5 min read

The Mandrake Screamed When They Pulled It Up

Reuben found duda'im in the wheat and Rachel traded a night for them. Later ages said the root screamed, and envy could cut a life short.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Duda'im in the Wheat
  2. A Plant That Looks Back
  3. The Eye That Shortens a Life
  4. Thirteen Years Alone with the Yetzer
  5. What Rachel Bought
The Mandrake Screamed When They Pulled It Up Click for full size

Duda'im in the Wheat

Reuben walked the wheat field in the days of the wheat harvest and found mandrakes, duda'im, their strange roots already shaped too much like a body (Genesis 30:14). He brought them to Leah with the simple pride of a son who has found something his mother might want. Rachel saw them and wanted them the way a barren woman wants any rumor of help. She traded a night with Jacob for the plants in her sister's hands.

The field did not care about the bargain. The roots came up dark and heavy, soil clinging like a second skin. In later ages Jews would say that pulling a mandrake could kill the puller, that the plant screamed when it left the ground, that only a dog's leash and a turned back could steal it safely while the scream spent itself on a beast instead of a man. The Torah tells the trade. Folklore filled the silence with a cry.

Jacob walked into a tent that had become a marketplace of need. He did not ask the plant for its side of the story.

A Plant That Looks Back

Medieval Jewish houses kept the fear close enough to taste. The yadu'a of the old discussions was tied to plant-animal hybrids and rites no one should boast of in the gate. Rashi in the eleventh century CE still had to name what the thing was for students who wanted edges defined. Garlic on the table was not only food. Certain breads and leftovers were said to dull memory before a night of study. Other foods were said to sharpen it, or to shape the character of a child not yet conceived if eaten before intimacy.

The body was a borderland. What entered the mouth could change more than hunger. What hung in a window could turn an eye. The mandrake sat in that borderland with a human outline and a reputation for answering desire at a cost that always looked, afterward, slightly higher than advertised.

Women who knew both recipes and psalms kept both near the bed and the cradle.

The Eye That Shortens a Life

Rabbi Joshua taught that three things drive a man out of the world: the evil eye, the evil inclination, and the hatred of humankind. The evil eye is not only a village superstition about envy of flocks. It is the refusal to let a neighbor's house be as safe as your own, the wish that another man's wife or children be spoken of badly in the market, the grudging stare at a colleague's learning when the page opens too easily for him and too hard for you.

They told of a man who looked with a grudging eye upon his fellow's Torah. His life was cut short. He left the world early, as if the stare had turned around and bitten the face that made it. Envy is not a private feeling in this telling. It is a force that thins the air around the envier until there is not enough left to breathe a full span of years.

Students learned to lower their eyes not only from modesty but from self-preservation.

Thirteen Years Alone with the Yetzer

The evil inclination arrives early. It grows with the child from the womb, senior to the good inclination by thirteen years. Before the age of responsibility, if the child profanes Shabbat, the yetzer (that evil inclination) does not stop him. If he reaches toward blood or shame, the yetzer does not warn. It has no interest in warnings. Only later does the good inclination enter like a second advisor who must catch up on a conversation already half finished and half ruined.

Mandrakes, memory foods, and amulets against the eye are all attempts to manage a world where invisible pressure is normal and visible virtue is late. The plant in Rachel's hands and the stare in a study house belong to the same map: desire and envy moving through flesh and root while heaven counts years a person cannot see.

What Rachel Bought

Rachel bought a night and a hope. Leah bought a night and a score settled in the currency of a husband's steps toward one tent instead of the other. The duda'im did not speak. Later storytellers gave them a scream so that no one would forget that some helps are torn out of the ground against the ground's will, and that fertility bargains leave marks on more than the bargainers.

