5 min read

God Sat Down at the Wheel After the Sixth Day Was Over

Rabbi Huna saw God at a potter's wheel, still working after creation. The clay yields or resists based on your direction. Eve arrived in twenty-four jewels.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The wheel that was already spinning
  2. Everything beneath the sky came from above or below
  3. God braiding the first woman's hair
  4. Eve walking into the garden in twenty-four jewels

The wheel that was already spinning

Rabbi Huna read a line in Job 37:12, about God revolving wheels by his own devices, and the image arrived fully formed. God at a potter's wheel. Hands wet with clay. Still leaning into the spin.

This was not a metaphor for the first week of creation. This was now. The Potter had not set down the clay after completing Adam on the sixth day. He had kept working. Creation was ongoing, a workshop still running, not a finished sculpture behind glass.

The implications were physical. When a person moved through life in the direction of righteousness and loving-kindness, the wheel spun one way and the clay yielded. The day went smoothly. The world offered purchase. When a person turned toward cruelty or dishonesty, the wheel reversed. The clay that had been soft became resistant. What felt like bad luck or the hostility of circumstances was, in Rabbi Huna's image, the potter adjusting the resistance of the wheel in response to the direction the clay was moving.

The world was not pushing you around randomly. It was responding to you.

Everything beneath the sky came from above or below

A second question caught the attention of the Bereshit Rabbah compilers. Where does everything come from? Not theologically. Physically. Which substances originate in heaven and which originate in the earth?

The rabbis laid out a careful taxonomy. Things that come down from above: dew, rain, the manna in the wilderness. Things that rise from below: springs, vapors, the first human being fashioned from soil. The categories sound simple until you notice they are not perfectly separable. Adam was made from earth, but his breath was blown in from above. The manna came from heaven, but it tasted of whatever the person eating it desired most, a quality that seemed to come from within the eater rather than from the bread.

The world ran on two axes, a vertical exchange between heaven and earth, and no created thing belonged entirely to one side or the other. The potter's clay came up from the ground. The hands shaping it reached down from something larger. Every object in existence was made at the intersection.

God braiding the first woman's hair

When God presented Eve to Adam, the rabbis asked what the presentation looked like. The verse in Genesis 2:22 uses the word vayivneha, and He built her, which sounds less like creation and more like construction. The rabbis read it as an elaborate preparation.

Rabbi Hoshaya imagined God braiding Eve's hair. Not just combing it, but separating each strand, drawing it through the fingers, and arranging it in the formal style that a bride wore in the cities of the Mediterranean world, where women of rank appeared at important occasions in plaited towers of hair threaded with ornament. The strands rose under the hands that had a moment before been wet with the clay of the wheel. God was doing the bride's hair before the introduction, the same fingers that turned the world now lifting and twisting and pinning, building height into the hair the way the verse said He had built her.

Eve walking into the garden in twenty-four jewels

Another reading added jewelry. Twenty-four adornments, matching the twenty-four priestly gifts and the twenty-four books of the Hebrew Bible. They went on one at a time over the finished braids, each piece sitting against skin that had not existed a day before, catching what light the garden held and throwing it back. Eve arrived at her first meeting with Adam carrying the full weight of what those numbers meant in Jewish tradition. She walked into the garden dressed in the categories of sacred obligation, the gifts of the altar and the books of the law worn on her body as ornament. Adam, who had named all the animals and watched them pair off without finding a mate, stood there looking at someone built to a scale he had not seen before, braided and jeweled and lit from the work of the same hands that had spun the soil he was made from.

The potter at the wheel. The taxonomy of heaven and earth. Eve in her twenty-four jewels. Bereshit Rabbah held these three images in one frame and called them all the same act. God was still making things. Still at the wheel. The braiding of Eve's hair and the spinning of human destiny were the same gesture from different distances.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 12:1Bereshit Rabbah

"These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created" (Genesis 2:4). It is written: "Behold, these are but the ends of His ways" (Job 26:14). Rav Huna said: All that you see are but the ends of the ways of the Holy One, blessed be He. "Behold, these are but the ends of His ways; and what a mere whisper of a word do we hear of Him! But the thunder of His mighty deeds, who can understand?" Rav Huna said: This thunder, when it goes forth as it should, no creature can withstand it. It is not written here "let us understand," but rather "who can understand" -- the clever ones know its hint and its meaning.

