5 min read

Eighty Women Hanged in One Day at Ashkelon

Ordinary courts could not try that many capital cases at once. The sages called Shimon ben Shetach's day an emergency, and the bodies came down before dark.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Day the Procedure Could Not Hold
  2. Wood That Is Not a Living Tree
  3. Night Must Empty the Wood
  4. After the Ropes Hung Empty

Ashkelon smelled of salt and rope by afternoon. Eighty bodies hung against the light, and the city noise dropped as if someone had thrown a heavy cloth over the market and told every throat to learn quiet.

Eighty Women Hanged in One Day at Ashkelon Click for full size

A Day the Procedure Could Not Hold

Shimon ben Shetach had done what ordinary capital procedure refused. Cases were not meant to be stacked into a single red day. Hanging was not the quiet everyday penalty of the debate hall where sages tested pronouns. Rabbi Eliezer later asked the question the court could not ignore: did he not hang women in Ashkelon? The answer, kept in the midrash, was yes. Eighty in one day.

The sages answered with a verse from Psalms: it was a time to act for God, because Torah was being violated (Psalms 119:126). The hour was called broken. The ruling was emergency, hora'at sha'ah, not a new hobby for judges who love exceptions the way other men love wine.

The discomfort stayed in the memory on purpose. Jewish law fears human power enough to slow it with procedure, and still remembers rare days when delay itself looked like betrayal of the living community. Ashkelon is that memory with a shoreline and a count too large for ease.

A boy selling fish that afternoon counted ropes instead of scales and forgot his prices. His father slapped the back of his head gently and still did not look up at the beams.

Wood That Is Not a Living Tree

The Torah said, "you shall hang him on a tree" (Deuteronomy 21:22). The midrash stripped the romance from the word eitz. Not a living tree with roots drinking the ground and birds returning at evening. Wood that was not rooted, a gallows built for judgment, not a field tree forced into the court's work.

"Him" also carried hard limits in ordinary reading. The condemned hung without garments, bare of costume, so the act struck the crime rather than inventing new theater of humiliation for the crowd's appetite. The word did not stretch to hang the scheming witnesses in the same breath as the convict they had tried to create. Two people were not judged for the same capital matter on the same ordinary day. Ashkelon's mass of eighty sat outside that ordinary day like a scar that refused to fade into precedent.

Women, in the base reading of one line, were not the ones hanged; Rabbi Eliezer argued they could be. The argument itself shows how tightly the sages pulled on every pronoun when death was near and language could open or close a grave.

"You shall remove the evil from your midst" did not stay abstract in the midrash. It meant removing doers of evil from Israel's midst, a communal purge with human faces and public consequence, not a sermon about moods.

Night Must Empty the Wood

After death, the body still had law on it. "You shall not leave his body overnight on the wood" (Deuteronomy 21:23). Leaving a corpse on the gallows into the dark was a negative commandment, a degradation of the dead and a stain on the land given as inheritance. If burial waited for honor, for shrouds, for a proper carrying that dignified rather than displayed, the delay was not the same sin. The wood is what demeans. Respect can take time. Exposure for contempt cannot.

Burial was also a positive command: bury, you shall bury. The court was not free to love the spectacle of hanging more than the dignity of the dead. The land had to stay clean of a justice that forgot it was still dealing with a human form after the breath left.

In Ashkelon the emergency had filled the day with death. The night still had to empty the wood. Men climbed with knives and careful feet. Knots gave way. Bodies that had been warnings became the dead again, heavy and specific, needing ground more than they needed to teach a lesson to passersby.

Shimon ben Shetach's name stuck to the day because the act was severe, public, and impossible to file under routine. The law that justified the hour also forbade turning the hour into a permanent style of rule, a template any angry court could copy without a broken world behind it.

After the Ropes Hung Empty

When the last body left the beam, the sea wind moved through empty rope and made a soft sound almost like speech. The city exhaled without joy. Markets would open again. Children would forget the count before the sages did.

