“He spoke of the trees, [from the cedar which is in Lebanon to the hyssop that emerges from the wall; he spoke of the animal, of the bird, of the creeping creatures, and of the fish]” (I Kings 5:13). Is it possible for a person to speak of the trees? It is rather that Solomon said: ‘Why is the leper purified by the tallest of the tall and the lowest of the low, with a cedar tree and a hyssop? It is because when a person elevates himself like a cedar, he is afflicted with leprosy, and when he lowers himself and demeans himself like the hyssop, which is low, he will ultimately be healed.’
Likewise, why is it that an animal is permitted with two signs130When an animal is slaughtered, the knife must penetrate the majority of both the gullet and the windpipe. and a bird is permitted with one sign?131When a bird is slaughtered, the knife must penetrate the majority of either the gullet or the windpipe. It is because the animal is created from the dry land, and the bird from the sea, as bar Kappara said: The bird was created from the mud.132Mud is a combination of dry land and water.
Thus, a bird’s status is between that of an animal, which was created from the earth, and a fish, created from water. Similarly, its slaughter requires the middle ground between that of an animal, which requires the penetration of two passageways, and that of a fish, which does not require ritual slaughter at all. Rabbi Avin said in the name of Rabbi Shmuel Kapodkiya, that the legs of a chicken are similar to the scales of a fish.
“And of the creeping creatures,” he said: Why is one who traps or wounds [one of the] eight swarming creatures [mentioned] in the Torah on Shabbat liable,133Liable for desecrating the Shabbat, which carries with it the death penalty or karet for intentional violation, and a sin-offering for unwitting violation. while for all the rest of the swarming creatures, repugnant creatures and creeping creatures, one is exempt?
It is because they have skins. “And of the fish,” he said: Why is it that all animals, beasts, and birds require slaughter, and fish do not require slaughter? It is from this verse: “Will flocks and herds be slaughtered?” (Numbers 11:22), while regarding fish, only gathering is written.134The entire verse states: “Will flocks and herds be slaughtered for them and suffice for them? If all the fish of the sea would be gathered for them, would it suffice for them?”
Yaakov, from the village of Nevurya, issued a ruling in Tyre that fish require slaughtering. Rabbi Ḥagai heard and he sent to bring him. [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘From where did you [derive] your ruling?’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘From here, as it is written: “Let the water swarm with swarms of the living and let birds fly” (Genesis 1:20). Just as a bird requires slaughter, so too, fish require slaughter.’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said: ‘Let him be flogged forty times.’ [Yaakov] said: ‘Shall a person who states a matter from the Torah be flogged?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘You did not issue a correct ruling.’
He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: “From where [do you derive this]?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘From here: “Will flocks and herds be slaughtered for them [and suffice for them? If all the fish of the sea would be gathered for them, would it suffice for them?]” (Numbers 11:22) – these with slaughter and these with gathering.’ [Yaakov] said: ‘Flog your floggings, as it is good for internalization.’