Parshat Beshalach5 min read

The Manna Was a Question and the Staff Was Sapphire

Two jars of it sat at the door of the Tent of Meeting. If a man swore he had taken no more than his portion, the morning's bread showed whether he lied.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Bread Had No Name
  2. Moses Supplied the Answer
  3. The Rock at Horeb Was Older Than Egypt
  4. Israel Misjudged Both Gifts
The Manna Was a Question and the Staff Was Sapphire Click for full size

The Bread Had No Name

They came out of their tents in the morning and found the desert floor covered with something they had never seen. Small. White. Thin as frost. It covered the ground the way dew covers grass, except this was not dew and did not evaporate when the sun came up. They looked at each other and passed the same question from camp to camp. Man hu. What is it?

That question became the bread's name. Manna: the bread of what-is-it. A nation that had just watched the sea split was standing over its breakfast unable to identify the food. God had kept the promise to feed them in the wilderness, and Israel's first response to the fulfillment was bewilderment.

Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai, preserving second-century tannaitic traditions, sits inside that bewilderment and decides it is not a failure. The bread arrived before the interpretation. That is the shape of most of heaven's gifts in the wilderness. The thing comes first, and the understanding has to be constructed around it while you are still hungry, still confused, still standing in the desert not yet sure if what you are looking at is safe to eat.

Moses Supplied the Answer

Moses told them: this is the bread the LORD has given you to eat. He did not wait for them to figure it out on their own. The man who had stood at the burning bush and watched fire that did not consume now stood before confused, hungry people and named the unnamed thing. The gift required a human interpreter to complete its transmission.

The Mekhilta draws a law out of this. The manna was also a judge. If a man's case was disputed, if a claim needed to be settled and witnesses contradicted each other, the manna's location in the morning would reveal the verdict. Two jars of manna sat at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting. If a man claimed he had not taken more than his portion, the manna either confirmed or refuted him. The bread of what-is-it became the bread of what-is-true. The same substance that fed could also weigh and adjudicate.

The Yalkut Shimoni tradition carries a parallel claim about the manna's antiquity. This bread was not improvised in the desert. It had been laid up in heaven from the beginning of creation, waiting for the moment when Israel would be in the wilderness with nothing and God would open the heavenly store. Israel was not receiving emergency rations. They were receiving something planned before the world had people in it to be hungry.

The Rock at Horeb Was Older Than Egypt

Then came Rephidim and the thirst and the staff again. God told Moses: take the staff with which you struck the Nile. The same staff. The same man. A rock instead of a river. Strike it, and water will come out.

But the tradition preserved in Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai insists on the nature of the staff before it touches the rock. The rod is sapphire. Made from the throne of glory. Given to Moses before Egypt, passed down from Adam through the patriarchs, fashioned at the end of the sixth day of creation alongside the other necessary things that had to exist before the first Sabbath arrived. The staff that strikes Horeb carries the weight and color of heaven itself.

God stood on the rock at Horeb before Moses struck it. The Yalkut carries the tradition that the footprint of God remained on the stone afterward, a mark pressed into the rock's surface by the divine presence that waited there while Moses lifted the staff. The rock held a print of the One who had been standing on it.

Israel Misjudged Both Gifts

The thread connecting manna and sapphire staff is misrecognition. Israel saw the manna and asked what it was. Israel saw the staff and feared it. Neither group of people standing in the wilderness understood what they were looking at. The bread from heaven looked like nothing they knew. The rod looked like a weapon of judgment held by an exhausted man in the desert.

Both misreadings were natural. The manna was genuinely unprecedented. The staff genuinely had a history of destruction behind it. But the wilderness was teaching Israel something harder than hunger: how to stand in front of a gift you cannot identify and not flinch from it, how to look at the thing that hurt your enemy and trust it with your children's thirst.