A woman holds a root shaped like a body. A man stares at another man's open book until his own years crack. Between them runs the old Jewish sense that nature is not neutral, that the eye and the plant and the yetzer all have hands, and that a bargain in a wheat field can echo longer than the harvest and longer than the marriage quarrel that made it necessary.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Jewish Magic and Superstition, Ch. 12Jewish Magic and Superstition (Trachtenberg, 1939)

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Jewish Magic and Superstition, Joshua Trachtenberg (1939) · Public Domain

Medieval Jewish folk belief wove a dense web of connections between the natural world and the supernatural. Certain plants healed. Certain foods enhanced memory or destroyed it. The human body itself was a battleground where invisible forces struggled for influence. Joshua Trachtenberg traced these beliefs from their Talmudic roots through the elaborate folklore of the Rhineland and French Jewish communities.

The most famous magical plant was the mandrake, the duda'im of (Genesis 30:14), which Rachel bargained from Leah. Medieval Jews inherited the widespread ancient belief that pulling a mandrake from the ground was lethal. Rashi, in the 11th century, still identified the yadu'a mentioned in the Talmud (Sanhedrin 65a) with a plant-animal hybrid used in magical rites. Louis Ginzberg traced the legend's Jewish origins, noting that the idea of a death-bringing plant was ancient, while its transformation into a "vegetable human" was a later, likely Germanic addition.

Food carried magical properties far beyond nutrition. Garlic was prized as an aphrodisiac since antiquity, the Talmud itself endorses it. Certain foods before intimacy could determine the character of children conceived. The Sefer Hasidim and Ziyuni recorded beliefs about foods that strengthened or weakened memory: some items sharpened the mind while others, particularly leftovers and certain bread crusts, caused forgetfulness. Cutting fingernails in proper order on Friday before Shabbat (the Sabbath) was believed to protect memory, recorded by Isserles in the Shulhan Arukh.

Eleazar of Worms, the great 13th-century Hasidei Ashkenaz master, catalogued physical signs that revealed a person's inner nature, a system strikingly parallel to physiognomic texts circulating in contemporary Latin literature. The body was readable. Birthmarks, hair patterns, and facial features all disclosed destiny. These "signs" drew on the same impulse that drove astrology: the conviction that the invisible world left legible traces on the visible one.

Full source
Avot DeRabbi Natan 16Avot DeRabbi Natan

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Minor Tractates of the Talmud, trans. A. Cohen, Soncino Press (1965) · CC-BY

R. JOSHUA SAID: THE EVIL EYE, THE EVIL INCLINATION, AND THE HATRED OF MANKIND DRIVE A MAN OUT OF THE WORLD.THE EVIL EYE. What does this mean? It teaches that as a man regards his own house, so he should regard the house of his fellow; and as a man would not wish an evil report spread about his wife and children, so he should not wish an evil report spread about his fellow’s wife and children.Another interpretation. What is meant by THE EVIL EYE? It teaches that no man should begrudge the learning of his fellow. The story is told of a man who looked with a grudging eye upon his colleague’s learning that his life was cut short and he departed [prematurely from the world].

