Parshat Noach5 min read

The Flood Ended With Breath, Precise Dates, and a Bow

Philo reads the flood as drowning the senses, counts the days of drying, asks whether God regretted it, and finds the rainbow sealing a covenant.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. All Human Time Had Come Against God
  2. Fifteen Cubits Drowned the High Places of the Senses
  3. The Wind That Ended the Flood Was Spirit, Not Just Air
  4. Noah's Six Hundred and First Year Was the Year the Earth Dried
  5. God Promised and the Rainbow Sealed It

All Human Time Had Come Against God

The verse said: the end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with violence. Philo of Alexandria, the first-century Jewish philosopher, stopped at the word all. Not some flesh. Not the particularly wicked. All. And not only violence in the obvious forms. He read it as a total corruption of time itself, of how humanity was spending its days, of the ordinary hours that together add up to a life.

A person does not need to commit dramatic crimes to help ruin the world. Philo's flood begins when ordinary time is spent in ways that make creation answerable for human choices. The water came because the space between morning and evening, multiplied by every person alive, had become evidence against humanity. Time itself had become a verdict.

Fifteen Cubits Drowned the High Places of the Senses

The Torah said the waters rose fifteen cubits above the mountains. Philo refused to leave this as geography. He counted the senses. Five of them, lodged in the head, in the most elevated part of the body. Multiply five by three, the number of movement and completion, and you have fifteen. The waters that rose fifteen cubits above the mountains symbolized the complete overwhelming of the senses, the proud high places of human perception drowned under the flood's weight.

A corrupt world is not only violent in its actions. It is flooded in its perceptions. The senses that should read creation honestly, that should see beauty and ugliness with clear eyes and hear truth and falsehood with honest ears, are instead overwhelmed by what they desire rather than what they perceive. The flood that drowned the mountains also drowned the internal high ground where human discernment was supposed to live.

The Wind That Ended the Flood Was Spirit, Not Just Air

God caused a wind to pass over the waters and they began to recede. Philo asked: what kind of wind? The Hebrew word is the same word used for the spirit of God hovering over the waters at creation. Was the ending of the flood a repetition of the beginning? Was the spirit that had hovered over chaos before the first day now hovering again over a world that had returned to something close to chaos?

Philo answered that both meanings were in the word and neither cancelled the other. The wind that dried the earth was air, was movement, was atmospheric physics. It was also spirit, divine breath working through the mechanics of weather to begin a new world. The flood did not end with a miracle that violated nature. It ended with spirit working through nature at the point where the two were the same thing.

Noah's Six Hundred and First Year Was the Year the Earth Dried

Noah was six hundred years old when the flood began. The earth dried fully on the first day of the first month of his six hundred and first year. Philo did not let this arithmetic pass without comment. The first day of the first month of a new year of the patriarch's life: creation beginning again, time starting fresh, the calendar of Noah's body aligned with the calendar of the world's renewal.

The precision of biblical dates was not accidental to Philo. Dates are where eternity touches time, where the unchanging purpose of God becomes visible in the specific numbered day on a specific year of a specific man's life. Noah's six hundred and first year was the year he stepped out of the ark onto dry ground. The same man who had been told to build a boat in the middle of a world that saw no reason for one now stood in the first month of a new year on ground that was no longer covered in water. The numbers marked the change.

God Promised and the Rainbow Sealed It

God said to Noah and his sons: I will establish my covenant with you, and never again will all flesh be cut off by floodwaters. The rainbow appeared in the clouds as the sign of this covenant. Philo asked whether God regretted the flood, and found the question answered in the promise. Regret is not quite the right word for what the text expresses. God sees the rainbow and remembers. The remembering is built into the sign, which means the covenant is not simply a declaration but a structure woven into weather itself. Every rain cloud that produces a bow of color is the covenant renewing itself. The sky carries the promise in the physics of light through water.

Philo's reading left the flood larger than meteorology and smaller than mythology. It was a real historical event read through the lens of what it meant for the human soul: justice served at enormous cost, the world returned through spirit and wind and precise timing to the state of readiness for a covenant that would try again where the previous attempt had failed.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

7 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

The Midrash of Philo 13:1The Midrash of Philo

That feeling, that nagging sense of injustice, it's not new. Not by a long shot.

