The story goes that Moses, having slain an Egyptian taskmaster, intervenes in a quarrel between two Hebrews. And what does he get for his trouble? A stinging rebuke: "Who appointed you a ruler and judge over us? Do you propose to kill me as you killed the Egyptian?" (Exodus 2:14). Ouch.
But there's so much more to this brief exchange than meets the eye. The ancient Rabbis, in their commentary on the Torah called Shemot Rabbah, unpack this moment with layers of meaning. They saw in it not just a simple rejection of Moses' authority, but a glimpse into the very character of the Israelites and the challenges they faced.
So, what's behind this accusation? The text says, "Who appointed you a ruler [and judge [ish sar veshofet] over us?]" Shemot Rabbah offers several intriguing interpretations of this question. Rabbi Yehuda weighs in, suggesting Moses was only twenty years old at the time. The implication? He wasn't old enough! "You are not yet eligible to be a ruler and a judge over us, because [only] one who is forty years old has understanding," he says, citing Avot 5:25. Rabbi Nehemya, however, claims Moses was forty. Perhaps the issue wasn't age, but something else entirely.
The Rabbis offer another possibility: "Aren’t you the son of Yokheved? How do they call you son of Batya? You seek to be a ruler and a judge over us? We will inform about you, what you did to the Egyptian." This hints at a deeper suspicion, questioning Moses' very identity and motives. Was he truly one of them? Was his past disqualifying?
And then there's the most intriguing interpretation of all, centered on the phrase, "Do you propose [omer] to kill me?" The text emphasizes that it doesn't say "Do you seek to kill me," but rather, "Do you omer [literally, say]." The Rabbis pounce on this nuance. "From here you learn," Shemot Rabbah explains, "that he had invoked the ineffable name against the Egyptian, and killed him." The ineffable name, of course, refers to the most holy and unpronounceable name of God. Did Moses use divine power to strike down the Egyptian? The very idea is both awe-inspiring and terrifying.
When Moses heard this, he was frightened. As Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Shalom said in the name of Rabbi Ḥanina the Great, and our Rabbis said in the name of Rabbi Alexandri: Moshe was pondering in his heart and saying: What sin did Israel commit that caused them, more than all the nations, to be enslaved? When he heard his response, he said: ‘There is slander in their midst, how can they be deserving of redemption?’ Therefore he said: “Indeed the matter is known” – now I know the reason for their enslavement."
The implication is staggering. Moses realizes that the Israelites' own internal conflicts, their willingness to suspect and accuse one another, are a barrier to their liberation. He understands that their fractured community, riddled with lashon hara – evil speech or slander – is holding them back.
Think about it: Moses, destined to be their leader, is met with distrust and accusations. He realizes that before they can be freed from external oppression, they must first confront their own internal divisions. Redemption, it seems, requires more than just a powerful leader; it demands a transformation of the heart and a commitment to unity.
This passage from Shemot Rabbah invites us to reflect on our own communities. How often do we allow suspicion and division to undermine our collective goals? Are we willing to extend grace and understanding, or are we quick to judge and accuse? Perhaps, like the ancient Israelites, our own liberation depends on confronting the "slander in our midst" and building a more unified and compassionate world.