THE EVIL INCLINATION. What does this mean? It has been said that the evil inclination is senior to the good inclination by thirteen years,1The evil inclination, it was held, entered the human body even before birth, whereas the good inclination was acquired at the age of thirteen, the age of religious responsibility. for it grows with and accompanies the child from the moment it comes forth from the mother’s womb. If the child begins to profane the Sabbath it2i.e. the evil inclination the child has no sense of wrongdoing. does not deter him; if he is about to take life it does not deter him; if he is about to commit an immoral act it does not deter him. After thirteen years, however, the good inclination is born in him. If then he is about to profane the Sabbath it3i.e. the good inclination. warns him, ‘You fool! Scripture states, Every one that profaneth it shall surely be put to death’.4Ex. 31, 14. If he is about to take life, it warns him, ‘You fool! Scripture states, Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed’.5Gen. 9, 6. If he is about to commit an immoral act, it warns him, ‘You fool! Scripture states, Both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death’.6Lev. 20, 10. When a man’s passions are stirred and he is about to commit an act of lewdness, all his limbs are ready to obey him, because the evil inclination is king over the two hundred and forty-eight limbs of man. On the other hand, when a man is about to perform an act of piety, all his limbs become sluggish,7The Heb. mith‘annin is unusual in this sense, but might be derived from the verb ‘innah, ‘to delay’ (cf. ‘innuï haddin, ‘the delay of justice’, Aboth 5:8). Schechter suggests the reading mith‘aẓẓlin, ‘are slothful’. because the evil inclination which is within him bears sway over the two hundred and forty-eight limbs of his body, whereas the good inclination is like one who is confined in prison, as it is stated, For out of prison he came forth to be king,8Eccl. 4, 14. which verse has been interpreted as referring to the good inclination.9Cf. Midrash Rabbah, Ecclesiastes, ad loc. (Sonc. ed. p. 123).Others interpret this verse as referring to the righteous Joseph. When that wicked woman10Potiphar’s wife (Gen. 39, 7ff). came [to tempt him] she afflicted him with her words, saying, ‘I will have you imprisoned’; and he replied, ‘The Lord looseth the prisoners’.11Ps. 146, 7. She said, ‘I will have your eyes plucked out’; and he replied, ‘The Lord openeth the eyes of the blind’.12ibid. 8. She said, ‘I will bend your stature’; and he replied, ‘The Lord raiseth up them that are bowed down’.13ibid. She said, ‘I will accuse you of sin’;14lit. ‘I will make you wicked’. and he replied, ‘The Lord loveth the righteous’.15ibid. She said, ‘I will make you a stranger’;16The word in the text ’armai, ‘a heathen’, makes no sense. The translation follows the version quoted by the Baalë Tosafoth on Gen. 39, 12. Joseph is threatened with banishment. and he replied, ‘The Lord preserveth the strangers’.17ibid. 9. Finally he said, ‘How then can I do this great wickedness’.18Gen. 39, 9.Marvel not at the [virtue of the] righteous Joseph, for consider the case of R. Zadok, the greatest man of his generation. When he was taken captive, a certain matron acquired him [as a slave] and sent in a beautiful maid-servant to him. As soon as he saw her, he turned his eyes to the wall so as not to look upon her, and sat absorbed in study the whole night long. In the morning the girl went and complained to her mistress, saying, ‘I would rather die than be given to that man!’ [The matron] sent for him and asked, ‘Why did you not treat this woman as men usually act?’ He replied, ‘What else could I do, seeing that I belong to the High-priestly line? I am from a noble family and said to myself, “[I must refrain] lest I cohabit with her and increase the number of illegitimate children in Israel” ’. On hearing his words, she ordered [his release] and set him free with great honour.Do not marvel at [the virtue of] R. Zadok, for consider the case of R. ‘Aḳiba who was greater than he. When R. ‘Aḳiba came to a certain land,19MS. E. reads ‘to Rome’. a malicious accusation was laid against him before the Ruler. The latter sent in two beautiful women to him who had bathed, anointed and adorned themselves like brides for their grooms. They importuned him throughout the night, each saying, ‘Turn to me’. He sat between them, spat [in disgust], and turned to neither of them. They went and complained to the Ruler, saying, ‘We would rather die than be given to that man!’ He sent for him and asked, ‘Why did you not treat these women as men usually act towards women? Are they not beautiful? Are they not human like yourself? Did not He Who created you create them?’ He answered, ‘I could not do otherwise; their odour seemed to me like the odour of carrion, torn beasts and creeping things’.Do not marvel at [the virtue of] R. ‘Aḳiba, for consider the case of R. Eliezer the Great who was more distinguished than he. R. Eliezer brought up his sister’s daughter, and for thirteen years she [slept] with him in one bed until she reached puberty. Then he said to her, ‘Go and get married’. She replied, ‘Am I not your maid, [even contented] to be a servant to wash the feet of your disciples?’20By this expression she implied her desire to marry him. The parallel passage in j.Yeb. XIII, 2, 13C reads, ‘I am your handmaid to wash the feet of my master’s slaves’. He said to her, ‘My daughter, I am now an old man; go and marry a young man of your own age’. She replied, ‘Have I not already told you that I am your maid, [even contented] to be a servant to wash the feet of your disciples?’ When he heard her words, he obtained her consent to a betrothal and married her.