Rav Huna said: If you cannot withstand the order of the thunder, how much more so the order of the world! It is astonishing. And if a person should say to you, "I am able to comprehend the order of the world," say to him: After a king of flesh and blood you are not able to stand; after the King of kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, are you able to stand? It is astonishing.

Rav Nachman said: A parable of a thicket of reeds, which no person was able to enter, for whoever entered it would lose his way. What did one clever person do? He cut and entered, cut and entered. He entered by way of the cutting and went out by way of the cutting.

Then all began to gather and go out by way of the cutting. Rav Nachman gave another parable: a parable of a great palace that had many entrances, so that whoever entered it would lose his way. What did one clever person do? He took a ball of cord and tied it opposite the entrance, and entered by way of the cord and went out by way of the cord. Then all began to enter and go out by way of the cord.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai said: A parable of a king of flesh and blood who built a palace, and people would enter it and say, "If only the columns were taller, it would be beautiful. If only the walls were taller, it would be beautiful. If only the ceiling were higher, it would be beautiful."

But will a person come and say, "If only I had three eyes, if only I had three feet, it would be lovely for me"? It is astonishing! It is not said here "that which He has already made," but rather "that which they have already made" (Ecclesiastes 2:12) -- as it were, the King of kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, and His court are counted over every single limb of yours and set you upon your base, as it is said: "Do you thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? Is not He your father who acquired you? He made you and established you" (Deuteronomy 32:6). Rabbi Levi bar Chayta said: A king of flesh and blood builds a palace, and if he puts its drainpipe at its entrance it is not beautiful; but the King of kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, created this man and put his drainpipe at his entrance, and it is beautiful, and it is to His praise.

Rabbi Yitzchak bar Meryon said: It is written, "And the LORD God formed the man" (Genesis 2:7); and what does Scripture teach by saying "which He had formed" (Genesis 2:8)? As it were, the Holy One, blessed be He, takes pride in His world and says, "See the creature that I have created and the form that I have formed." Rabbi Yitzchak bar Meryon said: It is written, "These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created" (Genesis 2:4) -- their Creator praises them, and who shall disparage them?

Their Creator extols them, and who shall find fault in them? Rather, they are beautiful and they are praiseworthy, as it is said: "These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made earth and heaven" (Genesis 2:4).

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 5:9Bereshit Rabbah

The Book of Genesis might just have the answer. to the creation story, specifically (Genesis 1:11): "God said, ‘Let the earth sprout grass, vegetation yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit in their kind, in which there is its seed, upon the earth,’ and it was so." Simple enough. Well, according to the sages in Bereshit Rabbah, a classic collection of rabbinic interpretations on Genesis, there's more to this verse than meets the eye.

Rabbi Natan, as quoted in Bereshit Rabbah, points out that while Adam, Eve, and the serpent were brought to judgment, the earth itself also got caught in the crossfire. The earth was cursed, as we read in (Genesis 3:17), "Cursed is the ground because of you." But why? What did the earth do wrong?

The curse, according to Rabbi Natan, meant the earth would produce "cursed items" like gnats, flies, and fleas. Ugh. But even those have a purpose, says Rabbi Yitzchak! Everything has its place.

So, why the curse in the first place? Here’s where we get two fascinating perspectives, courtesy of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Shalom and Rabbi Pinḥas.

Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Shalom argues that the earth actually disobeyed God’s command! God said, "Let the earth sprout grass… just as the fruit is edible, so should the tree be edible." In other words, the whole plant should be food. But the earth didn’t deliver. As (Genesis 1:12) says, "The earth produced grass… and trees bearing fruit" – the fruit is edible, but the tree? Not so much. The earth fell short.

