5 min read

The Smoke That Stood Straight and the Voice That Came Down

The House of Avtinas knew how to make incense smoke rise as one pillar. They guarded the secret so fiercely that their women never wore perfume.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Pillar That Could Not Be Imitated
  2. The Alexandrians Who Failed
  3. What a Love Poem Says About Smoke
  4. The Voice That Answered

The Pillar That Could Not Be Imitated

The test was visible from across the Temple courtyard. The incense had to rise as a single straight column, a rod of white smoke that climbed without wavering until it reached the cedar ceiling of the sanctuary, where it spread out like a bunch of grapes opening in every direction. If the smoke billowed sideways at the floor, the offering had failed. The prayer had missed its address.

One family knew how to make the column stand. The House of Avtinas had served in the Second Temple for generations, and Shir HaShirim Rabbah preserves the only surviving account of their secret. Rav Huna counted the eleven spices from Exodus 30:34 and understood the formula as a kind of engineering. The blend was not merely aromatic. It was structural. The right proportions produced a smoke that held its shape against the drafts and currents of a building where fire burned daily and thousands of feet moved through the courts.

The Avtinas family refused to teach the formula to anyone.

The Alexandrians Who Failed

The Sages grew impatient. They brought skilled perfumers from Alexandria, craftsmen who worked with the finest aromatics in the ancient world, and asked them to reproduce the pillar. The Alexandrians knew their trade. They assembled the eleven spices, blended them carefully, and set fire to the mixture.

The smoke spread sideways the moment it left the censer. It eddied along the floor, drifted toward the walls, opened in all directions. The column never formed. The sages watched, and then sent the Alexandrians home.

They brought the Avtinas family back at double wages. The family returned, resumed the work, and the pillar rose again as it always had. The sages demanded an explanation for the silence. Why had they never taught this? The family's answer was not arrogance. They had a tradition, passed down through their generations, that the Temple would fall. And when it fell, they did not want the incense formula in the hands of people who would use it for other gods, who would stand in front of idols and make the same pillar rise for a different address.

So they kept it. They kept it even from their own women. No daughter of the Avtinas house ever wore perfume, in case anyone passing her in the market suspected she was skimming the sacred mixture for personal use.

What a Love Poem Says About Smoke

Shir HaShirim Rabbah read the incense pillar through Song of Songs 3:6: Who is this coming up from the wilderness like a column of smoke, perfumed with myrrh and incense? The verse had to be about Sinai. The column of smoke in the Song was the same column that descended on the mountain when God spoke to Moses, the divine presence arriving in its characteristic form, smoke-wrapped and unmistakable.

The Temple incense, in this reading, was not decorating a ceremony. It was re-enacting the arrival. Every morning and every evening when the Avtinas family set fire to their formula, the smoke that rose as a pillar was an argument in compressed form. The Shekhinah came to Sinai as smoke and fire. The smoke that rises straight in the Temple says, we are Sinai. Come back.

The Voice That Answered

Mount Sinai, the rabbis said, was the place where heaven opened a direct line to earth. Every mountain in the region had aspired to be the place of revelation. Sinai was the one God chose, and the midrash gives the reason as humility. Sinai was not the tallest peak in the range. Tabor was taller. Carmel was older and better positioned near the sea. Sinai was unremarkable, and that unremarkability was precisely why the voice came down there.

The connection between the incense pillar and the Sinai tradition runs through the same logic. God does not need spectacle to descend. He needs precision. The Avtinas formula was precise. The pillar rose straight because every ingredient was exactly right. And when the ingredients were exactly right, the smoke said to the voice, this is where you are expected. Come down.

The family that refused to share their recipe was not hoarding a trade secret. They were guarding a frequency. Once the Temple fell and the pillar could no longer rise, the communication did not end. The Torah remained. The prayer remained. The tradition of getting the proportions exactly right remained. But the visible confirmation, the white rod ascending to the cedar ceiling, was gone. The Avtinas women who never wore perfume had understood what was at stake.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Shir HaShirim Rabbah 6:4Shir HaShirim Rabbah

Shir HaShirim Rabbah turns to The Secret Incense Recipe of the House of Avtinas.