The sages did not forget. They kept Ashkelon beside the ordinary fences of hanging and burial, so later judges would feel both pressures at once: the terror of a day when Torah seemed to require speed, and the command to get the dead off the wood before night turned justice into desecration.

A woman who had watched from a doorway went home and washed her hands though no blood had touched them. Water is what people reach for when memory will not rinse itself.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Sifrei Devarim 221:2Sifrei Devarim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sifrei by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein · CC-BY

Rabbi Eliezer asked the question nobody in the court could ignore: did Shimon ben Shetach not hang women in Ashkelon?

The answer, preserved in Sifrei (Devarim 221:2), is yes. He hanged eighty women in one day. That should have been impossible under ordinary procedure. Capital cases were not supposed to be stacked together, and hanging was not the normal penalty being discussed. The sages answer with one sentence from (Psalms 119:126): it was a time to act for God, because Torah was being violated.

This is the frightening category later called hora'at sha'ah, an emergency ruling for a broken hour. The story is not permission for judges to love exceptions. It is a warning that exceptions can become necessary only when delay itself becomes betrayal. Shimon ben Shetach is remembered because the act was severe, public, and impossible to treat as routine.

The passage leaves the discomfort in place. It forces the reader to hold two truths at once: Jewish law guards procedure because human power is dangerous, and Jewish law also remembers rare moments when a leader believed the hour would collapse without immediate judgment. That tension is why Ashkelon stayed in the rabbinic memory.

Full source
Sifrei Devarim 221:5Sifrei Devarim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sifrei by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein · CC-BY

In the book of Devarim, Deuteronomy, we find the verse, "and you shall hang him." But what does "him" truly mean? The Sifrei Devarim, a collection of legal interpretations, unpacks this seemingly simple phrase with surprising depth.

First, "him" implies that the condemned is to be hanged without their garments. Naked. Stripped bare, both literally and figuratively. This isn’t gratuitous humiliation, but a matter of principle. The execution is about the crime, not about further degrading the individual.

The Sifrei Devarim doesn't stop there. It clarifies that "him" excludes the scheming witnesses who might have falsely accused him. Remember the warning in Devarim 19:19 against false witnesses? The point is clear: the focus remains on the convicted individual, not on inflicting further punishment or side justice on those who may have wrongly accused him.

Then, a truly fascinating point: "him" teaches us that two individuals cannot be judged for the same offense on the same day. It speaks to a system designed to prevent hasty judgments, to ensure due process, and to avoid the appearance of a bloodthirsty rush to execution. Each case deserves its own careful consideration, its own day in court.

Now, let’s turn to the word eitz, which appears in the verse, "and you shall hang him on eitz." What exactly is this eitz? The Hebrew word eitz can mean both "wood" and "tree." So, are we talking about hanging someone from a tree, or from a wooden gallows?

The Sifrei Devarim is unequivocal: it’s not a living tree. It must be an eitz that is not rooted. In other words, a constructed gallows made of wood.

Why this distinction? Why not a tree?

The text anticipates this question! Perhaps, it suggests, the verse does mean a rooted tree! But the Torah itself provides the answer in Devarim 21:23: "but you shall bury it." The key here is the need for burial. A cut tree requires both cutting and burial. The need for burial refers to the body of the condemned, not the tree used for execution. This shows that the verse refers to something that only needs burial. This excludes a rooted tree, which would also require cutting.

It reveals a legal system deeply concerned with justice, fairness, and even a degree of dignity for the condemned. It highlights the importance of precise language, careful interpretation, and a constant striving to understand the true intent behind the law. It’s a reminder that even in the most difficult of circumstances, we are called to act with thoughtfulness and compassion.

Full source
Sifrei Devarim 221:7Sifrei Devarim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sifrei by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein · CC-BY

Like, "You shall not leave his body overnight on the eitz" – that's from the Book of Deuteronomy, and it’s something the rabbis grappled with intensely. What does it really mean?

