeatedly and completely. He begged for food. He told his story and watched people dismiss him. He arrived in Ammon and ended up working in the palace kitchens, cooking for a king who did not know who he had hired. He worked with his hands, in a servant's role, in a foreign kingdom, under a name that no one there would have recognized even if he had used it.

He caught the eye of the king's daughter, Naamah, who either saw something real in him or simply loved him. When her father found out that she had married the cook, he ordered both of them into the desert to die. They wandered further. Solomon fished to stay alive, opening his catch each night to eat, surviving on what the water provided.

The Fish and the Ring

One evening he cut open a fish and found inside it the ring engraved with the divine name, the ring that Asmodeus had taken from him at the moment of the dispossession. The moment he held it, his authority returned. The exile was over. Not because anything around him had changed, not because anyone had finally believed his story, but because the object that carried his legitimate power had come back to his hand.

He made his way back to Jerusalem, appeared before the court with the ring, and confronted Asmodeus. The demon could not maintain the disguise against the name. He fled. Solomon sat again on his own throne and faced what three years of wandering had done to his understanding of himself.

What the Exile Was For

The tradition does not present this as arbitrary punishment. The three violations, too many horses, too many wives, too much wealth, were not incidental excesses. Each one represented a category of misplaced trust: military power instead of divine protection, political alliance instead of covenant faithfulness, material security instead of reliance on God. Solomon had quietly replaced the conditions of righteous kingship with the conditions of ordinary imperial power, and the exile was the lesson that demonstrated what ordinary imperial power actually meant without the ring: nothing.

He had told people his name for three years and been laughed at. That was the curriculum. By the time the fish returned his ring to him, he had learned what it meant to have authority that rested entirely in something he could not manufacture, could not protect by his own effort, and could lose in a moment.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 5:139Legends of the Jews

Biblical figures is often remembered as flawless, but the story of Solomon, the wisest of men, reminds us that even royalty can stumble. And it’s a wild ride to redemption.

For three whole years, Solomon, the once-glorious king, wandered. Can you imagine? Begging for food, moving from town to town, country to country. Why? He was atoning for three significant sins. According to the book of Deuteronomy, kings shouldn't accumulate too many horses, wives, or wealth. Solomon, it seems, had indulged in all three.

Why such a harsh punishment? Well, the story isn't just about sin; it's also about divine mercy. That God eventually had pity on Solomon, not just for his own sake, but for the sake of his father, David, and for the sake of Naamah.

Who was Naamah? Ah, here’s where the story gets even more interesting. Naamah, the daughter of the Ammonite king, was destined to be the ancestress of the Messiah! The story goes that the time was drawing near for her to become Solomon’s wife and queen in Jerusalem. So, God guided the wandering Solomon to the Ammonite capital.

Now, picture this: The mighty King Solomon, reduced to working as a lowly kitchen helper in the royal household. But he was a natural, quickly rising through the ranks until he became the king's chief cook! It was in this unlikely position that he caught the eye of the princess, Naamah. She fell head over heels for the cook.

Of course, her parents weren't thrilled. They tried everything to dissuade her from marrying beneath her station. Threats, pleas – nothing worked. They even threatened to execute both her and her beloved! Desperate, the Ammonite king banished the lovers to a desolate desert, hoping they’d perish from starvation.

But fate, and perhaps a bit of divine intervention, had other plans. As Solomon and Naamah wandered through the desert, they stumbled upon a city by the sea. Desperate for sustenance, they bought a fish. When Naamah prepared the fish, she made an astonishing discovery: inside the fish's belly was the magic ring!

This wasn't just any ring. It was the ring that Solomon had given to Asmodeus, the demon who had usurped his throne. As the story goes, Asmodeus had thrown the ring into the sea, where it was swallowed by a fish. Solomon recognized it instantly. He slipped it back on his finger, and in an instant, he was transported back to Jerusalem!

With the ring restored, Solomon banished Asmodeus, who had been impersonating him for three long years, and reclaimed his rightful place on the throne. Justice was served, and the stage was set for the destined union with Naamah.

What does this all mean? Perhaps it's a reminder that even the wisest among us can lose our way, but that redemption is always possible. And sometimes, the most unexpected paths lead us back to where we’re meant to be. Plus, who knew a fish could play such a crucial role in royal affairs? It just goes to show, sometimes the greatest treasures are hidden in the most unlikely of places.

Full source
Kohelet Rabbah 11:1Kohelet Rabbah

It grapples with the very human experience of seeking knowledge, stumbling, and trying to make sense of it all.

The verse It's a loaded verse, isn't it? Full of questions about legacy, wisdom, and the cyclical nature of human experience.

The rabbis in Kohelet Rabbah really dig into this. "I turned [ufaniti] to behold wisdom," the text says. But one interpretation suggests we should read ufaniti as ufiniti – "I emptied." Like a bowl, sometimes full, sometimes empty. This resonates deeply. Haven't we all had moments of clarity, followed by periods of forgetfulness, where the wisdom we thought we grasped seems to vanish? The text suggests that even Solomon himself, famed for his wisdom, would study Torah and then, at times, forget it.

Then the text moves into interpretations of "debauchery and folly." Rabbi Ḥanina bar Pappa sees "debauchery" as the corruption of the kingdom, and "folly" as the heavy-handedness of those in power. Harsh taxes on the "foolish masses," as he puts it. Rabbi Simon offers a different take: "Debauchery" is the debauchery of heresy, and "folly" is just plain foolishness. It's fascinating how the rabbis use this verse as a lens to critique the society around them.

And what about that phrase, "As who is the person who would come after the king..."? The text takes this as a challenge to human arrogance. If you can't even understand the motivations of a human king, how can you presume to understand the ways of the King of Kings, the Holy One, blessed be He? It's a humbling thought.

Rabbi Naḥman offers two powerful parables to illustrate this point. One is about a field of reeds so dense that no one can enter. A clever person figures out how to cut through it, paving the way for others. The other is about a vast palace with so many entrances that people get lost inside. Someone uses a skein of reed grass to create a trail, allowing everyone to find their way in and out. Each of these parables highlights the importance of finding a path, a method, for working through the complexities of the world. A way to make sense of the seemingly incomprehensible.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai adds another layer with his analogy of a king who builds a palace. Passersby critique the palace, suggesting improvements. But, he asks, is it appropriate for people to critique themselves in the same way? Should a person wish for three hands, three eyes? The verse says "asuhu," which means "they have already done" (plural), not "asahu" (singular). It's as if God and His court deliberated over our creation, designing us with intention and purpose. As (Deuteronomy 32:6) says, "He made you and established you."

Rabbi Levi bar Ḥaita uses the image of a palace again. If a human king placed the drainpipe at the entrance, it would be ugly and inappropriate. But God placed our "drainpipe" – our nose – at our entrance, and it's part of our beauty and worth. Rabbi Yitzḥak bar Maryon emphasizes this idea of divine artistry. God is the Tzur, the Rock, a beautiful sculptor (tzayar). He takes pride in His creation, inviting us to admire the sculpture He has sculpted.

And finally, Rabbi Pinḥas, citing Rabbi Levi, points to the verse "behibare’am" (Genesis 2:4), meaning "when they were created." He interprets this as "He created them with the letter heh [beheh bera’am]." The letter heh is the easiest to pronounce, suggesting that creation required no exertion on God's part.

So, what does it all mean? Perhaps it's a reminder that wisdom is a journey, not a destination. That even in our moments of doubt and forgetfulness, we are part of something larger, a creation crafted with intention and love. It's an invitation to appreciate the beauty and complexity of the world, and to trust in the divine wisdom that shaped us.

Full source