Specifically, the incense prepared by the House of Avtinas.

In Shir HaShirim Rabbah, this priestly family held a closely guarded secret: the precise blend of spices that created the Temple's unique incense. Rabbi Yoḥanan interprets the verse, “Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense, and with all the powders of the merchant” (Song of Songs 3:6) as a hint toward the complex mixture of this special incense.

Rav Huna, drawing on (Exodus 30:34) ("Take spices for you.."), meticulously counts the ingredients. "Spices," being plural, implies at least two. Then come "stacte, onycha, and galbanum" – that makes five. The repetition of "spices" suggests another five, making ten. And finally, "pure frankincense" brings the total to eleven. The Sages, it says here, examined the matter and found that only these eleven spices were ideal for incense.

But it wasn't just the ingredients; it was the preparation. The House of Avtinas were masters of their craft. They were experts in the preparation and blending of the incense, so expert that it would generate a perfect column of smoke rising straight up to the heavens. Imagine that for a moment – a fragrant pillar reaching towards the Divine.

And here’s where the story takes a turn. The Avtinas family, for reasons we'll explore, refused to share their secrets. The Sages, wanting to replicate their success, brought in incense makers from Alexandria, who were skilled but lacked that crucial ability to make the smoke rise properly. The Avtinas’ incense would ascend like a rod until it reached the rafters, then spread out and descend like a cluster. But the Alexandrians' incense? It just spread downward immediately.

Why was this a problem? Well, the Sages believed that everything created by God should be for His glory. As (Isaiah 43:7) states, "Everything that is called by My name, for My glory I created it." The smoke that didn't rise straight up simply wasn't befitting that glory.

So, they restored the House of Avtinas to their position. But getting them back wasn't easy. They demanded double their wages! Rabbi Meir says they went from twelve maneh (a unit of currency) a day to twenty-four. Rabbi Yuda claims it was even more – from twenty-four to forty-eight!

The Sages, of course, had to ask: why the secrecy? Why wouldn't they teach others their methods? The Avtinas family revealed a profound reason: they had a tradition that the Temple would eventually be destroyed. They feared that if they shared their knowledge, it would be used to create incense for idol worship, mimicking the sacred rituals performed for the Holy One.

For this, they were commended. But the story doesn't end there. To maintain the integrity of their service, the women of the House of Avtinas never wore perfume. When marrying someone from outside the family, they made sure the bride agreed to abstain from perfume as well. They didn't want anyone to think they were using the Temple incense for personal benefit, fulfilling the verse "You shall be vindicated before God and before Israel" (Numbers 32:22) and striving to "find grace and good favor in the eyes of God and man" (Proverbs 3:4).

Rabbi Akiva shares a story he heard from Shimon ben Loga: Once, while gathering herbs with a child from the House of Avtinas, Shimon saw the child cry and then laugh. When asked why, the child explained that he cried for the diminished honor of his family but laughed because he knew their legacy was preserved for the righteous and that God would ultimately bring joy to His children. The child then pointed out a substance that produced a rising column of smoke, but refused to show it, citing a family tradition. Tragically, the text says that not many days elapsed before that child died, perhaps as a consequence for divulging the secret.

Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Nuri also recounts an encounter with an elder from the House of Avtinas who possessed a scroll listing the spices. The elder, feeling he had no worthy successor, passed the scroll to Rabbi Yoḥanan, urging him to be careful with it. When Rabbi Yoḥanan told Rabbi Akiva about this, Rabbi Akiva wept, declaring that they could no longer denounce the House of Avtinas, as the elder's actions proved their devotion to heaven.

What does this all mean? It's more than just a recipe for incense. It's a story about dedication, about protecting sacred knowledge, and about the profound responsibility that comes with serving something greater than oneself. The House of Avtinas understood that their craft was not just about creating a pleasant aroma; it was about connecting the earthly and the divine, about upholding the glory of God even in the face of potential destruction.

And perhaps, in our own lives, we can find ways to honor that same spirit of dedication, to protect the things that are truly sacred, and to strive for a connection to something beyond ourselves.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 10:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

The mystics of old certainly did. And they found echoes of that very quest in the most unexpected places, even in the sensuous poetry of the Song of Songs.