The Sifrei Devarim, a collection of early rabbinic legal interpretations on Deuteronomy, dives right in. It asks: where do we even get the idea that letting a dead person remain unburied overnight violates a negative commandment, a lo ta'aseh? Well, it all comes back to that verse: "You shall not leave his body overnight on eitz." Eitz simply means "tree" or "wood," but in this context, it refers to a stake or gallows used for execution.

Hold on, it gets more nuanced. What if you're delaying the burial out of respect? Say, to fetch a beautiful casket, or to prepare proper shrouds? Surely, that's different. The rabbis thought so too. The text continues, saying, "If he left it overnight for his honor… I might think he transgresses; it is, therefore, written 'on the eitz'. Just as the eitz is demeaning to him, so, all that is demeaning to him (is forbidden, to exclude the above)."

The key here is the idea of degradation. Leaving a body exposed on the eitz is inherently shameful. So, the prohibition focuses on preventing dishonor to the deceased. Delaying burial for honorable reasons? That's not the same thing at all. It's not about disrespect, but about honoring the dead.

So, we have a negative commandment – "You shall not leave his body overnight on the eitz" – and a positive commandment – "but bury shall you bury it" (k'vor tik'b'renu). But what if someone has been executed and hung on a tree? Now what? This is where it gets really interesting.

The Sifrei Devarim presents a rather stark solution. "What is to be done? We wait until it gets dark; then he is suspended from the eitz and then he is taken down. If not, he is in transgression of 'You shall not leave his body overnight on the eitz.'" According to this interpretation, even if the person was already dead, the act of leaving the body on the eitz overnight, even after death, is still a violation. You almost have to re-enact the hanging at dusk, just to fulfill the letter of the law before taking the body down for burial.

Why this seemingly strange ritual? It emphasizes the urgency of proper burial and the imperative to avoid any further dishonor to the deceased, even if that person was a criminal. It's a complex and challenging teaching, one that forces us to confront the intersection of law, morality, and the dignity of the human spirit.

Full source
Sifrei Devarim 221:1Sifrei Devarim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sifrei by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein · CC-BY

In fact, Jewish tradition grapples with this idea of removing evil, of cleansing the community, in some pretty direct ways.

We find this in the Sifrei Devarim, a collection of legal interpretations on the Book of Deuteronomy. When it says "and you shall remove the evil," it's not just talking about abstract wickedness. According to the Sifrei, it means removing the doers of evil from within the community of Israel. A pretty strong statement. It highlights the responsibility placed on the community to actively confront and eradicate harmful influences.

It's a concept that goes beyond just punishing individuals. It speaks to a deeper need for societal purification and the maintenance of moral order. But how far does this "removal" go? How does it manifest in practice?

The text then turns to a rather difficult passage from Deuteronomy (21:22): "And if there be in a man a sin whose judgment is death, then he shall be put to death, and you shall hang him on a tree." Now, this isn't about the initial execution itself, but what happens after someone has been put to death for a capital crime. The text specifies that the body should be hung, or rather, suspended, on a tree.

But there's a crucial distinction here: the Sifrei specifies that a man is hanged, and not a woman. This immediately raises questions. Why the difference? Is it a reflection of societal roles, a form of added shame, or something else entirely?

Rabbi Eliezer challenges this very point. He argues that a woman, too, should be hanged. This dissenting opinion emphasizes that even within these ancient legal discussions, there was room for debate and differing interpretations. It wasn't a monolithic, unquestioned system.

What are we to make of this? The specifics are challenging, no doubt. But perhaps the core takeaway is the ongoing struggle to define justice, to balance punishment with societal values, and to confront the complexities of human nature. These aren’t easy questions. They weren’t easy then, and they certainly aren’t easy now.

And the fact that these debates, these nuances, are preserved within the text, speaks volumes. We're still wrestling with how to "remove the evil," how to create a just society, and how to understand the weight of our decisions.

Full source