Parshat Shelach5 min read

Moses Watched Rebellion Sink Into Its Own Grave

Plague blood flows from Egyptian mouths, the spies doom a generation, Dathan and Abiram refuse to come to court, and Moses fears being forgotten.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Egypt's Water Turned Against Its Own Mouths
  2. Abraham's Merit Held Open the Door Gehenna Used on Egypt
  3. The Spies Condemned a Generation to the Desert
  4. Dathan and Abiram Refused to Come
  5. Moses Feared Joshua Would Forget Him

Egypt's Water Turned Against Its Own Mouths

The first plague did not merely change rivers. It changed mouths. Legends of the Jews preserves a tradition that when the blood plague struck Egypt, it was not confined to the Nile and the canals and the vessels. Egyptian spit became blood the moment it left Egyptian mouths. If an Egyptian drank from the same trough as an Israelite, the Egyptian's portion turned to blood while the Israelite's remained water. An Egyptian who pressed an Israelite to sell clean water paid the people he had enslaved for relief from the judgment on his own body. Egypt had drowned Israelite babies in the Nile. Now the Nile became the medium of restitution. Even the idols bled, as if Egypt's gods were being made to testify against their own worshippers. The plague was not a detached punishment. It was a map of exactly what Egypt had done, drawn in the same color as the crime.

Abraham's Merit Held Open the Door Gehenna Used on Egypt

When the mixed swarm arrived as one of the later plagues, the Midrash traced its logic back to Egypt's own forced mixing of peoples. Israel had been mixed into Egyptian society against its will, its labor folded into Egyptian wealth, its identity pressed into Egyptian slavery. God answered with a plague of mixed creatures that turned Egypt's principle of forced incorporation back on the incorporators. The connection to Abraham and the fires of Gehenna runs deeper. Abraham had held closed the gate of Gehenna so that the circumcised would not descend there. Egypt's dead, who had participated in the system that murdered Israelite children, did not benefit from that mercy. The gates that Abraham's covenant had sealed for his descendants stood open for those who had worked against them.

The Spies Condemned a Generation to the Desert

The scouts returned from Canaan carrying an enormous cluster of grapes and a report that the land ate its inhabitants. The people who were there were giants. We were like grasshoppers in our own eyes, they said, and in their eyes too. The Midrash fixes the date: the night Israel wept at the spies' report was the ninth of Av, the same night that would mark both Temple destructions. God said: you have wept for nothing on this night. I will set aside a weeping for this night for generations. The generation that had seen Egypt's plagues, crossed the sea, received Torah at Sinai, eaten manna from the sky, and drunk water from the rock was condemned to die in the wilderness because it looked at its destination and decided it was impossible.

Dathan and Abiram Refused to Come

When Korah's rebellion broke out, Moses tried to use the court to resolve it. He summoned Dathan and Abiram to be heard. They sent a message back: we will not come up. The phrasing mattered. Moses was asking them to come up for judgment. They refused not only Moses but the mechanism of law itself. They rehearsed their grievances, you have brought us out of a land flowing with milk and honey to kill us in the wilderness, and called Egypt what God had always used to describe Canaan. They had reversed the world's moral geography. Egypt was milk and honey. The wilderness was death. God was the killer. Moses was a fraud. The Midrash notes that when the ground opened and swallowed Dathan, Abiram, and their households, it was as precise as all the other judgments. They had refused to come up. They went down instead. The refusal to be heard by justice became its own sentence.

Moses Feared Joshua Would Forget Him

Near the end of his life, Moses stood before God and worried about something smaller than the wilderness, the spies, or the rebellions. He worried that Joshua would forget him. Joshua had been beside him for forty years, had carried his instructions, had stood at the entrance of the tent while Moses spoke with God inside, had been named in public as the successor before all of Israel. And Moses still feared erasure. God reassured him. But the fear itself is remarkable. The man who had stood before Pharaoh, who had raised his staff over the sea, who had broken the first set of tablets and returned to carve the second, was afraid that the person who came after him would not keep his name alive. Greatness is not immune to the fear of being forgotten. Moses, who would be remembered in every generation, went to his death still carrying that particular anxiety as if it were a stone in his robe.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 4:292Legends of the Jews

Aaron, acting on divine command, stretched out his hand, and bam! Every drop of water in Egypt transformed into blood. Not just the Nile, not just the rivers and streams, but even the water stored in wooden and stone vessels. Can you picture it?

It gets even weirder. According to the legends, an Egyptian's own spittle would turn to blood the moment it left their mouth. Even their idols started dripping blood! A truly terrifying image.

Why blood? Why this particular plague? Jewish tradition often sees these plagues as not just punishments, but also as midah k’neged midah (מדה כנגד מדה), measure for measure – a fitting retribution for the Egyptians' actions. The Egyptians had shed the blood of Israelite babies, so now, their own water became a symbol of that bloodshed. Pretty powerful stuff.

Here's a twist. The transformation of water into blood wasn't just a punishment. It also presented an opportunity for the Israelites. According to Legends of the Jews, the Egyptians, desperate for untainted water, were forced to buy it from the Israelites at exorbitant prices.