The Mekhilta calls this instruction. Three days without water, then Marah's bitterness, then Elim's springs, then the manna, then the rock: each test sharpens the same skill. The wilderness does not provide in the ways you expect. The bread has no name. The water comes from stone. The sapphire staff that broke Egypt is the one that gives Israel life. Learning to receive correctly is harder than learning to endure hunger, and the desert gave Israel long months to practice both.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai 16:15Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai

Translation of the source text.Mechilta de-Rabbi Simon b. Jochai, ed. D. Hoffmann, Frankfurt 1905 · Public Domain

"And the children of Israel saw it, and they said one to another, 'man hu' [what is it?]" (Exodus 16:15) - like someone who says to his fellow, "What is it?" So Israel said, "man hu." "And Moses said to them, 'It is the bread'" - Moses spoke to the elders, and the elders spoke to Israel; thus the words of Rabbi Yehoshua. Rabbi Elazar of Modi'in says: Moses spoke to the elders, and he himself spoke to all Israel.

"It is the bread which the LORD has given you to eat." Rabbi Yose son of Rabbi Shimon says: Israel were fattened at that hour like horses. It says here "to eat," and it says elsewhere, "Man ate the bread of the mighty" (Psalms 78:25). He said to them: this bread that you eat swells the limbs, and so it says "mehuspas," for it descends into the two hundred and forty-eight limbs of a person. From where is this number derived? From "mehuspas" [by its numerical value]. Another interpretation: "Man ate the bread of the mighty [abirim]" - this is Joshua, for whom manna came down equal to all Israel.

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus 16:15Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel, trans. J. W. Etheridge, London, 1862 · Public Domain

The word manna itself, as Targum Pseudo-Jonathan tells it, was born from a question. The sons of Israel looked at the fine frost on the desert floor and said to one another Man Hu?, "What is it?"

This is the Hebrew pun the Torah itself records. The Targumist preserves the exchange but adds Moses's answer with unusual care: It is the bread which hath been laid up for you from the beginning in the heavens on high, and now the Lord will give it you to eat.

The phrase laid up from the beginning is the Targum's signature. We saw it in the previous chapter, and here it returns with emphasis. The manna was not a fresh production. It was a stored gift, set aside at creation, now being issued.

Think about what it must have felt like to be told this. You are hungry. You are grumbling. You are regretting Egypt. And Moses tells you that the bread on the ground has been waiting for you since the first Sabbath of creation. You are not improvising your way through the wilderness. You are eating what was reserved for you before the world had your name.

The Maggid finds in this a teaching about providence. The Hebrew word for providence, hashgachah, carries a double sense: watching over, and also provisioning ahead. The Holy One does not only watch. He also packs. When you finally need it, whatever it is, the provision has often been in the warehouse for longer than you have been alive.

Takeaway: the thing you did not know to ask for may already be stored up for you. The question Man Hu? is the start of every Jewish prayer of discovery. What is this? It is what was waiting.

Full source
Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai 16:29Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai

Translation of the source text.Mechilta de-Rabbi Simon b. Jochai, ed. D. Hoffmann, Frankfurt 1905 · Public Domain

"And the house of Israel called its name manna" (Exodus 16:31). The interpreters of marked words say: Israel called it manna. "And it was like coriander seed" (Exodus 16:31), you do not know of what. Rabbi Yehoshua said: you must say, like flaxseed. Or, just as flaxseed is red, perhaps it too was red? Scripture teaches: white.

Rabbi Eleazar of Modi'in says: it resembled an aggadah [a teaching], which draws a person's heart. Rabbi Yose says: it told about itself that it was manna, for it did not come down on Sabbaths, nor on festivals, nor on the Day of Atonement.

Others say: just as the prophet declares to Israel the hidden chambers and secrets, so the manna declared to them the hidden chambers and secrets. How so? If a woman sinned against her husband, she says, he sinned against me, and he says, she sinned against me. They come before Moses for judgment, and he says to them: in the morning there will be a verdict. In the morning, if her portion of manna was found in her husband's house, it is known that she sinned against him; and if her portion of manna was found in her father's house, it is known that he sinned against her.

