Parshat Balak6 min read

Balak Lost the Kings He Paid to Guard Him and Sent for Balaam

Sihon and Og took Moab's money for years to stand between Balak and the desert. Israel killed them both in one season. Now nothing stood there.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Two Kings He Had Been Paying
  2. Moab Pulled Itself Into Its Cities
  3. The Weapon That Was Not an Army
  4. The Last Prophet Given to the Nations
  5. Better If They Had Been Born Blind
Balak Lost the Kings He Paid to Guard Him and Sent for Balaam Click for full size

The Two Kings He Had Been Paying

Balak son of Zippor had been buying his safety for years, and the safety had two names. Sihon held the country to the north. Og held the country past that. Both were fighters, both took Moab's silver, and both stood where Moab's own army could not. Balak slept behind them.

Sihon had never been a friend. He had come down on the earlier king of Moab and taken his land as far as the Arnon, and Moab had swallowed the loss and gone on paying, because a thief in front of you is better than an open road. Og had done the same thing to the Ammonites. The two of them ate what they liked from their neighbors and their neighbors bought them off, and the arrangement held.

Then Israel came up out of the wilderness and took both of them in one season. Sihon's land changed hands. Og's land changed hands. It was theft with no iniquity in it, since the ground had been stolen twice already, and it left Balak looking at his northern border with nothing on it but the men who had killed his guards.

Moab Pulled Itself Into Its Cities

The column had already gone past the Ammonites. To Ammon it showed itself dressed for peace, weapons out of sight, because God had told Israel not to trouble the children of Ammon with any kind of trouble and not to provoke them with any kind of provocation at all. To Moab it showed itself armed. About Moab God had said only this much: do not make war on them. Whatever you can take short of war, take.

So the same army walked past two countries wearing two different faces, and Moab read its face correctly. Farmers came in off the fields. Herds came in behind them. Gates shut at midday. The whole kingdom gathered itself into its walled towns the way a man pulls in his hands.

Inside the walls they said the arithmetic out loud. God had sworn he would not give Israel one foot of Moab as an inheritance. And yet the land Sihon had taken off Moab was under Israelite feet already, and nobody was handing it back. The promise and the map had stopped agreeing with each other.

Then they looked at the size of the camp on the plain and looked at themselves, and the word they used for themselves was thorn. Not an army standing against an army. A thorn standing in front of a hand.

The Weapon That Was Not an Army

Balak had grown up on stories of enemies, and every one of them had come the same way. They came with wars and with subjugation. Both could be endured, because a war can be lost slowly and a tribute can be paid. What was moving past his gates was neither. He had also seen what happened in the wadis of the Arnon, and no one in Moab could explain it, and he did not raise the subject twice.

So he did not send for soldiers. He sent for a mouth. Somewhere east of him lived a man who could draw one word out from between his teeth and pull a whole nation up by the roots with it, and that was the man Balak wanted standing on a hill above the camp.

The Last Prophet Given to the Nations

The man was Balaam, and Balaam was the end of a long experiment.

It had started with Shem, in the mud after the flood. God said to him: if my Torah had been among the ten generations before this one, I suppose I would not have destroyed the world with water. Go now. Announce my revelations to the nations of the earth. Ask them whether they will take my Torah. Shem went out and asked. He asked for four hundred years, and the nations of the earth did not take it.

Others came after him. Job, and Eliphaz and Zophar and Bildad and Elihu, all of them descended from Nahor, Abraham's brother, through Milcah. Then Balaam, out of the same family, handed a gift the size of Moses' own so that no nation could ever stand up afterward and say it would have accepted the Torah if only it had been sent a prophet of that rank. In wisdom he matched Moses. In prophecy he matched Moses. He said of himself that he knew the knowledge of the Most High, and Moses had to beg God to show him his ways.

One thing separated them. God spoke to Moses with no preparation and no warning. Balaam could not get a syllable out of heaven without killing something first. Every revelation cost him an altar and a knife.

And in a long life he never once did anything good or kind. What he did was talk, and his talk came near to finishing the world.

Better If They Had Been Born Blind

Balak had eyes. That was the whole trouble.

The sons of God had looked at the daughters of men, seen how beautiful they were, and taken whichever ones they chose, and the water came up over everything. Ham had looked into his father's tent and walked out and told his two brothers what was lying in there. Pharaoh's officers had looked at Sarah and gone straight to the palace to describe her, and she was carried into Pharaoh's house. Shechem son of Hamor had looked at Dinah, and a city died for it.

It would have been better for the wicked if they had been born blind. Their eyes bring a curse into the world, and the curse never stays on them alone.

Balak stood on his wall, looked at a camp on the plain, and paid for one sentence. Because the prophet the nations had been given never used the gift for anything good, and because his tongue came so close to destroying everything, God swore an oath to Israel instead: he would never trade them for another people, and he would never let them live in any land but their own. Balak had bought the finest mouth on earth, and it still was not his mouth.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Midrash Tanchuma, Balak 2Midrash Tanchuma

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Townsend 1989 translation of Midrash Tanhuma, S. Buber Recension · CC-BY