But wait! Rabbi Pinḥas has a completely different take. He believes the earth actually exceeded expectations! It took the initiative! "Trees bearing fruit" – even the non-fruit trees produced fruit! Maybe not tasty fruit, but fruit nonetheless. The earth went above and beyond in fulfilling the Creator's will.

So, if Rabbi Pinḥas is right, why the curse?

Bereshit Rabbah answers with an analogy: it's like cursing the breasts from which someone nursed. The earth, was the ultimate provider of sustenance for humanity. Therefore, it was cursed as part of humanity's own punishment.

We’re left with two possibilities: The earth either didn’t fully follow God’s instructions, or it did even more than asked, but was cursed nonetheless due to its connection to humanity. Which is it?

Perhaps the point isn't to decide which Rabbi is "right," but to ponder the complexities of creation, obedience, and consequence. Maybe the earth's "failure" to make everything edible is a reminder of the effort and work required to sustain ourselves. Or perhaps, even in exceeding expectations, there can be unintended consequences. Either way, it gives us a lot to chew on – hopefully, along with some tasty, if imperfect, fruit.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 20:4Bereshit Rabbah

Bereshit Rabbah turns to Hoshaya, Eve at the Dawn of Creation.

The passage begins by focusing on the phrase "Because you did this [zot]". Notice that zot is the feminine form of "this" in Hebrew. Rabbi Hoshaya cleverly points out: "It was because of this woman!" In other words, the serpent's actions were driven by lust for Eve herself. Was every action that you took not because of her? That's quite a charge!

Rabbi Yehuda bar Simon, quoting Rabbi Hoshaya, adds another layer: from the beginning of Genesis up to this point, God’s name appears seventy-one times. Why is that significant? This number, indicates that the serpent was judged before a full Sanhedrin, the ancient Jewish high court consisting of seventy-one members.

What was the sentence? Rabbi Hoshaya of Sikhnin, in the name of Rabbi Levi, suggests the serpent was cursed with leprosy! Those stone-shaped blotches we see on snakes? Those are, according to this interpretation, leprous signs. A pretty harsh punishment, wouldn't you say?

Rabbi Elazar then poses an interesting question. "Have you ever seen that after a person strikes another with a rod he then strikes him with a strap?" A strap inflicts less pain than a rod. The curse reads, "Cursed are you from all the animals. from all the beasts of the field." Why state the "lesser" curse (from the beasts) after the "greater" one (from the animals)?

The answer lies in the gestation periods of different creatures. Large domesticated animals gestate for nine to twelve months, while wild animals often gestate for only six months. This implies that animals are actually "worse off" than beasts in this particular aspect of life. The curse, therefore, is layered: being worse off than animals and even more cursed than the beasts. The text goes on to give specific gestation times for various creatures, ranging from dogs to elephants and, most notably, the serpent.

This leads to a fascinating, almost comical anecdote. A certain scholar, curious about the serpent's gestation period, captures some snakes, puts them in a barrel, feeds them, and waits. After seven years of this dedication, the scholar travels to Rome and asks Rabban Gamliel, a prominent leader, how long it takes a serpent to bear offspring. Rabban Gamliel doesn't know and is visibly embarrassed.

Later, Rabbi Yehoshua sees Rabban Gamliel looking unwell and asks what's wrong. Upon hearing the question, Rabbi Yehoshua immediately replies, "After seven years." How does he know? He reasons that since a dog, an unclean beast, gestates for fifty days, and unclean animals for twelve months, the serpent, being "cursed above all animals and all beasts," must have a gestation period seven times longer than the animal.

Rabban Gamliel, upon hearing this, shares the answer with the scholar. The scholar is devastated, realizing that after seven years of painstaking observation, someone else figured it out with a simple deduction! He laments, "After everything that I toiled for seven years, this man comes and presented it to me with a reed!" Meaning, so effortlessly.

This story highlights the different paths to knowledge – empirical observation versus logical deduction. But it also reminds us that sometimes, the answers are right in front of us, hidden within the text itself, waiting to be unlocked with a little bit of clever interpretation. And perhaps, it also reminds us that sometimes, even with all our efforts, someone else might figure it out first. What do you think? What does this tell us about the nature of knowledge itself?

Full source