(Song of Songs 3:10). Sounds beautiful. But what does it mean?

The Rabbis, in their inimitable way, didn’t take this verse literally. Instead, they saw it as a coded message, a glimpse into the divine. "He made its pillars of silver," they said, referring to the pillars of the Tabernacle. We can see this connection mirrored in (Exodus 27:11): “The hooks of the pillars and their bands, silver.” See how they connect the verses? It's like a cosmic scavenger hunt!

What about "its cushion of gold?" Well, that’s linked to the gold plating of the Tabernacle’s planks, as described in (Exodus 26:29): “You shall plate the planks with gold.” And the "seat of purple wool?" That evokes the curtain of blue and purple wool in the Tabernacle, as we find in (Exodus 26:31). Each element of the verse becomes a symbolic building block.

But the real kicker is the last phrase: "its interior is plated with love." What does that refer to?

Rabbi Yudan suggests it signifies the merit of Torah study and the righteousness of those who dedicate themselves to it.: the very act of engaging with sacred texts, of wrestling with their meaning, creates a space filled with divine love.

But Rabbi Azarya, quoting Rabbi Yuda in the name of Rabbi Simon, takes it even further. He says that the "interior plated with love" actually represents the Divine Presence itself – the Shekhinah (the Divine Presence).

This brings us to a fascinating paradox. How can the Divine Presence, which is infinite, fit within the limited space of the Tabernacle? One verse says, "The priests were unable to stand and serve [due to the cloud]" (I (Kings 8:1)1), suggesting a tangible, overwhelming presence. But another verse says, "And the courtyard was filled with the aura of the glory of the Lord" (Ezekiel 10:4), implying a more contained manifestation.

Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin, quoting Rabbi Levi, offers a beautiful analogy to reconcile these ideas. He compares the Tent of Meeting to a cave beside the sea. The sea rages, and water flows into the cave, filling it completely. But does the sea lose any of its vastness? Of course not!

Similarly, the Tent of Meeting was filled with the aura of the Divine Presence, but the world itself lost nothing of that Presence. It's a powerful image, isn't it? The Divine doesn't diminish by being present in a specific place; it simply manifests in a concentrated way.

So, when did this happen? When did the Shekhinah, the Divine Presence, truly take up residence in the world? According to this tradition, it was on the day the Tabernacle was erected, as (Numbers 7:1) states: “It was on the day that Moses finished [erecting the Tabernacle].” A physical structure, built with human hands, became a vessel for the infinite. It’s a reminder that even in the most ordinary things, in the most mundane acts, we have the potential to create spaces for the Divine to dwell. It's not just about grand temples or elaborate rituals, but about the intention and love we bring to whatever we do. Maybe that's the real meaning of "its interior is plated with love."

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 6:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

In the beautiful, multi-layered world of Jewish interpretation, this verse opens up into a world of meaning far beyond the literal.

Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a classic midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) commentary on the Song of Songs, unpacks this verse in a fascinating way. It's not just about romantic love, but about the relationship between God and Israel, expressed through familiar religious practices.

So, what's this "left" and "right" all about?

One interpretation, as presented in Shir HaShirim Rabbah, sees the "left.under my head" as the first set of tablets given to Moses on Mount Sinai, and the "right embraces me" as the second set. The first set, tragically broken after the Golden Calf incident, representing perhaps a more conditional relationship. The second set, however, symbolizing the renewed covenant, a closer embrace.

But that's not all! The midrash continues, offering alternative readings. "His left is under my head," it suggests, could be the tzitzit, the ritual fringes on the corners of a garment. "And his right embraces me" could be the tefillin, the phylacteries worn on the arm and head during prayer. These mitzvot (commandments), commandments, aren't just actions; they're tangible expressions of our connection to the Divine.

It gets even more personal. "His left is under my head" might refer to reciting the Shema, the central Jewish prayer affirming God's oneness. "And his right embraces me" could be the Amidah, the standing prayer recited silently, a moment of direct communion with God.