(Numb. 22:2:) “Now Balak ben Zippor saw.” What is the meaning of “Now he saw?” He saw retribution which would come against Israel in the future. And he hated them more than all their enemies, as all of the [others] came with wars and subjugation which they could withstand. But this one was like a man who could extract a word from his mouth to uproot an entire nation. (Numb. 22:2:) “Now Balak [ben Zippor] saw.” It would have been better for the wicked if they had been blind, for their eyes bring a curse to the world. With reference to the generation of the flood, [it is written] (in Gen. 6:2), “The sons of God saw [how beautiful the human daughters were and took whomever they chose as their wives].” [It is also written] (in Gen. 9:22), “Then Ham, the father of Canaan, saw [the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside].” It is also written (in Gen. 12:15), “So Pharaoh's courtiers saw her (i.e., Abram's wife Sarah) [and praised her to Pharaoh, and the woman was taken to Pharaoh's house].” It is also written (in Gen. 34:2), “Then Shechem ben Hamor saw [Dinah].” So also [here] (in Numb. 22:2), “Now Balak [ben Zippor] saw.” The matter is comparable to someone who appointed guards to guard from an invader; and he had confidence in them, because they were warriors. When the invader came over and killed them, he trembled with fear for himself. It was the same also with Balak. When he saw what happened with Sihon and Og to whom he had been sending payment to guard him, he was afraid for himself. And in addition to that, he had seen the miracles at the Wadis of Arnon. (Numb. 22:3:) “Wayyagor mo'av.” What is the meaning of “Wayyagor (rt. ygr)?” When Israel appeared to the Ammonites, they appeared clothed for peace. But when they appeared to the Moabites they appeared armed [for battle]. Thus it is stated (in Deut. 2:19), “When you draw near the frontier of the Children of Ammon, do not trouble them.” It is written [to imply not to trouble them] with all kinds of trouble; (ibid., cont.) “and do not provoke (rt. grh) them,” with any kind of provocation. In regard to Moab, however, He said (in Deut. 2:9), “Do not trouble Moab, and do not provoke (rt. grh) them with war.” Do not make war with them, but whatever you can seize apart from [war], seize. For that reason they appeared armed, and [the Moabites] gathered themselves (rt. 'gr) to their cities, as stated (in Numb. 22:3), “Now Moab yagor (i.e., gathered).” Wayyagor (rt. ygr, here understood a form of 'gr) can only be a word for a gathering, just as it says (in Prov. 10:5), “A prudent child gathers (rt. 'gr) in the summer.” Another interpretation (of Numb. 22:3), “wayyagor”: [It is] a word for fear, in that they were afraid, as they saw the whole land in the hands of Israel. As Sihon had come and taken [part of] the land of Moab, as stated (Numb. 21:26), “and he fought against the earlier king of Moab….” And Og had taken all of the land of the Children of Ammon, as stated (Deuteronomy 3:11), “Since only Og was left from the remnant of the Rephaim….” [And] Israel came and took it from both of them; theft that has no iniquity. And [so the Moabites] saw their land in the hand of Israel and they would say, “Did the Holy One, blessed be He, not say (in Deuteronomy 2:9), ‘As I will not give you from its land as an inheritance’; and behold our land is in front of them (already in their possession).” Therefore they were afraid. (Numb. 22:3, cont.) “And Moab had a horror (rt. qwts) [of the Children of Israel],” because they saw themselves as a [mere] thorn (qwts) over against them.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:4Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

The answer, as often happens in Jewish tradition, is layered and complex, and more than a little surprising.

In Legends of the Jews, compiled by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, the story of Balaam, the last of the non-Jewish prophets, offers a powerful explanation. Balaam's life, filled with moral failings, serves as a cautionary tale about the responsibility that comes with divine gifts. His story essentially explains why God ultimately "withdrew from the heathen the gift of prophecy."

Let’s back up a bit. The tradition tells us that Shem, son of Noah, was the first prophet commissioned to speak to the nations after the flood. Go out and share My revelations! See if they'll accept it."

For four hundred years, Shem went around as a prophet. Four hundred years! And yet, the nations wouldn't listen.

Later, others arose. The book of Job, which many scholars believe originated outside of Israel, gives us Job and his friends Eliphaz, Zophar, Bildad, and Elihu. These figures, along with Balaam himself, are said to be descendants of Nahor, Abraham's brother, from his union with Milcah.

Now, here's where it gets really interesting. The text suggests that God gave the heathens Balaam as a prophet so that they couldn't later claim they were never given a fair chance. "Had we had a prophet like Moses," they might have argued, "we would have received the Torah!" So, God provides them with Balaam, who, according to this tradition, was in no way inferior to Moses in wisdom or prophetic ability. The text is claiming that Balaam was Moses' peer among the non-Jewish world! While Moses was undoubtedly the greatest prophet among the Israelites, Balaam held a similar stature among the other nations.

Of course, there were differences. Moses was called directly by God, without any need for preparation. Balaam, on the other hand, could only receive divine revelations through sacrifices. But Balaam had one advantage: Moses had to pray to God "to show him His ways," while Balaam could declare that he "knew the knowledge of the Most High." Quite a claim!

Yet, despite his prophetic gifts, Balaam failed to use them for good. He never performed a single act of kindness. Instead, his "evil tongue" nearly brought destruction upon the world. It was this moral failing, this profound disconnect between his prophetic abilities and his ethical behavior, that ultimately led God to vow never to exchange the Israelites for another people or allow them to dwell in any land other than Palestine.

The lesson? Prophecy isn't just about receiving divine messages. It's about using those messages for good, for justice, for the betterment of the world. Balaam's story reminds us that gifts, no matter how extraordinary, are meaningless without the moral compass to guide them. And perhaps, that's why prophecy ultimately took root so deeply in the Israelite tradition, a tradition that emphasizes not just knowledge of God, but also the responsibility to act in accordance with His will.

Full source