In fact, it’s a question that echoes all the way back to the very beginning, to the story of Noah and the Great Flood. God, seeing the state of humanity, declares "All the time of man has come against me, because the earth is filled with iniquity" (Genesis 6:13).

What does that really mean?

That’s the question posed in The Midrash of Philo, a collection of interpretations and expansions on the biblical text. Philo, for those unfamiliar, was a Jewish philosopher living in Alexandria in the first century CE. He tried to harmonize Greek philosophy with Jewish thought. His midrashim (rabbinic interpretive commentary), or interpretations, offer a unique window into how these ancient thinkers wrestled with the big questions.

So, back to that verse. "All the time of man has come against me…" It’s powerful, isn’t it? It’s not just some of humanity, or some of the time. It's all the time of all of humanity that has "come against" God. It’s a complete and utter breakdown of the relationship between Creator and creation.

Why this all-encompassing condemnation? Because, as the verse continues, "the earth is filled with iniquity." Iniquity, or hamas in the original Hebrew, implies not just wrongdoing, but violence and corruption. It’s a society rotten to its core.

Now, the text doesn't spell out precisely what that iniquity entails, leaving room for interpretation and, well, midrash! It invites us to consider what kind of behavior could so completely alienate humanity from the Divine. Was it idolatry? Social injustice? Moral decay? Perhaps it was a combination of all these things, a perfect storm of wickedness that poisoned the entire world.

The Zohar, that foundational text of Jewish mysticism, paints a vivid picture of this pre-flood world, describing rampant immorality and a complete disregard for divine law. Ginzberg, in his Legends of the Jews, compiles various traditions that elaborate on the sins of the generation of the Flood, ranging from sexual perversion to robbery and murder. It was a world where might made right, and compassion was a weakness.

Is it any wonder, then, that God felt compelled to start over? That the flood, as devastating as it was, became a necessary act of cosmic cleansing?

But here's the thing: the story of the Flood isn't just a historical account. It's a timeless parable about the consequences of our actions. It's a reminder that unchecked iniquity can have catastrophic consequences, not just for individuals, but for the entire world. It challenges us to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we creating? Are we contributing to the forces of hamas, or are we striving to build a more just and compassionate society?

Because ultimately, the question posed by (Genesis 6:13) isn't just about the past. It's about the present, and the future. It's a question that demands our attention, and our action. What kind of world will we leave behind?

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 20:1The Midrash of Philo

The Torah tells us, in (Genesis 7:19), about the flood: “And the water overflowed fifteen cubits above all the highest mountains.” Simple enough The first reading. But if we dig a little deeper, as the Midrash of Philo encourages us to do, we find a fascinating allegorical interpretation waiting for us. It's not just about the literal height of the water.

Philo, a Jewish philosopher living in Alexandria in the first century CE, saw profound symbolism in the Torah. He believed the text held hidden meanings, accessible through allegorical interpretation.

So, what are these "lofty mountains" that the flood surpassed? According to Philo, they represent the senses in our body. our senses, sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing, reside in the "lofty region" of our head. They're our connection to the world, our way of understanding and experiencing reality.

How many senses are there? Five. And five times three? Fifteen.

See where we're going with this?

The fifteen cubits, then, aren't just a measurement of water. They represent the complete and utter submersion of our senses. The flood wasn't just about physical destruction. It was about the overwhelming of our physical, sensory experience. The senses, our “lofty mountains,” were entirely covered.

Philo isn't just giving us a physics lesson; he's offering a spiritual insight. The flood, in his view, symbolizes a time when humanity’s reliance on the physical world was washed away, making way for something new. A chance for rebirth, a chance to connect with something higher.

What does it mean for us today? Maybe it's a reminder to not get too caught up in the sensory world. To look beyond the surface, to seek deeper meaning, and to remember that true understanding comes not just from what we see, hear, taste, touch, and smell, but from a place of deeper knowing. A place beyond the "lofty mountains" of our senses.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 1:10The Midrash of Philo

The familiar story is this: Noah, the ark, the animals, and the rain that just wouldn't stop. But what about that crucial moment when the waters finally receded? (Genesis 8:2) simply states, "He brought a breath over the earth, and the water ceased." Simple. But what is this "breath"? That's what the ancient sage Philo of Alexandria grappled with.