Likewise one who sells a slave to his fellow: this one says, I bought him, and the other says, I did not sell. They come before Moses for judgment, and he says: in the morning there will be a verdict. In the morning, if the slave's portion of manna was found in the house of the first master, it is known that he was not sold; and if his portion was found in the house of the second master, it is known that he was bought.

"And its taste was like a wafer in honey" (Exodus 16:31). Rabbi Yehoshua says: like a thin cake with sweet pastry. Rabbi Eleazar of Modi'in says: like fine flour that floats on top of a sieve, kneaded with honey and butter.

Full source
Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai 17:6Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai

Translation of the source text.Mechilta de-Rabbi Simon b. Jochai, ed. D. Hoffmann, Frankfurt 1905 · Public Domain

"Behold, I will stand before you there upon the rock at Horeb" (Exodus 17:6). The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him: Every place where you find the impression of a human footprint, as it says, "the likeness as the appearance of [a man]" (Ezekiel 1:26), there I am standing before you.

"And you shall strike the rock." From here Rabbi Yose ben Zimra says: This staff was made of sapphire. It is not written here "and you shall strike upon the rock," but rather "and you shall strike in the rock" [a sapphire staff striking into the rock without shattering it].

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus 17:6Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel, trans. J. W. Etheridge, London, 1862 · Public Domain

When the people cried out for water at Rephidim, Moses did not simply strike any rock. The Targum Pseudo-Jonathan insists on a precise geography: God said, "Behold, I will stand before thee there, on the spot where thou sawest the impress of the foot on Horeb" (Exodus 17:6). The rock was not chosen at random. It was marked.

The Aramaic reading teaches that when Moses had ascended Horeb to receive the burning-bush commission, he saw the imprint of a divine presence pressed into the stone. That place was bookmarked in his memory. Now, months later, with a mutinous nation ready to riot, God tells him to return to the exact spot. Strike that rock, and the water will answer.

There is a quiet theology here. Miracles do not happen everywhere; they happen where sanctity has already landed. Moses is not bullying nature into producing water. He is returning to a site where God had already declared His nearness, and the rock remembers.

So, the Targum concludes, "Moses did so before the elders of Israel", publicly, before witnesses, so that no one could later claim it was a trick. The takeaway: sometimes the way forward is to return to the place where you first met God, and to speak there again.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 261:19Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

Translation of the source text.Torat Emet (Yalkut Shimoni) · CC-BY-NC

Another interpretation: "Pass on before the people" and let your platform speak, "and take with you of the elders of Israel" (Exodus 17:5) as testimony, that they should not say there were springs already there. "And your staff with which you struck" the Nile, because of the murmurings. This is one of three things over which Israel used to murmur, saying that they were instruments of calamity, and these are they: the incense, the ark, and the staff. They said: This incense is a thing of calamity; it killed Nadab and Abihu, as it is said, "And the sons of Aaron took" and so forth (Leviticus 10:1). Therefore they learned that it brings atonement, as it is said, "And he put on the incense and made atonement for the people" (Numbers 17:12). The ark they said was a thing of calamity; it struck Uzzah and the men of Beth-shemesh, as it is said, "And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzzah" (II Samuel 6:7), and it is written, "And He struck the men of Beth-shemesh" (I Samuel 6:19). Therefore they learned that it is a thing of blessing, as it is said, "And the ark of the LORD remained in the house of Obed-edom, and the LORD blessed Obed-edom" (II Samuel 6:11). They said: This staff of sapphire brought ten plagues upon the Egyptians and ten at the sea. Therefore let them learn that it is a thing of miracles. "And your staff with which you struck the Nile," because of the murmurings.

Rabbi Abbahu said: Whoever leads his fellow to a matter of a commandment, Scripture credits it to him as though he had done it himself, as it is said, "And your staff with which you struck the Nile." But did Moses strike? Did not Aaron strike? Rather, this is to teach you that whoever leads his fellow to a matter of a commandment, Scripture credits it to him as though he had done it himself.

Full source