R. Reuben b. Iẓtroboli said: How can a man keep far away from the evil inclination which is within his body? For the first drop which a man injects into a woman is the evil inclination.21i.e. the first seed, the result of man’s passion, creates the evil inclination in the unborn child. The evil inclination dwells at the entrances of the heart, as it is stated, Sin coucheth at the door.22Gen. 4, 7. Cf. Ber. 61a (Sonc. ed. p. 384). It already speaks to the human being while he is an infant in the cot, saying, ‘That man seeks to kill you’, and [in consequence the infant] is ready to pluck out his hair.23The aggressive tendencies in a child are accordingly explained as incitement by the evil inclination, the latter creating the fear that persons wish to do him harm. When an infant lies in his cot and places his hand upon a snake or a scorpion so that he is bitten, this was caused by none other than the evil inclination which is within his body. Or when he lays his hand on glowing coals and is burnt, this was caused by none other than the evil inclination which is within his body, since the evil inclination it is that drives him headlong [to destruction]. Observe, however, a kid or lamb: when it sees a well it turns back, since there is no evil inclination in a beast [to lead it into harm].R. Simeon b. Eleazar said: I will explain it to you by a parable. To what is the evil inclination like? [25a] To a piece of iron which is cast into the fire. As long as it is in the fire one can make of it whatever vessel he wishes. So it is with the evil inclination: there is no other remedy for it but the study of the Torah which is likened to fire;24Cf. Jer. 23, 29, homiletically explained as teaching that by a man’s devotion to Torah, God will cause the enemy (i.e. the evil inclination) to be at peace with him and cease assailing him. as it is stated, If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat, and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink; for thou wilt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the Lord will reward thee.25Prov. 25, 21f. Read not will reward [yeshallem] thee but ‘will make him at peace [yashlim] with thee.’R. Judah the Prince said: I will explain it to you by a parable. To what is the evil inclination like? To the case of two men who entered an inn and one of them was arrested on a charge of robbery. When asked, ‘Who was with you [as an accomplice]?’ he could reply, ‘There was no one with me’; but he says to himself, ‘Since I am to be executed, let my fellow be executed along with me’. In the same way the evil inclination speaks, ‘Since I am doomed in the world to come, I will drag the entire body with me to destruction’.R. Simeon b. Yoḥai said: By this reasoning Israel will never see Gehinnom (the place of spiritual purification after death). This may be explained by a parable. To what is the matter like? To a mortal king who had a field of poor quality. Certain men came and leased it at a rental of ten kors of wheat annually. They manured it, hoed it, watered it and weeded it; but they could only make it yield one kor of wheat during the year. The king asked them for an explanation and they replied, ‘Our sovereign lord! You know that the field which you leased to us originally yielded nothing to you; now after manuring it, weeding it and watering it, we made it yield us no more than one kor of wheat’. In like manner Israel will in the future plead with the Holy One, blessed be He, ‘Lord of the universe! Thou knowest that it is the evil inclination that incites us, as it is stated, For He knoweth our impulse’.26Ps. 103, 14. E.V. our frame, the Heb. being the same as for ‘inclination, impulse’.

THE HATRED OF MANKIND. What does this mean? It teaches that a man should not adopt the rule: Love the Sages and hate the disciples, or Love the disciples and hate the ‘Am ha’areẓ. Let his rule be: Love them all, and hate [only] heretics, apostates, seducers and informers. So said David, Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate Thee? And do not I strive with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with utmost hatred; I count them mine enemies.27ibid. CXXXIX, 21f. But does not Scripture declare, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord?28Lev. 19, 18. And why? Because I created him. If he acts as thy people should act,29Cf. Ex. 22, 27, Thou shalt not … curse a ruler of thy people, and B.Ḳ. 94b (Sonc. ed. p. 549). then you must love him, but if not, then you must not love him. R. Simeon b. Eleazar said: With a great oath30So according to the MSS.; V reads ‘in a great hour’ which makes no sense. was this command said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. I the Lord have created him31Is. 45, 8. E.V. created it. if you love him, I am trustworthy to give you a good reward; but if you do not, I am a Judge to punish you.32On this passage, cf. Finkelstein, op. cit. pp. 47-52.

Full source