Some scholars, Philo explains, interpret this "breath" – the Hebrew word is ruach – as merely the wind. Makes sense The first reading, doesn't it? The wind picked up, pushing the waters back. But Philo, ever the keen observer, had a problem with this explanation. "I am not aware that water is diminished by wind," he argues. Wind stirs up waves, agitates the water, but does it actually remove it? If wind alone could dry up vast bodies of water, wouldn't the oceans have vanished long ago?

Philo, writing in the first century CE, was deeply influenced by Greek philosophy and sought to reconcile it with Jewish scripture. His interpretations often looked beyond the literal, searching for deeper, allegorical meanings. In this case, he proposed a far more profound interpretation of the ruach.

He believed that the "breath" was not just any wind, but the very Breath of the Deity.

Think about the magnitude of the Flood. This wasn't just a local rainstorm; it was a cataclysmic event that submerged the entire world. "An immense and boundless overflow, extending almost beyond the pillars of Hercules and the great Mediterranean Sea," Philo emphasizes. The Pillars of Hercules, known today as the Strait of Gibraltar, marked the edge of the known world for the ancients. The flood, in Philo's understanding, stretched even beyond that. Could a mere wind possibly clear such a vast expanse of water?

Philo argues that only "some invisible and divine virtue" could accomplish such a feat. This Breath of God, this ruach Elohim, is not just a force, but an active, creative power. It's the same breath that, according to (Genesis 1:2), hovered over the waters at the dawn of creation, bringing order out of chaos.

So, the receding of the Flood wasn't just a natural phenomenon, but a divine act of restoration. It was God's ruach, his life-giving breath, that brought security back to the universe, and to all living things.

What does this mean for us? Perhaps it suggests that even in the face of overwhelming challenges – floods, metaphorical or literal – there is always the potential for renewal, for the Breath of God to bring order back to chaos. Perhaps it encourages us to look beyond the surface, to seek the deeper meaning, the divine spark, within the seemingly ordinary events of our lives. Just as Philo did, wrestling with the simple words of scripture to uncover a profound truth.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 13:1The Midrash of Philo

Pull back for a second. A worldwide flood. The fate of humanity hanging by a thread – or rather, a wooden beam. And then… silence. The waters recede. But when they recede, and why then? That’s where things get interesting, especially when we dive into the world of Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary).

Specifically, It seems like a random detail, doesn't it? But in Jewish tradition, nothing is random. Everything is imbued with meaning. The Torah is incredibly precise. It doesn't waste words. So, this specific timing… it's practically begging us to ask, “What's so special about that moment?” What's the significance of Noah’s 601st year, the first day of the first month?

Unfortunately, the Midrash of Philo 13 leaves us hanging there. It poses the question, setting the stage for a beautiful exploration, but it doesn't provide the answer. It invites us to delve deeper, to wrestle with the text and seek out other interpretations.

That, in itself, is the beauty of Midrash. It's not about finding definitive answers. It's about the journey of seeking, of questioning, of engaging with the text in a personal and meaningful way. It reminds us that these stories are not just ancient history; they are living narratives that continue to speak to us today.

So, what do you think? Why that specific moment? What significance might that timing hold? Maybe, just maybe, the question itself is the answer, urging us to look closer at our own lives, our own moments of emergence from the floodwaters of hardship and chaos. What does the first day of a new beginning truly mean?

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 14:1The Midrash of Philo

The Midrash of Philo turns to The Precise Day the Earth Dried After the Flood.

Well, The Midrash of Philo, that wonderfully imaginative exploration of the Torah, doesn't let a detail like that slip by. It asks the very same question: "Why is it that the earth was dried up in the seventh month, and on the twenty seventh day?"

The answer, according to The Midrash of Philo, is profound, tied directly to the creation of Adam himself! The Torah tells us that Adam was created on the twenty-seventh day of the sixth month. A seemingly random detail. The world was cleansed, purified by the flood. And when was the earth deemed ready to receive humanity again? On the same day of the month that Adam was created!

The Midrash of Philo draws a direct parallel. The drying of the earth on the twenty-seventh day of the seventh month mirrors Adam’s creation on the twenty-seventh day of the sixth month. It's not just a coincidence. It's a cosmic reset.

The flood wasn't just about wiping out wickedness. It was about preparing the world for a new beginning, a new chance for humanity. The earth, cleansed and renewed, was once again ready to fulfill its purpose: to be a home for humankind. And on that specific day, the twenty-seventh, the day associated with the creation of the first human, Adam, the process was complete.