Imagine the scene: an Egyptian and an Israelite drawing water from the same trough. The moment the Egyptian's portion was separated, poof! Blood. The Israelite's water remained pure.

This bizarre situation allowed the Israelites to amass significant wealth, essentially turning the plague into an economic advantage. They were able to leverage their unique position to alleviate their own suffering, and to profit from the suffering of their oppressors.

You might think, "Okay, they can buy water, problem solved!" But it wasn't that simple. Even drinking from the same cup as an Israelite couldn't save them. The moment the water touched an Egyptian's lips, it transformed into blood. The Legends emphasize the absolute, inescapable nature of the plague.

This story, found within the larger narrative of the Exodus, is a potent reminder of divine justice, but also of human resilience. It shows how even in the face of unimaginable hardship, opportunities for survival and even prosperity can emerge. It’s a complex tale, filled with horror and hope, punishment and profit. And it makes you wonder: what strange opportunities might arise from the unexpected "plagues" in our own lives?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:301Legends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews turns to Abraham and the Fires of Gehenna of Egyptians.

Pharaoh, stubborn as ever, had ignored the previous warnings. He wouldn't release the Israelites, wouldn't listen to reason, wouldn't budge an inch. So, what did God do? He sent a plague. But not just any plague. This wasn't boils or blood. This was… different.

The text in Legends of the Jews, that incredible compilation of rabbinic tales assembled by Louis Ginzberg, tells us that this fourth plague wasn't just one thing. It wasn't just flies, as some might think. Oh no. It was a mixed horde of wild animals.

Lions. Bears. Wolves. Panthers. Can you picture it? A terrifying menagerie descending upon Egypt. But it doesn't stop there. The text goes on: "…and so many birds of prey of different kinds that the light of the sun and the moon was darkened as they circled through the air."

Imagine the sky, not blue, but black with circling birds of prey. The air filled with their screeches, the ground trembling under the paws of countless beasts. The sheer terror of that moment must have been unimaginable.

Why this particular plague? Why this gruesome parade of animals? According to Legends of the Jews, this plague was a direct response to the Egyptians' desire to force the descendants of Abraham – that’s us, the Jewish people – to assimilate, to "amalgamate with the other nations." They wanted to erase our unique identity, to blend us into the background. A "mixture" of animals as punishment for trying to force a "mixture" of peoples. God, the ultimate storyteller, used symbolism to drive home the point. The Egyptians sought to erase boundaries, to blur distinctions. So, God sent a plague that was itself a blurring of boundaries – a chaotic mix of creatures, each a distinct species, now united in their torment of the Egyptians. It was a quid pro quo of divine proportions.

The text says this mixture "cost them their life." It wasn’t just an inconvenience; it was a deadly threat. The message is clear: Oppressing a people, trying to erase their identity, has consequences.

And, perhaps, a deeper question emerges: What does it mean to be a "mixed multitude"? Is it a sign of strength, of diversity, of openness? Or, can it become a symbol of chaos, of lost identity, of oppression? Perhaps the answer lies in the intention. Was the mixture forced? Or was it embraced?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:114Legends of the Jews

The Israelites certainly did. And their story, as told in the Legends of the Jews, offers a fascinating, and sometimes unsettling, glimpse into divine justice and, ultimately, redemption.

The familiar story is this: the Exodus from Egypt, the giving of the Torah at Sinai. But then came the spies, sent to scout out the Promised Land. They returned with fear-mongering reports, sowing doubt and rebellion in the hearts of the people. This lack of faith had consequences.

In Ginzberg's retelling in, Legends of the Jews, this sin led to a unique punishment: a 40-year sentence of wandering in the wilderness, a generation destined to die before reaching the land flowing with milk and honey. But was this punishment as harsh as it seems? Not quite.

The Legends paints a more nuanced picture. Not everyone suffered equally. Those under 20 or over 60 at the time of the Exodus were exempt. The Levites, who remained faithful, were spared. And women, too, were shielded from this particular decree. It seems divine justice wasn't a blanket condemnation, but a carefully measured response.

Death itself came in a way that allowed the people to understand its purpose. They knew it was a consequence of their actions, a direct result of their lack of faith. All year long, nobody died. until a specific date.

Each year, on the eighth day of the month of Av – a month already associated with mourning in the Jewish calendar – Moses would issue a chilling proclamation: "Let each prepare his grave." Imagine the dread, the collective anxiety as they dug their own burial places. They would spend that night, the very night they had originally rebelled, in those freshly dug graves.

The next morning, another announcement: "Let the living separate themselves from the dead." Some would rise, spared for another year. But around fifteen thousand souls would remain, their punishment fulfilled. Talk about a somber, annual reminder!

This continued for forty years. Then, something remarkable happened. On the ninth of Av, the usual call went out. They prepared. They waited. But this time, on the morning of the tenth of Av, everyone arose. No one remained dead.