Then, the midrash takes us into the realm of holidays. "His left is under my head" is the sukkah, the temporary dwelling we build during Sukkot, a fragile shelter. "And his right embraces me" is the cloud of the Divine Presence in the future, a time when God's presence will be even more palpable. As it says in (Isaiah 60:19), "The sun will no longer be for you the light of day and the glow of the moon will not illuminate for you..The Lord will be for you an eternal light."

And finally, "his left is under my head" is the mezuza, the parchment inscribed with scripture affixed to our doorposts. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai points out that when entering your home from the marketplace, the mezuza is on your right, which is the left of the person exiting. It's a constant reminder, a gentle nudge, as we move between the world and our inner lives.

Rabbi Yoḥanan brings in an interesting point about the placement of the menorah (candelabrum) and the table in the Tabernacle, referencing (Exodus 26:35). Normally, you wouldn't place the candelabrum on the left, so it wouldn't hinder the right hand. But the unusual arrangement reflects that God’s embrace of Israel isn't for His comfort, but to support them. (Midrash HaMevoar; cf. Matnot Kehuna).

Rabbi Aḥa adds, citing (Deuteronomy 30:20), "To love the Lord your God..and to cleave to Him." This "cleaving," he says, is "His left is under my head." It's about intimacy, closeness, a profound and supportive connection.

So, what does it all mean? This verse from the Song of Songs, through the lens of Shir HaShirim Rabbah, becomes a powerful reminder of the many-sided ways God embraces us. It’s in the big moments and the small ones, in ritual and prayer, in the physical objects that surround us and the deep connection within. It's a continuous, comforting embrace, a constant reminder that we are held, supported, and loved.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 2:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

It all revolves around the verse in (Song of Songs 8:2): "I would lead you, would bring you to my mother's house, that you would teach me; I would give you to drink from the spiced wine, from the juice of my pomegranate." A lover's invitation? But the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), in its characteristic way, sees layers of meaning. It interprets this verse as Israel speaking directly to God.

"I would lead you, would bring you," Israel says. "I would lead you" – from the supernal, the heavenly realm, to the earthly. What does this even mean? The Midrash tells us it's about the giving of the Torah on Mount Sinai. A breathtaking thought, isn't it?

Why "my mother's house" in reference to Sinai? Rabbi Berekhya offers a beautiful explanation: Sinai is called "my mother's house" because Israel became like newborn babies there. Can you picture it? Fresh, clean, innocent. All their previous sins forgiven. Yefe Kol explains that they were cleansed and reborn. A complete reset.

What about the invitation to "teach me"? This, naturally, refers to the mitzvot, the commandments, and good deeds that form the bedrock of Jewish life. The very things that guide us on our path.

Now for the delicious part: "I would give you to drink from the spiced wine, from the juice of my pomegranate." What could this be? The Midrash offers several interpretations, each as rich and flavorful as the imagery suggests. One interpretation says the "spiced wine" represents the great collections of baraitot – teachings from the time of the Mishnah (the earliest code of rabbinic law) but not included in it – such as those compiled by Rabbi Ḥiyya the Great, Rabbi Hoshaya, bar Kappara, and Rabbi Akiva. These are heady, potent drinks for the soul, offering deep insights into Jewish law and tradition.

And the "juice of my pomegranate"? These are the aggadot. What's aggadah (non-legal rabbinic narrative)? It is the stories, the legends, the parables that fill out the "bones" of the legal material with flesh and blood. They're tasty, like a pomegranate, full of seeds of wisdom and wonder.

Alternatively, the Midrash proposes that the "spiced wine" is the Talmud itself, where mishnayot (the core teachings of the Oral Torah) are blended and debated, creating a complex and intoxicating brew. And the "juice of my pomegranate"? These are the vestments of the High Priest! As it says in (Exodus 28:34), "A golden bell and a pomegranate" adorned the hem of his robe. These symbols of holiness and service are offered as a gift.

So, what's the takeaway here? Is it simply about interpreting a verse in Song of Songs? I think it's much more than that. It's about the power of connection, the possibility of bridging the gap between the earthly and the divine. It's about the constant cycle of renewal and learning. And it's about the richness and depth of Jewish tradition, which offers us so many ways to taste the "spiced wine" and the "juice of the pomegranate." What will you choose to drink in today?

Full source