Isn't that incredible? It's a reminder that even in destruction, there's the potential for renewal. And that sometimes, the smallest details can hold the greatest significance. It makes you wonder, what other hidden connections are waiting to be discovered in the Torah's words? And what can we learn from those connections about ourselves, our world, and our place in it?

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 21:1The Midrash of Philo

The Midrash of Philo turns to Did God Regret the Flood and Promise Never Again.

That's precisely the question that bubbles up when we read (Genesis 8:21). "And the Lord God said, repenting him, I will not again proceed to curse the earth for the works of man, for the thoughts of the mind of man are toward, and are diligently and ceaselessly exercised in, wickedness from his youth up; therefore I will not now proceed to smite all living flesh as I have done at other times?"

So, what's going on here? Is this verse actually saying God felt remorse after the flood? It's a sticky question, and something the sages have grappled with for centuries.

The Midrash of Philo (a collection of interpretations and expansions on biblical text attributed to the philosopher Philo of Alexandria) dives headfirst into this very conundrum. It wrestles with the implications of God seemingly changing His mind. The flood was meant to cleanse the earth, to wipe the slate clean of wickedness. And yet, here's God, right after the waters recede, essentially saying, "You know what? Maybe that wasn't the best solution. Humans are just… like that. Always have been, always will be, inclined towards wickedness."

Is it really repentance?

Well, some might argue that attributing repentance to God is a bit… anthropomorphic. It implies a human-like fallibility that doesn't quite jive with the traditional image of an all-knowing, all-powerful deity.

But here's another way to look at it. Maybe it’s not about regret in the human sense. Perhaps it's more about a divine reassessment, a shift in strategy. Instead of wiping the slate clean every time humanity messes up, maybe the answer lies in something else.

What's fascinating is the reason given for this change of heart. God isn't saying humans have suddenly become angels. Quite the opposite! The verse states that "the thoughts of the mind of man are toward, and are diligently and ceaselessly exercised in, wickedness from his youth up." It's a pretty bleak assessment. So why, then, does God decide against another cataclysmic flood?

Perhaps it’s about understanding the inherent nature of humanity. Recognizing that imperfection is part of the package. That striving for good, even amidst the constant pull of wickedness, is what truly matters. That complete annihilation isn’t the answer, but rather, enduring patience and a continued opportunity for growth.

The real question, then, becomes: how do we interpret this divine "change of heart?" Does it give us license to be wicked, knowing God won't wipe us out? Or does it place a greater responsibility on our shoulders, knowing that despite our inherent flaws, we are still given the chance to strive for good, to learn, and to grow?

It’s a question worth pondering, isn't it? A question that reminds us that even in the face of our own imperfections, there’s always the potential for something more.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 3:1The Midrash of Philo

Take the moment after the Flood, when the world is starting over. God gives Noah and his family a new covenant, a new set of rules. And smack dab in the middle of it, we find this: "Every creeping thing which lives shall be to you for food" (Genesis 9:3).

Seems straightforward. Eat what you need to survive. But is that all there is to it? The rabbis of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) certainly didn't think so.

The Midrash of Philo, a collection of interpretations and expansions on the Torah, zeroes in on this very verse. Why, it asks, did God specifically mention "creeping things?" Was this just a divine endorsement of a snail-filled diet?

Well, probably not. The Midrash suggests that there's a deeper meaning lurking beneath the surface.

Perhaps, it's about recognizing the inherent worth in every creature, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant. Even the lowliest "creeping thing" has a place in God's creation. And by allowing us to consume them, God reminds us of the delicate balance of life, the interconnectedness of all things.: After the devastation of the Flood, humanity needed a new perspective. They needed to understand their role in this new world, a world where they were given dominion over all living things. But dominion doesn’t mean destruction or exploitation. It means stewardship, responsibility.

So, maybe that little phrase "creeping things" isn’t just about what's on the menu. Maybe it’s a reminder to appreciate the intricate web of life, to treat every creature with respect, and to recognize the divine spark in even the smallest among us. Maybe it's about understanding that even what seems insignificant has a purpose, a value, in the grand scheme of creation.

What do you think? Is there more to this verse than meets the eye? Perhaps the real nourishment isn't just the food we consume, but the wisdom we gain from understanding our place in the world and our relationship with all living things.

Full source