Confusion reigned. Had they miscalculated the new moon? Was it not the ninth of Av after all? They repeated the death preparations, night after night, until the fifteenth of Av. Finally, the full moon appeared, confirming that the ninth of Av had indeed passed. Their punishment was over.

In commemoration of this deliverance, this collective reprieve, the fifteenth of Av was established as a day of celebration, a minor holiday. A day of joy emerging from the depths of mourning.

This story, found within the larger narrative of the Legends of the Jews, reminds us that even in the face of divine judgment, there's always the potential for redemption. It's a evidence of the enduring power of hope, even in the darkest of times. What does this story, and its unusual ending, tell us about the nature of punishment, repentance, and the possibility of a fresh start, even after forty years in the wilderness? Perhaps it's something to ponder as we navigate our own personal deserts.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:12Legends of the Jews

The story of Korah's rebellion, found in the Book of Numbers, is one of the most dramatic and unsettling in the Torah, and the defiant words of Dathan and Abiram, two key figures in that rebellion, still echo through the ages.

Moses, ever the just leader, understood that even in the face of such opposition, the law had to be followed. He knew he couldn't just condemn Dathan and Abiram without giving them a chance to be heard. After all, Jewish law, as we see reflected in later rabbinic codes, always prioritized due process. So, Moses sent a messenger to summon them to his court. He wanted to give them an opportunity to explain themselves, to perhaps even find a path to reconciliation. He didn't want them punished without a fair hearing.

Their response? Utter defiance. "We will not come up!" they declared.

It's a chilling response, isn't it? And as the narrative unfolds, that simple refusal carries a weight far beyond just their disobedience. The text sees in it an "unconscious prophecy." As their end would show, they weren't going "up" at all. They were going down.

And it wasn't just a refusal to comply. They followed up their insolence with a scathing message to Moses. Their words drip with resentment and accusation: "Why dost thou set thyself up as master over us?" they demanded. What good had Moses ever done for them? "What benefit didst thou bring to us?"

They painted a picture of Egypt as a paradise lost, "a land 'like the garden of the Lord,'" and blamed Moses for leading them out, only to abandon them in the desolate wilderness. "Thou didst lead us out of Egypt... but hast not brought us to Canaan, leaving us in the wilderness where we are daily visited by the plague." The bitterness is palpable.

They even accused him of trickery, saying, "Thou didst beguile the people in their exodus from Egypt, when thou didst promise to lead them to a land of milk and honey; in their delusion they followed thee and were disappointed." They believed he’d deceived them with promises he couldn't keep. Now, they declared, they wouldn’t be fooled again. “We will not come and obey thy summons."

Their refusal wasn't just about disobeying Moses. It was a rejection of his leadership, a denial of his authority, and ultimately, a rejection of the divine plan itself. It’s a stark reminder of how easily resentment and disillusionment can fester, leading to rebellion against even the most well-intentioned leaders.

As we read this passage, we can't help but wonder: What were Dathan and Abiram really after? Was it truly about the hardships of the desert, or was there something deeper, a thirst for power, a resentment of authority that drove their defiance? And what lessons can we draw from their tragic story about the dangers of unchecked resentment and the importance of unity in the face of adversity?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:90Legends of the Jews

Even Moses, the great lawgiver, felt that sting.

Moses is often remembered as this towering figure, unflinching in his faith, boldly confronting Pharaoh and leading the Israelites through the desert. But the stories we find in Legends of the Jews, that amazing collection of rabbinic tales compiled by Louis Ginzberg, remind us that he was also just a man, with his own vulnerabilities and insecurities.

Ginzberg tells us that Moses deeply desired that Joshua be appointed as his successor. Can you imagine? To hand over the reins after leading your people for forty years? That takes a special kind of humility. It also speaks to Moses' profound love for Joshua.

Here’s the heartbreaking part: Moses couldn’t bring himself to voice this wish to God. Why? Because he remembered a previous incident, a moment of perceived failure. Remember back when God first called Moses to liberate the Israelites from Egypt? Moses had pleaded with God to send Aaron instead. He felt inadequate, unsure of his own abilities. And God, though ultimately granting Moses his request to include Aaron, had also shown displeasure.

The memory of that divine rebuke lingered, casting a long shadow.

The text says, "He was like the child who had once been burned by a coal, and the seeing a brightly sparkling jewel, took it to be a burning coal, and dared not touch it.” Isn't that a powerful image? A past experience, a perceived failure, can make us wary of even the most beautiful opportunities. A shimmering jewel, something meant to bring joy and fulfillment, is mistaken for a source of pain.

Moses’ silence speaks volumes. It reveals a man wrestling with his past, hesitant to make himself vulnerable again. The desire to see Joshua succeed him was a "brightly sparkling jewel," but the fear of repeating his past mistake held him back.

And that, my friends, is the human condition in a nutshell. We all carry our past with us, sometimes letting it dictate our present and future. But perhaps, like Moses, acknowledging our fears is the first step to overcoming them and reaching for the jewels that await us. The midrash, the traditional Jewish story, reminds us that even our greatest heroes are still, at their core, just like us.

Full source